Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - More Than Mortal

Pages: 1 ... 328329330 331332 ... 502
9871
Serious / Re: Isn't it convenient..
« on: December 19, 2014, 09:14:26 AM »
The government isn't manipulating mass media.

It's just that Americans - as media consumers - are more susceptible to stories like that.

9872
Serious / Re: Women could serve in the British Infantry by 2016
« on: December 19, 2014, 09:12:14 AM »
A woman trained in CQC fighting techniques will fuck up any sheep farming Taliban soldier, plain and simple. "But tyger women are weak!" Um no, given enough training a women can easily be stronger than the average man, and in hand to hand combat technique trumps brute strength. But how much does that even matter? Everyone get shot these days anyway
Nobody doubts the ability of women to be combatants.

However, experience in the Israeli army suggests that male and female soldiers don't mix in psychologically healthy ways, and in general women in the military are about three times more likely to be raped - especially by the enemy.

Combine all of this with their tradition as supporters to any big war effort and their socio-biological roles as mothers, I'd rather not bring women into the fold of licensed killers.

9873
Serious / Re: Women could serve in the British Infantry by 2016
« on: December 19, 2014, 06:59:54 AM »
I fucking well hope not.

Why is that?
If we ever need to maintain a conscripted army for whatever reason, we'd need the women to keep the home front alive.

Plus, I'm not entirely sure how good an idea it is to mix men and women in such an environment.

9874
Serious / Re: Women could serve in the British Infantry by 2016
« on: December 19, 2014, 02:07:05 AM »
I fucking well hope not.

9875
Serious / Re: I'm fucking sick of this shit
« on: December 18, 2014, 05:23:09 PM »


As Emperor of Serious, I order both of you to stop and make-up by giving each other a reach-around.

9876
Serious / Re: Rand Paul's Presidential Prospects Could Face Problems...
« on: December 18, 2014, 04:56:55 PM »
Oh well, fuck him.

The government won't change whether he gets elected or not. We could find the cunt lying in a ditch with 38 stab wounds with the message "Sort it out" written in blood on his corpse, and Congress would still argue over whether the murderer was a fucking Democrat or a Republican.

9877
The Flood / Re: I ate some food that had gone bad, and now my head hurts
« on: December 18, 2014, 03:48:46 PM »
I hope you die.

9878
Serious / Re: Is anybody truly evil?
« on: December 18, 2014, 03:32:32 PM »
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Dahmer#Trial
Near the bottom
It's quite evidently clear that - while he was deemed legally sane - the jury is just wrong on this one.

9879
Serious / Re: Is anybody truly evil?
« on: December 18, 2014, 03:30:03 PM »
Wikipedia
. . .

A link to the page and the section would be nice.

Found it myself, but it's quite evidently clear that - while he was deemed legally sane - the jury is just wrong on this one.

9880
Serious / Re: Is anybody truly evil?
« on: December 18, 2014, 03:06:24 PM »
Both of those claims are false. He was ruled to be legally sane, and he has pretty resoundingly been diagnosed - primarily - with borderline personality disorder.

You don't do what he did unless you're mentally ill.
In his final trial "Dahmer was ruled to be sane and not suffering from a mental disorder at the time of each of the 15 murders for which he was tried". But yeah I was wrong about the other part.
First of all it's entirely possible the court could've been wrong about that, considering knowledge of mental illness has only really exploded in the last decade or so.

Secondly, you're going to need a source for that quote.

9881
The Flood / Re: Another online purchase thread!
« on: December 18, 2014, 02:23:42 PM »
I bought a big fuck-off biography of Napoleon the other day.

9882
Serious / Re: Is the Washington Post lying, or just fucking dense?
« on: December 18, 2014, 01:56:00 PM »
Normally, the WaPo is quite good for a news source. So, I'm not sure what went wrong here (Though, I have no time to read the entire study).
From a cursory glance over a Reddit thread talking about the same article, it seems as if the figure comes from Table 1.

Which is actually just a table of assumptions.

9883
Serious / Is the Washington Post lying, or just fucking dense?
« on: December 18, 2014, 01:44:28 PM »
An article about the financial sector apparently being too big or some stupid shit, which leads to this claim below:
Quote
In perhaps the starkest illustration, economists from Harvard University and the University of Chicago wrote in a recent paper that every dollar a worker earns in a research field spills over to make the economy $5 better off. Every dollar a similar worker earns in finance comes with a drain, making the economy 60 cents worse off.

Funnily enough, however, the study doesn't fucking claim that. Fuck you, Washington Post.

9884
Serious / Re: Is anybody truly evil?
« on: December 18, 2014, 01:34:22 PM »
The Court ruled that he had no mental disorders and experts today disagree with each other about it.
Both of those claims are false. He was ruled to be legally sane, and he has pretty resoundingly been diagnosed - primarily - with borderline personality disorder.

You don't do what he did unless you're mentally ill.

9885
The Flood / Re: why is challenger so aggressive
« on: December 18, 2014, 12:59:01 PM »
It's because my balls are fucking enormous. I need to tow them every time I go outside.
Made me laugh.

9886
The Flood / Stephen Colbert is fucking ballsy as hell
« on: December 18, 2014, 12:57:47 PM »
YouTube

It's almost hard to watch.

9887
The Flood / Jimmy's on a roll
« on: December 18, 2014, 12:36:40 PM »
YouTube


Fucking hell, Jimmy

9888
The Flood / Re: Why are black women so hard to understand?
« on: December 18, 2014, 12:35:16 PM »
It is pretty weird that they say down with whitey and then the next day they are cashing their welfare check that whitey paid for at the bank that is owned by whitey.
YouTube

9889
The Flood / Cat sees snow for the first time
« on: December 18, 2014, 12:19:53 PM »






I think he's enjoying himself.

9890
The Flood / Re: I bet you won't fucking lock this thread
« on: December 18, 2014, 12:13:05 PM »
YouTube

Mods.

9891
The Flood / Re: I made a picture of Meta on Casual Friday
« on: December 18, 2014, 12:08:58 PM »
It's perfect.

9892
Serious / Re: Meta, fix me please.
« on: December 18, 2014, 09:50:55 AM »
Relies on a grassroots economic system to function.

Inefficient in the same way democracy is.

9893
The Flood / Re: I'm not looking for just another touch.
« on: December 18, 2014, 02:35:19 AM »
I'll fucking touch you

9894
The Flood / Re: I feel like shit and you're all shit
« on: December 18, 2014, 02:22:34 AM »
Oh.

::)

OT: Sucks dude. Whatcha get the person for secret santa?
A mug in the face of her favourite Disney character.

9895
The Flood / I feel like shit and you're all shit
« on: December 18, 2014, 02:13:16 AM »
Fuck you.

I got told off yesterday at college because I snapped and started shouting at my friend for being a cock-mongling fuck-up. And I'm fucking ill either from my mother or another friend of mine, so that fucking sucks.

And I can't take a day off either because today we're doing secret santa in my philosophy class and tomorrow is the last day - when we'll be doing secret santa among my friends.

Plus, we're doing absolutely fuck all for these past few days, and I honestly have no fucking lessons where I'm not going to learn anything despite knowing Jack fucking Balls about Orthodox iconography,  Arthur Schlesinger's hypothesis of the imperial presidency or what question to pick for a second piece of coursework on Oliver Cromwell.

Plus, the present I have for my friend in this secret santa fucking thing hasn't arrived yet, so somebody's going to find themselves with their testicles between a nutcracker if it doesn't arrive today.

9896
The Flood / Re: boring, incoherent blog/rant
« on: December 18, 2014, 02:00:10 AM »
As somebody who studies politics, history and philosophy - and who will go on to study Policy,  Politics & Economics at university in less than a year - I totally agree. Fuck the STEM circle jerk.

Although,  I am motivated by things other than happiness.

9897
Meta, you're hero hates this move.
Liking Rubio more than other Republicans =/= my hero.

I actually support this move; I was joking.

9898
Daily Mail.
Quote
It looks like something from a science fiction film, with giant wraparound screens and artificial intelligence software constantly monitoring things.

However, Rolls Royce believes that this is the future of shipping.

It says the 'future bridge' will be in use by 2025 in ships across the world - and has already fitted a prototype to one ship.

Together with VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Rolls-Royce today unveiled its latest vision of Ship Intelligence - a futuristic ship's bridge concept which could become reality by 2025.

Rolls-Royce has worked together with VTT's researchers and Aalto University to develop the new bridge, known as the Future Operator Experience Concept or 'oX'. 

It offers the crew smart workstations, which automatically recognise individuals when they walk into the bridge, and adjust to their own preferences.

The windows of the bridge serve as augmented reality displays of the vessel's surroundings, including visualisation of potential hazards that would otherwise be invisible to the human eye.

The system can, for example, pinpoint sea ice or tug boats and other craft that may not be visible to the crew, especially on large container ships.

A prototype of the Unified Bridge system has recently entered service on the vessel Stril Luna, where it coordinates the operation of on-board equipment ranging from engines to propulsion and cargo handling.

Stril Luna is a platform supply vessel designed to pierce through the waves under harsh weather conditions, making it possible to keep a more constant speed, reducing the use of fuel and increasing on board safety.

Mikael Makinen, Rolls-Royce, President - Marine, said: 'We are entering a truly exciting period in the history of shipping, where technology, and in particular the smart use of Big Data is going to drive the next generation of ships.

'Over the next ten to 20 years we believe Ship Intelligence is going to be the driving force that will determine the future of our industry, the type of ships at sea, and the competence levels required from tomorrow's seafarers.

'The new oX bridge concept, is one example of ship intelligence, and is a glimpse into the future where significant advances to navigation, efficiency of operations and safety at sea, can be achieved.

'With the demands of environmental legislation and rising operating costs, ships are going to become more complex.

'Add to that the fact that skilled crews are already in short supply, then we see a distinct gap opening up between the complexity of ships and the competency of the people who will crew them.

'That will cause real problems for the industry, and we believe it is ship intelligence, that will fill that gap.'
The oX concept, has been developed by studying user experience on ships today, and will transform the operating environment for crews on board large cargo ships and platform supply vessels.

Using advanced 3D animation to illustrate just what could be achieved in the next decade, the new concept will utilise the latest digital techniques to create safer and more energy efficient ship operations.
Today, Rolls-Royce already has many of the technologies that will be part of the intelligent ships of the future.

The Unified Bridge system has recently entered service on the vessel Stril Luna, representing a new ergonomic approach to all the activity required on the bridge of a ship, coordinating the operation of on-board equipment ranging from engines to propulsion and cargo handling.

The remote monitoring of equipment on board ships is also advancing, and Rolls-Royce has control centres in Alesund, Norway, and Rauma, Finland, where many ships and thrusters are already monitored in real-time in operation around the world.

Oskar Levander, Rolls-Royce, Vice President - Innovation - Marine, speaking at a Ship Intelligence briefing in London today, said: 'Many of the technology building blocks that will control the ships of the future are already available today, but there is still work to be done to develop marine solutions from them.

'We are investing in ship intelligence, which will be a major driver of the next transition era of shipping.
'Much in the way that sail gave way to steam powered ships, and coal gave way to oil, we will see increasingly sophisticated ships, highly automated and perhaps even unmanned remote controlled, plying the seas within the next two decades.'

Earlier this year Rolls Royce revealed dramatic plans to replace cargo ships with crewless 'drone boats' controlled remotely.

The firm is developing a 'virtual deck' in Norway that would allow captains to remotely command ships anywhere in the world.

Drone ships would be safer, cheaper and less polluting for the $375 billion shipping industry that carries 90 percent of world trade, Rolls-Royce says.

Rolls-Royce has already begun the process of designing giant drone ships able to shuttle cargo across the ocean minus a single solitary human being on board.

The UK engineering group's Blue Ocean marine innovation department have announced the concept of the robot vessels they believe would be able to carry more cargo, cut costs, be safer and produce less pollution.

Cameras would beam 360-degree views from the drone ship back to operators based in a virtual bridge VR system in Norway navigating the vessel remotely to steer them to their destinations.

Talks have commenced over any regulatory obstacles and potential perceived hurdles and Rolls Royce are optimistic that the drone ships may be operational in ten years time.

A Rolls-Royce Spokesperson says: 'Some steps have already been taken, mainly in the naval area, but we believe a first step will be moving certain functions on a ship ashore.

'For example, remote engine and equipment monitoring and some underwater operations - such as controlling ROVs - in the offshore sector could be the first.'

The firm has already begun outfitting ships with advanced cameras.

'A growing number of vessels are already equipped with cameras that can see at night and through fog and snow - better than the human eye, and more ships are fitted with systems to transmit large volumes of data.

'So, some questions: given that the technology is in place, is now the time to move some operations ashore? Is it better to have a crew of 20 sailing in a gale in the North Sea, or say five people in a control room on shore?

'The same person could monitor and steer many ships.'

The crewless ships would also be cheaper to build an maintain, Rolls Royce says.

'Many facilities and systems on board are only there to ensure that the crew is kept fed, safe, and comfortable.

'Eliminate or reduce the need for people, and vessels could be radically simplified, reducing construction costs.

'We think it is time to consider a roadmap to unmanned vessels of various types.'

9899
Serious / What happens when you privatise Big Brother
« on: December 17, 2014, 07:39:48 PM »
YouTube

Well. . .

9900
Serious / Sony has scrapped release plans for "The Interview"
« on: December 17, 2014, 07:27:28 PM »
From Deadline.
Quote
Sony Pictures has made official what has been painfully obvious to everybody since yesterday morning, when hackers threatened to blow up movie theaters if The Interview was released next week. The studio has officially scrapped its release plans. Sony had little choice here, after the major theater chains announced earlier today they would not display the film given the threatening circumstances.

Are we going to let keyboard vigilantes with a messiah complex fuck us over from now on, then?

Pages: 1 ... 328329330 331332 ... 502