Why wouldn't he be?

Yeah, she came out as gay. And she won't shut the fuck up about it. She finds a way to constantly sneak it into conversation. Like, a few weeks ago we were having a bit of banter in philosophy class and she was just sat there singing (she doesn't play the guitar any more since I shouted at her) and I told her to stop. She looked up at me and said: "You can't fucking make me". I said: "Going through our rebellious phase late, are we?"

She said: "I'm gay, I don't need to be rebellious".

The rage.

The sheer fucking rage. I ought to make good on my promise of 'neutralising' her.

anyway, here's some adriana lima

Spoiler

oh my

Yes

Nobody sees the truth.

Daughter fucking for all.

A vote for Meta is a vote for anal liberty.

I really don't know why it matters, just let people believe in their beliefs.

I suppose we should just leave ISIS to their own theology, then.

Half the store managers who work on Sundays will end up pulling me inside the store to do shit, and then chew me out when outside the store turns to shit.

Fucking horsecrap.

Also, Meta, one of the main issues with the death penalty (in all likelihood) not deterring any crime is the extremely small chance of actually being sentenced to death and being executed. This was a topic in my Criminal Sanctioning Law class last semester that partially dealt with a study showing that since there's only 35 executions in the US every year (for example), the odds that you'd ever get sentenced to death for anything other than the most heinous of crimes (serial rapists / torturers / killers, for example) are so remote that there is almost no way it would actually deter anyone.

So, what you're saying is. . . We need to kill some more motherfuckers?

Please expand on why you support or oppose it in the comments.

Personally, I couldn't support capital punishment on some sort of retributive moral foundation. I could only support it if it operated as an effective deterrent, and I really can't form a conclusion on the matter. We have retired federal judges coming out against it, and studies which show 88pc of criminologists reject the idea that the death penalty lowers homicide rates.

It seems almost to be the "technical" consensus among anybody with a semi-decent understanding of the issue that capital punishment doesn't, in fact, deter crime. Yet this doesn't really demonstrate the whole picture. A 2007 study showed a significant negative correlation between executions and homicide rates the following year, over the course of 1979 to 2007. They went on to conduct an analysis to see if the correlation was coincidental, and concluded that the chances of it indeed being coincidental was an astronomical 18,000-to-1, and that each execution seems to be associated with 71 fewer murders in the same year on average.

There have been more conservative estimations of the deterrent effect--ranging from three to 18--according to an economist's testimony to a Senate committe, which an study by another economist and law professor corroborates.

There have, in response to these findings (back in early 2006), been accusationsof methodological issues, and people like Jimmy Carter have noted how Red states who perform 80pc of the executions normally have higher homicide rates (no idea if this is, indeed, true).

So, as of right now, I'm genuinely undecided.

at the moment

MY FUCKEN NIGGER

Get some fucken bangers on

For me, it's power.

. . .

I was waiting for you to post that.

Islamic Borg?

They missed a naming opportunity, there.