6331
The Flood / Re: I have now joined a Christian organization
« on: April 02, 2015, 06:41:42 PM »Maybe if you suck the priest's dick hard enough he'll buy you some decent shoesThis made me laugh so much I had a coughing fit.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 6331
The Flood / Re: I have now joined a Christian organization« on: April 02, 2015, 06:41:42 PM »Maybe if you suck the priest's dick hard enough he'll buy you some decent shoesThis made me laugh so much I had a coughing fit. 6332
The Flood / My new favourite song: "Freaxxx"« on: April 02, 2015, 06:38:05 PM »YouTube Beautiful. 6333
The Flood / Re: Cruel and Unusual Punisihment Ideas.« on: April 02, 2015, 06:36:43 PM »I never have. You've proven your incompetence several times, squirt. This is too easy.Oh my fucking God, don't even. I still get mad when I think back to those times we argued on Serious. 6334
The Flood / Re: Cruel and Unusual Punisihment Ideas.« on: April 02, 2015, 06:31:39 PM »MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMI can fake it? Like all those women you failed to satisfy.God damnit, get angry with me. I need somebody to toy with.I'd wipe your channel from Youtube. Get the fucking camera you cock-mongling whore. 6335
The Flood / Holy fuck these guys are like Greenday but for queers« on: April 02, 2015, 06:30:18 PM »YouTube What the fuck is this? Honestly, it's fucking worse than Greenday. Like, what the fuck. 6336
The Flood / Re: Cruel and Unusual Punisihment Ideas.« on: April 02, 2015, 06:23:14 PM »God damnit, get angry with me. I need somebody to toy with.I'd wipe your channel from Youtube. 6337
The Flood / Re: Cruel and Unusual Punisihment Ideas.« on: April 02, 2015, 06:20:02 PM »
I'd wipe your channel from Youtube.
The most punishing thing about it for you would probably be watching everybody else weep tears of joy, however. 6338
Serious / Re: Any other Bongs watching the leaders debate on ITV?« on: April 02, 2015, 06:09:36 PM »Kill yourselfNigel FarageFuck no.So...who do I vote for?based farage 6339
Serious / Re: A United States Marine has a message for liberal college student whimps« on: April 02, 2015, 06:01:55 PM »I'd be more inclined to agree with mister marine if he wasn't such a condescending asshole about his position.I don't want to be anything but condescending to these SJW cunts. They deserve to be put down. 6340
Serious / Re: Any other Bongs watching the leaders debate on ITV?« on: April 02, 2015, 05:19:54 PM »So...who do I vote for?based farage 6341
The Flood / Re: cyclists shouldn't be allowed on the fucking roads« on: April 02, 2015, 05:19:13 PM »Which is why we should have bicycle lanes on sidewalks. Like in Berlin. Fucking Krauts know what they're doing. 6342
The Flood / Re: 330 chinchillas found in a Wisconsin home« on: April 02, 2015, 04:52:55 PM »
cutest house ever
6343
Serious / Re: Islamists target Christians in Kenyan University--147 dead« on: April 02, 2015, 04:52:04 PM »do not carelol and you once called me callous for supporting the way australia deals with asylum seekers and illegals trying to get in 6344
The Flood / Re: none of the three big bolshevik revolutionaries were ethnically russian« on: April 02, 2015, 04:44:15 PM »
its unfortunate alexander iii didn't finish his based russification policies
6345
Serious / Islamists target Christians in Kenyan University--147 dead« on: April 02, 2015, 04:07:29 PM »
CNN
Quote (CNN)The massacre that killed 147 people and wounded scores of others at a Kenyan university lasted for hours Thursday before the terror was over. Fucking savages. 6346
Serious / Re: Any other Bongs watching the leaders debate on ITV?« on: April 02, 2015, 03:58:32 PM »You know Milliband sounds like he's in a campaigning commercial every time he talks.he's the hero we need 6347
Serious / Re: Any other Bongs watching the leaders debate on ITV?« on: April 02, 2015, 03:45:38 PM »
WHERE THE FUCK DID THAT BITCH COME FROM
6348
Serious / Re: Any other Bongs watching the leaders debate on ITV?« on: April 02, 2015, 03:05:02 PM »
HURRR DURRR BANKERSSSS URRR EVUL
-- all of these cunts 6349
Serious / Re: Any other Bongs watching the leaders debate on ITV?« on: April 02, 2015, 02:50:28 PM »Suck my foxy cock.God that Green Party bitch fucks me off.Want to tweet about it? 6350
Serious / Re: Any other Bongs watching the leaders debate on ITV?« on: April 02, 2015, 02:37:00 PM »
God that Green Party bitch fucks me off.
6351
Serious / Any other Bongs watching the leaders debate on ITV?« on: April 02, 2015, 02:25:12 PM »
Here's the run down:
Bennett -- bumbling Aussie fuck who keeps using "banker" as some fucking buzzword. Farage -- somebody who can still suck you in, even if you disagree with him. Sturgeon -- stupid Scottish fuck pulling out child poverty statistics and banging on about nuclear weapons and austerity or some shit. Some fucking Welsh bitch -- some fucking Welsh bitch. Nick Clegg -- what the fuck even can I say? Miliband -- trying to come off as Prime Ministerial and its fucking creepy. Cameron -- the most competent, but he's got the burden of having a record to defence. 6352
The Flood / Re: SR-869 South is literally bae« on: April 02, 2015, 01:58:46 PM »whoa manLOL Indeed.Man I wish I had imaginary super cars. sick burn 6353
The Flood / Re: SR-869 South is literally bae« on: April 02, 2015, 01:56:18 PM »
I didn't know you could hit 125 in a Prius.
6354
The Flood / Re: cyclists shouldn't be allowed on the fucking roads« on: April 02, 2015, 09:48:56 AM »You're just jealous because all the radiation is killing your appetite.you should get on a bike you fat fuckyou're a bully 6355
The Flood / Re: cyclists shouldn't be allowed on the fucking roads« on: April 02, 2015, 09:44:03 AM »you should get on a bike you fat fuckyou're a bully 6356
The Flood / cyclists shouldn't be allowed on the fucking roads« on: April 02, 2015, 09:01:20 AM »
annoying fucks
6357
The Flood / Re: I have now joined a Christian organization« on: April 02, 2015, 07:59:36 AM »but yours seems much more malicious in tone on first glance.I get that a lot in person, too. That's just me. Malicious humour is best humour. 6358
The Flood / Re: I have now joined a Christian organization« on: April 02, 2015, 07:56:01 AM »I really do not understand why you ha e to make an effort to be an ass to anyone who is religious. You're not convincing them of anything except the fact that you're an ass.There's one flaw in your theorem, Doctor. I'm routinely an ass to pretty much everybody at some point. So I'm an atheist and religious people are an easy target for my sense of humour. . . Fucking sue me. Turkey and I get on well here, and if you're going to jump on my back for following his joke with another joke then that's your problem. Not mine. If you can't take the jokes, get the fuck off the forum. Shit, if anything it was a roundabout compliment. Turkey's a smart guy, and it's always nice to see a religious person knock cultish faith every once in a while. 6359
The Flood / Re: I have now joined a Christian organization« on: April 02, 2015, 07:12:09 AM »Good for you for getting out there socially and looking to grow yourself philosophically and spiritually.Remember kids, a self-deprecating Christian is a good Christian! 6360
Serious / A Compendium on the Great Recession« on: April 02, 2015, 06:26:10 AM »
Since I haven't actually fucking got around to that video I was going to do, I figure I might as well just not leave all the assembled information to rot on my hard drive. So, I may as well post it here in the meantime. I've made posts on the Recession before, but this is probably the most definitive account I've managed to assemble to date.
The standard narrative of the Great Recession is that there was a housing bubble which led to a severe financial crisis which led to a severe recession through bank disintermediation. Financial disintermediation is essentially a credit crunch, when banks refuse to lend to one another and investment grinds to a halt. This narrative is, I believe, incorrect. First and foremost is the housing bubble. It seems to me that the housing bubble was nothing more than a coincidence; a blip on the economy's radar that just confuses people. Looking at the number of housing starts per million people we can see a clear moderation in the previously cyclical nature of housing construction. Now, this would be interesting, if housing starts weren't commensurate with population growth at the time, largely due to immigration. So it's not entirely clear that there was any *significant* mal-investment in housing in the first place; investors didn't dump their money into housing as part of a speculative frenzy. While there was a national rise in house prices over the period, looking at the states there's a significant difference in just how prices acted, which would suggest a supply-side issue as well as a general trend. Usually, people blame the Federal Reserve for the housing bubble, claiming Greenspan kept interest rates "too low for too long". However, the idea that the rise in house prices was engendered by the Fed doesn't hold up under scrutiny, as housing construction is driven primarily by long-term interest rates, which have been decoupled from the Federal Funds rate since the 1990s, most likely due to a glut in savings from countries like China, India and Saudi Arabia. Not that the Federal Reserve should even need absolving from the creation of the bubble. Since the bubble seems to have been largely irrelevant. House prices peaked in 2006, and began a steady decline through 2007. Unemployment however, didn't rise significantly until mid-2008, when a **tight monetary regime** tanked the economy. And the Financial Crisis (I'm using the failure of Lehman Bros as the original metric) properly began just months after this decline. By the time we actually began to see any real, recessionary consequences, housing construction had declined to match the nadir of the 1990s recession. So, the decline of house prices obviously had no appreciable, negative impact on the economy. Some of you are probably wondering where I got **tight money** from. Nominal aggregate income, which is one of the most reliable indicators of the stance of monetary policy--alongside inflation--declined mid-2008. We don't just need to rely on nominal income, either. The real interest rate on 5-year TBs appreciated sharply in July 2008 and Alan Greenspan himself presciently predicted a Recession by December 2007, cited stabilising profit margins which are *partly* influenced by monetary policy. And a month-by-monthlook at GDP illuminates the fact that the Financial Crisis only began months into the Recession. And, from the mouth of an actual economist, Richmond Fed insider Robert Hetzel has explicitly blamed the Recession on a tight-money failure. Now, it's important to note that we would have had a financial crisis *anyway*, without a recession to trigger it. It just probably wouldn't have been so severe. Highly-rated mortgage debt was incredibly toxic, and Jeffrey Friedman has a good paper on how asset requirements actually incentivised banks to hold this kind of debt. Of course, high demand from Europe and Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac further encouraged the holding of such debt (the latter two for political reasons). It's not dissimilar from the Great Depression, which Milton Friedman identified as being a function of tight money much like 2008. It has been demonstrated throughout history that financial crises seldom lead to Recessions. The 1987 stock market crash (bigger, even, than 1929) led to virtually no stress on banks and didn't even register on the economy's radar. The crash of 1929, also, didn't even occur until after other indicators like industrial production were indicating weakness. Not only this, but the crash of 1929 didn't even cause a *financial crisis* unlike most people seem to think. The 40pc declination in the number of banks following the crash were due to small banks failing (as many had done in the '20s) and mergers, meaning no disintermediation and no credit crunch. The actual financial crisis was in 1933, when 11pc of all deposits were effected--1933 also happens to be the first year of recovery in the US. How does this relate to 2008? Credit was at an all-time high by the end of the year, and the data seems to indicate that the financial system was fully repaired by 2009 at the latest, despite chronic anaemic growth. The key here is that depressed lending is a **real**, not **nominal** factor, which would lead to slower rGDP growth. The weakness in nominal GDP suggests an issue with tight-money. The problem wasn't loose money, too much debt or over-speculation by the banking system. The problem was Ben Bernanke hitting the brakes in 2006-07 in response to a rise in oil prices. **TL;DR** - There was no mal-investment in housing, the bubble is largely irrelevant. - An unknowingly tight policy was followed by the Federal Reserve, which led to the Recession and triggered the financial crisis. - The financial crisis would've happened anyway, as the government incentivised the holding of risky-mortgage debt and had poor capital requirements. |