6061
Septagon / Re: Maybe I Need to Make A Thread Here...
« on: May 01, 2015, 05:28:01 PM »fuck metaOkay.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 6061
Septagon / Re: Maybe I Need to Make A Thread Here...« on: May 01, 2015, 05:28:01 PM »fuck metaOkay. 6062
Septagon / Re: Maybe I Need to Make A Thread Here...« on: May 01, 2015, 05:20:40 PM »
Camnator's the hero the Flood needs, but not the one it deserves.
6063
Serious / Re: Breaking news: the NHS is still fucking terrible« on: May 01, 2015, 05:18:48 PM »but I don't believe that the best way to achieve comprehensive universal healthcare (One of the few human rights I give a flying fuck about) is through the private sector.Not what I asked. Let's assume that the most efficient way of delivering healthcare is totally through the private sector and with no government involvement (that's not true, but just assume), would you honestly still have a problem with it? 6064
Serious / Re: Breaking news: the NHS is still fucking terrible« on: May 01, 2015, 05:07:43 PM »I don't believe people should be making money off of healthcare.Does it really matter if it works. 6065
Septagon / Re: Maybe I Need to Make A Thread Here...« on: May 01, 2015, 04:53:59 PM »
I, too, am outraged.
6066
Serious / Re: Breaking news: the NHS is still fucking terrible« on: May 01, 2015, 04:50:16 PM »That's mostly because healthcare shouldn't be a profit making businessThen you're at a massive loss to explain the efficiency of SHI systems in Germany and the Netherlands and France, which routinely use subsidised and regulated private insurance, and are reliably ranked as the best of the best; or other countries which don't use such systems, like Canada and Sweden, and still allow much more consumer choice and much less restriction. Quote it is a money sink but it's one of those areas that repays it's costs by keeping the population healthy and thus working.But it's not doing that, despite the fact we've historically met the rising funding needs. It's not that the NHS isn't being funded enough, it's that it's a ridiculously inefficient system. 6067
Serious / Re: How many more terms do you think Angela Merkel will win? (German politics thread« on: May 01, 2015, 04:44:12 PM »She's honestly kind of just riding on her reputation for apparently keeping Germany stable throughout the whole Eurozone crisis.So? Quote She hasn't innovated, or made grand sweeping reforms, or done anything new at all other than maintain the status-quo.How is this a bad thing? Germany doesn't need "grand sweeping reforms" for the sake of it. Quote The Eurozone crisis is gonna hit Germany at one point or anotheI highly doubt it. Unless we have another unforeseen economic crash, Germany at the moment is about as bad as its going to get. Unlike Greece and other periphery nations, they didn't have a ridiculous amount of debt when the Recession struck. 6068
Serious / Re: Breaking news: the NHS is still fucking terrible« on: May 01, 2015, 04:41:36 PM »The NHS doesn't have enough funds to invest in more efficient strategies of preventionAnd it never will. NHS funding requirements have consistently outpaced economic growth as a whole since it was created. 6069
Serious / Breaking news: the NHS is still fucking terrible« on: May 01, 2015, 04:11:18 PM »
When people rush to the defence of the ailing NHS, they often cite the 2014 Commonwealth Fund Report. Which is legitimate, of course, after reading through it I'm confident in saying that it's a solid paper. However, especially when it comes to healthcare, academic papers still have to make presuppositions; the CF report, for instance, is incredibly biased towards the NHS since it puts so much weight on metrics involving centralised systems, out-of-pocket costs or insurer rejection in some manner; all disregarding actually access to treatment, or the fact that there are around 9,000 unnecessary deaths a year as a result of negligence or inefficiency.
The 2014 European Health Consumer Index spits out a totally opposite result, throwing the NHS to the bottom of the pile behind even Portugal. I find the EHCI report more valid, since it places much less emphasis on principles like who is controlling the deliverance of healthcare or whether somebody is making a profit, and focuses on things like waiting times. When it comes down to it, however, I think the OECD's healthcare efficiency reports are the best studies into the real efficiency of healthcare, as the OECD even acknowledges: “there is no “one-size-fits-all” approach to reforming health care systems. Policymakers should aim for coherence in policy settings by adopting best practices from the many different health care systems that exist in the OECD and tailor them to suit actual circumstances.” Meaning they also judge groups singularly according to the type of system they have. ![]() The UK falls into Group 6, defined as: "Mostly public insurance. Health care is mainly provided by a heavily regulated public system, with strict gate-keeping, little decentralisation and a tight spending limit imposed via the budget process" The OECD has noted before that the UK could make significant efficiency gains when it comes to cost--in fact, it was in the top three countries for potential efficiency gains alongside Greece and Ireland. And the OECD's ultimate analysis of the UK is that: “The quantity and quality of health care services (in the UK) remain lower than the OECD average while compensation levels are higher. Reinforcing competitive pressures on providers could help mitigate price pressures, e.g. by increasing user choice further and reforming compensation systems.” The UK could look to be more like Norway in its deliverance of healthcare, which came out as the most efficient in group six, or it could seek to be more like Germany (where less than half of the hospitals are government owned), the Netherlands, Canada or Sweden which all have universal systems with varying methods of funding but with much less restriction, much more consumer choice and much more efficiency. 6070
The Flood / Re: Just found Internet Aristocrat's new channel« on: May 01, 2015, 03:30:09 PM »Brilliant.I thought he was gone for good after that whole drunk sex on a podcast debacle.Wait, what? I haven't heard about that. What happened there. 6071
The Flood / Re: Just found Internet Aristocrat's new channel« on: May 01, 2015, 03:26:37 PM »I thought he was gone for good after that whole drunk sex on a podcast debacle.Wait, what? I haven't heard about that. What happened there. 6073
Serious / Re: "Anti-gay" Republican sent nude photos to people on Grindr« on: May 01, 2015, 03:19:21 PM »In all seriousness, I have no issue calling out conservatives when they do stupid shit. 6074
Serious / Re: "Anti-gay" Republican sent nude photos to people on Grindr« on: May 01, 2015, 03:04:12 PM »If it was a liberal Meta would be laughingBecause some gay dude is going to try and get revenge on a liberal for voting against anti-discrimination laws, right? 6075
Serious / Dealing with Depression« on: May 01, 2015, 02:59:39 PM »
So, Sandtrap did a post not too long ago about chemotherapy and all that stuff, and there's nowhere near enough discussion about mental illness on Serious. So I figured I'd post a few things, most importantly this TED talk by Andrew Solomon:
YouTube And, also, this video: YouTube Depression is something I think most people will experience at least at some point in their lives. Even if they never actually have some form of depressive illness, they'll probably catch a glimpse of what it's like through extreme grief--or something similar enough. There are, of course, numerous forms of depression. Dysthymia, "minor" and chronic depression; Major Depressive Disorder; or a combination thereof known as "double depression", wherein people are chronically dysthymic with bouts of major depression. All of these besides the cyclical mood disorders like cyclothymia and bipolar disorder. On a personal level, depression is both difficult to live with and difficult to treat. It often feels as if you are one of the only people capable of perceiving the world correctly, and it sucks the motivation and vitality out of your life. It doesn't so much make you sad, as make you as close to dead as a living person can be besides a coma. The thing about depression, too, is that while it's correlated with certain personality types (Mr. P can probably give a better account of this than I), it can co-exist with either egosyntonic or egodystonic illnesses. People all across the board, from psychopaths and narcissists to the anxious and borderline, can feel depression for prolonged periods of time. And, even though on an intellectual level you're capable of understanding that help is available and that what you're feeling is ridiculous, you can't shake it. There's a deep delusional undertone to depressive thought and behaviour; fundamental and existential beliefs which are horribly mistaken, and impossible to relieve. It's an illness that truly plagues you for the rest of your life. And, I think, that is the most important thing to take away from discussions about depression. People who are depressed are not weak, or spineless. Depression is not a problem with an individual's will, but an individual's perception. As piling weights on the back of a man will cause his back to break eventually; so too will the constricted perception of a depressive, in time, cause his will to break as a natural consequence. 6076
The Flood / Knowledge is knowing that Frankenstein wasn't the monster« on: May 01, 2015, 02:10:07 PM »
Wisdom is knowing that Frankenstein was the monster.
6077
Serious / Re: "Anti-gay" Republican sent nude photos to people on Grindr« on: May 01, 2015, 01:58:56 PM »you'd be perfectly fine with that and wouldn't tell anybody?I'd block them and forget about the issue. I wouldn't go "Oh look, a closeted congressman" and then run to the press with it. 6078
Serious / Re: "Anti-gay" Republican sent nude photos to people on Grindr« on: May 01, 2015, 01:22:59 PM »Looking at the image in the news story, it looks as if the person he sent the picture to reciprocated nonetheless. Not, of course, that sending unsolicited pictures justifies outing somebody in the first place--regardless of how stupid a thing it is to do. 6079
Serious / No, we still can't trust Iran« on: May 01, 2015, 01:20:11 PM »
Where this idea has come from that Iran is some peaceful nation being bullied by the West I'll never fucking know. Everybody seems content to forget that it tried to procure nuclear contraband while negotiating with the US, purchased embargoed weapons from the Kremlin, actively funds Hamas (and has been arming the Houthis in Yemen since 2009), performing military drills on mock US carriers and intimidating international cargo ships.
And all of this besides the habitual anti-semitism, and "death to America" proclamations. Oh, and let's not forget the escalating demands and obscurantism by Iran during the recent nuclear agreements, and the Iranians' brazen rejection of any international investigations into their nuclear facilities. All of this from a fundamentalist Shi'a theocracy which actively celebrates terrorism. And yet again, the West will capitulate to these barbarous dogs. 6080
The Flood / Re: Some things i have noticed from raising my testosterone« on: May 01, 2015, 01:00:32 PM »
So, you're telling me that I have a ridiculous amount of testosterone?
6081
Serious / "Anti-gay" Republican sent nude photos to people on Grindr« on: May 01, 2015, 12:51:35 PM »
Jesus Christ
Quote Note to North Dakota state Rep. Randy Boehning: sending unsolicited explicit photos to other men via a gay dating app is a bad way to hide your sexuality. This is disgusting. Regardless of how the man voted, outing somebody in this manner is never okay. But I suppose that doesn't matter to the liberals obsessed with identity politics; this is surely his "comeuppance", right? No. Fuck you. I'm glad that the representative feels okay about the issue, but many of his friends and family didn't know, and his private life has been put on display for everybody to laugh and gawp at. 6082
Serious / Should we allow private prisons?« on: May 01, 2015, 12:38:16 PM »
According to some, they may be more efficient when it comes to deterring recidivism:
Quote Private companies are better at running prisons than the public sector, a study by a centre-right think tank says. 6083
The Flood / Re: favorite Spongebob moment« on: May 01, 2015, 12:30:18 PM »YouTube This gets funnier the older I get. 6084
The Flood / Re: favorite Spongebob moment« on: May 01, 2015, 12:28:37 PM »YouTube And this of course. 6086
The Flood / Re: favorite Spongebob moment« on: May 01, 2015, 11:13:31 AM »YouTube Best episode, ever. 6087
The Flood / Re: Favorite music collaborations« on: May 01, 2015, 10:52:45 AM »YouTube Alex Turner of Arctic Monkeys fame was a guest vocalist for If I Had a Tail. Only one which immediately comes to mind. 6088
The Flood / Re: Feminism in a nutshell« on: May 01, 2015, 10:26:18 AM »which meta does rather incessantly--the pigeonholing thingIt's very difficult not to do when I have an incredibly large pigeonhole to work with. This bullshit form of feminism that only cares for the minor inconveniences of women in developed countries has spread to even the Universities of my country. 6089
The Flood / Re: Feminism in a nutshell« on: May 01, 2015, 10:02:56 AM »#FallacyofRelativePrivationI don't even think that's a real fallacy for two reasons: 1. Telling people to think about more important issues is completely valid so long as those issues actually are more important. 2. It ain't a fallacy if the smaller 'problem' isn't really a problem. Also, which faggot moved this out of Serious. |