Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - More Than Mortal

Pages: 1 ... 187188189 190191 ... 502
5641
The Flood / Join the REAL party, dicknuggets
« on: May 24, 2015, 03:01:49 PM »

5643
The Flood / Join the party, fuckers
« on: May 24, 2015, 01:44:19 PM »

5644
The Flood / Re: Verbatim brand?
« on: May 24, 2015, 01:17:23 PM »
I only recently found out it's apparently pronounced "verb-ay-tim" in English. Strange things indeed.
How the fuck did you think it was pronounced?

5645
The Flood / Holy shit, check this out
« on: May 24, 2015, 01:14:20 PM »
lol

5646
We should change the name of morality to Eudaimonics so people stop getting fucking confused.

5647
>2015
>thinking morality is subjective


5648
The Flood / Re: Job application
« on: May 23, 2015, 05:05:16 PM »
"Raping your mom you mark ass bitch ass punk ass motherfucker."

Employers love confidence.
That made me laugh way too loudly.

5649
GET THE FOOK IN HERE

5650
The Flood / Re: Why do all of you
« on: May 23, 2015, 04:29:05 PM »
The Beatles
Simon & Garfunkel
Lana Del Rey
Elton John
Billy Joel
*Lana Del Bae

5651
Gimme 10 minutes.
Bitch, you got five.

5652
The Flood / Re: Why do all of you
« on: May 23, 2015, 04:25:29 PM »
classical
Franz Schubert represent!

5654
The Flood / Re: Why do all of you
« on: May 23, 2015, 04:18:42 PM »
Don't
Need To
Brag About
My taste
Because
Not Insecure
That's six, you stupid fuck.

5655
The Flood / Re: Why do all of you
« on: May 23, 2015, 04:18:21 PM »
Naw, but for real.

Spoiler
Queens of the Stone Age.
Foo Fighters.
Kasabian.
The Offspring.
Def Leppard.

5656
The Flood / Re: Why do all of you
« on: May 23, 2015, 04:13:50 PM »
Owl City.
James Blunt.
Plain White T's.
Blink 182.
Train.

5657
The Flood / Fucking banging tune ITT
« on: May 23, 2015, 04:08:51 PM »
YouTube

5658
The Flood / God damn, this is a good song
« on: May 23, 2015, 04:05:19 PM »
YouTube

5659
Serious / Re: Bank of England was secretly researching Brexit
« on: May 23, 2015, 03:27:05 PM »
UK won't leave the EU.
Yeah, I doubt it. I just hope Cameron can get a good reform deal.

But, I doubt that too.

5660
Serious / Bank of England was secretly researching Brexit
« on: May 23, 2015, 03:10:02 PM »
Guardian
Quote
Bank of England officials are secretly researching the financial shocks that could hit Britain if there is a vote to leave the European Union in the forthcoming referendum.

The Bank blew its cover on Friday when it accidentally emailed details of the project – including how the bank intended to fend off any inquiries about its work – direct to the Guardian.

According to the confidential email, the press and most staff in Threadneedle Street must be kept in the dark about the work underway, which has been dubbed Project Bookend.

It spells out that if anyone asks about the project, the taskforce must say the investigation has nothing to do with the referendum, saying only that staff are involved in examining “a broad range of European economic issues” that concern the Bank.

The revelation is likely to embarrass the bank governor, Mark Carney, who has overhauled the central bank’s operations and promised greater transparency over its decision-making.

MPs are now likely to ask whether the Bank intended to inform parliament that a major review of Britain’s prospects outside the EU was being undertaken by the institution that acts as the UK’s main financial regulator. Carney is also likely to come under pressure within the Bank to reveal whether there are other undercover projects underway.

Officials are likely to have kept the project under wraps to avoid entering the highly charged debate around the EU referendum, which has jumped to the top of the political agenda since the Conservatives secured an overall majority. Many business leaders and pro-EU campaigners have warned that “Brexit” would hit British exports and damage the standing of the City of London.

The report could prove incendiary, but without a public notice advertising the Bank’s research project, parliament and the public would be unable to demand its publication.

The email indicates that a small group of senior staff are to examine the effect of a Brexit under the authority of Sir Jon Cunliffe, who as deputy director for financial stability has responsibility for monitoring the risk of another market crash.

Cunliffe also sits on the board of the City regulator, the Prudential Regulatory Authority.

James Talbot, the head of the monetary assessment and strategy division, is involved in Project Bookend, drawing on his past work as an adviser on European economic policy.

The email, from Cunliffe’s private secretary to four senior executives, was written on 21 May and forwarded by mistake to a Guardian editor by the Bank’s head of press, Jeremy Harrison.

It says: “Jon’s proposal, which he has asked me to highlight to you, is that no email is sent to James’s team or more broadly around the Bank about the project.”

It continues: “James can tell his team that he is working on a short-term project on European economics in International [division] which will last a couple of months. This will be in-depth work on a broad range of European economic issues. Ideally he would then say no more.”

The email states that Talbot planned to inform staff on Thursday.

The message goes on to propose that questions from “other parties (eg: the press) about “whether this was a project to look at the referendum”, should be given the answer “that there is a lot going on in Europe in the next couple of months – pointing to some of the specific European economic issues (eg: Greece) that would be of concern to the Bank”.

Among the senior staff listed on the email and aware of the project are: Iain de Weymarn, Mark Carney’s private secretary since last month; Nicola Anderson, head of risk assessment in the financial stability department; Phil Evans, director of the international division; and Jenny Scott, executive director communications.

A Bank spokesman said: “It is stated government policy that there will be a renegotiation and national referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union at some point. It should not come as a surprise that there are a range of economic and financial issues that arise in the context of the renegotiation and national referendum. It is one of the Bank’s responsibilities to assess those that relate to its objectives.

“It is not sensible to talk about this work publicly, in advance. But as with work done prior to the Scottish referendum, we will disclose the details of such work at the appropriate time. While it is unfortunate that this information has entered the public domain in this way, the Bank will maintain this approach.”

To be honest, they should probably release the research after it's completed.

5661
Implications for us? The worst possible scenario, dude.
How so? I presume their territory and influence would expand, significantly. How could something like that even be fought?

5662
Serious / Re: Do you think WWIII will be fought over water?
« on: May 23, 2015, 01:39:17 PM »
If there's anything to be fought over, it will be energy before water.
Increasing oil prices as a result of constricted supply will lead to investment in nuclear and renewable energy before we approach a war.

5663
Serious / Re: Is peace attainable?
« on: May 23, 2015, 01:36:31 PM »
Total peace will be attainable when we transcend human nature as a result of technology.

Or an AI kills us all. . .

5664
Arguments from authority, argument from personal incredulity and appeal to moderation are all fucking terrible.

5665
Serious / Re: Michael Brown is getting a sidewalk memorial
« on: May 23, 2015, 01:12:02 PM »
I support it. It's the least they could do.
The least they could do is build a monument with public money to a criminal?

5666
The Flood / Re: this is some next level shit
« on: May 23, 2015, 10:33:28 AM »
Jesus that was a terrible shot with the Gnasher.

5667
Holy shit you're conceding defeat. You'd have never done that in the past :)

But seriously, I think you're underestimating just how much al Qaeda and its allies have gained in recent months. In fact, you didn't even mention them at all. They now control all of Idlib (nominally right now. Give it time and they will take over whatever the regime has left near the Al Ghab plains), and control significant swaths in Daraa and Quneitra.

But the fact that IS has been able to mount more offensives in Syria is also worrying. The most important of which was taking Tadmur. This essentially shuts the SAA forces in Deir al Zour off from aid from Damascus by land. They could try to fly aid into the airbase at Deir al Zour, but that might be limited with the threat of IS anti air.

So, I think the next major thing to fall to IS in Syria will be Deir al Zour. Which will mean that IS will control all of that province. However, should be noted that Deir al Zour is basically desert but still.
I remember reading a news story a number of months ago about how IS and al-Qaeda could end up rebuilding bridges and forming a sort of alliance. Do you think this is possible? And what implications would it have for us?

5668
Serious / Re: How should the US change their anti-IS strategy?
« on: May 23, 2015, 09:21:32 AM »
Yes. JTAC's and offensive SOF forces in Iraq are desperately needed.

As for Syria, I have no fucking clue. FSA is so irrelevant now and I don't think we're serious about building it back up. Al Qaeda basically owns the opposition now.
Oh shit, man, good to see you. About time you turned up here; we need some more people with an interest and understanding of foreign policy:

OT: some infantry support for the Kurds, increased air strikes, more covert operations and maybe even a ground assault on Dabiq wouldn't go amiss.

5669
Where are these statistics from?
Research by Missouri State.

Quote
It's not a black thing.
Sure, I completely agree. The point is that it's a cultural issue which seems to disproportionately affect Hispanic and black communities and disproportionately not affect Asian communities when poverty is taken into the mix. It is by no means the fault of the black and Hispanic youth--we're all born into our circumstances without choice. But there's more to the story than impoverishment, although it's certainly a factor.

5670
Did you not read my post? There are Cambodian, Chinese, Vietnamese, and other Asian street gangs in America. They're pretty big too.
They exist, but they aren't that substantial proportionally. Hispanics and blacks are the most gang-affiliated at 47pc and 34pc, with whites at 13pc and Asians trailing way behind at 6pc.

Pages: 1 ... 187188189 190191 ... 502