This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - More Than Mortal
Pages: 1 ... 136137138 139140 ... 502
4111
« on: July 13, 2015, 06:18:27 PM »
It's a fall back "science" for retards that like to parade around and pretend they're smart when all they really got was a degree in blogging.
Literally the best post you've ever made.
4112
« on: July 13, 2015, 06:13:08 PM »
Sex with me is so good, it basically proves Ricardo's Labour Theory of Value.
4113
« on: July 13, 2015, 06:12:41 PM »
You can capture all the social benefits of my Schumpeterian growth, bae.
4114
« on: July 13, 2015, 06:11:08 PM »
My dick is basically a giffen good; when it rises, so does the demand for it.
4115
« on: July 13, 2015, 06:10:16 PM »
If you be Greece, I can be the IMF and insert substantially liquidity into you.
S&M?...
More like S&D.
4116
« on: July 13, 2015, 06:04:14 PM »
If you be Greece, I can be the IMF and insert substantially liquidity into you.
4117
« on: July 13, 2015, 06:02:41 PM »
One thing though, for a more serious note, people really aren't rational beings and trying to assert that they are is just downright silly.
Seriously, read Friedman. It's silly to think economists haven't thought of this.
4118
« on: July 13, 2015, 05:59:52 PM »
Babe, I bet you're tighter than the Bundesbank.
4119
« on: July 13, 2015, 05:54:19 PM »
>people are not rational actors
somebody forgot to read their friedman
Have you met the great british public?
They aren't rational they are fucking mongs.
you mean like psychologists who think they're rational but make disparaging statements about a science, of which they know very little? IF YOU DON'T READ YOUR FUCKING FRIEDMAN, YOU WON'T GET NO CUNTING CANDY
4120
« on: July 13, 2015, 05:45:48 PM »
>people are not rational actors
somebody forgot to read their friedman
4121
« on: July 13, 2015, 05:27:55 PM »
Economics isn't a science and morality is subjective.
END YOURSELF, BITCH
4122
« on: July 13, 2015, 05:21:40 PM »
so meta
what if I told you that
economics is a man-made construct and therefore relative.
WHAT YOU MEAN LIKE MORALITY FUCK OFF
4123
« on: July 13, 2015, 05:16:45 PM »
Economics is not a science.
i'll wreck you so bad you're marginal utility will increase during sex and you'll die of friction burns
4124
« on: July 13, 2015, 05:12:44 PM »
list reasons why economists are pseudoscientists:
1: the economy isnt even fucking real, asshole, kill yourself and take your retarded ass "harvard graduates" with you, faggot
triggered
4125
« on: July 13, 2015, 05:05:22 PM »
Does tobacco count?
yes
Ah, well then.
4126
« on: July 13, 2015, 05:02:57 PM »
1. its full of fucking marxists
4127
« on: July 13, 2015, 02:01:31 PM »
Does tobacco count?
4128
« on: July 13, 2015, 01:48:52 PM »
They won't be able to hide behind their snow now that we've got global warming on our side. Time to put some warheads on foreheads.
had to do it
4129
« on: July 13, 2015, 12:53:43 PM »
We all have something to hide.
You clearly have no idea who OP is.
4130
« on: July 13, 2015, 12:48:53 PM »
like sociology or art.
This is the only part of that post that made me mad.
4131
« on: July 13, 2015, 12:44:41 PM »
People whose interests are threatened by the things you aren't doing wrong, presumably.
4132
« on: July 13, 2015, 11:54:37 AM »
This is the kind of domestic issue that literally does not matter
It doesn't matter insofar as it isn't shifting any weight, sure, but it's still pretty clear there's a right and wrong course of action here.
4133
« on: July 13, 2015, 06:15:50 AM »
It's quarter past twelve, here.
4134
« on: July 13, 2015, 05:40:56 AM »
Empirical doesn't mean what you think it means.
^ This. Change your fucking title; it's pissing me off.
4135
« on: July 13, 2015, 04:40:47 AM »
Really? Is it that big of an issue to get this heated over?
Yup. It's fucking ridiculous to see conservatives bitch about what they perceive to be the slightest infringement of their liberties, but as soon as the principle of secularism is openly contradicted there is no issue.
4136
« on: July 13, 2015, 04:35:56 AM »
across the board.
Not really; you're going to be unable to hit the optimal minimum wage for the US at the federal level. It differs too much between states and metro areas.
4137
« on: July 12, 2015, 05:36:06 PM »
Couldn't that be used as an excuse to classify everything under economics, though?
No, but I think you could say that all the social sciences have implications for all the other social sciences and be pretty safe.
4138
« on: July 12, 2015, 05:25:12 PM »
Isn't black label the favorite drink of Christopher Hitchens?
Not a clue, although I know he was a big whiskey drinker. EDIT: Actually, I think I might've read something about black label in his memoirs. I've heard Saddam was a big fan of black label, though.
4139
« on: July 12, 2015, 05:24:08 PM »
i have no interesting response to this question
this is probably my least favorite thing to be asked in the world
Don't lie. You'd develop and market and irreversible contraceptive.
4140
« on: July 12, 2015, 05:19:42 PM »
I wouldn't really consider all of these to fall under economics. I see the relation, but these are more sociology than economics imo.
I'd say most of them fall into economics, and I think all of them have economic implications even if only from a historical perspective. The "most" sociological one is probably the one regarding the Dutch famine, but even that has some massively important implications for economics; especially from a Malthusian perspective.
Pages: 1 ... 136137138 139140 ... 502
|
Show Posts