Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - More Than Mortal

Pages: 1 ... 108109110 111112 ... 502
3271
Serious / Re: Rand Paul wants to dissolve the Fed.
« on: September 22, 2015, 08:52:48 AM »
Rand Paul is such a moron. Where was this homeostatic mechanism that corrected the Eurozone economies when they didn't pursue monetary stimulus?

The housing bubble is also oft-misunderstood. It's probably the case that Greenspan left rates too low for too long on account of an output gap (which was, more than likely, a productivity boom they couldn't identify), but there is also the fact that the decline in underwriting practices was led primarily by private banks allowed to operate under a poor regulatory structure (with incentives from the HUD for good measure). The problem with the housing bubble wasn't that it put stress on banks; economies can actually perform rather well even as the financial system seems to be falling down around our ears. The primary issue with the housing bubble was that--when prices crashed--it led to a consumption shock among highly-leveraged households who suddenly found themselves in negative equity, which was then exacerbated by foreclosures which led to more declines in house prices and so on, so forth.

It's also worth noting that the Federal Reserve drastically worsened/caused the Recession by (probably) popping the house price bubble and then contracting even more by raising the IOR in mid-2008, with Lehman failing a few months after.

Basically, we had a housing bubble due to a number of bad incentives and a poor regulatory structure, which was then popped when the fed began tightening in 2007 which led to a consumption shock. The Fed didn't offset this consumption shock, tightened even more and then plunged the country into an even deeper recession. Falling nGDP probably made the issue with toxic mortgage debt in the financial system worse, and the banking system began to collapse.

3272
The Flood / Re: Tfw you can't sleep until death/forever
« on: September 22, 2015, 06:21:01 AM »
completely agree

3273
The Flood / >he doesn't think smoking makes you a cool cat
« on: September 21, 2015, 07:35:03 PM »


he's wrong

3274
The Flood / Why does Michael J. Fox make the best milkshakes?
« on: September 21, 2015, 07:30:26 PM »
He uses only the finest ingredients.

3275
The Flood / FUCK
« on: September 21, 2015, 07:29:52 PM »
MY BAD

3276
Serious / Re: "I hate what marijuana does to my students"
« on: September 21, 2015, 07:17:50 PM »


dis gon b gud

3277
Serious / Price gouging in the pharmaceutical industry
« on: September 21, 2015, 07:15:13 PM »
NYT

Quote
A huge overnight price increase for an important tuberculosis drug has been rescinded after the company that acquired the drug gave it back to its previous owner under pressure, it was announced on Monday.

However, outrage over a gigantic price increase for another drug spread into the political sphere on Monday, causing biotechnology stocks to fall broadly as investors worried about possible government action to control pharmaceutical prices. The Nasdaq Biotechnology Index fell more than 4 percent.

“Price-gouging like this in the specialty drug market is outrageous,” Hillary Rodham Clinton, a contender for the Democratic presidential nomination, said in a tweet on Monday. She said she would announce a plan on Tuesday to deal with rising drug prices.

Ms. Clinton was referring to the actions of Turing Pharmaceuticals, which last month acquired Daraprim, a 62-year-old drug used to treat a serious parasitic infection, and raised its price to $750 per tablet, from $13.50.

Prescription drugs are seen on an automated pharmacy assembly line at Medco Health Solutions in Willingboro, N.J.On the Agenda: Prescription Drug Costs Are Rising as a Campaign IssueSEPT. 21, 2015
Martin Shkreli is the founder and chief executive of Turing Pharmaceuticals, which raised the price of the drug Daraprim to $750 a tablet from $13.50.Drug Goes From $13.50 a Tablet to $750, OvernightSEPT. 20, 2015
The cases of Daraprim and of the tuberculosis drug, cycloserine, are examples of a relatively new business strategy — acquiring old, neglected drugs, often for rare diseases, and turning them into costly “specialty” drugs.

Cycloserine was acquired last month by Rodelis Therapeutics, which promptly raised the price to $10,800 for 30 capsules, from $500.But the company agreed to return the drug to its former owner, a nonprofit organization affiliated with Purdue University, the organization said on Monday.

“We discovered literally on Thursday the strategy that had been undertaken” by Rodelis, said Dan Hasler, the president of the Purdue Research Foundation, which has oversight of the manufacturing operation. “We said this was not what we had intended.”

By Saturday, he said, Rodelis had agreed to give back the drug. Rodelis confirmed this in a brief statement on its website.

The foundation now will charge $1,050 for 30 capsules, twice what it charged before, but far less than Rodelis was charging. Mr. Hasler said the new price was needed to stem losses.

Cycloserine is used to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, a serious form of the disease that does not respond to the usual drugs. There are only about 90 new cases a year in the United States, Mr. Hasler said, and about half those patients get treated with cycloserine.

Turing does not appear ready to surrender. Turing’s founder and chief executive, Martin Shkreli, a former hedge fund manager, used television interviews and also Twitter and Reddit to defend his move.

He said that toxoplasmosis, the infection Daraprim is used to treat, had been ignored by the pharmaceutical industry because there was little money to be made. Now that Turing can presumably make money, he said, it will be able to educate doctors about the disease, improve delivery to patients and develop better drugs for the infection.

Infectious disease specialists, who have protested the price increase, question the need for new drugs for toxoplasmosis and say that if Turing wants to develop such drugs, it should use money from investors. They say the price increase will raise the cost of treating some adult patients with toxoplasmosis to hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.

Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who is also vying for the Democratic presidential nomination, sent Turing a letter on Monday demanding information on the price increase.

“Without fast access to this drug, used to treat a very serious parasitic infection, patients may experience organ failure, blindness or death,” Mr. Sanders said in a letter written with Representative Elijah Cummings, Democrat of Maryland. The two lawmakers have been investigating sharp price increases in drugs, many of them old generics.

Rodelis, which increased the price of the tuberculosis drug, said last week it needed to invest to make sure the supply of the drug remained reliable. Rodelis reveals almost no information about itself, such as the names of its executives, directors or investors, on its web page.

Cycloserine, which went on sale in 1955 and is also known by the brand name Seromycin, was long produced by Eli Lilly and Company, which around 2000 decided to drop the drug, in part because the company was getting out of antibiotics.

Starting in 2003, as part of a philanthropic initiative on TB, Lilly transferred rights and manufacturing skill to generic drug companies in India, China, South Africa and elsewhere to supply the regions most affected. In 2007 it gave the rights for the United States and Canada to the Chao Center for Industrial Pharmacy and Contract Manufacturing, which is under the auspices of the Purdue Research Foundation.

Mr. Hasler, a former Lilly executive, said the Chao Center had lost about $10 million on the drug since 2007 because of the small number of patients and high regulatory costs. So the Chao Center was interested when it was approached by Rodelis. “They found us,” Mr. Hasler said.

A patient with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis might take two capsules a day of cycloserine, along with other drugs, for 18 to 24 months, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Under the price Rodelis planned to charge, a full course of treatment would have cost more than $500,000 for cycloserine alone. With the new price from the Chao Center, it will be closer to $50,000.

The drug made by generic companies abroad costs only about $20 for 100 capsules.

Amir Attaran, an expert on pharmaceutical access issues at the University of Ottawa, said it would have made much more sense to just import the drug from abroad, rather than have it produced in America for so few patients at such high cost.

Mr. Hasler said this was probably not done because foreign manufacturers were not willing to bear the expense of applying for regulatory approval in the United States.

Dr. Attaran said Lilly should have kept more control over pricing. “There’s an obligation on their part, having transferred this, to ensure that the objective of the philanthropic initiative continues to be met,” he said.

Lilly said that to comply with antitrust rules it retained no control over pricing once it transferred the rights to the Chao Center and had no say when Chao transferred the rights to Rodelis.

3278
Serious / Re: Ahmed Mohamed: the kid with the clock
« on: September 21, 2015, 07:07:36 PM »
my high school didn't let kids bring backpacks to class
I don't believe you.
Mine didn't, ether. Apart from being a MASSIVE inconvenience, it's also fucking retarded for reasons I shouldn't even have to explain. Like, if I were to be carrying a bomb or weapon in my backpack, there's no rule stopping me from utilizing it in the fucking hallway.
What weird schools you people go to.
The ones in Michigan.

3279
Serious / Re: "I hate what marijuana does to my students"
« on: September 21, 2015, 06:14:05 PM »
I tried pot once. Nothing special.

That's as far as my knowledge extends on this topic; I imagine the culture surrounding pot consumption is pretty awful.

3280
Serious / Re: people like this require the death penalty
« on: September 21, 2015, 05:02:44 PM »
Capitalism.
Which is also the thing which lets other competitors come in and undercut the gougers, assuming the gouge is indeed 'illegitimate'.

Drugs aren't cheap.

3281
Serious / Re: Trump down eight points
« on: September 21, 2015, 03:38:34 PM »
Meta sourcing MSNBC.

It is truly the end times..
What are you talking about?

I support Sanders.

3282
Serious / Trump down eight points
« on: September 21, 2015, 03:35:53 PM »
MSNBC
Quote
For much of the summer, the polls in the Republican presidential race have moved in one direction: Donald Trump building on his previous leads, gathering additional support from GOP voters.
 
But as every financial-firm commercial is required to tell you, past performance is not indicative of future results. MSNBC’s Benjy Sarlin reported yesterday on an interesting new CNN poll.
The first major national poll since the second GOP debate finds Carly Fiorina surging into a second place and Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s campaign in total collapse.
 
The survey by CNN of 444 registered Republican voters put Donald Trump in first place with 24% support, a drop of 8 points since their last poll, and Fiorina in second place with 15%. Fiorina earned plaudits on the right for her debate performance, which included multiple clashes with Trump, although fact checkers pointed out that she vividly cited footage from a hidden camera video of Planned Parenthood that does not appear to exist.
Here’s the latest rundown:
 
1. Donald Trump: 24% (down eight points from early September)
2. Carly Fiorina: 15% (up 12 points)
3. Ben Carson: 14% (down five points)
4. Marco Rubio: 11% (up eight points)
5. Jeb Bush: 9% (unchanged)
6. Ted Cruz: 6% (down one point)
6. Mike Huckabee: 6% (up one point)
8. Rand Paul: 4% (up one point)
9. Chris Christie: 3% (up one point)
10. John Kasich: 2% (unchanged)
 
If you’re noticing Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s (R) absence, you’re not alone. The far-right governor is tied for 12th place with – I kid you not – less than 1% support.
 
In fact, in CNN polling, if a candidate’s support is .5 or greater, that total is rounded up the next closest percentage point (5.5% becomes 6%; 10.5% becomes 11%, and so on). In Walker’s case, his support is listed simply as an asterisk, which means he’s registering support below 0.5%, tying him with Bobby Jindal, Jim Gilmore, Lindsey Graham, and George Pataki.
 
There was a time, not too long ago, that Team Jindal would have been thrilled beyond words to be tied with Scott Walker. That time has long since passed.
 
At the risk of twisting the knife, let’s note that Walker is now also tied with candidates who are barely trying.
 
As for the top tier, this is the first time in quite a while that four different candidates reached double digits in the same national poll. That said, the top three candidates – who currently enjoy 53% of the Republican vote between them – have a combined total of zero days in public office.
 
Trump remains on top, at least for now, and his backers can’t be pleased to see his advantage shrink this much, this quickly. But looking past the top-line result, Trump is still seen by GOP voters as the best candidate to handle the economy, address illegal immigration, and oversee foreign policy.
 
Asked, however, about “social issues, such as abortion and same-sex marriage,” Republican voters narrowly preferred Ben Carson to Trump.

Fionrina and Rubio are the winners, it'd seem.

3283
Serious / Re: Scott Walker to Drop Out of GOP Primary
« on: September 21, 2015, 03:32:15 PM »
While it won't make a huge impact in the standing right now - Walker's doners and supporters will be important in the long term, especially if they go for someone like Bush, Rubio, or Carson.
I'd expect most of them to go for Bush.

3284
The Flood / Re: How well do you take notes
« on: September 21, 2015, 11:01:14 AM »
Always been fucking terrible at taking notes and revising.

Probably why I've always under-achieved in exams.

3285
YouTube


According to a new, unofficial biography by Lord Ashcroft:

Lad.

Quote
There is, as they say, only one story the political world is sniggering about today. In an unambiguously hostile biography of David Cameron, it is reported that as a young man the Prime minister placed his private parts in the mouth of a dead pig. This is said to have been part of an initiation for an aristocratic Oxford University dining club. There is a photograph, it is said.

First, the truth. Is it true? It doesn't matter. As Lyndon Johnson knew, the real point of accusing your enemy of sex with pigs is to force him to deny it. True or not, the image is so vivid it sticks in the mind, indelibly colouring someone's reputation. And LBJ was operating in the pre-internet age. Today online debate is emotion first, facts a long-distant second.

Barely 12 hours after publication, the internet has decided that David Cameron did something unspeakable with a pig. Nothing can change that. Even a the most convincing and comprehensive refutation of the story, a sworn confession from everyone involved that they made it up, won't change the story: it would just become a footnote on a Wikipedia page, a thing clever people say in years to come when the story is retold in pubs ("actually it wasn't true"). Some stories are so compelling the truth can't change them. Look up who really deleted Milly Dowler's voicemails to see what I mean.

3286
The Flood / Re: use the rarepe.pe generator and post what you get
« on: September 21, 2015, 10:32:47 AM »


Beautiful.

3287
The Flood / Re: Game of Thrones wins record 12 Emmys
« on: September 21, 2015, 10:31:40 AM »
Tried to get into the show, honestly couldn't do it. I find it incredibly boring.

3288
Serious / Bernie Sanders and TPP
« on: September 21, 2015, 08:04:37 AM »
So, Bernie has a cute little webpage where he lists ten reasons why TPP would be bad for America. Unsurprisingly, they are mostly bullshit.

1. TPP will allow corporations to outsource even more jobs.

Who cares? The resulting "job loss" from this is literally true only in the most irrelevant kind of way. Required reading for people stupid enough to make this claim is Paul Krugman's A Country is Not a Company. Free trade doesn't even lead to a spike in unemployment; usually because jobs also get insourced, as well as monetary policy being able to reduce slack in the labour market.

Besides, gains from trade are in wages and prices, not employment.

2. U.S. sovereignty will be undermined by giving corporations the right to challenge our laws before international tribunals.

Sanders doesn't even understand what he is criticising. ISDS is an arbitration process wherein companies can receive monetary compensation for suffering at the hands of unfair or discriminatory laws; it doesn't allow legislation to be "challenged", and does not allow companies to 'sue for lost profits'. (See: Phillip Morris, Ethyl Corp, Hamburg-Vattenfall).

3 - Wages, benefits, and collective bargaining will be threatened.

This is the opposite of what free trade does; wages and benefits have been doing just fine since NAFTA passed. This really is a basic concept of economics; if Vietnamese workers can make jeans for $0.50/hr compared to US workers making jeans for $2.00/hr this is good for Americans because jeans will then be cheaper. It's called comparative advantage.

4 - Our ability to protect the environment will be undermined.

There's a decent argument to be made for the environmental externalities of trade; Sanders doesn't make them. He goes on to claim that most ISDS cases are regarding environmental law, but the TPP itself has a public health exemption. So long as the regulations apply to both foreign and domestic firms, and so long as they're actually public health laws, the legislation is fine.

Cases wherein environmental law has been challenged (Ethyl Corp, Hamburg-Vattenfall) is usually due to said law being unduly discriminatory or unnecessary.

5 - Food Safety Standards will be threatened.

He doesn't even make an argument here; it's just playground logic about how Vietnamese food exports could be contaminated and thus the increase in volume will bring illnesses into the US. It's just stupid.

6 - Buy America laws could come to an end.

Good. Although, unfortunately, the US usually manages to get exemptions for this from trade deals.

7 - Prescription drug prices will increase, access to life saving drugs will decrease, and the profits of drug companies will go up.

We've heard the same bullshit come out of groups like Doctors Without Borders. Countries are permitted to ignore pharmaceutical patents for anything on the essential drugs list, or if there is a public health crisis as long as the drugs are manufactured for domestic consumption. An agreement between developed countries, however, usually results in the patents being honoured in order to incentivise further development so we can all have better drugs.

When it comes to developing countries, they are either excused or subject to mandatory generic licensing of pharmaceutical patents with the exception of drugs considered elective. This was formalised in a WTO agreement called TRIPS, which was amended in the early 2000s to allow third parties to manufacture essential drugs for certain countries and provide them for free (most HIV for Africa is manufactured in the US) since most poor countries don't have the biomedical infrastructure to produce them. The TPP IP chapter reaffirms the primacy of TRIPS.

8 - Wall Street would benefit at the expense of everyone else.

He claims TPP would outlaw a FTT and restrict the implementation of capital controls; utterly baseless.

9 - The TPP would reward authoritarian regimes like Vietnam that systematically violate human rights.

Foreign aid is a much bigger issue in this arena, but personally I will be waiting for Bernie to reveal his plan to improve human rights in countries like Vietnam.

10 - The TPP has no expiration date, making it virtually impossible to repeal.

He would've been better off making a list of nine points.

3289
It's worth noting, however, the fit for work nonsense (while being pretty fucking awful) has only resulted in one confirmed death. A lot of the Left in this country seem to think disabled people are dying by the thousands because of it.

3290
The Flood / Re: Ben and Jerrys or Haagen Dazs
« on: September 21, 2015, 06:39:45 AM »
Berry and Jen's.

3291
The Flood / Re: Has anyone on Sep7agon ever died
« on: September 21, 2015, 06:34:39 AM »
A couple of people thought I was dead when I went to Spain for a week.

Other than that,  Goji hasn't been around for a while. I'm sure he's okay, though.

3292
Serious / So I finally finished the Republican debate
« on: September 20, 2015, 07:21:12 PM »
Rand is irrelevant.

Huckabee's a nice enough guy but batshit insane.

Rubio is incredibly strong on foreign policy, and managed to finish well.

Cruz is just nuts.

Carson is a likable guy, but he doesn't seem to have the temperament to be President.

Trump is trump.

Bush was probably the strongest performer; he managed to defend his record well, especially on the issue of drugs. The fact that Republicans are cheering for rehabilitation and treatment is a godsend to US politics. However, he finished incredibly weakly.

Scott Walker is just as irrelevant as Rand Paul.

Carly Fiorina reminds me of Margaret Thatcher; principled and resolute. When it comes down to it though, she seems to be largely spinning shit. Rebuilding the sixth fleet? Jesus.

Kasich was weak throughout the entire debate. He didn't open or close strongly, and he seemed to fumble about a lot. Ultimately, he was just rather boring. He has a solid record, but he doesn't stand out.

Christie just came off as sanctimonious.

Thus far, it seems Bush would be the best choice. Although his polls are dropping; it seems like the strongest contender who isn't Trump or Fiorina is Rubio, and he has the largest capacity to drag the Republican Party into modernity despite his lunatic views on Cuba.

3293
IDS is the thorn in my Conservative side.
Quote
A coroner has concluded for the first time that a man with severe mental illness killed himself as a direct result of being found “fit to work” by the Government’s outsourced disability assessors.

Michael O’Sullivan, a 60-year-old father from north London, hanged himself after his disability benefits were removed despite the opinion of three doctors that he was suffering from recurrent depression and certified as unable to work by his GP.

Figures released last month by the Department for Work and Pensions showed that nearly 90 people died every month between 2011 and 2014 after they had been declared fit for employment after undergoing a work capability assessment (WCA).

Ministers insisted that the statistics provided no basis for a link to the Government’s welfare reforms. But it has now emerged that a coroner ruled in the case of Mr O’Sullivan that the WCA and anxiety caused to him by its findings were the direct cause of his death.

Mary Hassell, the senior coroner for inner north London, wrote to the DWP warning that she believed there was a risk of similar deaths in future and demanding preventative action.

And far from being the thorn in just my side, he is the bullet in the loaded gun pointed at the heads of disabled people in the UK.

3294
Haven't the Tories been making astronomically larger cuts on defense than Labour ever has?
There were some initial cuts to specific programmes, but spending is currently fairly strong and sitting around NATO's ~2pc/GDP guideline.

3295
Serious / British Army general threatens mutiny if Corbyn is elected in 2020
« on: September 20, 2015, 05:24:27 PM »
Independent.

Quote
A senior serving general has reportedly warned that a Jeremy Corbyn government could face "a mutiny" from the Army if it tried to downgrade them.

The unnamed general said members of the armed forces would begin directly and publicly challenging the labour leader if he tried to scrap Trident, pull out of Nato or announce “any plans to emasculate and shrink the size of the armed forces.”

He told the Sunday Times: “The Army just wouldn’t stand for it. The general staff would not allow a prime minister to jeopardise the security of this country and I think people would use whatever means possible, fair or foul to prevent that. You can’t put a maverick in charge of a country’s security.

“There would be mass resignations at all levels and you would face the very real prospect of an event which would effectively be a mutiny.”

3296
Serious / Re: -5 Points for You, Carson
« on: September 20, 2015, 05:16:15 PM »

3297
Serious / Re: -5 Points for You, Carson
« on: September 20, 2015, 05:01:25 PM »
One religion's kill count was less than the other.
Islamic terrorists kill more people every year than the Inquisition did in 350.

And Christianity had a couple hundred years head start.

So I'd be surprised if the gap was at all wide.

3298
Serious / Re: -5 Points for You, Carson
« on: September 20, 2015, 04:41:53 PM »
I don't see the problem. He made a very clear distinction between theocratic Muslims and secular Muslims, which I think most would agree that the former is utterly unelectable.

Any theocratic candidate should be unelectable - no matter the religion.
Agreed, but if we're talking proportionality here, a Christian theocrat is morally preferable to a Muslim theocrat.

That's still like saying Stalin is preferable to Zedong.
Despite my general disdain for Islam as a set of values and ideas, I have to agree with you. If we have a Christian as fundamentalist as a theocratic Muslim when it comes to the Old and New Testaments the Christian would probably be worse.

3299
The Flood / Re: AMA
« on: September 20, 2015, 02:23:21 PM »
Are fractional reserves properly regulated? Like, do we keep it in line?
Yes.

3300
Serious / Re: -5 Points for You, Carson
« on: September 20, 2015, 02:21:45 PM »
despite the fact that Muslims in our country are far more moderate than many believe (Apparently, all Muslims are terrorists to some here).
Muslims in the US are probably more moderate than in Western Europe, but there's still a rather significant problem with fundamentalism even in America. 51pc of mosques have violent texts on-site, and Muslims make up 1pc of the population and 80pc of the terror convictions.

Sauce?
http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/sharia-adherence-mosque-survey/html

The United States has, as of 2010, over 2000 mosques throughout the country. While I get the whole need for sampling size being a small percentage, the study only used 100 mosques in 2011 - which is not even 10% of the total amount.

I don't have time to read through the entire website - mind picking out the sections where it shows which texts are used, etc?
100 samples of a population of 2,106 is sufficient for a confidence interval of ~9.

Pages: 1 ... 108109110 111112 ... 502