Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - More Than Mortal

Pages: 1 ... 473474475 476477 ... 502
14221
Serious / British intelligence has identified Foley's executioner
« on: August 24, 2014, 09:16:42 AM »
http://www.haaretz.com/1.612137

Quote
The British security services MI5 and MI6 have identified the British member of the Islamic State jihadist organization who is suspected of murdering American journalist James Foley, according to the London-based Sunday Times newspaper.

The newspaper attributed the information to "senior government sources."

The Sunday Times did not name the killer, saying that its sources "gave no details of the man they have identified," though it did give the name of a person it described as a "key suspect" – hip-hop artist Abdel-Majed Abdel Bary.

According to the newspaper, Bary, 23, left his family's home in an upmarket London suburb last year. It says he recently tweeted a picture of himself holding up a severed head.

The gruesome video of Foley's beheading, which was released last week, featured a man with a London accent. The newspaper said that Bary is known to fellow fighters as “Jihadi John.”

The Islamic State, also known as ISIS, has conquered considerable swathes of land in Iraq and Syria in recent months.

14222
The Flood / Imagine if megalodon sharks still existed
« on: August 24, 2014, 09:13:07 AM »



14223
Serious / Re: "Minimum wage jobs are meant for teens"
« on: August 24, 2014, 09:08:46 AM »
Maybe she's wanted to stay there all that time? Maybe she has inheritance or something? Unless you can give me her bank statement, I don't think this Choo-choo can be used as a proper example.

However, what do you suggest? Price floors will always cause an increase in supply. Minimum wage will either literally result in jobs being lost or slow the growth of the labour market. I don't know what the situation is like in the U.S., but over here the difference between minimum wage and "living wage" is almost exactly what the government taxes them.

I do know, for the U.S., that the most effective forms of poverty reduction are transfers and subsidies like the E.I.T.C., which'd be a far better model than simply raising the minimum wage like a Neanderthal with a club.

14224
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage
« on: August 24, 2014, 09:04:23 AM »

I have three questions:
- Which economists do we listen to?

- How do you explain the global and dramatic reduction in violence throughout history? It would seem that a massive, one-world government would be prone to incredible instability and need to "section" itself, while giving the sections considerable autonomy.

- It may very well be true that scientists are not motivated by market forces when researching/inventing, but the market is the single best tool for innovation, which makes everybody wealthier. Do you deny the innovative powers of the market?

14225
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage
« on: August 24, 2014, 08:59:47 AM »
>The government shouldn't have bailed out any of the automotive or banking companies.

Mein neger. That's like the only one I disagreed with.

14226
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage
« on: August 23, 2014, 06:34:20 PM »


U wot m8?
george galloway is slimy, self-serving scum.

14227
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage
« on: August 23, 2014, 06:25:44 PM »
> George Galloway should be PM

Damn right <.<
omg die

14228
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage
« on: August 23, 2014, 06:01:29 PM »
I agree with all of those points save for the Euroscepticism, abolishing of minimum wage, and your Econo jargon (I have no idea what it all is, so I'm not gonna make an opinion on it right now)
Yes, but I want to know some of your opinions which have caused controversy.

14229
Serious / Re: Your political opinions which make people rage
« on: August 23, 2014, 05:58:42 PM »
Probably every opinion I have.
nah m80

ur just a giant faggoot

14230
Serious / Your political opinions which make people rage
« on: August 23, 2014, 05:53:48 PM »
What opinions do you hold that have irritated people in the past? I'll probably have a bit of an advantage here since I actually took politics and it's really easy to irritate morons.

All of these, at one point or another, has provoked ire from somebody else:

- Euroscepticism.
- I'm generally very pro-immigration.
- Pro-fracking.
- Very pro-nuclear energy.
- Not being a Keynesian (from my politics teacher, who said it worked for Hitler), and not being a socialist (from a classmate).
- Some inflation is good.
- The abolition of the minimum wage.
- The establishment of a negative income tax.
- The abolition of corporation tax.
- Flatter income tax rates.
- Greater private influence in pensions (like Chile's system).
- Private providers of healthcare (like anywhere that knows what the fuck it's doing).
- Abolishing the NHS.
- Selling the right to live here.
- Government caused the Recession.
- The Financial Crisis was largely caused by unfortunate, but well-meaning, regulations.
- Taking minimum wage earners out of income tax.
- Rehabilitation is way more important than punishment.

Those are all that come to mind, at the moment.

Special addition - Kinder's opinions:

- Being a fascist.

14231
The Flood / Re: Take a motherfucking screenshot RIGHT NOW
« on: August 23, 2014, 05:37:07 PM »
Spoiler
Fuckin' A that's incriminatory.

14232
The Flood / Re: The gimmick goes full retard
« on: August 23, 2014, 05:35:40 PM »
no u

Obviously just fucking jealous.

14233
The Flood / Re: The gimmick goes full retard
« on: August 23, 2014, 05:30:23 PM »
Comms and Sentra are officially ordained into the High Order of Fucking Bros.

14234
The Flood / Take a motherfucking screenshot RIGHT NOW
« on: August 23, 2014, 05:29:00 PM »


Let's see those incriminating tabs.

14235
Serious / Re: More fearmongering from the pro-exit crowd
« on: August 23, 2014, 04:56:41 PM »
Problem is, which economists should be listened to more? Economics isn't an exact science and you'll find that a lot of highly educated and intelligent economists still disagree on many of today's issues.
I'm talking about the really fuckin' obvious shit.

Subsidies, price controls, tariffs - the things which are pretty much universally supported.

The other stuff? I'm not so sure. I am hopeful when I see things like New Zealand bringing together the Keynesians and neo-Monetarists in genius ways like proposing to put fiscal stimulus under the remit of the central bank. And then you have the policies with strong academic and political support - like NGDPLT - which have little costs in comparison to the huge potential benefits.

I'm not saying economists' words should be dogma, I'm just saying that the political theatre of today ignores or politicises them far too much.

14236
Serious / Re: British opinion poll
« on: August 23, 2014, 04:48:26 PM »
Spoiler
It's a joke, just like UKIP
you fukkin w0t

14237
Serious / Re: More fearmongering from the pro-exit crowd
« on: August 23, 2014, 04:47:53 PM »
I'd take technocracy to the ends of the earth <.<
Proper technocracy mind you, not just extended cronyism.

Take the badger cull debacle, they ignore the advice of all the scientists and insist on shooting them to appease the fucking farmers. It makes it worse, they don't kill enough of them and ohohoho look at that, ignoring scientists led to what? A mess.

._.

Or Mental Health services, you have Psychiatrists and The royal college putting it as bluntly as they can that it's failing millions and they keep cutting it. Do they put more funding into it? Nope. Do they slash it's budget again and again? Of course they fucking do, they are tories.

o.e

This is why I tend to avoid political discussion, because it usually ends up with me getting pissed off >.>

I can understand that. But everything is fundamentally a game of economics; how you allocate the resources. You can't have all these technocratic institutions governing themselves because you still need a government to fund them and legislation is, in itself, a skill. I agree, economists should probably be listened to more, but I think the solution is to allow these elements greater autonomy in the face of the political process, not to base the government around "experts".

14238
The Flood / Re: Why do we allow pedophiles on the forum?
« on: August 23, 2014, 04:00:56 PM »
You should thank me.

My upvote just pushed you up to Ascended. I'm cushioning your inevitable fall, here.

14239
Serious / Re: More fearmongering from the pro-exit crowd
« on: August 23, 2014, 03:59:02 PM »
And an equally, if not longer list of problems caused by politicians and statesmen can also be drawn up.

Scientists and Economists > Politicians.
The Soviet scientists and economists did more damage than any politician could've possible hoped to have done.

Although, I agree with the basic sentiment. I'm just not sure how far you want to take this technocratic ideal >.>

14240
Serious / British opinion poll
« on: August 23, 2014, 03:56:46 PM »
Guess the order of the public's voting intentions!

4.
Spoiler
Liberal Democrats - 8% (-1).

3.
Spoiler
UKIP - 18% (+1)

2.
Spoiler
Conservatives - 32% (+1)

1.
Spoiler
Labour - 34% (nc)

Overall, I'm quite optimistic about that.
Spoiler
If nothing changes, we'll have another hung parliament and might see a Tory-Ukip coalition.

14241
Serious / Re: Leading Scottish intellectual supports Yes Campaign
« on: August 23, 2014, 03:40:27 PM »
> Scots complain about Opresshun
> mfw it was the Scottish who conquered England and not the other way around.
>tfw we still came out on top.

14242
Serious / Re: Wow, my respect for Recon just tanked (Ferguson shooting)
« on: August 23, 2014, 03:39:26 PM »
Fascism comes in all shapes, sizes, and colors my friend.

Churchill did say "The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascists." Identifying as a libertarian is close enough for Kinder.

14243
Serious / Re: Wow, my respect for Recon just tanked (Ferguson shooting)
« on: August 23, 2014, 03:17:11 PM »
The shittiest people are the ones who are assholes to each other over political opinions. You don't have to agree with Recon, but to dislike him because you don't agree with him is pretty low. You have to be under some pretty strong political indoctrination to really make it your priority to hate people with different opinions.
Unless they're fascists/Nazis.

They suck.

14244
nah
i kno w0t u look like anyway

ur in my dreems

14245
I've explained to you before, the "militarization" of police isn't bad. We live in a new age where serious threats are being made constantly and foreign groups are trying to cause harm to the nation.
Whatever little respect I had for you has now just disappeared.

I hope you never get a position of authority, you fascist scumbag.

14246
Serious / Re: More fearmongering from the pro-exit crowd
« on: August 23, 2014, 03:11:59 PM »
Over some issues, yes. But generally I'd like to see the United States of Europe someday >.>
I quite like their technocratic approach to a lot of issues and whilst it might seem like pointless and silly meddling it generally has a point and purpose. Like outlawing certain lightbulbs, vacuum cleaners and setting green energy targets etc.

I'm not of the mind that we should let the planet get run into the ground and then expect the free market to fix it for profit.

You could draw up a long list of disasters and problems caused by "technocrats".

14247
Your context of speech says otherwise. When you speak about an organization or group, then you're talking about everybody affiliated with it. Don't want people to think that? Say something like "what the fuck is wrong with certain cops in the U.S?"
Holy shit, I literally just gave you a paragraph and the answer is still the same. This reminds me of the time you jumped on Commissar for saying something like a "liberal interpretation of the Constitution" and you immediately went into political-Liberal bashing mode.

Jesus Christ, get over yourself.

14248
"What the fuck is wrong with the police in the U.S.?"

Yeah, you did. You said "the police" meaning all policeFact remains that the actions of a few don't represent all
Well, no it doesn't. You could only reach that conclusion with any confidence by being a pedantic piece of shit and, even then, you're still wrong. If I say "what the fuck is wrong with ASDA", I'm not condemning every single employee. There could be something wrong with structure, management, perception, general ethics et cetera, with a relationship which can be mapped inversely by number of individuals and influence.

I'm not even beginning to claim that every single copper is corrupt. Please thing before you speak.

14249
The Flood / Re: tfw you have 1889 unread Emails
« on: August 23, 2014, 01:31:20 PM »
Oh shit, I need to check my emails.

14250
So you're telling me the action of ONE police officer means all 764,999 of officers in the U.S are also bad? Sorry buddy, but there will ALWAYS be a bad apple out of an entire picking. Stop acting like Kiyo
Well, first of all, I didn't say that.

Second of all, no it wasn't just one police officer.

Pages: 1 ... 473474475 476477 ... 502