This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - More Than Mortal
Pages: 1 ... 441442443 444445 ... 502
13261
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:59:13 PM »
Goddamnit Dustin, you need to shut the fuck up.
13262
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:11:32 PM »
My .7" in your grandma's pelvis.
lol
umm... not even a whole inch, eh?
Don't be silly. I'm using ft. and inches.
13263
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:09:07 PM »
My .7" in your grandma's pelvis.
13264
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:08:10 PM »
Btw, reported for harassment.
From the guy who accused the forum of defending paedophiles.
13265
« on: September 13, 2014, 07:04:29 PM »
It feels good to not be at the centre of forum drama.
13266
« on: September 13, 2014, 06:58:24 PM »
Brociopath hates me.
Who doesn't?
13267
« on: September 13, 2014, 06:54:12 PM »
Huh. I thought it was because people attack perceived weakness out of an animal instinct for survival and betterment of the species.
You're giving people way too much credit. We're just sadistic.
13268
« on: September 13, 2014, 06:41:43 PM »
Too many lefties for me.
This. Fucking commies.
13269
« on: September 13, 2014, 06:40:47 PM »
I knew what it'd be.
And I still clicked it.
13270
« on: September 13, 2014, 06:26:41 PM »
13271
« on: September 13, 2014, 06:00:44 PM »
So?
13272
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:51:05 PM »
Oh my god just fucking deploy 50,000 troops and napalm these fucking monkeys.
I fucking laughed.
13273
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:49:56 PM »
I cry evrytiem ;-;
But seriously, don't sweat it. I'll take your word on it, who was the OP? or who posted it?
Ms Math. I wouldn't take anybody else's word for it. I spoke with him about it in a thread a little, too.
13274
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:48:17 PM »
This is the way the world ends.
Not with a bang, but a whimper.
13275
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:45:56 PM »
My Results:
Suck my dick you fascist commie faggots
>mfw left wing 
13276
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:43:40 PM »
You could say the same for any opinion poll out there, even scientific, that people are just making shit up and lying about their opinion. It's a moot point and it doesn't mean much in a practical way of trying to understand things.
Yes, but Dustin. This is a poll to an anonymous community (don't you dare deny the psychological importance of that) which largely doesn't like you/fucks with you/is tired of your shit. I'm not going to take the five people who voted for those options seriously (I'm one of them), and neither should you. Especially since you failed to define whether "okay" meant in a legal or moral sense or whether it was consensual, and what constitutes a significant decrease in the AoC and who qualifies as an older person. The problem isn't polls, it's the shitty quality of yours and the nature of your answers.
13277
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:36:27 PM »
@Meta
Link?
Fuck off. I'm not going to find which of my accounts are in Sec7, sign in and then try and find a thread I found months ago.
13278
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:34:55 PM »
I'm not making a claim here. I said twice in this thread already that I made the poll to figure out what the forum really believed on the subject, nothing more and nothing less.
Fucking what? The claim you're making is that the poll is truly representative of what we "really believe".
13279
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:34:12 PM »
I'm really going to believe that I'm overreacting when it seems as if everyone on this forum is defending those who want to exploit children. My only fault is that I've gone to lengths to change those opinions rather than just sit back and not care. But I still don't understand why people who don't agree with exploiting children are defending those that do agree with it. It boggles my mind.
Take a step back. Breathe. Sit down for this one. We aren't doing that.Criticising you for being an utter bumblefuck about the issue isn't the same as defending the exploitation of children. Which, by the way, anime patently is not. Hell, two Dutch sexologists have called for the legalisation of virtual child pornography on the basis it could help paedophilic urges, and you think the people who post loli images, support lowering the AoC, and those who defend them are bad on the grounds that this somehow supports child exploitation? Not to mention, child molestation=/=paedophilia. Child molesters are almost guaranteed to be psychopaths, which is a mental health issue that stretches way beyond the confines of the things we're considering.
13280
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:30:14 PM »
Publicly outing someone without their permission is the worst thing you can do to someone, and it makes you a pretty big jackass for it. If you really do like this person this is definitely not the way to do things. All you're looking for is ways to inspire hatred here.
"Publicly outing" isn't possible when the information is public and is potentially available to anybody who is browsing the Internet.
It actually wasn't. Math only told a few people some of which were in Sapphire, but Dustin decided to spill the beans a couple months ago.
I found it in Sec7.
13281
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:25:20 PM »
See my final post, your bait lost it's appeal.
You almost lured me back in with the reputation bit, but in the words of Tarantino 'I'm not biting'.
It's been fun in the loosest sense of the word.
Then I guess I will keep you muted now if to you [url]I'm a troll for being concerned with the exploitation of children[/u]. I'm sure you don't actually think that, but you have a reputation you need to care about.
Why are you completely incapable of grasping this? Over the past few weeks you've spewed forth all manner of utter bullshit. And this one originally started with you blowing something way out of proportion. You're making this into a huge deal, when, evidently, the exploitation of children isn't at all, to even a minimal fucking degree, an issue to be concerned about on a fucking off-site forum of a video-game developer. Just think about the fucking lunacy at the bedrock of this. I can understand not wanting children to be exploited or molested, really, I can. That's not our problem here. Our problem is the insufferable way in which you approach this, the unbearable sanctimony and the absolutely ridiculous levels of naysaying you're performing against this forum, as if you're the only bastion of what's good and proper here. Most of us are tired of it. So, really, if there's a massive moral dilemma in this forum that, for some fucking reason, you perceive and it's giving you trouble. Then do everybody a favour and fuck off.
13282
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:15:22 PM »
You're just being ridiculous now and asking me to do something you know I can't do.
No, Dustin. The ridiculous thing here is your initial assumption that the results of this poll would be even remotely reliable.
13283
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:09:19 PM »
Whats SJW stand for?
Social Justice Warrior. It's a pejorative for people who are overly concerned with social justice to the point of ridiculousness. See: people on tumblr who talk about cultural appropriation, fat acceptance, white/male privilege and triggers.
13284
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:06:25 PM »
So, why are you assuming the answers to the poll are serious?
A moot question, really. Mostly because people have been arguing about those opinions in past threads.
I agree, the question really is moot. Now, give a proper reason for assuming the five people who answered with the undesirable options are absolutely truthful.
13285
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:02:37 PM »
So, why are you assuming the answers to the poll are serious?
13286
« on: September 13, 2014, 05:01:49 PM »
I said it a million times, literally. Fuck me.
13287
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:51:43 PM »
A bit more centrist than I expected really.
Oh Mr P. That's the dumbest thing you've ever done.
13288
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:41:28 PM »
having to pay taxes
It would make no sense to have them pay tax.
If they weren't kept as high and mighty rulers we wouldn't need taxes to pay for their protection, or whatever else it goes towards. Then a percentage of their revenue still generated from tourism can be siphoned off to go to something else, or their vast amount of totally private properties (which I hardly believe are all occupied) can be opened as attractions, generating further profit.
They give the U.K. government more revenue from their lands than their salary costs the taxpayer.
13289
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:37:30 PM »
yeah they're fucking expensive
What?
The revenue from their lands is greater than their salary.
Not counting tourism benefits.
Is there an estimated figure of the revenue they bring in?
I remember a figure from 2009-2010 that including their yearly 37million they ended up costing around 200 million. I don't know much about the matter but surely 200million is extreme?
13290
« on: September 13, 2014, 04:35:42 PM »
having to pay taxes
It would make no sense to have them pay tax.
Pages: 1 ... 441442443 444445 ... 502
|
Show Posts
