11581
The Flood / Re: It's time I departed the Flood
« on: October 28, 2014, 06:47:45 PM »
by fag0t
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 11582
Serious / Re: YOU'RE NOT A LIBERAL« on: October 28, 2014, 06:46:51 PM »
I'm still waiting for him to demonstrate how China is communist by either Marx and Engel's measures or by the Oxford English Dictionary's.
He's failed on both counts, thus far. 11583
The Flood / Re: Today, I fulfilled a dream, while fulfilling a dream.« on: October 28, 2014, 06:45:38 PM »
Fuck you, you piece of shit.
You should've gifted the kid your car. You're rich enough to afford another. WHY AREN'T YOU PAYING 80pc INCOME TAX? 11584
Serious / Re: YOU'RE NOT A LIBERAL« on: October 28, 2014, 06:41:52 PM »You linked me to a forum post by a user named SoulSkill.Which follows quite easily to this: http://www.technologyreview.com/view/519241/report-suggests-nearly-half-of-us-jobs-are-vulnerable-to-computerization/ 11585
The Flood / Re: Snapchat« on: October 28, 2014, 06:40:17 PM »
RESPOND YOU CUNT, I KNOW YOU OPENED IT THREE MINUTES AGO
11586
The Flood / Re: Why not make 2 different "Flood" forums« on: October 28, 2014, 06:39:46 PM »
This fucking thread is so fucking.
11588
The Flood / Re: Snapchat« on: October 28, 2014, 06:33:02 PM »
Added Dustin and Officer Faglicker.
11589
Serious / Re: Pope Francis declares evolution and Big Bang theory are right« on: October 28, 2014, 06:28:49 PM »If you accept it, then why make outlandish statements as such that make contradictions?So, let me get this straight. You think that me claiming Catholicism cannot own religious findings as its own, and saying that being religious doesn't command a higher respect in the field of science, is equal to em saying that religious people and institutions haven't played a significant role in scientific advancement? Yeah, you aren't reading me correctly. Hell, I even quite explicitly stated: Quote I'm not in any way implying that devout religious people can't contribute to science, or otherwise shouldn't[.] And: Quote religion has been inexorably intertwined with massive cultural leaps throughout 11590
Serious / Re: YOU'RE NOT A LIBERAL« on: October 28, 2014, 06:22:06 PM »Here's the correct definition from the Oxford dictionarySee, the reason I used that definition was because it cited the literature of Friedrich Engels. Quote Finally, when all capital, all production, all exchange have been brought together in the hands of the nation, private property will disappear of its own accord, money will become superfluous, and production will so expand and man so change that society will be able to slough off whatever of its old economic habits may remain. However, sticking with your own definition, it'd be great if you should show me exactly how the Chinese class war has succeeded, how all property is publicly owned (I'd say the government doesn't necessarily count, but I don't even need that premise) and how the economy is structured around production for use. I'll save you the fucking time: none of that is the case. Stop being so facile. Also, as an aside, the Oxford English Dictionary is surprisingly wrong on this front. People are paid in Communism because their is no money, and it's based on the principles of a gift economy. 11591
The Flood / Re: Snapchat« on: October 28, 2014, 06:18:33 PM »
Add me and send dickpics.
AshtonW97. 11592
The Flood / MMMMM, YOU TOUCH MY TRALALA« on: October 28, 2014, 06:17:24 PM »
MY DING DING DONG
YouTube 11593
Serious / Re: Pope Francis declares evolution and Big Bang theory are right« on: October 28, 2014, 06:11:23 PM »Please, keep denying that religion has been a major player in scientific advancementExcept I didn't deny that. I quite implicitly accepted it in my premise. You're either not reading what I've said, or intentionally being moronic. 11594
Serious / Re: YOU'RE NOT A LIBERAL« on: October 28, 2014, 06:09:45 PM »I've posted a definition of Communism for you before, and in this thread. China aren't communist. They don't even call themselves communist, they try to pass themselves off as market socialist, which still isn't true. They are, as I've said, state capitalist.So you attempt to ignoring the facts? Because the facts is that China is communistChina is communist.Blatantly ignoring facts is more retarded than anything Icy's done. To think of China as communist isn't just to believe what the Chinese government tells you - which is intellectually arresting in the first place - but to assume that the name of the governing, corrupt party somehow translates into the actual socioeconomic system. 11595
Serious / Re: Germany is building "smart factories", which need no human workers« on: October 28, 2014, 06:07:41 PM »that research can't automate.The grunt work of research - I'm thinking pharmacology and law - is already automated. The point is that automated labour can push the professions over too. 11596
Serious / Re: YOU'RE NOT A LIBERAL« on: October 28, 2014, 06:03:24 PM »China is communist.Blatantly ignoring facts is more retarded than anything Icy's done. 11597
Serious / Re: Germany is building "smart factories", which need no human workers« on: October 28, 2014, 06:00:21 PM »The process of eliminating the societal need of a work force will probably take a thousand years, maybe a few hundred at best.m80 45% of jobs are at risk of automation over the next 2-3 decades. The unemployment rate during the Great Depression was 25%. This is something we will witness within our lifetimes. It might not totally complete itself, but we'll definitely be seeing at minimum it gain momentum. 11598
Serious / Germany is building "smart factories", which need no human workers« on: October 28, 2014, 05:55:08 PM »
From MarketWatch.
Quote AMBERG, Germany--The next front in Germany's effort to keep up with the digital revolution lies in a factory in this sleepy industrial town. We truly are on the cusp of something fundamental, great and beautiful. 11599
The Flood / Re: Sep7agon« on: October 28, 2014, 04:51:50 PM »
Bill Maher's just a pretentious fucking douchebag.
11600
Serious / Re: War on terror? or war on Muslims?« on: October 28, 2014, 04:47:45 PM »I would just say it's a war for stable oil prices.That doesn't make sense, though. The CCASG, which is unfortunately falling apart at the moment, has done the most for stable oil prices in recent history. However, is the desire for stable oil prices that reprehensible in the first place? 11601
Serious / Re: Discussion on Deism (not religion)« on: October 28, 2014, 04:45:21 PM »It's still an unnecessary regression.As an origins hypothesis it essentially solves nothing. Because instead of asking where the universe came from you're forced to ask where the clockmaker came from.But if it's supernatural you don't really necessarily have to answer where it came from, considering it's supernatural. Maybe the laws of physics behave differently in a completely void Universe, and maybe that just might mean creating something from nothing. Especially considered your definition as one of an "act" as opposed to a "thing", which doesn't pre-suppose agency. By this logic, whatever caused the initial inflation of the Universe is God, and that is a definition so diluted of meaning as to be inconsequential. 11602
The Flood / Re: Sep7agon« on: October 28, 2014, 04:43:26 PM »He's just so fucking uninteresting and unintelligent.Ugh, I hate Bill Maher.How come? 11603
Serious / Re: Discussion on Deism (not religion)« on: October 28, 2014, 04:42:29 PM »Well yes.Deism is much more intellectually respectable than theism when it comes to a cosmological playing field. However, as Laplace said to Napoleon: "I had no need of that hypothesis."I thought you were agnostic though? All agnostics are atheists unless qualified with something else, and all reasonable atheists are agnostics. 11604
The Flood / Re: What the fuck has happened to Serious?« on: October 28, 2014, 04:36:25 PM »I'm really not mad though, since you're all essentially proving the point.But we aren't in Serious. 11605
Serious / Re: Discussion on Deism (not religion)« on: October 28, 2014, 04:34:59 PM »
Deism is much more intellectually respectable than theism when it comes to a cosmological playing field. However, as Laplace said to Napoleon: "I had no need of that hypothesis."
11606
Serious / Re: War on terror? or war on Muslims?« on: October 28, 2014, 04:32:32 PM »
It's a war on Islam, as it should be.
If Muslims want to live here, and conform to our liberal system of the rule of law and tolerance of others' rights - as they haven't done in great enough numbers - I'm more than happy for them to do that. It's great; multiculturalism is socially beautiful. I will not, however, bend my knee to barbarism and those who would impose upon me their medieval ethics and laws. 11607
Serious / Re: Would you like to live in the Republic of Meta?« on: October 28, 2014, 04:23:16 PM »Wut bout women? Brutally oppressed. As they should be. 11608
Serious / Re: Would you like to live in the Republic of Meta?« on: October 28, 2014, 04:20:46 PM »Manipulating information from Minipax?Alright.Are we at war with Eastasia or Eurasia?Eurasia. Off to a labour camp, prole! 11609
Serious / Re: Would you like to live in the Republic of Meta?« on: October 28, 2014, 04:15:43 PM »Are we at war with Eastasia or Eurasia?Eastasia. |