11251
Serious / Re: The highs and lows of different presidents
« on: November 06, 2014, 04:03:39 PM »*sips sweet tea*It's on the same level as saying the arming of Slobodan Milosevic would be worse than arming Hitler.
Nice opinion
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 11251
Serious / Re: The highs and lows of different presidents« on: November 06, 2014, 04:03:39 PM »*sips sweet tea*It's on the same level as saying the arming of Slobodan Milosevic would be worse than arming Hitler. 11252
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 04:02:24 PM »virtue of being the constitutionWhich the amendment process shows to be self-evidently false. The fact that you'd place such stock in a document, regardless of what it says, says a lot about you. I wouldn't want you to be a citizen of an Orwellian State. 11253
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 04:00:17 PM »Oh my God, stop dodging the question.So what you're saying is it is right because you agree with it.It's right because it is right Is it right by virtue of being the constitution, or is it right because of its contents? 11254
Serious / Re: The highs and lows of different presidents« on: November 06, 2014, 03:57:36 PM ». . .More so then arming Syrian rebels who have ties with extremist groupsIraq was friendly to the U.S government during that time, especially since the Iran-Iraq War had post-revolutionary Iran fighting.I don't think that excuses arming Hussein. No. No it isn't. If you think arming an Islamofascist, criminal psychopath is equal to arming a group of extremist rebels you really need to re-evaluate your priorities. 11255
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:53:21 PM »That wasn't what I asked.Nope. Free speech, privacy, self-defense, fair trial, etc is far from wrong. The U.K can learn a thing or two from the U.SThe Constitution is the highest law of the land. Ignoring that is no different than Congress enforcing laws, despite not their role to do soHas it ever occurred that the law of the land, regardless of its altitude, could be wrong? You either think the Constitution is important because it is the constitution, or because the contents of the Constitution are agreeable. It's either axiomatically right, or right because it includes right things. So which? Also, what does that have to do with anything? 11256
Serious / Re: The highs and lows of different presidents« on: November 06, 2014, 03:51:55 PM »Iraq was friendly to the U.S government during that time, especially since the Iran-Iraq War had post-revolutionary Iran fighting.I don't think that excuses arming Hussein. 11257
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:50:08 PM »The Constitution is the highest law of the land. Ignoring that is no different than Congress enforcing laws, despite not their role to do soHas it ever occurred that the law of the land, regardless of its altitude, could be wrong? 11258
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:46:22 PM »Except I'm not refusing to understand. Comparing something in the Constitution to something not is not even a logical concept.It's like you think the Constitution is infallible, by virtue of being the constitution. 11259
The Flood / Re: Stupid shit you did as a child« on: November 06, 2014, 03:39:40 PM »
I still do stupid shit now.
11260
The Flood / Re: Hey Brits« on: November 06, 2014, 03:33:48 PM »
I'm fairly certain I'm the only guy here who uses pc instead of %.
11261
Serious / Re: The highs and lows of different presidents« on: November 06, 2014, 03:32:19 PM »For Reagan, you forgot to add the fact he armed and supplied our enemieslolno ohai 11262
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:29:43 PM »>disregarding everything i saidWhy are you refusing to understand that people can prioritise things differently to you? Max might rank science-denial up there with Constitution-denial. 11263
Serious / Re: The highs and lows of different presidents« on: November 06, 2014, 03:20:40 PM »Whoooaaaa there Meta, you're missing a whole lot of lows with Reagan.Just keeping it balanced. 11264
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:19:41 PM »Except Door never stated Constitutionalism isn't assumedExcept he quite implicitly did when he said this person wants a total ban on guns. You still haven't given a clear answer. Would you, or would you not, support an individual who agreed with absolutely everything you say except on the issue of guns, wherein they want a total ban? 11265
Serious / Re: The highs and lows of different presidents« on: November 06, 2014, 03:18:19 PM »No mention of Truman? I mean come on he has the record of high and low.Don't know enough about him. 11266
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:17:06 PM »America has a Constitution that guarantees gun ownership Constitutionalism isn't assumed. The point isn't whether or not they end up getting into office, it's about this person's opinions. Let's assume they aren't even running for office. 11267
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:16:00 PM »Natural selection is in many parts survival of the fittest. My example perfectly displayed such. And evolution is divided between mico and macro. We have not observed macro, but have observed micro which is known as adaptation; take the moths in Britain that changed.The fact you're taking biology doesn't count for shit when micro- and macro-evolution are identical processes looked at from a different temporal frame. So, unless you want to try and pedal the idea that the Earth is 10,000 years old, there's really nothing more I have to say considering your astounding deficit in this area. 11268
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:11:51 PM »>mfw gun ownership is a constitutional rightYou're either dodging the question or misunderstanding him. Constitutionalism isn't assumed. Answer the question properly. 11269
Serious / Re: The highs and lows of different presidents« on: November 06, 2014, 03:10:54 PM »I'm surprised you consider the New Deal to be good economic policy.It's. . . It's acceptable. It's better than the assumed counterfactual of inaction. I'd stop short of explicitly calling it "good". 11270
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 03:05:09 PM »
You have got natural selection and evolution exactly backwards.
We can, and have, observed alterations and genetic similarities between species. We have observed evolution which led us to develop the theory of natural selection. What you're talking about is just survival of the fittest, which is facile. There'd be no point to natural selection if it didn't facilitate the process of evolution. By accepting natural selection, that is where you admit all species are essentially related to each other (which is pretty much beyond doubt). 11271
Serious / The highs and lows of different presidents« on: November 06, 2014, 03:01:50 PM »
While we all have a vague conception of the quality of most presidents, almost all have exceptionally good and exceptionally bad things about their term(s). So, pick a few presidents and then one or two of the best and worst things about their presidency.
FDR The Good: - Kept America afloat, if not prosperous with the New Deal. - Was incredibly charismatic and was able to lead the American people. The Bad: - Internment of Japanese-Americans at the beginning of the War. - The Roosevelt Recession of 1937, chiefly as a result of monetary tightening and slashed fiscalism. LBJ The Good: - LBJ's Great Society. The Bad: - Gulf of Tonkin Nixon The Good: - Ended the draft - Ending segregation The Bad: - Affirmative Action - Watergate Reagan The Good: - Reduced inflation to 4.4pc - Reduced federal income taxes The Bad: - Took advice from an astrologer - War on Drugs Bill Clinton The Good: - Good economic growth - Free trade The Bad: - Bombing pharmaceutical companies in Sudan. - Doing nothing about the genocide in Rwanda. Dubya The Good: - Iraq The Bad: - Everything else 11272
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 02:45:21 PM »First off, evolution is the observation; natural selection is the theory.Care to explain what is funny? Look up evolution; it's a theory. Somebody needs to take science again it seemsExcept evolution is a theory, not a factLOL Secondly, do you even know what a theory is? You're treating it as a synonym for "hypothesis". The theory of evolution via natural selection is about as solid as you'll find. 11273
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 02:41:16 PM »Except evolution is a theory, not a factLOL 11274
Serious / Re: What if there was indisputable proof that God exists/doesn't exist?« on: November 06, 2014, 02:40:00 PM »
I'd accept his existence, but I wouldn't worship him.
11275
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 02:07:52 PM »It's certainly not as important with actors, and even less so with musicians (unless they're religious).It changes my view of them, but I can certainly still enjoy their work.Mostly the same for me. I think it's dumb that Jason Lee is a big scientologist, but it doesn't stop me from loving My Name is Earl. The only real issue I have with a public figure's political views is when they're writers or journalists. 11276
Serious / Re: Do you care about beliefs of actors/musicians/etc that you like?« on: November 06, 2014, 02:03:41 PM »
It changes my view of them, but I can certainly still enjoy their work.
11277
Serious / Re: The only way to remove ideology from politics is to remove democracy« on: November 06, 2014, 09:43:59 AM »
I can't tell if you're serious.
You must be able to see the danger in allowing the government to choose who can or cannot vote beyond the imprisoned and legitimately insane. Not to mention, the concept of "good" and "bad" policies is often negligible, since differing values often precede conclusions. Most Republicans don't want environmental legislation because of its potential impact on the economy, not because they think eco-fascists are trying to impose a communist regime. Not to mention, most othet examples aren't as clear cut, especially when it comes to economics. Do we rule out the people who want a gold standard, or a gift society, considering such ideas are pretty bankrupt in intellectual circles? What about people who define fairness as proportionality instead of equality? Or those who value tradition over liberty? 11278
Serious / Re: I can feel myself getting worse, and more violently-minded« on: November 05, 2014, 04:15:53 PM »
I'll PM you, man.
11279
The Flood / Why have the mods turned into Nazis?« on: November 05, 2014, 03:50:45 PM »
Like, seriously?
11280
The Flood / Re: Personal statements suck« on: November 05, 2014, 03:30:34 PM »the other 2 wait until the deadline before choosing3/5 offers, nigga.what? why only 3/5? you had good predicted grades from what I can remember. |