This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - More Than Mortal
Pages: 1 ... 365366367 368369 ... 502
10981
« on: November 16, 2014, 02:27:10 PM »
why should he be killed because others that hold ideals like him are a threat?
Threatening ideals + threatening past behaviour = a threat.
By that logic I should be threatened by people on the internet.
Except there's a difference between somebody advocating higher taxes and then fucking beheading somebody for disagreeing.
10982
« on: November 16, 2014, 02:23:24 PM »
why should he be killed because others that hold ideals like him are a threat?
Threatening ideals + threatening past behaviour = a threat.
10983
« on: November 16, 2014, 02:15:44 PM »
Genuinely surprised that Kinder and Assassin don't support the murder of Jihadi john
when others lives aren't at risk.
Are you fucking serious?
10984
« on: November 16, 2014, 02:12:05 PM »
"Let's show them that killing people is wrong by killing people!"
There's punishment, and then there's war. One is for the stability of civilisation, and the other is for its very foundations.
10985
« on: November 16, 2014, 01:45:16 PM »
A person should NEVER be killed or given a sentence without first be given a fair trial.
Lol, good luck being a cop when some coked-up sociopath is gunning for you with a butcher's knife.
Entirely different scenario
Well I was playing on the fact that you explicitly said never. You obviously believe there are some situations in which it is acceptable to kill a person without a trial.
10986
« on: November 16, 2014, 01:41:55 PM »
based puten
10987
« on: November 16, 2014, 01:41:32 PM »
A person should NEVER be killed or given a sentence without first be given a fair trial.
Lol, good luck being a cop when some coked-up sociopath is gunning for you with a butcher's knife.
10988
« on: November 16, 2014, 01:13:29 PM »
I was too vague, to be honest. I should've asked if Lutherans are the most common Protestants in America. We really don't discriminate between the different sects here in England, seeing as we have a national church.
10989
« on: November 16, 2014, 01:06:59 PM »
Non-denominational Christian that highly respects Judaism and especially Islam
10990
« on: November 16, 2014, 12:59:32 PM »
certain islamophobic members .
I'm going on record to say I equally disagree with Kosher slaughter, and also think it should be abolished.
I don't see why the bitchers just don't label meat as halal and kosher anyway, I doubt any of the wankers would be able to taste the difference.
I think the issue is one of animal welfare, not of taste. . .
Which is the point I was making -_-, killing an animal in a ritualistic manner doesn't make it taste any better or worse, so why put the animal through it.
Oh. >.> <.< In that case I agree.
10991
« on: November 16, 2014, 12:55:30 PM »
certain islamophobic members .
I'm going on record to say I equally disagree with Kosher slaughter, and also think it should be abolished.
I don't see why the bitchers just don't label meat as halal and kosher anyway, I doubt any of the wankers would be able to taste the difference.
I think the issue is one of animal welfare, not of taste. . .
10992
« on: November 16, 2014, 12:49:11 PM »
certain islamophobic members .
I'm going on record to say I equally disagree with Kosher slaughter, and also think it should be abolished.
10993
« on: November 16, 2014, 12:35:35 PM »
From the Independent.David Cameron wants Jihadi John, the Isis terrorist who has beheaded two British and two American hostages, to "face justice" for his crimes rather than be killed.
The Isis (also known as Islamic State) militant, who is British, was reportedly wounded in a US-led air strikes carried out last Saturday. It is believed he was taken to hospital after the attack in Western Iraq.
Asked at the end of the G20 Leaders Summit in Brisbane whether he hoped Jihadi John, who is the masked executioner in the beheading videos filmed by the Islamic state as warnings to the West might actually be dead, Mr Cameron said: "I want Jihadi John to face justice for the appalling acts carried out in Syria.”
However, he added that the air strike was a warning to would-be British terrorists of their likely ultimate fate if they join Islamic State: "If people travel to Syria or Iraq in order to conduct terror operations against British people, British citizens, then they are putting themselves in harm's way." It's a shame he didn't die. May as well make a spectacle of him if we catch him alive, though.
10994
« on: November 16, 2014, 11:16:59 AM »
That mean you're coming to murica if you ahve to go abroad?
Fuck yeah, baby.
10995
« on: November 15, 2014, 06:38:52 PM »
PM?
Or facebook.
Whichever's easiest.
Facebook is probably easier, I'm just going to grab my breakfast and some tea and then we can start >.>
>breakfast at dinner time
Fucking bongs
It gets worse when you realise it's 40 minutes past midnight, here. I'm having soup with bread.
10996
« on: November 15, 2014, 06:23:49 PM »
PM?
Or facebook. Whichever's easiest.
10997
« on: November 15, 2014, 06:15:53 PM »
I couldn't really tell without going over a whole bunch of questions with ya, and I don't know if the mains are the most appropriate place for that >.>
Fuck, I don't mind. If you want to, that is. I ain't getting to sleep any time soon >.>
10998
« on: November 15, 2014, 06:10:13 PM »
All I can really think of is that you're probably already depressed and music just brings it out.
Kupo hit the nail on the head.
Wouldn't I know if I were perpetually depressed?
10999
« on: November 15, 2014, 05:17:36 PM »
Also, string theory is dumb.
wat
11000
« on: November 15, 2014, 04:46:24 PM »
That takes away all the fun.
10/10
11001
« on: November 15, 2014, 04:44:03 PM »
Sometimes I get new information when I play devil's advocate
Is it really worth it, though? You could just make a thread saying you're going to argue for a position while making it explicitly clear you aren't actually espousing that position, and still get the same results without people thinking you're an idiot.
11002
« on: November 15, 2014, 04:38:22 PM »
I just don't have the energy to keep on when I know you know I'm not being serious.
I found it funny, at first, but now it's just so fucking boring. You bore me, Dustin. And it's a shame, because I like you. I hope you don't care, because that'd be exactly my response, but for fuck's sake I think you should know you're just making yourself look like a massive tool. 
11003
« on: November 15, 2014, 04:33:19 PM »
I just find it convenient that everything we can scientifically prove about the nature of God happens to be written in the Bible.
So, you believe that something as supernatural and transcendent as God can be accurately described in a book with its roots in iron-age Palestine, and that this book's claims, with all its contradictions, can be scientifically verified? Or, are you saying that what you think happens to be necessary for a God is in the Bible, and the rest of what the Bible says and claims is just fluff?
11004
« on: November 15, 2014, 04:27:34 PM »
I love how you cannot even confront my argument just give throw around someone else's opinion. I've laid it out plain and clear: either you doubt science and therefore God, or you trust science and therefore God.
Well now you're just being an idiot. Let me ask, when you say "God", are you talking deistically or theistically?
11005
« on: November 15, 2014, 04:25:07 PM »
its existential nihilism I'd dispute that, to be honest. It's a subtle difference, but existentialism and nihilism differ, distinctly, in the fact that the latter claims there is no meaning to create. Which is why I'd hesitate to call "existential nihilism" of your order any meaningful (pun intended) form of nihilism. But, hey, that's only my take.
11006
« on: November 15, 2014, 04:22:12 PM »
And so your solution is to give yourself a deity so diluted of religious meaning that it should quite literally be offensive to use the term God? If you want to go the deistic route, and posit some supernatural beginning for the world, then great I'm willing to respect that. However, you should know that the ontological argument hasn't been espoused for centuries and even it's most recent iterations are astoundingly weak. Sticking with your deistic idea, however, you have all your work cut out for you to justify a personal, moralistic and worship-worthy deity.
11007
« on: November 15, 2014, 04:12:49 PM »
11008
« on: November 15, 2014, 04:10:31 PM »
The ideas you're looking for are panentheism and existentialism, respectively. Not deism and nihilism.
11009
« on: November 15, 2014, 04:07:33 PM »
I'm Lutheran.
Is that the yank work for Protestant?
11010
« on: November 15, 2014, 03:03:22 PM »
Or we could just not have a new religion.
Pages: 1 ... 365366367 368369 ... 502
|
Show Posts