10621
Serious / Re: What are your "hot-button" issues?
« on: November 26, 2014, 12:34:17 PM »How mussies are supposedly respectable. Especially after they fucked over one of the best achieved peoples on the planet.'Splain?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 10621
Serious / Re: What are your "hot-button" issues?« on: November 26, 2014, 12:34:17 PM »How mussies are supposedly respectable. Especially after they fucked over one of the best achieved peoples on the planet.'Splain? 10622
Serious / Re: The Taliban's Psychiatrist [BBC]« on: November 26, 2014, 12:15:13 PM »I'm not entirely sure how one would get epilepsy from beheading people >_>Physical trauma to the head can cause epilepsy. More a side-effect of warfare than beheading people specifically; it's actually quite a big problem for our own military. 10623
Serious / Re: The Taliban's Psychiatrist [BBC]« on: November 26, 2014, 12:02:45 PM »
I want the 68pc of British Muslims who oppose freedom of speech to go to Iraq and Syria. They should fight for ISIS. They should behead innocents, murder children and proclaim genocide against the Jews. And those that aren't completely psychopathic should develop depression, PTSD, epilepsy and anxiety. They should suffer.
Then, and only then, will they realise the true extent of the suffering their despicable ideology causes. 10624
Serious / What are your "hot-button" issues?« on: November 26, 2014, 11:49:42 AM »Ever since Theresa May announced the U.K.'s new anti-terrorism bill, I've been in a running debate with one of my friends regarding liberty vs. security. He commented today on how much more "conservative" and "patriotic" I'd become in response to May's bill, and I'll admit I've certainly been pushed into a more libertarian and hawkish attitude. So, essentially, are there any hot button issues that turn you into an ideologue? If so, what are they? 10625
Serious / Re: Is capitalism exploitative?« on: November 25, 2014, 03:34:22 PM »Economy is a tool; humans are exploitative.Certain systems, however, are more adept at facilitating exploitation. 10626
Serious / Re: Is capitalism exploitative?« on: November 25, 2014, 03:33:55 PM »Pure, unregulated capitalism - yes.I take a bit of a (pedantic) issue with the use of the term "unregulated". It seems to me that, so long as you have an effectual social safety net in place, then regulation isn't that important. Although, I doubt you were using the term "unregulated" in such a specific sense >.> 10627
Serious / Is capitalism exploitative?« on: November 25, 2014, 03:07:22 PM »
There are always numerous arguments in favour of this, and yet so few against for some reason.
I despise state socialism for its blatant and unapologetic paternalism, and yet left-libertarianism has lost none of this arrogant paternalism in its insistence on telling people they're being exploited and used. I think, so long as the potential employee isn't bargaining for the means of his survival, capitalism isn't exploitative. 10628
Serious / Re: I'm shamelessly advertising another (political) forum I use« on: November 25, 2014, 02:41:38 PM »Find me on the forum now ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)Easy. 10629
Serious / Re: I'm shamelessly advertising another (political) forum I use« on: November 25, 2014, 02:39:05 PM »Well, I found Meta.Oh fucken 'ell nigger you got me. 10630
Serious / Re: I'm shamelessly advertising another (political) forum I use« on: November 25, 2014, 02:34:41 PM »You know what's a joke? Sor- ![]() Sorry, wha- I CAN'T HEAR YOU, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SPEAK UP. 10631
Serious / Re: I'm shamelessly advertising another (political) forum I use« on: November 25, 2014, 02:31:25 PM »Exactly why would I benefit from joining?It was a joke, ese. 10632
Serious / Re: Question to determinists like Meta« on: November 25, 2014, 02:22:20 PM »Fatalism implies a complete lack of choice or influence in your environment. If you think that's qualitatively similar to determinism, then you don't understand determinism.Joke's on you, I really don't. you're just #rekin and #kekin today aren't you? 10633
Serious / Re: I'm shamelessly advertising another (political) forum I use« on: November 25, 2014, 02:21:33 PM »I keep trying to sign up and it won't let me.Must not like ancaps, then. 10634
Serious / Re: I'm shamelessly advertising another (political) forum I use« on: November 25, 2014, 02:20:25 PM »Excuse me?Yes dear? 10635
Serious / Re: Question to determinists like Meta« on: November 25, 2014, 02:19:51 PM »
Fatalism implies a complete lack of choice or influence in your environment. If you think that's qualitatively similar to determinism, then you don't understand determinism.
10636
Serious / Re: Russia has been financing right-wing parties in the EU« on: November 25, 2014, 01:01:13 PM »Truth be told, though, the US is probably doing the same thing throughout Europe.I thought the U.S. quite openly supported the E.U.? If there's any substantial funding going on, the Liberal Democrats should be the most popular party in my country >.> 10637
Serious / Re: Russia has been financing right-wing parties in the EU« on: November 25, 2014, 12:56:07 PM »THIS TOTALLY BLOWS MY MINDDon't mistake resigned discontent for surprise. 10638
Serious / Russia has been financing right-wing parties in the EU« on: November 25, 2014, 12:44:29 PM »
They're also all Eurosceptic.
Quote Marine Le Pen has admitted that her far-right Front National accepted money from a Russian bank, amid growing evidence that the Kremlin is backing anti-European parties across the continent. Jesus fucking Christ. 10639
Serious / I'm shamelessly advertising another (political) forum I use« on: November 25, 2014, 12:32:06 PM »
It's a U.K.-based forum for young(ish) people to debate politics, philosophy, economics and the like.
It has a fairly decent American population, with dedicated boards for different countries/regions. The discussion there is somewhat more challenging than the discussion here, and more thought-provoking. Basically, Kinder would definitely benefit from a visit. It'd be nice to grow the community there, too. It really is very diverse, ranging from Communists to Conservatives and Muslims to some guy with Richard Dawkins as his avatar. Just in case you need any more convincing, I've been PM'ing one of the mods and mentioned we're an offsite from B.net. His response? "I'm aware of how bad Bungie's site is." Bang on the money. Get your fucking sorry asses over here. 10640
Serious / Re: You know what's worse than a police state? A fucking nanny state« on: November 25, 2014, 12:03:01 PM »Why don't you just move to America? It's not perfect, but it's way better than England.Funny you should say that, but I've actually thought about it. I'm studying in America for a year during my undergraduates degree, too, which should prove interesting. Not sure how it aligns with my long-term interests, however. 10641
Serious / Re: You know what's worse than a police state? A fucking nanny state« on: November 25, 2014, 11:59:03 AM »That's ridiculous. I'd much rather live in a nanny state than a fucking fascism.I didn't say otherwise. I'm saying nanny states are just fucking pathetic. 10642
Serious / Re: You know what's worse than a police state? A fucking nanny state« on: November 25, 2014, 11:50:46 AM »Why would you want them as your avatar?Maybe I disagree with the assessment that they're stupid fucks? 10643
Serious / Re: You know what's worse than a police state? A fucking nanny state« on: November 25, 2014, 11:48:22 AM »Why do you always have some old person as your avatar? Should I know who these people are?The last one was Ben Bernanke. This one is Alan Greenspan. 10644
Serious / Re: You know what's worse than a police state? A fucking nanny state« on: November 25, 2014, 11:47:49 AM »Police states exist to enforce nanny states.In proper police states at least you can respect the fascist brutes doing the enforcing. Something about a man smashing my head in for inciting insurrection strikes me as a more respectable way of using one's time, when compared with stopping people for speeding on a bicycle in a park. 10645
Serious / You know what's worse than a police state? A fucking nanny state« on: November 25, 2014, 11:41:16 AM »
BBC presenter Jeremy Vine was stopping for going three times the speed limit. . .
At 16mph. On a bicycle. In a park. Fuck me. Meanwhile we have police commissioners telling us council tax needs to be hiked 25pc in order to properly fund the police force. 10646
Serious / Re: Should the constitution come before the democratic verdict?« on: November 25, 2014, 11:32:18 AM »
I'd hope the constitution prevailed.
10647
Serious / Re: Totally not an exaggerated hypothetical thread« on: November 25, 2014, 01:21:00 AM »
You're falling into the depths of Pyrrhonism, here. The only cure is to read some Hume.
10648
Serious / Re: I think it's time for another "controversial opinions" thread« on: November 24, 2014, 05:00:53 PM »How on earth do you separate political and personal opinions?ExplainI separate my personal opinions from my political/professional onesThat's the biggest load of fucking nonsense I've ever heard. 10649
Serious / Re: I think it's time for another "controversial opinions" thread« on: November 24, 2014, 04:55:57 PM »I separate my personal opinions from my political/professional onesThat's the biggest load of fucking nonsense I've ever heard. 10650
Serious / Re: I think it's time for another "controversial opinions" thread« on: November 24, 2014, 04:53:23 PM »This is an opinion thread, not a political platform threadThe amount of question dodging is ![]() |