Quote from: God on September 13, 2014, 08:06:45 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:01:26 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:59:51 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:49:52 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:48:14 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:44:45 PMexploitationAdults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.Some old man trying to get into a 14 year old's pants? Not really exploitation, but certainly creepy. Though that's just as creepy as if an old man is trying to have sex with an 18 year old, or a 16 year old.But a 16-18 year old dating a 14 year old? A teenager dating a teenager? No, the older kid shouldn't be branded a sex offender for the rest of his life for that.It's exploitation because they're too young to be making decisions that may ultimately ruin their life. I wouldn't support the AoC if it was only in place because I found it creepy.Do you think that Europe is an immoral shithole then? There are only a couple of European countries with AoC over 16 and they for the most part laugh at how prudish Americans are.Except that isn't true. It's not hard to fact check while on the internet.
Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:01:26 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:59:51 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:49:52 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:48:14 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:44:45 PMexploitationAdults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.Some old man trying to get into a 14 year old's pants? Not really exploitation, but certainly creepy. Though that's just as creepy as if an old man is trying to have sex with an 18 year old, or a 16 year old.But a 16-18 year old dating a 14 year old? A teenager dating a teenager? No, the older kid shouldn't be branded a sex offender for the rest of his life for that.It's exploitation because they're too young to be making decisions that may ultimately ruin their life. I wouldn't support the AoC if it was only in place because I found it creepy.Do you think that Europe is an immoral shithole then? There are only a couple of European countries with AoC over 16 and they for the most part laugh at how prudish Americans are.
Quote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:59:51 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:49:52 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:48:14 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:44:45 PMexploitationAdults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.Some old man trying to get into a 14 year old's pants? Not really exploitation, but certainly creepy. Though that's just as creepy as if an old man is trying to have sex with an 18 year old, or a 16 year old.But a 16-18 year old dating a 14 year old? A teenager dating a teenager? No, the older kid shouldn't be branded a sex offender for the rest of his life for that.It's exploitation because they're too young to be making decisions that may ultimately ruin their life. I wouldn't support the AoC if it was only in place because I found it creepy.
Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:49:52 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:48:14 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:44:45 PMexploitationAdults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.Some old man trying to get into a 14 year old's pants? Not really exploitation, but certainly creepy. Though that's just as creepy as if an old man is trying to have sex with an 18 year old, or a 16 year old.But a 16-18 year old dating a 14 year old? A teenager dating a teenager? No, the older kid shouldn't be branded a sex offender for the rest of his life for that.
Quote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:48:14 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:44:45 PMexploitationAdults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.
Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:44:45 PMexploitation
exploitation
Quote from: Meta Cognition on September 13, 2014, 08:11:59 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:10:26 PMExcept that isn't true. It's not hard to fact check while on the internet.What? There are four countries with AoC laws higher than 16. . .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#mediaviewer/File:Age_of_Consent_-_Global.svg
Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:10:26 PMExcept that isn't true. It's not hard to fact check while on the internet.What? There are four countries with AoC laws higher than 16. . .
Except that isn't true. It's not hard to fact check while on the internet.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on September 13, 2014, 08:15:09 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:14:03 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on September 13, 2014, 08:11:59 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:10:26 PMExcept that isn't true. It's not hard to fact check while on the internet.What? There are four countries with AoC laws higher than 16. . .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#mediaviewer/File:Age_of_Consent_-_Global.svgHave you suffered brain trauma or something? We're talking about Europe here.So look at Europe and count...
Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:14:03 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on September 13, 2014, 08:11:59 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:10:26 PMExcept that isn't true. It's not hard to fact check while on the internet.What? There are four countries with AoC laws higher than 16. . .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#mediaviewer/File:Age_of_Consent_-_Global.svgHave you suffered brain trauma or something? We're talking about Europe here.
Quote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 08:10:50 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:01:26 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:59:51 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:49:52 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:48:14 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:44:45 PMexploitationAdults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.Some old man trying to get into a 14 year old's pants? Not really exploitation, but certainly creepy. Though that's just as creepy as if an old man is trying to have sex with an 18 year old, or a 16 year old.But a 16-18 year old dating a 14 year old? A teenager dating a teenager? No, the older kid shouldn't be branded a sex offender for the rest of his life for that.It's exploitation because they're too young to be making decisions that may ultimately ruin their life. I wouldn't support the AoC if it was only in place because I found it creepy.I don't know what secluded Catholic village you were raised in, but 14 year olds have sex all the time. And it's not the sex that ruins their lives, it's the extreme AoC laws. If a 16 year old has sex with a 14 year old in a state where the AoC is 16, that 16 year old is considered a pedophile and a sex criminal, and will have a lifelong mark of shame on his record. Is that seriously something you support?AoCs laws aren't a simple number. In the United States they give a five year age difference when it comes to relationships that overlap.
Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:01:26 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:59:51 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:49:52 PMQuote from: SecondClass on September 13, 2014, 07:48:14 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:44:45 PMexploitationAdults having sex with 14 year olds is exploitation. I'm well aware of the word and how it's used.Some old man trying to get into a 14 year old's pants? Not really exploitation, but certainly creepy. Though that's just as creepy as if an old man is trying to have sex with an 18 year old, or a 16 year old.But a 16-18 year old dating a 14 year old? A teenager dating a teenager? No, the older kid shouldn't be branded a sex offender for the rest of his life for that.It's exploitation because they're too young to be making decisions that may ultimately ruin their life. I wouldn't support the AoC if it was only in place because I found it creepy.I don't know what secluded Catholic village you were raised in, but 14 year olds have sex all the time. And it's not the sex that ruins their lives, it's the extreme AoC laws. If a 16 year old has sex with a 14 year old in a state where the AoC is 16, that 16 year old is considered a pedophile and a sex criminal, and will have a lifelong mark of shame on his record. Is that seriously something you support?
But you're not explaining to me why you're arguing against me when my ONLY claim is that child abuse is wrong.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on September 13, 2014, 08:16:31 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:15:43 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on September 13, 2014, 08:15:09 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:14:03 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on September 13, 2014, 08:11:59 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:10:26 PMExcept that isn't true. It's not hard to fact check while on the internet.What? There are four countries with AoC laws higher than 16. . .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#mediaviewer/File:Age_of_Consent_-_Global.svgHave you suffered brain trauma or something? We're talking about Europe here.So look at Europe and count...Fuck me.Yes I see that. Point?
Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:15:43 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on September 13, 2014, 08:15:09 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:14:03 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on September 13, 2014, 08:11:59 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:10:26 PMExcept that isn't true. It's not hard to fact check while on the internet.What? There are four countries with AoC laws higher than 16. . .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#mediaviewer/File:Age_of_Consent_-_Global.svgHave you suffered brain trauma or something? We're talking about Europe here.So look at Europe and count...Fuck me.
Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 08:06:14 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:04:50 PMQuote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 08:00:54 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:55:57 PMQuote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 07:54:17 PMHmm, how about no?You didn't do me the courtesy of clarifying your stance, so why the fuck should I be bothered to play along with any more of this crap?So you can look it up in the thread that got locked if you like, or you can take it to PMs, or you can continue to shitpost in my shitposting thread and get this video linked ad nauseum.YouTubeI told you my only stance was that I was concerned that there were members who were in favor of child exploitation, and you agreed that it was bad as well. You didn't make it clear to me why you were still arguing with me, other than that you don't like me.Jesus christ marie, you nitwit.I never said that I didn't like you, infact I quite liked you up until this recent shitfest. Where it's moved from 'like' to 'uncertain' because I'm still not sure if you are trolling or genuinely this dense. Despite all the shitflinging that I've been doing, I'm still surprised that you've gone this incoherent. You seemed like one of the more intelligent members on the flood when you weren't baiting, but hey, I've been wrong before.That's what so fucking irritating about all of this bollocks, from the first thread about the teacher's union until this one, I don't actually disagree with you. I just don't agree completely or as strongly, and I do object to unnecessary demonisation which is what you've been pulling in the latest run of threads.Demonisation? Is that not what you're doing when you call me an SJW and say I'm a troll?*sigh*I guess I was wrong then, you are this dense.That doesn't answer the question as to why you were so emotionally hating on me. If you simply thought I was overreacting, you wouldn't have that kind of response.
Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:04:50 PMQuote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 08:00:54 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:55:57 PMQuote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 07:54:17 PMHmm, how about no?You didn't do me the courtesy of clarifying your stance, so why the fuck should I be bothered to play along with any more of this crap?So you can look it up in the thread that got locked if you like, or you can take it to PMs, or you can continue to shitpost in my shitposting thread and get this video linked ad nauseum.YouTubeI told you my only stance was that I was concerned that there were members who were in favor of child exploitation, and you agreed that it was bad as well. You didn't make it clear to me why you were still arguing with me, other than that you don't like me.Jesus christ marie, you nitwit.I never said that I didn't like you, infact I quite liked you up until this recent shitfest. Where it's moved from 'like' to 'uncertain' because I'm still not sure if you are trolling or genuinely this dense. Despite all the shitflinging that I've been doing, I'm still surprised that you've gone this incoherent. You seemed like one of the more intelligent members on the flood when you weren't baiting, but hey, I've been wrong before.That's what so fucking irritating about all of this bollocks, from the first thread about the teacher's union until this one, I don't actually disagree with you. I just don't agree completely or as strongly, and I do object to unnecessary demonisation which is what you've been pulling in the latest run of threads.Demonisation? Is that not what you're doing when you call me an SJW and say I'm a troll?*sigh*I guess I was wrong then, you are this dense.
Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 08:00:54 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:55:57 PMQuote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 07:54:17 PMHmm, how about no?You didn't do me the courtesy of clarifying your stance, so why the fuck should I be bothered to play along with any more of this crap?So you can look it up in the thread that got locked if you like, or you can take it to PMs, or you can continue to shitpost in my shitposting thread and get this video linked ad nauseum.YouTubeI told you my only stance was that I was concerned that there were members who were in favor of child exploitation, and you agreed that it was bad as well. You didn't make it clear to me why you were still arguing with me, other than that you don't like me.Jesus christ marie, you nitwit.I never said that I didn't like you, infact I quite liked you up until this recent shitfest. Where it's moved from 'like' to 'uncertain' because I'm still not sure if you are trolling or genuinely this dense. Despite all the shitflinging that I've been doing, I'm still surprised that you've gone this incoherent. You seemed like one of the more intelligent members on the flood when you weren't baiting, but hey, I've been wrong before.That's what so fucking irritating about all of this bollocks, from the first thread about the teacher's union until this one, I don't actually disagree with you. I just don't agree completely or as strongly, and I do object to unnecessary demonisation which is what you've been pulling in the latest run of threads.Demonisation? Is that not what you're doing when you call me an SJW and say I'm a troll?
Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 07:55:57 PMQuote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 07:54:17 PMHmm, how about no?You didn't do me the courtesy of clarifying your stance, so why the fuck should I be bothered to play along with any more of this crap?So you can look it up in the thread that got locked if you like, or you can take it to PMs, or you can continue to shitpost in my shitposting thread and get this video linked ad nauseum.YouTubeI told you my only stance was that I was concerned that there were members who were in favor of child exploitation, and you agreed that it was bad as well. You didn't make it clear to me why you were still arguing with me, other than that you don't like me.Jesus christ marie, you nitwit.I never said that I didn't like you, infact I quite liked you up until this recent shitfest. Where it's moved from 'like' to 'uncertain' because I'm still not sure if you are trolling or genuinely this dense. Despite all the shitflinging that I've been doing, I'm still surprised that you've gone this incoherent. You seemed like one of the more intelligent members on the flood when you weren't baiting, but hey, I've been wrong before.That's what so fucking irritating about all of this bollocks, from the first thread about the teacher's union until this one, I don't actually disagree with you. I just don't agree completely or as strongly, and I do object to unnecessary demonisation which is what you've been pulling in the latest run of threads.
Quote from: Mr Psychologist on September 13, 2014, 07:54:17 PMHmm, how about no?You didn't do me the courtesy of clarifying your stance, so why the fuck should I be bothered to play along with any more of this crap?So you can look it up in the thread that got locked if you like, or you can take it to PMs, or you can continue to shitpost in my shitposting thread and get this video linked ad nauseum.YouTubeI told you my only stance was that I was concerned that there were members who were in favor of child exploitation, and you agreed that it was bad as well. You didn't make it clear to me why you were still arguing with me, other than that you don't like me.
Hmm, how about no?You didn't do me the courtesy of clarifying your stance, so why the fuck should I be bothered to play along with any more of this crap?So you can look it up in the thread that got locked if you like, or you can take it to PMs, or you can continue to shitpost in my shitposting thread and get this video linked ad nauseum.YouTube
Because many members did, and a larger amount are arguing against me for arguing against those who support it.
It looks like the Baltic region is a nice inspiring place to live full of peace and happiness.
SC said the AoC should be lowered to 14. How is he correct that the shittiest of Europe is a good model?
Quote from: Meta Cognition on September 13, 2014, 08:26:24 PMQuote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:25:11 PMCommissar claimed you ousted Ms. Math as a transgender.Link me to the fucking post because I have no idea what the hell he's talking about.
Quote from: Le Dustin on September 13, 2014, 08:25:11 PMCommissar claimed you ousted Ms. Math as a transgender.
AMA me anything about psychology.
