- Open and concealed carry allowed in all states

- Repeal the NFA $200 tax stamp along with loosening the restrictions on class 3 firearms

- Forbid any attempts and repeal state decisions to restrict guns and gun ownership

- Prison system be transferred to government and out of hands of private holders

- Legalize narcotics like marijuana and mushrooms but tax and regulate it like tobacco and alcohol

- No reduce sentences or plea bargains for murderers, rapists, and other scum

- Have people serving non-violent inmates be drafted in times of war before anybody else and pardon crime after war

- Strengthen job growth and industry by putting America first and establish tariffs on imports

- Any corporation that does business in America will be subjected to taxes and chances of loopholes are slim

- Abolish the Federal Reserve and place Congress at the head of the creation of money

- Pay off debts and revert back to a gold and silver standard to avoid irresponsible debt again

- Repeal the national income tax

- End programs like Common Core

- End ObamaCare

- End several federal agencies where the responsibilities can be assumed by state and local government 

- No reduce sentences or plea bargains for murderers, rapists, and other scum

How about no reduced sentences for anyone? It kinda invalidates the whole point of sentences if you can get around it.

I have three questions:
- Which economists do we listen to?

- How do you explain the global and dramatic reduction in violence throughout history? It would seem that a massive, one-world government would be prone to incredible instability and need to "section" itself, while giving the sections considerable autonomy.

- It may very well be true that scientists are not motivated by market forces when researching/inventing, but the market is the single best tool for innovation, which makes everybody wealthier. Do you deny the innovative powers of the market?

Good question. Probably people who are retired and do not benefit from certain market strategies to help eliminate bias. Scientific economists would be most preferable.

Hue. The day one of those is found is the day I stop bothering to study economics.

There's probably economists out there who want the whole of society to benefit who wouldn't put an emphasis on one group of people.

That's most economists, to be honest. There's just a lot of them who disgaree on a lot of things. Economics isn't a science.

Hue W0T M80?!

He's right.

Imagine it, the United Republic of North America. Except for Mexico....it gets nuked.

I don't necessarily agree with all of those, but I like the overall tone of it >.>

I think I left one out...

> Anti-SJW

- Anti-EU
- Anti-UN (in it's current form)
- Pro-NATO (this was controversial with all the hippies that want to see us get invaded lol)
- Pro-federalised military of the British commonwealth (fuck you sjw faggots and your white guilt)
- Pro-lower, flatter tax rate
- Pro-abolishment of the welfare state
- Pro-less government interference in business
- Pro-private parties right to discriminate
- Pro-fucking free speech and the abolishment of our current basis for thought crime laws.
- Anti-Anglo/Amero special relationship (they only seem to want us to do stuff that hurts the power of the British nation without equal compensation)
- Pro-nukes
- Pro-nuclear power
- Pro-military
- Pro-commonwealth and British legacy (again, go fuck yourselves sjw)

I can't think of anymore right now.

>want out of EU because muh sovereignty
>hey canada, australia and NZ, we want to control your military pls gib nao :DDDDDD

-the british right-wing in a nutshell

> arguing that a federalised military is the same as a political union

Are you retarded?

He is, yes.