This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mordo
Pages: 1 ... 208209210 211212 ... 243
6271
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:32:04 AM »
This really is incredible. We criticize these people for their barbarism - and immediately users who know we value free speech treat us like xenophobic bigots.
Nobody says they can't disrespect the dead. We're saying they SHOULD NOT disrespect the dead.
 It's a perfect example of why modern liberalism has failed IMO. "Criticize white theocracy, government and power, but go beyond these realms and you're a bigot." Political correctness will be the death of us, I swear.
6272
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:29:07 AM »
Jar Jar is the Senate.
*key
6273
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:26:09 AM »
 EEEURGARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
6274
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:18:15 AM »
As disrespectful as it may be, they have the right not to stand up.
Forcing them to pay respects really doesn't make us any better than the terrorists, as ironic as it may be.
I'm saying they're cunts for not respecting the people who died in the name of the very freedom they're exercising. They can refuse to stand, or speak during a minute's silence, all they like--but I won't sit idly by at such flagrant hypocrisy and moral insanity.
You know, this is the same type of argument Conservatives use to bitch out people who won't stand for the Pledge of Allegiance/National Anthem over here.
No it fucking isn't. People have died.
You do realize that many people here associate the Pledge/Anthem with out military, correct? Many see it as saluting them, as well as the country - including those that died.
But this discussion has already been done, so unless there's something new to add other than "Fucking PC Liberal", I'll take my leave.
makes you look like a Muslim apologist?
So be it.
Now I've seen it all. A gay dude who's a Muslim apologist.
An oxymoron if I ever saw one.
Why is that?
You must be aware that Islam adopts extremely homophobic and downright fascistic sentiments towards homosexuals, right? It isn't just some extremist Jihadi fringe group that espouses these ideas. One could argue the majority of Muslims holds these values, as Meta's statistics seem to attest to it.
I do.
But my sexuality doesn't define my views in who I may or may not be an "apologist" for, nor should it.
Sure, I guess so. It just doesn't make a lot of sense. It's like a Jew trying to water down what the Nazis did.
6275
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:14:00 AM »
As disrespectful as it may be, they have the right not to stand up.
Forcing them to pay respects really doesn't make us any better than the terrorists, as ironic as it may be.
I'm saying they're cunts for not respecting the people who died in the name of the very freedom they're exercising. They can refuse to stand, or speak during a minute's silence, all they like--but I won't sit idly by at such flagrant hypocrisy and moral insanity.
You know, this is the same type of argument Conservatives use to bitch out people who won't stand for the Pledge of Allegiance/National Anthem over here.
No it fucking isn't. People have died.
You do realize that many people here associate the Pledge/Anthem with out military, correct? Many see it as saluting them, as well as the country - including those that died.
But this discussion has already been done, so unless there's something new to add other than "Fucking PC Liberal", I'll take my leave.
makes you look like a Muslim apologist?
So be it.
Now I've seen it all. A gay dude who's a Muslim apologist.
An oxymoron if I ever saw one.
Why is that?
You must be aware that Islam adopts extremely homophobic and downright fascistic sentiments towards homosexuals, right? It isn't just some extremist Jihadi fringe group that espouses these ideas. One could argue the majority of Muslims hold these values, as Meta's statistics definitely seem to attest to it.
6276
« on: January 13, 2015, 11:10:26 AM »
As disrespectful as it may be, they have the right not to stand up.
Forcing them to pay respects really doesn't make us any better than the terrorists, as ironic as it may be.
I'm saying they're cunts for not respecting the people who died in the name of the very freedom they're exercising. They can refuse to stand, or speak during a minute's silence, all they like--but I won't sit idly by at such flagrant hypocrisy and moral insanity.
You know, this is the same type of argument Conservatives use to bitch out people who won't stand for the Pledge of Allegiance/National Anthem over here.
No it fucking isn't. People have died.
You do realize that many people here associate the Pledge/Anthem with out military, correct? Many see it as saluting them, as well as the country - including those that died.
But this discussion has already been done, so unless there's something new to add other than "Fucking PC Liberal", I'll take my leave.
makes you look like a Muslim apologist?
So be it.
Now I've seen it all. A gay dude who's a Muslim apologist.
An oxymoron if I ever saw one.
6277
« on: January 13, 2015, 10:44:22 AM »
Ehh I kinda feel Peter Hackso...ahem, sorry Jackson has kinda went full George Lucas with the Hobbit trilogy. His fondness of CGI over practical effects and scraping the bottom of the barrel in regards to the source material (should it have really been three movies?) only reaffirms that notion.
I haven't gotten round to seeing BoFA because I never really enjoyed DoS that much (it had worse pacing issues than the first one IMO). I sort of like Unexpected Journey but it never really blew my mind like the OT did. Perhaps I'll give it a shot when it comes out on Blu Ray, although I'm not expecting anything stellar.
6278
« on: January 13, 2015, 10:39:11 AM »
>Star Wars
>Sci-Fi
hue
OT: Children Of Men or Her.
6279
« on: January 13, 2015, 08:04:48 AM »
Don't know why everyone creams their pants when Neil Blomkamp is brought into the frey. He's literally made like two movies, one of them decent and the other containing some of the biggest hamfisted political messages I've ever seen in a movie. LOL RICH PEOPLE ARE PSYCHOPATHIC SCUM THE POOR ARE BEING SHAFTED LYK IF YOU CRY ERRYTIME! Yeah, we get it Neil.
Hopefully Chappie plays it a bit more subtly like District 9 did.
6280
« on: January 12, 2015, 06:25:33 PM »
I'm pretty sure I missed some morality point that was brought up.
I don't know what else we would be talking about. Nobody's arguing they shouldn't be allowed to exercise their freedom to expression in light of this; nobody's arguing that legal action should be taken against them.
We're saying this is something you ought not to do, and they're shitty human beings for it. No doubt you agree, but just because it's a right it doesn't mean you need to add any caveats like "Well, we shouldn't stop them because it's a right." We all know that, and we're all intelligent enough to understand the implications of taking away such a right from a minority.
I'm merely reaffirming my position on freedom of expression. I'm completely aware people have the right to levy harsh condemnation for these student's behaviour, as much as these students have the right to express themselves. Not sure what you extracted from my original post but evidently it seems like you interpreted it incorrectly.
6281
« on: January 12, 2015, 06:19:20 PM »
They're not different at all.
The point is moral, not legal.
Not adhering to the pledge of allegiance is illegal?
I'm referring to your comment about them being within legal 'jurisdiction' to exercise a lack of respect. They have the same legal guarantees in both instances, but the difference between the two within this jurisdiction is a moral discrepancy.
Okay?
I'm pretty sure I missed some morality point that was brought up. All I'm saying is refusing to stand for the pledge of allegiance is as much of a right as refusing to pay respects to the recently deceased during formal hours. I don't know what morality has to do with the discussion, although if you want to talk about it I'd be more than happy to do so.
You keep saying they have the right to do this as if anyone is disagreeing with you on that point. We've already said they have that right multiple times now. Who are you arguing with?
I honestly don't know. I think we can probably chalk this up to a simple miscommunication on all our behalfs. Of course people have the right to criticise and be criticised. I never once took an opposing position to that stance.
6282
« on: January 12, 2015, 06:16:04 PM »
Yes, it's pledging allegiance to a piece of cloth - but to many, it's also pledging allegiance and paying respects to all the soldiers who have tied for your freedoms and America's security (Blah blah blah, patriotism).
Point is - yes, they're dicks for choosing not honor the dead and pay their respects with the rest of the country. But they have the same right to not participate as everyone does, and they choose to exercise it. It doesn't mean I agree with them for not participating in the silence, as I would have done so.
They're not different at all. People have the right to not pledge allegiance to a panel of cloth, just as they have the right to not pay respects to people that died. Of course, that makes them cunts, especially the latter, but they're perfectly within their jurisdiction to exercise these rights.
They have a right not to be silent and people have a right to criticize them for it. I don't think anyone is trying to force them to be decent human beings.
What is so hard to understand about this?
Uh huh. I don't disagree. What are you and Meta even fucking arguing about at this point?
6283
« on: January 12, 2015, 06:15:04 PM »
They're not different at all.
The point is moral, not legal.
Not adhering to the pledge of allegiance is illegal?
I'm referring to your comment about them being within legal 'jurisdiction' to exercise a lack of respect. They have the same legal guarantees in both instances, but the difference between the two within this jurisdiction is a moral discrepancy.
Okay? I'm pretty sure I missed some morality point that was brought up. All I'm saying is refusing to stand for the pledge of allegiance is as much of a right as refusing to pay respects to the recently deceased during formal hours. I don't know what morality has to do with the discussion, although if you want to talk about it I'd be more than happy to do so.
6284
« on: January 12, 2015, 06:10:10 PM »
They're not different at all.
The point is moral, not legal.
Not adhering to the pledge of allegiance is illegal?
6285
« on: January 12, 2015, 06:06:40 PM »
As disrespectful as it may be, they have the right not to stand up.
Forcing them to pay respects really doesn't make us any better than the terrorists, as ironic as it may be.
I'm saying they're cunts for not respecting the people who died in the name of the very freedom they're exercising. They can refuse to stand, or speak during a minute's silence, all they like--but I won't sit idly by at such flagrant hypocrisy and moral insanity.
You know, this is the same type of argument Conservatives use to bitch out people who won't stand for the Pledge of Allegiance/National Anthem over here.
One is about pledging allegiance to a piece of cloth, and the other is about the brutal murder of people for posting a cartoon. Do I have to point out how those two situations are not similar?
They're not different at all. People have the right to not pledge allegiance to a panel of cloth, just as they have the right to not pay respects to people that died. Of course, that makes them cunts, especially the latter, but they're perfectly within their jurisdiction to exercise these rights.
6286
« on: January 12, 2015, 06:04:30 PM »
> Not partaking in a minutes silence.
Such a fucking crime.
Don't you have to pray towards the Mecca or something right now?
6287
« on: January 12, 2015, 05:37:22 PM »
As disrespectful as it may be, they have the right not to stand up.
Forcing them to pay respects really doesn't make us any better than the terrorists, as ironic as it may be.
6288
« on: January 12, 2015, 04:06:47 PM »
>was the original reporter that discredited the threats against Anita Sarkeesian and uncovered multiple major discrepancies within the allegations >is openly gay yet is constantly painted out by the sjw jezebeels to be a right wing jingo because he writes for brietbart >remains completely non partisan and unbiased when reporting gamergate despite that he has become sympathetic to the movement >btfos feminist banshees constantly How can one man be so based?
6290
« on: January 12, 2015, 12:51:52 PM »
Antisemitism is about as retarded as Islamophobia.
You might wanna be careful saying that, the Jewish police in England may not like what you're saying.
http://news.sky.com/story/1406497/extra-jewish-patrols-in-london-after-attacks
>neighbourhood watch I'd rather have these in the droves than the Islamic troglodytes patrolling the streets setting up Shariah zones and removing alcohol from people simply because they walked into the wrong area. That's just me though.
6291
« on: January 12, 2015, 12:44:13 PM »
Antisemitism is about as retarded as Islamophobia.
6292
« on: January 12, 2015, 12:39:27 PM »
It took me a while to realise he was holding a giant pencil and not a baguette.
6293
« on: January 12, 2015, 11:28:59 AM »
Spoiler Seriously, do you have any idea how torturous it is to be into fat chicks but be against the fat acceptance movement as well
Why on earth would you be into fat women?
You're straight yes?
Explain why you're into boobs.
Except boobs aren't disgusting and unhealthy
Not really answering my question but okay.
And because they're attractive.
Explain why they're attractive though.
Flee took the liberty of answering that
Yes, we finally got there in the end.
Perhaps there's a biological reason as to why I'm attracted to overweight women, no?
Because you're a freak?
So homosexual people are freaks too?
No
>lemon logic
Still taking those internet is srs bsns classes I see.
Stay mad nigga
>still being a sperger
stay autist
It's not my fault you want to bang whales
Stay freak
>says the virgin
i'd rather be a virgin than a chubby chaser.
to each their own lmao
don't sprain your wrist too hard tonight darling
Better than suffocating on stomach flab
which is better than using up your fifth bottle of nivea handcream
still trying to justify your bestiality?
Hey, call it bestiality if you want. Whatever makes you feel better about your insecurities. I'm not the one choking on my ball stench browsing pornhub while my mum makes me my third microwave meal.
y u mad tho?
clue's in the name bby
6294
« on: January 12, 2015, 10:13:48 AM »
>another buttblasted cutfag that can never get decent sex or a wank
Move along everyone.
6295
« on: January 12, 2015, 10:08:28 AM »
They're not consistent enough for me to form an opinion on them. It really doesn't seem like they hold any actual objective or infrastructure, because one minute they're busting paedophile rings, and the next minute they're releasing credit card info from Amazon on the internet. Anything goes with them.
6296
« on: January 11, 2015, 07:01:06 PM »
why the fuck has no one mentioned the grabs Budapest hotel?
>wes anderson
literally autism personified.
PLEASE kill yourself
please return to /r/movies
6297
« on: January 11, 2015, 06:55:27 PM »
why the fuck has no one mentioned the grabs Budapest hotel?
>wes anderson literally autism personified.
6298
« on: January 11, 2015, 06:52:42 PM »
When were you diagnosed with autism?
Surprisingly enough, I wasn't. That doesn't erase the possibility, however. In fact, I'd be surprised if I wasn't autistic.
When are you gonna ask a non-autistic question, my friend?
When were you diagnosed with aspergers?
6299
« on: January 11, 2015, 06:49:46 PM »
When were you diagnosed with autism?
6300
« on: January 11, 2015, 06:46:21 PM »
I heard there was a big guy in this thread?
OF COURSE
If I take that meme off will you die?
you're a big upboat
4 jew
U U U U
Pages: 1 ... 208209210 211212 ... 243
|
Show Posts