This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mordo
Pages: 1 ... 204205206 207208 ... 243
6151
« on: January 22, 2015, 06:46:54 AM »
No because I'm not a pussy.
You forgot to log in to your PSU account Max.
6152
« on: January 22, 2015, 06:24:05 AM »
If she's intending to keep it then yes.
Are you...saying that if the baby is going up for adoption that it doesn't matter? Please tell me that's not what you mean.
No. As in if she intends to keep the pregnancy after the third trimester.
6153
« on: January 22, 2015, 06:16:41 AM »
If she's intending to keep it then yes.
6154
« on: January 21, 2015, 08:29:24 PM »
Fuck off and keep your circlejerking to yourselves
6155
« on: January 21, 2015, 08:28:25 PM »
[THIS POST HAS BEEN CENSORED BY THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT]
6156
« on: January 21, 2015, 08:14:00 PM »
Fuck off, Orcposting will never catch on.
mad your may may is on its last legs?
6157
« on: January 21, 2015, 08:08:42 PM »
TATERS
PO-TAT-OES
BOIL 'EM, MASH 'EM
STICK 'EM IN A STEW
share the load
6158
« on: January 21, 2015, 08:06:25 PM »
 TELL ME ABOUT SAURON WHY DOES HE WEAR THE RING
6159
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:59:24 PM »
kinder ye fet
6160
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:51:40 PM »
6161
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:46:58 PM »
6162
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:45:21 PM »
6163
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:43:29 PM »
6164
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:42:36 PM »
someone just watched trainspotting
6165
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:40:28 PM »
6166
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:38:27 PM »
.....
You're just now figuring this out..?
its a conspiracy
6167
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:33:56 PM »
Darth BANE?
6168
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:29:47 PM »
6169
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:28:11 PM »
time to not go fast
6170
« on: January 21, 2015, 07:25:00 PM »
ming=blown
6171
« on: January 21, 2015, 03:30:11 PM »
holy fuck lol
6172
« on: January 21, 2015, 03:27:18 PM »
The Joker(The Dark Knight)
Alex(A Clockwork Orange)
Tyler Durden(Fight Club)
Shadow the Hedgehog(Sonic)
Light Yagami(Death Note)
You forgot Travis Bickle.
6173
« on: January 21, 2015, 03:26:06 PM »
1. Batman
2. Superman
3. Tyrion Lannister (Game Of Thrones pre Feast For Crows.)
4. Paul Gualtieri (Sopranos)
5. Tony Soprano (Sopranos)
6. Francis Begbie (Trainspotting)
7. Hannibal Lecter
8. Han Solo (Star Wars)
9. Rust Cohle (True Detective)
10. Verbal Kint (The Usual Suspects)
ehh kind of a faggy list but idc
6174
« on: January 21, 2015, 01:40:59 PM »
 O' captain my captain
6175
« on: January 21, 2015, 12:57:17 PM »
Who actually sits fucking legs akimbo anyway?
6176
« on: January 21, 2015, 10:43:35 AM »
 Daily reminder that Hackson went full George Lucas.
6177
« on: January 21, 2015, 10:37:18 AM »
Because they're attracted to both sexes?
Clue's in the name.
6178
« on: January 20, 2015, 03:32:01 PM »
You have no problem attacking Breitbart but are completely comfortable to defend MSNBC. Your bias is showing.
The Breitbart article proceedings to do what every great source (Including MSNBC, Fox News, etc) does with interview, and pick five sentences and leave the rest
I am not defending MSNBC - which is a bad source (And yes I have used it before, along with also using Fox News - if the article is the only one available). Whether or not you feel it is bad as Breitbart is up to you.
Considering the amount of controversies and debacles MSNBC has under its wing compared to Breitbart, I think it's pretty evident which is the worst news outlet.
And as Kupo said, one is a 24 hour news channel that has been around far longer than Breitbart.
But if we're going by the amount of controversies and debacles to determine how good a source is, The Huff Post is apparently quite good and clean.
And the Huffington Post is as relatively old as Breitbart is. Moot point. I fail to see what longevity has to do with anything anyway. But really, I digress, I think we've both established a lot of news outlets are biased from whatever political alignment they belong to.
6179
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:48:12 PM »
You have no problem attacking Breitbart but are completely comfortable to defend MSNBC. Your bias is showing.
The Breitbart article proceedings to do what every great source (Including MSNBC, Fox News, etc) does with interview, and pick five sentences and leave the rest
I am not defending MSNBC - which is a bad source (And yes I have used it before, along with also using Fox News - if the article is the only one available). Whether or not you feel it is bad as Breitbart is up to you.
Considering the amount of controversies and debacles MSNBC has under its wing compared to Breitbart, I think it's pretty evident which is the worst news outlet.
6180
« on: January 20, 2015, 01:21:24 PM »
First off, allow me to take a moment to laugh at linking "Breitbart" It is pretty hilarious considering you've linked MSNBC and HuffPost innumerable times in the past.
Breitbart.com is objectively worse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSNBC_controversies
Yeah I don't know about that.
MSNBC was also the news outlet that had the cumnugget Matt Binder on air and took everything he had to say as the gospel truth and refused to give any credence to gamergate arguments. Top notch journalistic practices right there.
Not being open to debate on Gamergate is hardly as bad as believing in a fictional terrorist organization. You have failed your readers if you refuse to acknowledge utter falsehoods.
Actually taking everything in such a black and white manner is the antithesis of good journalism. Reputable journalism is supposed to analyze, investigate and consider two sides of the argument in an egalitarian manner. That's why I respect David Pakman on his reporting on Gamergate despite him being relatively left leaning. He remains non partisan and neutral.
Not sure why you're trying to compare Gamergate with ISIS anyway.
Because you did.
No I brought up an example of poor journalistic practices within MSNBC and multiple major discrepancies within their reports to bring attention to the fact that they're just as bad, if not perhaps worse, than Breitbart.
It was you that conflated the two together, actually.
If you're going to compare two news sources, you have to compare the facts themselves, or else what's the point? We can't have some invisible boundary that's like 'let's look at these separately and give them equal negative value' because that's dishonest.
Exactly.
Which is why I linked multiple controversies for MSNBC whereas you linked one for Breitbart. If you'd like to find a different way to quantify Breitbart and MSNBC's bias then you're more than welcome to try.
Well, Breitbart has a few but there's not as many. I guess when you're not a 24/7 news channel, there's a lot less that can go wrong >.>
Although I feel like generally, MSNBC tries to pretend that it's more neutral than it really is. Breitbart.com has never pretended to not be biased, I don't think.
All the more evidence as to why MSNBC is shit tier.
Not really, but this argument has become pointless.
Kinda what I'm talking about. You have no problem attacking Breitbart but are completely comfortable to defend MSNBC. Your bias is showing.
Pages: 1 ... 204205206 207208 ... 243
|
Show Posts