Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Mordo

Pages: 1 ... 199200201 202203 ... 243
6001
The Flood / One will protect you, the other 8 will try to kill you
« on: January 31, 2015, 08:04:01 PM »

6002
The Flood / Re: There are over 100 Billion Galaxies
« on: January 31, 2015, 12:36:21 PM »
Not sure what cosmology has to do with my crush.

6003
Gaming / Re: Do the Elder Scrolls games now feel all that fantasy to you?
« on: January 31, 2015, 07:03:03 AM »
Nah, the game with Nazi elves that want to un-make reality, a hermaphroditic literally bi-racial god-king who's spear is literally and metaphorically his penis, and space-traveling moths and sunbirds, focusing on enantiomorphs and god-heads, set in the consciousness of a sleeping god, is totally not fantasy.

It's science fiction.
Did George Lucas write the Elder Scrolls EU?

6004
The Flood / Jet fuel vs steel beams
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:40:56 AM »
Who would win in a fight?

6005
The Flood / Re: ITT: shit books
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:36:45 AM »
Catcher in the why

6006
The Flood / Re: Just watched the wolf of Wall Street
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:34:54 AM »

6007
The Flood / Re: Game of Thrones Season 5 trailer
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:30:21 AM »


"Who said anything about him?"

mfw

I'm already pissed-right-the-fuck-off enough that they completely cut out Aegon and Jon Connington's stories from the show, and seem to be doing the same with Victarion and Euron Greyjoy.

They only have a certain amount of time to do stuff, there are practical and other reasons, y'know.
Aegon actually plays a crucial role in Dany's story arc, but in all likeliness they're probably going to cut him and give all the glory to Dany to appeal to the tumblr brigade.

6008
The Flood / Re: Game of Thrones Season 5 trailer
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:28:11 AM »
I think they should take a break after this season, and allow the author to finish Winds Of Winter (hopefully by the end of this century). AFFC and ADWD are essentially just the same book split into two. They'd be stretching out the source material like hackson did with the Hobbit.

HBO wouldn't allow that at all, unless they did a series set during The Age of Heroes or Robert's Rebellion, leading up to the events of Game of Thrones season 1.
That'd actually be based as fuck.

Henry Cavill or Chris Hemsworth when they aren't filming their respective roles for young Bobby B would be GOAT. Doubt it's gonna happen though.

6009
The Flood / Re: Game of Thrones Season 5 trailer
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:24:49 AM »
omg

I can't wait. I want to see more of Mance Rayder's army. But what the hell was happening to Bran at the end of S4?
They've actually caught up to Bran's story in regards to the source material, so he wont be in S5. Until Gurrm actually finishes Winds we wont know what he'll be doing.

6010
The Flood / Re: Game of Thrones Season 5 trailer
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:23:18 AM »
I think they should take a break after this season, and allow the author to finish Winds Of Winter (hopefully by the end of this century). AFFC and ADWD are essentially just the same book split into two. They'd be stretching out the source material like hackson did with the Hobbit.

6011
Serious / Re: Allowing transexuals to use the other bathroom (in school)
« on: January 30, 2015, 05:16:19 AM »
I don't really see the point of gendered bathrooms anyway. I mean, what purpose do they serve other than to inconvenience someone?

6012
I know this is bait but I kind of agree. Not sure why it was moved to the flood. Even if it was flagrant shitposting, it still had a semblance of serious discussion value to it.

Well, it was.
That the thread turned around and actually ended up with proper discussion is a positive, sure. I can see a case for moving it back, but it's a shitposty/bait thread to begin with which kind of stacks it against itself.
You should probably just lock it then. It serves no purpose in either forum.
Ehh maybe, I'm not a massive fan of just outright locking threads because it seems more like stifling discussion than just moving it where it belongs.
I thought mods were starting to crack down on shitposting in the flood anyway? Or is that a working progress?

6013
I know this is bait but I kind of agree. Not sure why it was moved to the flood. Even if it was flagrant shitposting, it still had a semblance of serious discussion value to it.

Well, it was.
That the thread turned around and actually ended up with proper discussion is a positive, sure. I can see a case for moving it back, but it's a shitposty/bait thread to begin with which kind of stacks it against itself.
You should probably just lock it then. It serves no purpose in either forum.

6014
I know this is bait but I kind of agree. Not sure why it was moved to the flood. Even if it was flagrant shitposting, it still had a semblance of serious discussion value to it.

6015
Gaming / Re: Prometheans (Halo) vs A Space Marine
« on: January 29, 2015, 07:47:26 PM »

Which Prometheans we talking about?

Been a while since I looked up the lore but there is actually a difference between Forerunner Prometheans and the robot ones we see in the game. The former can crack planets in half.

Read the title, the ones from halo.
Yeah no shit. There are two types of Prometheans in Halo. Those in the game and those in the EU. Which one?

6016
Gaming / Re: Prometheans (Halo) vs A Space Marine
« on: January 29, 2015, 07:06:51 PM »
Which Prometheans we talking about?

Been a while since I looked up the lore but there is actually a difference between Forerunner Prometheans and the robot ones we see in the game. The former can crack planets in half.

6017
The Flood / Re: Best QotsA album?
« on: January 29, 2015, 07:04:40 PM »
>QotsA

Lol

6018
Gaming / Re: Star Wars Battlefront News
« on: January 29, 2015, 06:08:21 PM »
I'd hardly call this news. We've known Hoth and Endor will be playable maps since the 2014 trailer. Hell, the teaser basically revealed Hoth as a playable map back in 2013.

6019
The Flood / Re: Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day.
« on: January 29, 2015, 06:05:26 PM »
Give him a woman and he'll eat as much fish as he wants.

6020
Gaming / Re: How would YOU finish off a trilogy?
« on: January 29, 2015, 06:03:31 PM »
Arkham Origins is a prequel m80. The Arkham series isn't finished yet.

But yeah, the only good third installments I can think of are Dragon Age Inquisition and Halo 3.

The point is, it's the third installment in the franchise.

I'm not even going to comment on your obvious Halo 3 bait.
But your title clearly states trilogy. Arkham Origins is not part of the trilogy. Nice backpedaling.

There's no "backpedaling" here. Origins is the third in the franchise, deal with it. Prior to Arkham Knight's announcement, everyone was okay with calling it a trilogy.

I assume Knight will be the best in the RS trilogy, but Origins was third in line.

But again, I'm not here to argue semantics. Either add something to the conversation or leave.
There's a very stark difference between franchise and trilogy. It's like saying AC Brotherhood is the worst in the trilogy because it was the third installment. Change your OP or stop damage controlling.

Seriously, your backpedaling is borderline cringy here.

I remember why I muted your ass on Bnet, now. You're like the disabled love child of Gojira and Verbatim.

Cringe all you want, mate. There's no backpedaling here. You can participate in the conversation that everyone else is or you can continue to try and bait me. Either way, I don't care.

>getting this buttblasted over your own fuck up

holy shit, i bet you're an ex desticle or something

6021
Climate change has been happening before humans even industrialized. Ever hear of the Medieval Warm Age and Little Ice Age?
Ever heard of carbon dioxide and how it's a heat trapping gas? Ever hear about the fact that the majority of our technology emits carbon dioxide?

Seriously, you have to actually wilfully try to deny anthropogenic climate change. Fuck. Turn your fucking brain on.
I'm not denying climate change exists, I'm questioning that history and science has shown multiple times in the past that change in the environment is natural. A study conducted in 2003 showed that temperatures 1000-1100 AD are comparable to the temperatures from 1900-1990. Rising CO2 levels are a result of global warming, not a cause of it. As temperatures increase, CO2 is released from "carbon sinks" such as the oceans or the Arctic tundra.  Measurements of ice core samples show that over the last four climactic cycles (past 240,000 years) periods of global warming preceded global increases in CO2. Human releases of CO2 cannot cause climate change as any increases in CO2 are eventually balanced by nature. CO2 gets absorbed by oceans, forests, and other "carbon sinks" that increase their biological activity to absorb excess CO2 from the atmosphere. 50% of the CO2 released by the burning of fossil fuels and other human activities, has already been absorbed
[Citation needed]
I'll be awaiting your pseudo science source.
Arthur B. Robinson, PhD, et al., "Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide" (3 MB) , Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Fall 2007

Willie Soon, PhD, and Sallie Baliunas, PhD, "Proxy Climatic and Environmental Changes of the Past 1000 Years" (660 KB) , Climate Research, 2003

Anders Moberg, PhD, et al., "Highly Variable Northern Hemisphere Temperatures Reconstructed From Low and High Resolution Proxy Data," Nature, Feb. 2005

Timothy Ball, PhD, "Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?," www.canadafreepress.com, Feb. 5, 2007

Nicholas Caillon, PhD, and Jeffrey P. Severinghaus, PhD, et al., "Timing of Atmospheric CO2 and Antarctic Temperature Changes Across Termination III," Science, Mar. 14, 2003

US Senate Minority Environment and Public Works Committee, "US Senate Report: Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007," epw.senate.go, Dec. 20, 2007

Willie Soon, PhD, "Implications of the Secondary Role of Carbon Dioxide and Methane Forcing in Climate Change: Past, Present, and Future,” Physical Geography, 2007

Arthur B. Robinson, PhD, et al., "Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide" (3 MB) , Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, Fall 2007
Yeah I want actual links to these sources. Anyone can make up a name with a PhD attached to it.

6022
Climate change has been happening before humans even industrialized. Ever hear of the Medieval Warm Age and Little Ice Age?
Ever heard of carbon dioxide and how it's a heat trapping gas? Ever hear about the fact that the majority of our technology emits carbon dioxide?

Seriously, you have to actually wilfully try to deny anthropogenic climate change. Fuck. Turn your fucking brain on.
I'm not denying climate change exists, I'm questioning that history and science has shown multiple times in the past that change in the environment is natural. A study conducted in 2003 showed that temperatures 1000-1100 AD are comparable to the temperatures from 1900-1990. Rising CO2 levels are a result of global warming, not a cause of it. As temperatures increase, CO2 is released from "carbon sinks" such as the oceans or the Arctic tundra.  Measurements of ice core samples show that over the last four climactic cycles (past 240,000 years) periods of global warming preceded global increases in CO2. Human releases of CO2 cannot cause climate change as any increases in CO2 are eventually balanced by nature. CO2 gets absorbed by oceans, forests, and other "carbon sinks" that increase their biological activity to absorb excess CO2 from the atmosphere. 50% of the CO2 released by the burning of fossil fuels and other human activities, has already been absorbed
[Citation needed]
I'll be awaiting your pseudo science source.

6023
Serious / NO BREAKS ON THE HAPPENING TRAIN
« on: January 29, 2015, 09:49:10 AM »

6024
Climate change has been happening before humans even industrialized. Ever hear of the Medieval Warm Age and Little Ice Age?
Ever heard of carbon dioxide and how it's a heat trapping gas? Ever hear about the fact that the majority of our technology emits carbon dioxide?

Seriously, you have to actually wilfully try to deny anthropogenic climate change. Fuck. Turn your fucking brain on.

6025
The Flood / Re: Some people take Snapchat way too seriously
« on: January 29, 2015, 09:36:23 AM »
Top cuck

6026
The Flood / Re: Fork in left or right hand
« on: January 29, 2015, 09:35:15 AM »
You're subhuman if you use the fork in your right.

6027
Strongly encourage her to have an abortion, and if she doesn't want to, then I end the relationship.

Sounds kind of dickish but I would be in no position to raise a child. Hell, I don't think I ever will.

6028
The Flood / Re: I Like Nirvana Unironically
« on: January 29, 2015, 07:53:39 AM »
They're singles are solid but I wouldn't listen to their albums through and through.

6029
Gaming / Re: How would YOU finish off a trilogy?
« on: January 29, 2015, 06:04:02 AM »
Arkham Origins is a prequel m80. The Arkham series isn't finished yet.

But yeah, the only good third installments I can think of are Dragon Age Inquisition and Halo 3.

The point is, it's the third installment in the franchise.

I'm not even going to comment on your obvious Halo 3 bait.
But your title clearly states trilogy. Arkham Origins is not part of the trilogy. Nice backpedaling.

There's no "backpedaling" here. Origins is the third in the franchise, deal with it. Prior to Arkham Knight's announcement, everyone was okay with calling it a trilogy.

I assume Knight will be the best in the RS trilogy, but Origins was third in line.

But again, I'm not here to argue semantics. Either add something to the conversation or leave.
There's a very stark difference between franchise and trilogy. It's like saying AC Brotherhood is the worst in the trilogy because it was the third installment. Change your OP or stop damage controlling.

Seriously, your backpedaling is borderline cringy here.

6030
The Flood / Re: proof that it NEVER happened
« on: January 28, 2015, 08:00:03 PM »

Pages: 1 ... 199200201 202203 ... 243