This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mordo
Pages: 1 ... 192193194 195196 ... 243
5791
« on: February 19, 2015, 06:45:48 AM »
Nah.
As knowledgeable as he is on economics and politics I don't think he's entirely...stable for the job.
5792
« on: February 18, 2015, 09:05:38 PM »
Why do I get the feeling there's more to this story?
5793
« on: February 18, 2015, 08:59:47 PM »
5794
« on: February 18, 2015, 03:38:56 PM »
this stopped being funny a long time ago
5795
« on: February 18, 2015, 03:37:29 PM »
 INTERRACIAL BREEDING GROUNDS
5796
« on: February 18, 2015, 02:42:42 PM »
 I'd still bang her.
5797
« on: February 18, 2015, 12:47:10 PM »
 how the mighty have fallen tfw you will never relive the glorious 2004-2007 Vanilla/BC period again
5798
« on: February 18, 2015, 11:44:44 AM »
What is this, the Islamic Borg?
It explains so much...
 >ultimate goal is to assimilate everyone into their religion >no individual thought fug
5799
« on: February 18, 2015, 11:41:31 AM »
Not specifically that claim. But here is an article by the BBC from back in 2001 a few years following the ban From the article: The research, commissioned by the Countryside Alliance's Campaign for Shooting, has concluded that existing laws are targeting legitimate users of firearms rather than criminals. Hmm. and (>.>) an article from the Daily Mail from 2009. >Daily Mail I'm not so much questioning the data, but I think you can do better with some of these sources Meta. The DM article doesn't even link the Government research either.
5800
« on: February 18, 2015, 11:07:18 AM »
in the U.K. handguns used in crime have doubled since they were banned in 1997 Your link requires me to subscribe to the Times. You got a different link that corroborates with this claim?
5801
« on: February 18, 2015, 10:48:52 AM »
5802
« on: February 17, 2015, 06:23:23 PM »
Thought you were gonna say full fat.
5803
« on: February 17, 2015, 05:22:21 PM »
Aren't you bisexual yourself?
Only for your mother.
5804
« on: February 17, 2015, 05:14:54 PM »
Aren't you bisexual yourself?
5805
« on: February 17, 2015, 04:56:03 PM »
5806
« on: February 17, 2015, 04:50:46 PM »
5807
« on: February 17, 2015, 04:49:19 PM »
 tfw bongistanople will never be fiscally responsible
5808
« on: February 17, 2015, 04:46:34 PM »
I want to move to England for football, friends, and annoyed with 'Murica for raisins we mustn't state
Don't forget the shit weather, Muslims, immigrants that can't speak a lick of English, high cost of living, CCTV, and no freedom.
5809
« on: February 17, 2015, 04:41:49 PM »
5810
« on: February 17, 2015, 04:16:56 PM »
 DUDE MONEY DOESN'T EXIST LMAO
5811
« on: February 17, 2015, 03:53:43 PM »
Whatever keeps the feminists quiet I guess.
Feminism isn't bad, at least not the idea of it. It's when bitches take it too far that it's annoying and it gives everyone a bad face.
KINDA like Religion
Eh, if by feminism you mean equal opportunity between the sexes then yeah, I'm all for it. Saying that, it's pretty much been established in most of the western world at this point, which is why a lot of third wave feminists are so divisive over what constitutes as an actual issue. I have no patience for the shrieking misandrists that seem to have hijacked the movement either, which unfortunately doesn't seem to be the fringe minority anymore.
5812
« on: February 17, 2015, 03:45:34 PM »
Explain whatever the fuck it is you were saying, then.
Jesus Christ does your bowlcut affect your intelligence as well?
5813
« on: February 17, 2015, 03:43:26 PM »
Yeah big tits are bad but walking powerhouses of pure ab are totally cool. >implying women can't be muscular without being sexualized
people like you just don't deserve rights
5814
« on: February 17, 2015, 03:40:10 PM »
 le progressiveness faec Yeah big tits are bad but walking powerhouses of pure ab are totally cool. Whatever keeps the feminists quiet I guess.
5815
« on: February 17, 2015, 03:13:47 PM »
Eh it's alright. My main gripe is that it takes the Titanfall route by telling a narrative (if you can call it that) through multiplayer. Absolutely does not warrant a AAA price given the amount of content it offers.
That being said, it's not a bad game. The gameplay is tight and everything seems relatively polished both in the graphics and playability department. But like I said, it shouldn't be $60/£50.
5816
« on: February 17, 2015, 02:06:31 PM »
Remember when you were actually excited for Elysium
lets not
5817
« on: February 17, 2015, 01:05:07 PM »
Anyone remember this trailer back in 2013? Shit, this looks miles better than Elysium: Occupy Wall St in space.
5818
« on: February 17, 2015, 12:58:58 PM »
>blaming Sony
Also, "flopder" is the least clever name for a Sony product I've ever seen. Ever. Regardless of whether or not I agree with you.
>saltposting
5819
« on: February 17, 2015, 12:57:06 PM »
I don't think you can blame Sony. You should blame the developers.
Ready at Dawn, and SCE Santa Monica Studio
i know but sony fits neatly into B R A V O
5820
« on: February 17, 2015, 12:52:48 PM »
 S B R A V O N Y
Pages: 1 ... 192193194 195196 ... 243
|
Show Posts
