This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mordo
Pages: 1 ... 186187188 189190 ... 243
5611
« on: March 05, 2015, 06:21:38 AM »
My RA just asked me if I like LoTR about three minutes ago and I said no.
>not having a soul
5612
« on: March 05, 2015, 06:16:17 AM »
>getting hard over a towel head gun
takbir
5613
« on: March 05, 2015, 06:15:04 AM »
He's a strong case for conservatism as a mental illness.
Really?
Are we really going to go there?
Someone with his level of education and career should be above his beliefs given the factual evidence of which he should be aware by now.
It's almost like Rand Paul insinuating that vaccines cause autism. How can one even be qualified for their career if they perpetuate baseless objections inconsistent with the empirical findings of their own field?
Yeah so he's a retard then.
There is as much retarded liberals out there as there is retarded conservatives.
Sick rebuttal.
Fact of the matter is SJW's aren't politicians (thank gOD) but the majority of republicans are the Christian equivalent of the Taliban.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/middle-ground
Yeah because Republicans encompass all conservatives right enough.
I'm aware they're are a fuckton of right wing jingos as much as anyone, but to suggest that conservatism is a "mental illness" reads like something from Jay's rhetoric. Lets not jump on the generalisation bandwagon, shall we?
I have yet to see where social conservatism has been good for humanity.
Obviously calling it a mental illness is hyperbole.
There is also a thing called economic conservatism, which in and of itself, isn't necessarily bad. In fact, I consider myself a proponent of it. Yeah well, I'm sure if some random nutjob stabbed her kids in the name of "liberalism" and I came crashing into the thread demanding liberalism be categorised as a 'mental illness' I'm sure you'd find it affronting as well.
5614
« on: March 04, 2015, 08:00:27 PM »
5615
« on: March 04, 2015, 04:41:17 PM »
He's a strong case for conservatism as a mental illness.
Really?
Are we really going to go there?
Someone with his level of education and career should be above his beliefs given the factual evidence of which he should be aware by now.
It's almost like Rand Paul insinuating that vaccines cause autism. How can one even be qualified for their career if they perpetuate baseless objections inconsistent with the empirical findings of their own field?
Yeah so he's a retard then.
There is as much retarded liberals out there as there is retarded conservatives.
Sick rebuttal.
Fact of the matter is SJW's aren't politicians (thank gOD) but the majority of republicans are the Christian equivalent of the Taliban.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/middle-ground
Yeah because Republicans encompass all conservatives right enough. I'm aware they're are a fuckton of right wing jingos as much as anyone, but to suggest that conservatism is a "mental illness" reads like something from Jay's rhetoric. Lets not jump on the generalisation bandwagon, shall we?
5616
« on: March 04, 2015, 03:54:52 PM »
He's a strong case for conservatism as a mental illness.
Really?
Are we really going to go there?
Someone with his level of education and career should be above his beliefs given the factual evidence of which he should be aware by now.
It's almost like Rand Paul insinuating that vaccines cause autism. How can one even be qualified for their career if they perpetuate baseless objections inconsistent with the empirical findings of their own field?
Yeah so he's a retard then.
There is as much retarded liberals out there as there is retarded conservatives.
I never said there wasn't.
So why make the baseless and fallible claim of conservatism being a "mental illness"? I mean, I don't see how it's any different to calling Obama a communist jihadist member of the Illuminati.
There's a difference between being a conservative and being batshit insane. Carson happens to fall into the latter.
But your initial comment didn't make that distinction.
Oops.
ye u fokin dun goofd u wanka
5617
« on: March 04, 2015, 03:53:27 PM »
He's a strong case for conservatism as a mental illness.
Really?
Are we really going to go there?
Someone with his level of education and career should be above his beliefs given the factual evidence of which he should be aware by now.
It's almost like Rand Paul insinuating that vaccines cause autism. How can one even be qualified for their career if they perpetuate baseless objections inconsistent with the empirical findings of their own field?
Yeah so he's a retard then.
There is as much retarded liberals out there as there is retarded conservatives.
I never said there wasn't.
So why make the baseless and fallible claim of conservatism being a "mental illness"? I mean, I don't see how it's any different to calling Obama a communist jihadist member of the Illuminati.
There's a difference between being a conservative and being batshit insane. Carson happens to fall into the latter.
But your initial comment didn't make that distinction.
5618
« on: March 04, 2015, 03:46:49 PM »
He's a strong case for conservatism as a mental illness.
Really?
Are we really going to go there?
Someone with his level of education and career should be above his beliefs given the factual evidence of which he should be aware by now.
It's almost like Rand Paul insinuating that vaccines cause autism. How can one even be qualified for their career if they perpetuate baseless objections inconsistent with the empirical findings of their own field?
Yeah so he's a retard then.
There is as much retarded liberals out there as there is retarded conservatives.
I never said there wasn't.
So why make the baseless and fallible claim of conservatism being a "mental illness"? I mean, I don't see how it's any different to calling Obama a communist jihadist member of the Illuminati.
5619
« on: March 04, 2015, 03:44:04 PM »
dat 8.5/10 tho
>IMBd
>literally reddit the lovechild
What does that make Metashitic then?
Keep shilling your marxist cuck of a film maker.
5620
« on: March 04, 2015, 03:42:53 PM »
He's a strong case for conservatism as a mental illness.
Really?
Are we really going to go there?
Someone with his level of education and career should be above his beliefs given the factual evidence of which he should be aware by now.
It's almost like Rand Paul insinuating that vaccines cause autism. How can one even be qualified for their career if they perpetuate baseless objections inconsistent with the empirical findings of their own field?
Yeah so he's a retard then. There is as much retarded liberals out there as there is retarded conservatives.
5621
« on: March 04, 2015, 03:41:42 PM »
your opnion 
5622
« on: March 04, 2015, 03:40:39 PM »
dat 8.5/10 tho
>IMDb >literally reddit the lovechild
5623
« on: March 04, 2015, 03:34:17 PM »
He's a strong case for conservatism as a mental illness.
Really? Are we really going to go there?
5624
« on: March 04, 2015, 02:40:03 PM »
I don't really care what 5 people think.
Enjoy Crappie then
5626
« on: March 04, 2015, 01:46:17 PM »
Nowadays extremism is pretty much exclusively referring to hardline/salafist/wahabbi muslims, as a mark of distinction between them and say Shias or Kurds who (as far as I understand it) don't advocate the wholesale slaughter of anyone who sneezes whilst looking eastward.
I'm not sure how it would be akin to racism though, it's just a way of clarifying what it is you have an issue with. If you have a problem with all muslims/islam as a whole then that's one thing, if you have a problem with ISIS tier psychotics and the branches of islam that breed and ferment these people then that's another.
That being said, it's entirely possible for extremist vegetarians/vegans to apply their views selectively and advocate stuff like killing humans who eat meat.
My problem is that when anyone commits a heinous act in the name of an ideology, it always gets written off as "extremism" as if that's the answer to why they did what they did without factoring in any kind of extraneous variables involved, or the ideology that they based it off of. These people intentionally divert discourse and criticism just to maintain the status quo of being politically correct. Hence my "omg das racis" analogy.
http://www.newstatesman.com/religion/2014/08/what-jihadists-who-bought-islam-dummies-amazon-tell-us-about-radicalisation
Some evidence suggests that the influence of Islamic ideology may have little to do with why some become extremists though.
From the article: "In 2008, a classified briefing note on radicalisation, prepared by MI5’s behavioural science unit, was leaked to the Guardian." HMMMMM I don't deny that there are retards out there who do it just to have some sort of belonging somewhere. However, when you examine the mindset of these people through various interviews and documentaries, they genuinely believe they're doing the will of "Allah" and they will for all intents and purposes, enter paradise after death. The Nazi campaign, for the most part, wasn't lead by mentally ill psychopaths with a thirst for cooking some Jews. They were lead by completely sane, normal individuals who totally and fervently believed in the toxic ideology they espoused. Ideas are the biggest impetus for human behaviour.
5627
« on: March 04, 2015, 01:08:54 PM »
Nowadays extremism is pretty much exclusively referring to hardline/salafist/wahabbi muslims, as a mark of distinction between them and say Shias or Kurds who (as far as I understand it) don't advocate the wholesale slaughter of anyone who sneezes whilst looking eastward.
I'm not sure how it would be akin to racism though, it's just a way of clarifying what it is you have an issue with. If you have a problem with all muslims/islam as a whole then that's one thing, if you have a problem with ISIS tier psychotics and the branches of islam that breed and ferment these people then that's another.
That being said, it's entirely possible for extremist vegetarians/vegans to apply their views selectively and advocate stuff like killing humans who eat meat.
My problem is that when anyone commits a heinous act in the name of an ideology, it always gets written off as "extremism" as if that's the answer to why they did what they did without factoring in any kind of extraneous variables involved, or the ideology that they based it off of. These people intentionally divert discourse and criticism just to maintain the status quo of being politically correct. Hence my "omg das racis" analogy.
5628
« on: March 04, 2015, 12:51:57 PM »
Extremism itself is not morally reprehensible if the core beliefs that brought radicalism into fruition are not inherently violent or pernicious. For example, an extremist vegetarian would hardly pose a threat to society because of their paralyzing pacifism, and reluctance to harm a living creature, much akin to Jainism. The use of the word extremism has almost become synonymous with throwing the term "racism" around to curtail any sort of genuine criticism of an idea. It's really frustrating. Spoiler And yes, this is a thinly veiled anti Islam thread
5629
« on: March 04, 2015, 11:25:53 AM »
5630
« on: March 04, 2015, 11:22:10 AM »
5631
« on: March 04, 2015, 10:19:25 AM »
>neurosurgeon
>doesn't understand the effects of suppressing sexuality
Where do they get these people?
5632
« on: March 04, 2015, 08:52:54 AM »
Once reality hits them square in the face, most will understand the importance to free expression, self evaluation and critical thinking.
I'm just concerned it'll be too late if and when they do realise. It worries me that a generation so eager to be divorced from reality, and so reluctant to engage in contrasting ideals will actually be in charge of the planet in the next decade or so. The fascists of the future will be called anti fascists
5633
« on: March 04, 2015, 08:46:40 AM »
I don't think anyone can.
No offense to anyone religious here, but all it really boils down to is "my feelings" and "what I've always known." There isn't really any rational argumentation you can bring to the table to morally justify adhering to a religion. Whenever a thread like this is created, the religious folk always, without fail, resort to handwaving criticisms off as "religious bashing" and le funny hat memes are used in retaliation. It really only signifies that you don't have any kind of objective argument to use, and why I'm reluctant to participate in religious discussion here. It doesn't get us anywhere intellectually.
5634
« on: March 03, 2015, 09:13:58 PM »
Turn my room into a masturbation furnace.
5635
« on: March 03, 2015, 09:07:17 PM »
I can use Google translate too guys.
5636
« on: March 03, 2015, 08:55:29 PM »
LOL at how wrong and mad you are
>thinks breaking bad is filler maximum discardment
5637
« on: March 03, 2015, 08:55:11 PM »
Shit tier:
-Dexter
Pick one, and only one.
>Dexter
>ever being good post season 2
stay pleb
If you had said season 4 you would have been right.
5638
« on: March 03, 2015, 08:50:59 PM »
5639
« on: March 03, 2015, 08:49:44 PM »
Shit tier:
-Dexter
Pick one, and only one.
>Dexter >ever being good post season 2 stay pleb
5640
« on: March 03, 2015, 08:43:42 PM »
 tfw INGSOC was really just meant to be SOCJUS
Pages: 1 ... 186187188 189190 ... 243
|
Show Posts
