This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mordo
Pages: 1 ... 184185186 187188 ... 243
5551
« on: March 09, 2015, 11:02:43 AM »
I think there was always be some semblance of a market for Halo even if 343 manages to completely alienate their hardcore fanbase. Despite the mediocrity that was Halo Reach, Halo 4 still did surprisingly well in sales, so obviously it's more than just original fans of the series playing the game.
I think Halo 5 has the potential to flop critically, but commercially speaking, that seems very unrealistic.
5552
« on: March 09, 2015, 10:47:11 AM »
I wonder when Halo will devolve into an entirely multiplayer game. No campaign, just episodic Spartan ops at most, and yearly releases with updated graphics and polished gameplay. Like Unreal Tournament or Madden games.
With literally half assed games like Evolve and Titanfall becoming the norm this actually seems like a realistic scenario.
5553
« on: March 08, 2015, 10:58:49 PM »
Because he's the political mouthpiece of Seth McFarlane
5554
« on: March 08, 2015, 10:35:07 PM »
CAN WE MAKE IT TO PAGE 5?
we did it
5555
« on: March 08, 2015, 10:34:21 PM »
Drawing a line through 3 words is easier than writing another sentence. And it also implies you lack the decency to man up to your fuck ups.
Because you were doing it and it clearly didn't seem like a serious argument because of that, ffs. "So I better accuse him of that even though I'm equally guilty."
-You.
I'm taking it so seriously I'm replying with one line responses and not bothering to quote like you are. You're certainly taking it seriously enough to continue replying, that's for sure.
>I derailed thread
>OP refused to keep commenting on the on-topic responses I made and attack how I was conducting my responses instead
Damn, I'm terrible. >still continuing to do the very thing you're accusing me of
it's like poetry, it rhymes.
How the hell is crossing out what I did that you didn't like and putting something else there instead not manning up to it? If I didn't man up to it, then I would still be arguing that point.
I wasn't looking for a serious argument, you responded to my statement with a care-free response and that's how I responded afterwards. If you didn't want a care-free argument, but a serious one, don't conduct your responses that way. In your own words, man the fuck up about that and move on.
Great argument.
Yeah, because I'm taking it so seriously, huh?
Which you're doing now, funnily enough.
So what are we doing now then? Pretending to argue seriously?
Judging by the amount of saltiness in your posts, pretty seriously. Unless this all one big ebin ruse.
I'm not arguing about the millions of dead from ancient war, we're just arguing about how we're writing these posts instead of what we're arguing about. We're just arguing about how we're arguing, please stop.
plz stop meme speak. just stop this. It's going nowhere. You've guaranteed it's pointlessness, I'd prefer you see that then just me ceasing to reply.
So stop then? I've clarified my position, and you've continued to digress and evade my points. It's really just about you getting the last word at this point.
If that's what you think, fine comment after me and get the last word in, call me whatever you want, say whatever. I made my point clear, you ignoring or misunderstanding it doesn't matter too much to me, but I thought you might've learned something from it, oh well.
Ah, so we've finally arrived at the "i was just trying to teach you something all along" stage. The classic phase of damage control behaviour. Whatever bro. You can think what you like. At the end of the day, you turned something lighthearted into something vitriolic and totally irrelevant. That's on you, not me, contrary to whatever you're telling yourself.
5556
« on: March 08, 2015, 10:16:18 PM »
Drawing a line through 3 words is easier than writing another sentence. And it also implies you lack the decency to man up to your fuck ups.
Because you were doing it and it clearly didn't seem like a serious argument because of that, ffs. "So I better accuse him of that even though I'm equally guilty."
-You.
I'm taking it so seriously I'm replying with one line responses and not bothering to quote like you are. You're certainly taking it seriously enough to continue replying, that's for sure.
>I derailed thread
>OP refused to keep commenting on the on-topic responses I made and attack how I was conducting my responses instead
Damn, I'm terrible. >still continuing to do the very thing you're accusing me of
it's like poetry, it rhymes.
How the hell is crossing out what I did that you didn't like and putting something else there instead not manning up to it? If I didn't man up to it, then I would still be arguing that point.
I wasn't looking for a serious argument, you responded to my statement with a care-free response and that's how I responded afterwards. If you didn't want a care-free argument, but a serious one, don't conduct your responses that way. In your own words, man the fuck up about that and move on.
Great argument.
Yeah, because I'm taking it so seriously, huh?
Which you're doing now, funnily enough.
So what are we doing now then? Pretending to argue seriously?
Judging by the amount of saltiness in your posts, pretty seriously. Unless this all one big ebin ruse.
I'm not arguing about the millions of dead from ancient war, we're just arguing about how we're writing these posts instead of what we're arguing about. We're just arguing about how we're arguing, please stop.
plz stop meme speak. just stop this. It's going nowhere. You've guaranteed it's pointlessness, I'd prefer you see that then just me ceasing to reply.
So stop then? I've clarified my position, and you've continued to digress and evade my points. It's really just about you getting the last word at this point.
5557
« on: March 08, 2015, 10:11:03 PM »
Drawing a line through 3 words is easier than writing another sentence. And it also implies you lack the decency to man up to your fuck ups.
Because you were doing it and it clearly didn't seem like a serious argument because of that, ffs. "So I better accuse him of that even though I'm equally guilty."
-You.
I'm taking it so seriously I'm replying with one line responses and not bothering to quote like you are. You're certainly taking it seriously enough to continue replying, that's for sure.
>I derailed thread
>OP refused to keep commenting on the on-topic responses I made and attack how I was conducting my responses instead
Damn, I'm terrible. >still continuing to do the very thing you're accusing me of
it's like poetry, it rhymes.
How the hell is crossing out what I did that you didn't like and putting something else there instead not manning up to it? If I didn't man up to it, then I would still be arguing that point.
I wasn't looking for a serious argument, you responded to my statement with a care-free response and that's how I responded afterwards. If you didn't want a care-free argument, but a serious one, don't conduct your responses that way. In your own words, man the fuck up about that and move on.
Great argument.
Yeah, because I'm taking it so seriously, huh?
Which you're doing now, funnily enough. So what are we doing now then? Pretending to argue seriously? Judging by the amount of saltiness in your posts, pretty seriously. Unless this all one big ebin ruse.
5558
« on: March 08, 2015, 10:03:23 PM »
>Objectively doesn't exist anymore
Whut r Legends? Objectively not canon?
If you want to go full autismus maximus here, sure, the EU exists in the sense that the material can still be read and "enjoyed." It doesn't however, exist in the sense that's actually part of the lore anymore. Hence my statement that you took out of context.
Could you seriously not figure out that I called you out for putting words in my mouth, or have you yet to realize you did that? >takes my statement out of context
>I'm the one putting words in mouths
Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant.
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions was freaking evil. Quote me a line of dialogue in the prequels or OT where this was actually stated. And I don't mean just a "hurr durr de sif r ebil becus." I actually mean the "killing millions" part, in crystal clear exposition.
So, Palpatine could be absolved of his crimes of ordering the death of thousands of warrior-monks that were serving the Republic because some ancient feud means that the Jedi had it coming? If it was actually canon, which it's fucking not for the millionth time.
Though past elements of the Expanded Universe have been declared non-canon as a whole, they remain a resource for future Star Wars material to reference elements of the EU, thus bringing these elements into the new continuity as canon.
Nice evasion there.
Forgot to put the line through the millions part the second time I posted that because you couldn't read it the first, my bad. Also,
>"Dis nigga seriously defending the Sith, saying they aren't bad guys?"
Oh, okay you are right. Palps just killed them all for no real reason given, which is much morally better.
>scoring a line through a sentence like a fourth grader
>not manning up and admitting you fucked up
This whole argument could've been resolved if you had just been slightly more mature and didn't try to damage control your way out of it.
Also I'm not defending anything. I'm simply questioning the moral stance of the Jedi and The Republic. Seeing as how the EU actually gave us a backstory between the Jedi and Sith (and a questionable one at that), and seeing as how it no longer exists in a canonical context, all we're given in the movies is "the sith are bad because." Which in and of itself, isn't necessarily bad since Star Wars was originally meant to be a medieval knights tale in space, until Lucas had to be a hack and whore the franchise out.
>ITT butthurt fagit got REKT is butthurt
"this happened"
"no it didn't"
"omg yes it did"
"HAHA LE BUTTHURD GOT REKD EX DEE DEE DEE"
lmao, okay. isn't it prime time for browsing reddit now?
You're the only one that keeps saying butthurt and damage control, dumbass.
Perhaps because that's what it is you're doing?
Isn't that a novel concept.
>Asks for a mature argument
>Resorts to insults and name-calling almost immediately as he starts feeling his position is threatened
>having a selective memory
Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant. You're the only one that keeps saying butthurt and damage control, dumbass Keep damage controlling though. This is fun.
You're acting like this argument was serious from the beginning or that you mentioned you wanted a serious argument at that point. It wasn't and you didn't.
So why are you continuing to act like it's serious then?
5559
« on: March 08, 2015, 10:02:22 PM »
Drawing a line through 3 words is easier than writing another sentence. And it also implies you lack the decency to man up to your fuck ups. Because you were doing it and it clearly didn't seem like a serious argument because of that, ffs. "So I better accuse him of that even though I'm equally guilty." -You. I'm taking it so seriously I'm replying with one line responses and not bothering to quote like you are. You're certainly taking it seriously enough to continue replying, that's for sure. >I derailed thread
>OP refused to keep commenting on the on-topic responses I made and attack how I was conducting my responses instead
Damn, I'm terrible. >still continuing to do the very thing you're accusing me of it's like poetry, it rhymes.
5560
« on: March 08, 2015, 09:56:07 PM »
>Objectively doesn't exist anymore
Whut r Legends? Objectively not canon?
If you want to go full autismus maximus here, sure, the EU exists in the sense that the material can still be read and "enjoyed." It doesn't however, exist in the sense that's actually part of the lore anymore. Hence my statement that you took out of context.
Could you seriously not figure out that I called you out for putting words in my mouth, or have you yet to realize you did that? >takes my statement out of context
>I'm the one putting words in mouths
Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant.
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions was freaking evil. Quote me a line of dialogue in the prequels or OT where this was actually stated. And I don't mean just a "hurr durr de sif r ebil becus." I actually mean the "killing millions" part, in crystal clear exposition.
So, Palpatine could be absolved of his crimes of ordering the death of thousands of warrior-monks that were serving the Republic because some ancient feud means that the Jedi had it coming? If it was actually canon, which it's fucking not for the millionth time.
Though past elements of the Expanded Universe have been declared non-canon as a whole, they remain a resource for future Star Wars material to reference elements of the EU, thus bringing these elements into the new continuity as canon.
Nice evasion there.
Forgot to put the line through the millions part the second time I posted that because you couldn't read it the first, my bad. Also,
>"Dis nigga seriously defending the Sith, saying they aren't bad guys?"
Oh, okay you are right. Palps just killed them all for no real reason given, which is much morally better.
>scoring a line through a sentence like a fourth grader
>not manning up and admitting you fucked up
This whole argument could've been resolved if you had just been slightly more mature and didn't try to damage control your way out of it.
Also I'm not defending anything. I'm simply questioning the moral stance of the Jedi and The Republic. Seeing as how the EU actually gave us a backstory between the Jedi and Sith (and a questionable one at that), and seeing as how it no longer exists in a canonical context, all we're given in the movies is "the sith are bad because." Which in and of itself, isn't necessarily bad since Star Wars was originally meant to be a medieval knights tale in space, until Lucas had to be a hack and whore the franchise out.
>ITT butthurt fagit got REKT is butthurt
"this happened"
"no it didn't"
"omg yes it did"
"HAHA LE BUTTHURD GOT REKD EX DEE DEE DEE"
lmao, okay. isn't it prime time for browsing reddit now?
You're the only one that keeps saying butthurt and damage control, dumbass.
Perhaps because that's what it is you're doing?
Isn't that a novel concept.
>Asks for a mature argument
>Resorts to insults and name-calling almost immediately as he starts feeling his position is threatened
>having a selective memory Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant. You're the only one that keeps saying butthurt and damage control, dumbass Keep damage controlling though. This is fun.
5561
« on: March 08, 2015, 09:53:25 PM »
I admitted to forgetting to underline the sentence the second time I posted it, since your feeble mind couldn't handle it the first time. Which could've been clarified in a simple sentence instead of trying to haphazardly sweep it under the rug. If you want a mature argument, then I suggest you don't start with greentexting Which you've also been doing. and words like "hue" at the end of your posts. If you don't act serious, nobody will treat you seriously. It's safe to say you're taking this pretty seriously now, lol. Not defending any side of an argument? Just saying the guy who committed such a shitload of atrocities that it makes Hitler look like the bully that stole your lunch money in comparison. Alright. I'm referring to your EU derailment. It was all pretty much simple lighthearted jokes until you decided to take lessons from Verbatim, derail the thread, then pathetically damage control your way out of it.
5562
« on: March 08, 2015, 09:38:32 PM »
>Objectively doesn't exist anymore
Whut r Legends? Objectively not canon?
If you want to go full autismus maximus here, sure, the EU exists in the sense that the material can still be read and "enjoyed." It doesn't however, exist in the sense that's actually part of the lore anymore. Hence my statement that you took out of context.
Could you seriously not figure out that I called you out for putting words in my mouth, or have you yet to realize you did that? >takes my statement out of context
>I'm the one putting words in mouths
Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant.
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions was freaking evil. Quote me a line of dialogue in the prequels or OT where this was actually stated. And I don't mean just a "hurr durr de sif r ebil becus." I actually mean the "killing millions" part, in crystal clear exposition.
So, Palpatine could be absolved of his crimes of ordering the death of thousands of warrior-monks that were serving the Republic because some ancient feud means that the Jedi had it coming? If it was actually canon, which it's fucking not for the millionth time.
Though past elements of the Expanded Universe have been declared non-canon as a whole, they remain a resource for future Star Wars material to reference elements of the EU, thus bringing these elements into the new continuity as canon.
Nice evasion there.
Forgot to put the line through the millions part the second time I posted that because you couldn't read it the first, my bad. Also,
>"Dis nigga seriously defending the Sith, saying they aren't bad guys?"
Oh, okay you are right. Palps just killed them all for no real reason given, which is much morally better.
>scoring a line through a sentence like a fourth grader
>not manning up and admitting you fucked up
This whole argument could've been resolved if you had just been slightly more mature and didn't try to damage control your way out of it.
Also I'm not defending anything. I'm simply questioning the moral stance of the Jedi and The Republic. Seeing as how the EU actually gave us a backstory between the Jedi and Sith (and a questionable one at that), and seeing as how it no longer exists in a canonical context, all we're given in the movies is "the sith are bad because." Which in and of itself, isn't necessarily bad since Star Wars was originally meant to be a medieval knights tale in space, until Lucas had to be a hack and whore the franchise out.
>ITT butthurt fagit got REKT is butthurt
"this happened"
"no it didn't"
"omg yes it did"
"HAHA LE BUTTHURD GOT REKD EX DEE DEE DEE"
lmao, okay. isn't it prime time for browsing reddit now?
You're the only one that keeps saying butthurt and damage control, dumbass.
Perhaps because that's what it is you're doing? Isn't that a novel concept.
5563
« on: March 08, 2015, 09:37:40 PM »
>Objectively doesn't exist anymore
Whut r Legends? Objectively not canon?
If you want to go full autismus maximus here, sure, the EU exists in the sense that the material can still be read and "enjoyed." It doesn't however, exist in the sense that's actually part of the lore anymore. Hence my statement that you took out of context.
Could you seriously not figure out that I called you out for putting words in my mouth, or have you yet to realize you did that? >takes my statement out of context
>I'm the one putting words in mouths
Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant.
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions was freaking evil. Quote me a line of dialogue in the prequels or OT where this was actually stated. And I don't mean just a "hurr durr de sif r ebil becus." I actually mean the "killing millions" part, in crystal clear exposition.
So, Palpatine could be absolved of his crimes of ordering the death of thousands of warrior-monks that were serving the Republic because some ancient feud means that the Jedi had it coming? If it was actually canon, which it's fucking not for the millionth time.
Though past elements of the Expanded Universe have been declared non-canon as a whole, they remain a resource for future Star Wars material to reference elements of the EU, thus bringing these elements into the new continuity as canon.
Nice evasion there.
Forgot to put the line through the millions part the second time I posted that because you couldn't read it the first, my bad. Also,
>"Dis nigga seriously defending the Sith, saying they aren't bad guys?"
Oh, okay you are right. Palps just killed them all for no real reason given, which is much morally better.
>scoring a line through a sentence like a fourth grader
>not manning up and admitting you fucked up
This whole argument could've been resolved if you had just been slightly more mature and didn't try to damage control your way out of it.
Also I'm not defending anything. I'm simply questioning the moral stance of the Jedi and The Republic. Seeing as how the EU actually gave us a backstory between the Jedi and Sith (and a questionable one at that), and seeing as how it no longer exists in a canonical context, all we're given in the movies is "the sith are bad because." Which in and of itself, isn't necessarily bad since Star Wars was originally meant to be a medieval knights tale in space, until Lucas had to be a hack and whore the franchise out.
>ITT butthurt fagit got REKT is butthurt
"this happened"
"no it didn't"
"omg yes it did"
"HAHA LE BUTTHURD GOT REKD EX DEE DEE DEE"
lmao, okay. isn't it prime time for browsing reddit now?
You can try to deny it all you want (if it lets you sleep any better), but the facts are you got fucking REKT.
Stay mad, pussy faggot
If what constitutes as a "rek" or whatever meme buzzword you guys are currently using right now is tantamount to repeating the same points and admitting you made a mistake, then it must be pretty easy to "rek" someone here.
Stop trying to skirt the fact you got your asshole loosened, k? You got dicked, son
Is this you projecting right now?
Yeah I'm projecting my cock right into your mouth
>being this closeted you're practically bumming Mr Tumnus
Bitch, did I say you could talk? Now swallow, it's not lady like to spit
Quoting childhood experiences with your daddy isn't going to bring him back mang.
5564
« on: March 08, 2015, 09:33:45 PM »
>Objectively doesn't exist anymore
Whut r Legends? Objectively not canon?
If you want to go full autismus maximus here, sure, the EU exists in the sense that the material can still be read and "enjoyed." It doesn't however, exist in the sense that's actually part of the lore anymore. Hence my statement that you took out of context.
Could you seriously not figure out that I called you out for putting words in my mouth, or have you yet to realize you did that? >takes my statement out of context
>I'm the one putting words in mouths
Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant.
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions was freaking evil. Quote me a line of dialogue in the prequels or OT where this was actually stated. And I don't mean just a "hurr durr de sif r ebil becus." I actually mean the "killing millions" part, in crystal clear exposition.
So, Palpatine could be absolved of his crimes of ordering the death of thousands of warrior-monks that were serving the Republic because some ancient feud means that the Jedi had it coming? If it was actually canon, which it's fucking not for the millionth time.
Though past elements of the Expanded Universe have been declared non-canon as a whole, they remain a resource for future Star Wars material to reference elements of the EU, thus bringing these elements into the new continuity as canon.
Nice evasion there.
Forgot to put the line through the millions part the second time I posted that because you couldn't read it the first, my bad. Also,
>"Dis nigga seriously defending the Sith, saying they aren't bad guys?"
Oh, okay you are right. Palps just killed them all for no real reason given, which is much morally better.
>scoring a line through a sentence like a fourth grader
>not manning up and admitting you fucked up
This whole argument could've been resolved if you had just been slightly more mature and didn't try to damage control your way out of it.
Also I'm not defending anything. I'm simply questioning the moral stance of the Jedi and The Republic. Seeing as how the EU actually gave us a backstory between the Jedi and Sith (and a questionable one at that), and seeing as how it no longer exists in a canonical context, all we're given in the movies is "the sith are bad because." Which in and of itself, isn't necessarily bad since Star Wars was originally meant to be a medieval knights tale in space, until Lucas had to be a hack and whore the franchise out.
>ITT butthurt fagit got REKT is butthurt
"this happened"
"no it didn't"
"omg yes it did"
"HAHA LE BUTTHURD GOT REKD EX DEE DEE DEE"
lmao, okay. isn't it prime time for browsing reddit now?
You can try to deny it all you want (if it lets you sleep any better), but the facts are you got fucking REKT.
Stay mad, pussy faggot
If what constitutes as a "rek" or whatever meme buzzword you guys are currently using right now is tantamount to repeating the same points and admitting you made a mistake, then it must be pretty easy to "rek" someone here.
Stop trying to skirt the fact you got your asshole loosened, k? You got dicked, son
Is this you projecting right now?
Yeah I'm projecting my cock right into your mouth
>being this closeted you're practically bumming Mr Tumnus
5565
« on: March 08, 2015, 09:32:19 PM »
>Objectively doesn't exist anymore
Whut r Legends? Objectively not canon?
If you want to go full autismus maximus here, sure, the EU exists in the sense that the material can still be read and "enjoyed." It doesn't however, exist in the sense that's actually part of the lore anymore. Hence my statement that you took out of context.
Could you seriously not figure out that I called you out for putting words in my mouth, or have you yet to realize you did that? >takes my statement out of context
>I'm the one putting words in mouths
Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant.
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions was freaking evil. Quote me a line of dialogue in the prequels or OT where this was actually stated. And I don't mean just a "hurr durr de sif r ebil becus." I actually mean the "killing millions" part, in crystal clear exposition.
So, Palpatine could be absolved of his crimes of ordering the death of thousands of warrior-monks that were serving the Republic because some ancient feud means that the Jedi had it coming? If it was actually canon, which it's fucking not for the millionth time.
Though past elements of the Expanded Universe have been declared non-canon as a whole, they remain a resource for future Star Wars material to reference elements of the EU, thus bringing these elements into the new continuity as canon.
Nice evasion there.
Forgot to put the line through the millions part the second time I posted that because you couldn't read it the first, my bad. Also,
>"Dis nigga seriously defending the Sith, saying they aren't bad guys?"
Oh, okay you are right. Palps just killed them all for no real reason given, which is much morally better.
>scoring a line through a sentence like a fourth grader
>not manning up and admitting you fucked up
This whole argument could've been resolved if you had just been slightly more mature and didn't try to damage control your way out of it.
Also I'm not defending anything. I'm simply questioning the moral stance of the Jedi and The Republic. Seeing as how the EU actually gave us a backstory between the Jedi and Sith (and a questionable one at that), and seeing as how it no longer exists in a canonical context, all we're given in the movies is "the sith are bad because." Which in and of itself, isn't necessarily bad since Star Wars was originally meant to be a medieval knights tale in space, until Lucas had to be a hack and whore the franchise out.
>ITT butthurt fagit got REKT is butthurt
"this happened"
"no it didn't"
"omg yes it did"
"HAHA LE BUTTHURD GOT REKD EX DEE DEE DEE"
lmao, okay. isn't it prime time for browsing reddit now?
You can try to deny it all you want (if it lets you sleep any better), but the facts are you got fucking REKT.
Stay mad, pussy faggot
If what constitutes as a "rek" or whatever meme buzzword you guys are currently using right now is tantamount to repeating the same points and admitting you made a mistake, then it must be pretty easy to "rek" someone here.
Stop trying to skirt the fact you got your asshole loosened, k? You got dicked, son
Is this you projecting right now?
5566
« on: March 08, 2015, 09:30:20 PM »
>Objectively doesn't exist anymore
Whut r Legends? Objectively not canon?
If you want to go full autismus maximus here, sure, the EU exists in the sense that the material can still be read and "enjoyed." It doesn't however, exist in the sense that's actually part of the lore anymore. Hence my statement that you took out of context.
Could you seriously not figure out that I called you out for putting words in my mouth, or have you yet to realize you did that? >takes my statement out of context
>I'm the one putting words in mouths
Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant.
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions was freaking evil. Quote me a line of dialogue in the prequels or OT where this was actually stated. And I don't mean just a "hurr durr de sif r ebil becus." I actually mean the "killing millions" part, in crystal clear exposition.
So, Palpatine could be absolved of his crimes of ordering the death of thousands of warrior-monks that were serving the Republic because some ancient feud means that the Jedi had it coming? If it was actually canon, which it's fucking not for the millionth time.
Though past elements of the Expanded Universe have been declared non-canon as a whole, they remain a resource for future Star Wars material to reference elements of the EU, thus bringing these elements into the new continuity as canon.
Nice evasion there.
Forgot to put the line through the millions part the second time I posted that because you couldn't read it the first, my bad. Also,
>"Dis nigga seriously defending the Sith, saying they aren't bad guys?"
Oh, okay you are right. Palps just killed them all for no real reason given, which is much morally better.
>scoring a line through a sentence like a fourth grader
>not manning up and admitting you fucked up
This whole argument could've been resolved if you had just been slightly more mature and didn't try to damage control your way out of it.
Also I'm not defending anything. I'm simply questioning the moral stance of the Jedi and The Republic. Seeing as how the EU actually gave us a backstory between the Jedi and Sith (and a questionable one at that), and seeing as how it no longer exists in a canonical context, all we're given in the movies is "the sith are bad because." Which in and of itself, isn't necessarily bad since Star Wars was originally meant to be a medieval knights tale in space, until Lucas had to be a hack and whore the franchise out.
>ITT butthurt fagit got REKT is butthurt
"this happened"
"no it didn't"
"omg yes it did"
"HAHA LE BUTTHURD GOT REKD EX DEE DEE DEE"
lmao, okay. isn't it prime time for browsing reddit now?
You can try to deny it all you want (if it lets you sleep any better), but the facts are you got fucking REKT.
Stay mad, pussy faggot
If what constitutes as a "rek" or whatever meme buzzword you guys are currently using right now is tantamount to repeating the same points and admitting you made a mistake, then it must be pretty easy to "rek" someone here.
5567
« on: March 08, 2015, 09:26:11 PM »
>Objectively doesn't exist anymore
Whut r Legends? Objectively not canon?
If you want to go full autismus maximus here, sure, the EU exists in the sense that the material can still be read and "enjoyed." It doesn't however, exist in the sense that's actually part of the lore anymore. Hence my statement that you took out of context.
Could you seriously not figure out that I called you out for putting words in my mouth, or have you yet to realize you did that? >takes my statement out of context
>I'm the one putting words in mouths
Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant.
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions was freaking evil. Quote me a line of dialogue in the prequels or OT where this was actually stated. And I don't mean just a "hurr durr de sif r ebil becus." I actually mean the "killing millions" part, in crystal clear exposition.
So, Palpatine could be absolved of his crimes of ordering the death of thousands of warrior-monks that were serving the Republic because some ancient feud means that the Jedi had it coming? If it was actually canon, which it's fucking not for the millionth time.
Though past elements of the Expanded Universe have been declared non-canon as a whole, they remain a resource for future Star Wars material to reference elements of the EU, thus bringing these elements into the new continuity as canon.
Nice evasion there.
Forgot to put the line through the millions part the second time I posted that because you couldn't read it the first, my bad. Also,
>"Dis nigga seriously defending the Sith, saying they aren't bad guys?"
Oh, okay you are right. Palps just killed them all for no real reason given, which is much morally better.
>scoring a line through a sentence like a fourth grader
>not manning up and admitting you fucked up
This whole argument could've been resolved if you had just been slightly more mature and didn't try to damage control your way out of it.
Also I'm not defending anything. I'm simply questioning the moral stance of the Jedi and The Republic. Seeing as how the EU actually gave us a backstory between the Jedi and Sith (and a questionable one at that), and seeing as how it no longer exists in a canonical context, all we're given in the movies is "the sith are bad because." Which in and of itself, isn't necessarily bad since Star Wars was originally meant to be a medieval knights tale in space, until Lucas had to be a hack and whore the franchise out.
>ITT butthurt fagit got REKT is butthurt
"this happened" "no it didn't" "omg yes it did" "HAHA LE BUTTHURD GOT REKD EX DEE DEE DEE" lmao, okay. isn't it prime time for browsing reddit now?
5568
« on: March 08, 2015, 09:21:13 PM »
>Objectively doesn't exist anymore
Whut r Legends? Objectively not canon?
If you want to go full autismus maximus here, sure, the EU exists in the sense that the material can still be read and "enjoyed." It doesn't however, exist in the sense that's actually part of the lore anymore. Hence my statement that you took out of context.
Could you seriously not figure out that I called you out for putting words in my mouth, or have you yet to realize you did that? >takes my statement out of context
>I'm the one putting words in mouths
Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant.
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions was freaking evil. Quote me a line of dialogue in the prequels or OT where this was actually stated. And I don't mean just a "hurr durr de sif r ebil becus." I actually mean the "killing millions" part, in crystal clear exposition.
So, Palpatine could be absolved of his crimes of ordering the death of thousands of warrior-monks that were serving the Republic because some ancient feud means that the Jedi had it coming? If it was actually canon, which it's fucking not for the millionth time.
Though past elements of the Expanded Universe have been declared non-canon as a whole, they remain a resource for future Star Wars material to reference elements of the EU, thus bringing these elements into the new continuity as canon.
Nice evasion there.
Forgot to put the line through the millions part the second time I posted that because you couldn't read it the first, my bad. Also,
>"Dis nigga seriously defending the Sith, saying they aren't bad guys?"
Oh, okay you are right. Palps just killed them all for no real reason given, which is much morally better.
>scoring a line through a sentence like a fourth grader >not manning up and admitting you fucked up This whole argument could've been resolved if you had just been slightly more mature and didn't try to damage control your way out of it. Also I'm not defending anything. I'm simply questioning the moral stance of the Jedi and The Republic. Seeing as how the EU actually gave us a backstory between the Jedi and Sith (and a questionable one at that), and seeing as how it no longer exists in a canonical context, all we're given in the movies is "the sith are bad because." Which in and of itself, isn't necessarily bad since Star Wars was originally meant to be a medieval knights tale in space. That is, until Lucas had to be a hack and whore the franchise out.
5569
« on: March 08, 2015, 09:03:56 PM »
Lol at all these Disney pegboys shilling out
>wanting a canonical clusterfuck of contradictions written by Lucas and a team of other equally hack writers
I bet you enjoyed Jedi Rocks.
>liking the canonical clusterfuck of contradictions created by Lucas in the movies and his team of shitty writers that made the shitty TCW animated series.
What the fuck are you talking about? The prequels? Where in this discussion did I ever say I enjoyed them? I acknowledge they're canon sure, but that's not tantamount to actually liking them. Something you seem unable to discern.
5570
« on: March 08, 2015, 09:01:31 PM »
>Objectively doesn't exist anymore
Whut r Legends? Objectively not canon? If you want to go full autismus maximus here, sure, the EU exists in the sense that the material can still be read and "enjoyed." It doesn't however, exist in the sense that's actually part of the lore anymore. Hence my statement that you took out of context. Could you seriously not figure out that I called you out for putting words in my mouth, or have you yet to realize you did that? >takes my statement out of context >I'm the one putting words in mouths Except, you know unless you're seriously daft, this one is pretty obviously canonically relevant.
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions was freaking evil. Quote me a line of dialogue in the prequels or OT where this was actually stated. And I don't mean just a "hurr durr de sif r ebil becus." I actually mean the "killing millions" part, in crystal clear exposition. So, Palpatine could be absolved of his crimes of ordering the death of thousands of warrior-monks that were serving the Republic because some ancient feud means that the Jedi had it coming? If it was actually canon, which it's fucking not for the millionth time.
5571
« on: March 08, 2015, 08:50:50 PM »
Lol at all these Disney pegboys shilling out
>wanting a canonical clusterfuck of contradictions written by Lucas and a team of other equally hack writers I bet you enjoyed Jedi Rocks.
5572
« on: March 08, 2015, 08:44:37 PM »
>I'm twisting lore to suit my argument
>3rd sentence into 1st paragraph of your response is twisting the meaning of a quote I copied into something
that I didn't even imply Not sure what you're even trying to say at this point. All I know is you made an erroneous statement about canon that objectively doesn't exist anymore, I called you out, and now you're damage controlling. Quite pathetically at that, might I add. Yeah, that's all so irrelevant and doesn't tie into the universe at all. It isn't. Only your third and fourth point are canonically relevant, with the fourth point being extremely ambiguous since we no longer know what caused the feud between the two factions.
5573
« on: March 08, 2015, 08:33:58 PM »
5574
« on: March 08, 2015, 08:30:49 PM »
I take it that's why when he was to be put under arrest and brought to trial before the Galactic Senate he killed everyone in the room?
>trial via the Jedi
>democratic
hue
>Not understanding that the Galactic Senate is not run by the Jedi.
>thinking the Jedi and the Senate aren't in bed together
good goy
>Thinking the Senate is in bed with the Jedi when the Senate is run by a Sith Lord.
>run
>was on emergency powers
>Was easily able to make himself Emperor by just making a speech
exactly why he's so based
>Is a tyrant
>claiming that's what makes him not a villain
>is persuasive
>somehow that makes him tyrannical
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions
>has cloned child soldiers that want to leave the army and live a normal life killed by Special Operations teams
>caused Galactic Civil war so that he could gain more power of Republic Senate
>slaughters society of ancient warrior monks b/c of ancient feud
>using the EU as canon
maximum discardment
Republic Commando is still canon, ya coont.
>ancient feud
>sith killing millions
hi noelle
What the hell else would they have been doing, dummy?
Not a clue, but it certainly isn't part of the universe anymore.
Old Republic era is still canon, it's mentioned in the movies. The Jedi and Sith used to fight, that's pretty given. Stop using "it isn't canon anymore" as an excuse for your argument being bad, you ignored 3 other points, and the deal with canon consistency has been a hot mess since TCW Animated series came into existence. Really canon only exists as what you think is canon at this point with how convoluted and horribly the situation has been handled.
I mean, holy shit is Lucas just crazy and indecisive.
"After Star Wars was released, it became apparent that my story—however many films it took to tell—was only one of thousands that could be told about the characters who inhabit its galaxy. But these were not stories that I was destined to tell. Instead, they would spring from the imagination of other writers, inspired by the glimpse of a galaxy that Star Wars provided. Today, it is an amazing, if unexpected, legacy of Star Wars that so many gifted writers are contributing new stories to the Saga."
―George Lucas, from the introduction of Splinter of the Mind's Eye, 1996[src]
There was a feud sure, but it's never exactly explained in explicit detail in the movies. The whole "Sith killing millions" was established in the EU, which was, as we all know, retconned by Disney. You're right in the fact that the EU was one big stinking pile of horseshit that any low grade writer used as a quick cash grab to peddle their mediocre stories, but now that Disney has done us all a favour by starting anew, your arguments are pretty much moot. If anyone's twisting the lore to suit their own argument, it's you. I intentionally ignored your other points because they're for all intents and purposes, irrelevant to the contemporary universe.
5575
« on: March 08, 2015, 08:16:12 PM »
I take it that's why when he was to be put under arrest and brought to trial before the Galactic Senate he killed everyone in the room?
>trial via the Jedi
>democratic
hue
>Not understanding that the Galactic Senate is not run by the Jedi.
>thinking the Jedi and the Senate aren't in bed together
good goy
>Thinking the Senate is in bed with the Jedi when the Senate is run by a Sith Lord.
>run
>was on emergency powers
>Was easily able to make himself Emperor by just making a speech
exactly why he's so based
>Is a tyrant
>claiming that's what makes him not a villain
>is persuasive
>somehow that makes him tyrannical
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions
>has cloned child soldiers that want to leave the army and live a normal life killed by Special Operations teams
>caused Galactic Civil war so that he could gain more power of Republic Senate
>slaughters society of ancient warrior monks b/c of ancient feud
>using the EU as canon
maximum discardment
Republic Commando is still canon, ya coont.
>ancient feud
>sith killing millions
hi noelle
What the hell else would they have been doing, dummy?
Not a clue, but it certainly isn't part of the universe anymore.
5576
« on: March 08, 2015, 08:13:49 PM »
I take it that's why when he was to be put under arrest and brought to trial before the Galactic Senate he killed everyone in the room?
>trial via the Jedi
>democratic
hue
>Not understanding that the Galactic Senate is not run by the Jedi.
>thinking the Jedi and the Senate aren't in bed together
good goy
>Thinking the Senate is in bed with the Jedi when the Senate is run by a Sith Lord.
>run
>was on emergency powers
>Was easily able to make himself Emperor by just making a speech
exactly why he's so based
>Is a tyrant
>claiming that's what makes him not a villain
>is persuasive
>somehow that makes him tyrannical
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions
>has cloned child soldiers that want to leave the army and live a normal life killed by Special Operations teams
>caused Galactic Civil war so that he could gain more power of Republic Senate
>slaughters society of ancient warrior monks b/c of ancient feud
>using the EU as canon
maximum discardment
Republic Commando is still canon, ya coont.
>ancient feud >sith killing millions hi noelle
5577
« on: March 08, 2015, 08:10:45 PM »
I take it that's why when he was to be put under arrest and brought to trial before the Galactic Senate he killed everyone in the room?
>trial via the Jedi
>democratic
hue
>Not understanding that the Galactic Senate is not run by the Jedi.
>thinking the Jedi and the Senate aren't in bed together
good goy
>Thinking the Senate is in bed with the Jedi when the Senate is run by a Sith Lord.
>run
>was on emergency powers
>Was easily able to make himself Emperor by just making a speech
exactly why he's so based
>Is a tyrant
>claiming that's what makes him not a villain
>is persuasive
>somehow that makes him tyrannical
>murders people that want him tried for being the leader of an ancient cult that used to commonly kill millions
>has cloned child soldiers that want to leave the army and live a normal life killed by Special Operations teams
>caused Galactic Civil war so that he could gain more power of Republic Senate
>slaughters society of ancient warrior monks b/c of ancient feud
>using the EU as canon maximum discardment
5578
« on: March 08, 2015, 08:00:50 PM »
I take it that's why when he was to be put under arrest and brought to trial before the Galactic Senate he killed everyone in the room?
>trial via the Jedi
>democratic
hue
>Not understanding that the Galactic Senate is not run by the Jedi.
>thinking the Jedi and the Senate aren't in bed together
good goy
>Thinking the Senate is in bed with the Jedi when the Senate is run by a Sith Lord.
>run
>was on emergency powers
>Was easily able to make himself Emperor by just making a speech
exactly why he's so based
>Is a tyrant
>claiming that's what makes him not a villain
>is persuasive >somehow that makes him tyrannical
5579
« on: March 08, 2015, 07:56:26 PM »
I take it that's why when he was to be put under arrest and brought to trial before the Galactic Senate he killed everyone in the room?
>trial via the Jedi
>democratic
hue
>Not understanding that the Galactic Senate is not run by the Jedi.
>thinking the Jedi and the Senate aren't in bed together
good goy
>Thinking the Senate is in bed with the Jedi when the Senate is run by a Sith Lord.
>run
>was on emergency powers
>Was easily able to make himself Emperor by just making a speech
exactly why he's so based
5580
« on: March 08, 2015, 07:35:39 PM »
I take it that's why when he was to be put under arrest and brought to trial before the Galactic Senate he killed everyone in the room?
>trial via the Jedi
>democratic
hue
>Not understanding that the Galactic Senate is not run by the Jedi.
>thinking the Jedi and the Senate aren't in bed together
good goy
>Thinking the Senate is in bed with the Jedi when the Senate is run by a Sith Lord.
>run >was on emergency powers
Pages: 1 ... 184185186 187188 ... 243
|
Show Posts