Quote from: Madman Mordo on March 16, 2015, 07:40:28 PM

I admire the poeticism of underground rap.

Sue me.

Ew

People who listen to underground rap just for the sake of listening to underground rap are stupid

Lucky I'm not one of those people then.

Quote from: Madman Mordo on March 16, 2015, 07:44:38 PM

Quote from: Kernel Kraut on March 16, 2015, 07:42:13 PM

Quote from: Madman Mordo on March 16, 2015, 07:40:28 PM

I admire the poeticism of underground rap.

Sue me.

I said gangsta rap. You know "bitch, hoe, nigga, gonna rob me a wigga"

Well NWA, Kendrick Lamar, Joey Badass and Biggie Smalls all have a lot of substance to their music despite being considered "gangsta rap."

This whole "hurr durr rap is shit it's just black people jibberish hurr durr" is literally like me saying country and folk is dominated by inbred mountain people. It's pretty obvious you haven't really delved into the genre that much.

Kill yourself

Maybe someday.

I admire the poeticism of underground rap.

Sue me.

Dexter post season 2.

Fucking Eastenders (Britbong show).

I feel like if The Walking Dead continues with its borefest writing then it's going to fall under this category very soon. The only reason I still watch it is for the occasional gem of an episode. E.g. Spend and Too Far Gone.

Not sure why Agents of S.H.I.T is still going.

I loved the use of practical effects for Noah's death scene. Reminded me a bit of the original Total Recall.

This episode was actually pretty enjoyable for a change, weirdly enough.

Ya mang. It's bretty good.

If you're into the whole Catch Me If You Can/House Of Cards type themes then this is like, the perfect movie.

>only just discovering that devs lie

HEY O'CONNEL

You did.

Quote from: Madman Mordo on March 16, 2015, 11:30:24 AM

Quote from: Azumarill on March 16, 2015, 11:04:26 AM

Quote from: Madman Mordo on March 16, 2015, 10:57:21 AM

Quote from: Azumarill on March 16, 2015, 10:43:18 AM

holy christ this turned into a clusterfuck. do you people really have nothing better to do than sling shit at each other in the serious board? wheres the substantive discourse? all i see is a bunch of people tripping over their own rhetoric and failing to provide meaningful sources for bold claims.

I'm enjoying this civilized debate with BrenMan actually.

try debating like that in any formal forensics competition and youd be laughed out of the building.

>the guy who strawmans till the cows come home and misinterprets the opposition's position is lecturing me on how to argue better

And I thought I'd seen it all.

mmmmm, jimmies still rustled i see

>using a three year old plebbit maymay

But no matter how you look at it, it's just trash.

holy christ this turned into a clusterfuck. do you people really have nothing better to do than sling shit at each other in the serious board? wheres the substantive discourse? all i see is a bunch of people tripping over their own rhetoric and failing to provide meaningful sources for bold claims.

I'm enjoying this civilized debate with BrenMan actually.

As a society, Somalia has actually improved since dismantling its central government.

There was mixed results, actually. While it's true that the private sector flourished and certain conditions like travel and commerce improved under the free market (which I'm completely for, just to clarify) the result of anarchism obviously brought into fruition multiple warring factions and warlords which tore the country apart. Not to mention that Islamic Courts and various other religious institutions took a hold of the Education system.

The only reason Somalia is getting back on track is because the TFG has now been set up. This resonates with my argument of a small government and openly free market. It is possible for the two to coexist, shockingly enough.

Regulatory bodies can exist without a centralized monopoly on violence.

And who would those regulatory bodies be, exactly? What's to stop these aforementioned bodies from becoming a monopoly themselves?

Really, all you're arguing for here is replacing a tax funded state with a corporate one.

There's already a human trafficking market, if you haven't noticed.  In fact, it's one of the fastest growing businesses among transnational criminal organizations.

I'm completely aware. I never repudiated that claim. My argument that you elected to ignore however was that eliminating laws and regulation on human trafficking would completely and utterly exacerbate the problem.

I've yet to hear your argument as to how anarcho capitalism would solve the issue of human trafficking.

If you're going to make the claim that Somalia is anarchy I'll play along with this response.

This isn't really a relevant response to my point. Anarchism has basically become a colloquial term for what Somalia underwent. But if you want to go down the pedant route I'll start using the correct terms if it makes you feel better.

Somalia has never committed mass genocide.

Umm...

Somalia has never nuked a city.

What does this have to do with Anarcho Capitalism or state control?

Somalia has never invaded a country thousands of miles away, overthrown its government, and tried to install a democratic government.

Well mostly because it's never had the resources nor desire to be democratic...

Somalia has never caused a coup.

I'm not sure if you're entirely aware of Somalia's history.

You know why?  Because there's no money to be made from nuking a country.

There is actually. Why do you think the market for developing weapons is so large?

There's no money to be made from overthrowing a government.

I'm sure someone would have a reason to, thus creating a market.

There's no money to be made from committing mass genocide.

Again, these are just repeated points. If someone has a desire to commit mass genocide, you have a market.

For someone that so highly reveres the free market you don't seem to understand how it operates that well.

>watches Bates Motel
>thinks videogames aren't art