How fat are we talkin here, Mordo

Depends. I wouldn't actually classify myself as a chubby chaser per se, I just find nearly every body type extremely attractive, sans the morbidly obese and the anorexic. I would consider myself a sort of bisexual for body types really.

Quote from: Madman Mordo on April 01, 2015, 01:48:06 PM

I had a smoking hot Irish drama teacher during my first year of high school and she would always like to wear sandals to class. One time she took them off and scrunched her feet in front of a group session. Fuck man, I fapped to that mental image for at least a solid year.

lol you have a foot fetish

tfw not even a foot freak i just like giving foot massages to hot grils

I had a smoking hot Irish drama teacher during my first year of high school and she would always like to wear sandals to class. One time she took them off and scrunched her feet in front of a group session. Fuck man, I fapped to that mental image for at least a solid year.

Quote from: Madman Mordo on April 01, 2015, 01:17:27 PM

Quote from: Mad Max on April 01, 2015, 01:14:00 PM

I still don't get why the bill is even necessary to begin with.

To ensure economic sovereignty for businesses most likely.

The market always finds a way though, as this thread has amiably pointed out, so there was never really a fuss to begin with. Like I've said in the past, there's no money to be made in isolating your consumer base.

So if businesses aren't having their religious freedoms trampled on, why was this even passed, and why are there similar bills in more than a dozen other states?

I'm not sure what you're getting at. The bill is there to protect economic freedom, not impede it. The government should not be forcing a business or a commercial body to serve someone. That's the entire point of the bill.

I suppose it's ironic then, because the reasons for the Iraq war being presented by you and Meta were not the original justifications for the war.

I already conceded to the fact that the reasons given for entering the war were pretty flimsy. That's not the crux of the argument me and Meta are making though. What ultimately matters here is the outcome of the war, and if it will benefit Iraq in the long term (which it will).

It's to the Iraqi's thoughts on the invasion--lukewarm at best.

So the majority don't actually think they're worse off then, the initial statement which you posited?

I must sound like a broken record at this point--the modern incarnation of ISIS was directly caused by the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/false-cause

By the way, ISIS wasn't going away even if the coalition allies didn't invade, and I can only suspect that Hussein would've more than likely supported and funded them, given his history with previous terrorist organizations.

Paranoia sure is a common theme in conservative foreign policies.

Seeing as how The Soviet Union parked nukes right on The US's doorstep literally a year later I don't blame them.

The Iranian government has its own fair share of egregious human rights issues.You're just dismissing it because there's no legitimate reasons why we shouldn't invade them, too

Yeah, I know and it's despicable. Unfortunately in terms of geopolitics, that isn't substantial enough to enter into a war. North Korea has a bigger repertoire of human rights abuse than both countries combined but we don't invade because geopolitically, they don't have much of an impact on the rest of the world. Hussein was fucking around with the world economy, which funnily enough, effects more than just Iraq intrinsically, not to mention he was threatening the stability of the entire Middle East with his attempted annexation of Kuwait. I recognize Iran has committed heinous deplorable acts against humanity, but as harsh as it may sound, it's an internalized issue, not externalized.

Oh, and they have it in their country's constitution that one of their primary reasons for existence is to wipe Israel clean off the map. It's a declaration of war if I've ever seen one,

lmao no.

Apologies for using NK as an example again, but they constantly hurl abuse at the South and The US with "threats of war" and nothing ever really happens. They're all bark but no bite. That's hardly a viable reason to invade though.

Simply saying something does not constitute as an act of aggression. You actually have to, you know, do something funnily enough.

certainly a lot more clearly than whatever you imagine Saddam to have been saying in 2003.

I really couldn't give two flying fucks about what he may or may not have said. What ultimately matters here is what he did.

And as I've already implied before, the oil situation was like exaggerated to some significant degree.

You know, if you're going to link me to the page of an oil company that somehow proves whatever point you're trying to make here, at least put a modicum of effort in and direct me to the section that posits your argument.

Regardless of Hamas' legitimacy as a government, Palestine is still a sovereign nation. Considering their own litany of human rights abuses, we should invade them, too, along with Iran.

I think we should support Israel in attempting to wipe Hamas off the map and avoid any kind of serious conflict at the same time. But Hamas is a terrorist organization. They're not in control of the government. Hussein was.

Or does someone need to invent false claims of active weapons programs for that to happen?

They weren't false.

Granted, the Bush administration over exaggerated the amount found, but chemical weapons were uncovered nonetheless.

Do you live under a rock?

Do I seriously need to repeat myself again? I'm beginning to feel like a Parrot.

Assad and his government are not a threat to international security like Hussein was.

That was really funny. He's a great entertainer, but he tends to surround himself with people that will laugh at his jokes and parrot his opinions back to him while patting each other on the back, and it's that vacuousness to his show that I find insufferable.

Yeah I tend to find his audience a bunch of dipshits too. Looking back to when Christopher Hitchens was on and displayed pro Iraq War sentiments, the audience literally booed him to the point where he flipped them off.

Say what you will about him, but this is a pretty based speech.

Quote from: Comet on March 31, 2015, 08:46:01 PM

if his thoughts have changed on gay marriage id like him more.

Is he against it?

It'd be interesting to hear a gay man's dissenting view on gay marriage.

He views homosexuality as a choice as opposed to genetic predisposition.

Quite peculiar, for a gay man.

Quote from: Madman Mordo on March 31, 2015, 04:49:21 PM

prodigy a shit

they immediately went downhill after The Fat Of The Land

lol ur from scotland like ur opinion even matters

Also, May 15 is like two weeks after Age Of Ultron. I hope they know what they're doing, otherwise they could really take a hit financially.

Quantum of Solace was literally shit though. In fact all of Craig's Bond films are shit and Craig is a stale Bond. Connery is a beast however, SHAKEN NOT STIRRED MOTHERFUCKER

QoS is a good action movie, just not a good Bond movie. You could definitely tell the film-makers definitely put in the effort, but their ideas just didn't translate well onto the screen. It is definitely the weakest of Craig's filmography as the character.

Casino Royale and Skyfall are fucking fantastic though. Royale only edges out Skyfall slightly because the third act of Skyfall literally turns into Home Alone: Spy edition.

What's wrong with Roger Moore?

Generally cheesy unlikable acting, lacking any sort of gravitas or wit. You could say Connery and Brosnan were cheesy too, but they had a sort of charm and wisecracking aura about them to compensate. Moore was just all round corny with no redeemable qualities. He didn't the look like James Bond, and didn't feel like James Bond, hence his place on the list.

God tier:
-Daniel Craig

Great tier:
-Sean Connery

Literally Who tier:
-Timothy Dalton
-George Lazenby
-David Niven

Nostalgiafag tier:
-Pierce Brosnan

Shit tier:
-Roger Moore
-Barry Nelson

Quote from: GethKhilafah on March 30, 2015, 10:05:39 PM

Goddammit, just shut up with your conspiracy shit. Please.

http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/03/military-admits-martial-law-test-runs-planned-throughout-u-s-this-summer/

http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/03/military-admits-martial-law-test-runs-planned-throughout-u-s-this-summer/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3013900/Fears-martial-law-special-ops-set-swarm-Southwest-operate-undetected-civilians-ve-deemed-HOSTILE-massive-military-exercise.html

http://www.newsmax.com/US/military-exercise-martial-law-training-army/2015/03/26/id/634756/

Christ, man, you were just arguing the other day that they'd have contingency plans like this.

Go to bed Alex.