This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mordo
Pages: 1 ... 737475 7677 ... 243
2221
« on: April 17, 2016, 03:40:40 PM »
It can and has produced results, yes.
That doesn't mean it is something that should be endorsed or supported.
Why not if it produces results?
Because there are other options that can and should be explored - options that are less likely to have unintended side effects.
Continuing to do something that violates multiple segments of human rights accords and treaties because it gets us results easiest is, at the most basic root, pure laziness.
And what would these alternative options be?
2222
« on: April 17, 2016, 03:31:26 PM »
It can and has produced results, yes.
That doesn't mean it is something that should be endorsed or supported.
Why not if it produces results?
2223
« on: April 17, 2016, 03:06:37 PM »
Let me ask a forum in which at most they've read a wiki or news article about it.
GOOD JOB
delete this
2224
« on: April 17, 2016, 03:02:25 PM »
T4R
2225
« on: April 17, 2016, 12:05:54 PM »
2226
« on: April 17, 2016, 09:12:32 AM »
gaddaffi was gu boi he dindu nuffin he just need mo money fo dem pogroms
2227
« on: April 16, 2016, 03:02:29 PM »
I still need to finish Hearts Of Stone fug
2228
« on: April 15, 2016, 03:34:44 PM »
Sometimes I question whether you think about the propositions you make, at all. He doesn't. He's just a virtue signalling faggot that echoes whatever pwogwessive line of thought is trendy at the time.
2229
« on: April 15, 2016, 03:05:27 PM »
Haha sick meme bro!! You're totally hip and happening Argumentum ad novitatem is a shit fallacy pham
Literally all you did was post a picture of John Oliver, when he has a fucking point every time he announces the year. It means that at this point in history, people should know better. It's an argument.
The only rebuttal to that argument that I've literally ever seen is mockery. "HAHA TIME AN DATE MAN HE SAYS THE YEAR THAT MEANS HES WRONG"
Simply naming the current date as if it's some kind credible point is not an argument.
Saying "your point of view is outdated" is an argument, and that's what saying the year implies.
This isn't hard.
What? So I'm just supposed to presume your argument is correct because you're able to tell the time?
It doesn't prove anything besides the fact that you mentioned a date.
....no. I just told you what you're supposed to presume.
This seems hard for you for some reason, so maybe every time you hear "it's 2016" in an argument, recognize that the point there is to imply your way of thinking is outdated. You can then respond to that accusation and say why it's not true instead of freaking out about "ALL U DID WAS SAY A DATE"
Uh yeah, all you did was mention a date. Again, not a fucking argument.
What is it supposed to tell me? How does it advance the discourse by any means? It's presuppostional faggotry of the highest order and nobody besides you and your social justice loser posse take it seriously, especially in academia.
Literally all it's fucking saying is that the person using the phrase thinks that the person the phrase is directed at has outdated views. That's what it's supposed to tell you. How many times do I have to repeat myself here?
Is this a trigger word for you or something? Should I just replace the word "outdated" with the number string "2016"? It means literally the same goddamn thing.
"DUDE YOUR VIEWS ARE OUTDATED ACCORDING TO MY SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTION OF THE WORLD I WIN THE ARGUMENT SHUT UP SHUT SHUT UP"
I understand what it means you dolt, it just isn't a logical assertion by any stretch of the imagination.
It can certainly be a logical assertion. Calling a view outdated can be right, wrong, or ambigous. If someone was going up and down the road saying black people's skull shapes biologically make them more violent, you would call their view outdated. You could even say (gasp) "it's 2016"
Yeah see there you just provided a justification/reasoning to the argument you were positing, which I have no problem with. Simply saying "le current solar cycle" as if it's the be all and end all to the debate is a shit tier way of getting your points across. It's a statement of a basic fact, not a statement of reasoning using evidence based conclusions.
There are far more flimsy arguments that get used all the time than calling something outdated. And yet this whole "le time man XDDD" meme is the one everyone like you spazzes out over.
That's probably because it's the most common argument your little brogressive clique uses.
2230
« on: April 15, 2016, 02:55:25 PM »
Haha sick meme bro!! You're totally hip and happening Argumentum ad novitatem is a shit fallacy pham
Literally all you did was post a picture of John Oliver, when he has a fucking point every time he announces the year. It means that at this point in history, people should know better. It's an argument.
The only rebuttal to that argument that I've literally ever seen is mockery. "HAHA TIME AN DATE MAN HE SAYS THE YEAR THAT MEANS HES WRONG"
Simply naming the current date as if it's some kind credible point is not an argument.
Saying "your point of view is outdated" is an argument, and that's what saying the year implies.
This isn't hard.
What? So I'm just supposed to presume your argument is correct because you're able to tell the time?
It doesn't prove anything besides the fact that you mentioned a date.
....no. I just told you what you're supposed to presume.
This seems hard for you for some reason, so maybe every time you hear "it's 2016" in an argument, recognize that the point there is to imply your way of thinking is outdated. You can then respond to that accusation and say why it's not true instead of freaking out about "ALL U DID WAS SAY A DATE"
Uh yeah, all you did was mention a date. Again, not a fucking argument.
What is it supposed to tell me? How does it advance the discourse by any means? It's presuppostional faggotry of the highest order and nobody besides you and your social justice loser posse take it seriously, especially in academia.
Literally all it's fucking saying is that the person using the phrase thinks that the person the phrase is directed at has outdated views. That's what it's supposed to tell you. How many times do I have to repeat myself here?
Is this a trigger word for you or something? Should I just replace the word "outdated" with the number string "2016"? It means literally the same goddamn thing.
"DUDE YOUR VIEWS ARE OUTDATED ACCORDING TO MY SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTION OF THE WORLD I WIN THE ARGUMENT SHUT UP SHUT SHUT UP"
I understand what it means you dolt, it just isn't a logical assertion by any stretch of the imagination.
It can certainly be a logical assertion. Calling a view outdated can be right, wrong, or ambigous. If someone was going up and down the road saying black people's skull shapes biologically make them more violent, you would call their view outdated. You could even say (gasp) "it's 2016"
Yeah see there you just provided a justification/reasoning to the argument you were positing, which I have no problem with. Simply saying "le current solar cycle" as if it's the be all and end all to the debate is a shit tier way of getting your points across. It's a statement of a basic fact, not a statement of reasoning using evidence based conclusions.
2231
« on: April 15, 2016, 02:48:43 PM »
Haha sick meme bro!! You're totally hip and happening Argumentum ad novitatem is a shit fallacy pham
Literally all you did was post a picture of John Oliver, when he has a fucking point every time he announces the year. It means that at this point in history, people should know better. It's an argument.
The only rebuttal to that argument that I've literally ever seen is mockery. "HAHA TIME AN DATE MAN HE SAYS THE YEAR THAT MEANS HES WRONG"
Simply naming the current date as if it's some kind credible point is not an argument.
Saying "your point of view is outdated" is an argument, and that's what saying the year implies.
This isn't hard.
What? So I'm just supposed to presume your argument is correct because you're able to tell the time?
It doesn't prove anything besides the fact that you mentioned a date.
....no. I just told you what you're supposed to presume.
This seems hard for you for some reason, so maybe every time you hear "it's 2016" in an argument, recognize that the point there is to imply your way of thinking is outdated. You can then respond to that accusation and say why it's not true instead of freaking out about "ALL U DID WAS SAY A DATE"
Uh yeah, all you did was mention a date. Again, not a fucking argument.
What is it supposed to tell me? How does it advance the discourse by any means? It's presuppostional faggotry of the highest order and nobody besides you and your social justice loser posse take it seriously, especially in academia.
Literally all it's fucking saying is that the person using the phrase thinks that the person the phrase is directed at has outdated views. That's what it's supposed to tell you. How many times do I have to repeat myself here?
Is this a trigger word for you or something? Should I just replace the word "outdated" with the number string "2016"? It means literally the same goddamn thing.
"DUDE YOUR VIEWS ARE OUTDATED ACCORDING TO MY SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTION OF THE WORLD I WIN THE ARGUMENT SHUT UP SHUT SHUT UP" I understand what it means you dolt, it just isn't a logical assertion by any stretch of the imagination.
2232
« on: April 15, 2016, 02:41:31 PM »
Haha sick meme bro!! You're totally hip and happening Argumentum ad novitatem is a shit fallacy pham
Literally all you did was post a picture of John Oliver, when he has a fucking point every time he announces the year. It means that at this point in history, people should know better. It's an argument.
The only rebuttal to that argument that I've literally ever seen is mockery. "HAHA TIME AN DATE MAN HE SAYS THE YEAR THAT MEANS HES WRONG"
Simply naming the current date as if it's some kind credible point is not an argument.
Saying "your point of view is outdated" is an argument, and that's what saying the year implies.
This isn't hard.
What? So I'm just supposed to presume your argument is correct because you're able to tell the time?
It doesn't prove anything besides the fact that you mentioned a date.
....no. I just told you what you're supposed to presume.
This seems hard for you for some reason, so maybe every time you hear "it's 2016" in an argument, recognize that the point there is to imply your way of thinking is outdated. You can then respond to that accusation and say why it's not true instead of freaking out about "ALL U DID WAS SAY A DATE"
Uh yeah, all you did was mention a date. Again, not a fucking argument. What is it supposed to tell me? How does it advance the discourse by any means? It's presuppositional faggotry of the highest order and nobody besides you and your social justice loser posse take it seriously, especially in academia.
2233
« on: April 15, 2016, 02:32:50 PM »
Haha sick meme bro!! You're totally hip and happening Argumentum ad novitatem is a shit fallacy pham
Literally all you did was post a picture of John Oliver, when he has a fucking point every time he announces the year. It means that at this point in history, people should know better. It's an argument.
The only rebuttal to that argument that I've literally ever seen is mockery. "HAHA TIME AN DATE MAN HE SAYS THE YEAR THAT MEANS HES WRONG"
Simply naming the current date as if it's some kind credible point is not an argument.
Saying "your point of view is outdated" is an argument, and that's what saying the year implies.
This isn't hard.
What? So I'm just supposed to presume your argument is correct because you're able to tell the time? It doesn't prove anything besides the fact that you mentioned a date.
2234
« on: April 15, 2016, 02:27:24 PM »
Haha sick meme bro!! You're totally hip and happening Argumentum ad novitatem is a shit fallacy pham
Literally all you did was post a picture of John Oliver, when he has a fucking point every time he announces the year. It means that at this point in history, people should know better. It's an argument.
The only rebuttal to that argument that I've literally ever seen is mockery. "HAHA TIME AN DATE MAN HE SAYS THE YEAR THAT MEANS HES WRONG"
Simply naming the current date as if it's some kind credible point is not an argument. "Yo Pope Urban why are we invading the Holy Lands" "BECAUSE IT'S 1096, I MEAN C'MON"
2235
« on: April 15, 2016, 02:22:25 PM »
Haha sick meme bro!! You're totally hip and happening Argumentum ad novitatem is a shit fallacy pham
2236
« on: April 15, 2016, 02:03:35 PM »
It's 2016. 
2237
« on: April 15, 2016, 01:44:30 PM »
What exactly is wrong with being a degenerate?
 what's right with it?
2238
« on: April 15, 2016, 01:43:46 PM »
So? Drugs are fun tbh fam.
you wont be saying that when you inject your 4th marijuana and have an overdose family
2239
« on: April 15, 2016, 01:39:00 PM »
is just an excuse degenerates use to justify their degenerate lifestyle
2240
« on: April 15, 2016, 01:34:54 PM »
Jews are awesome.
2241
« on: April 15, 2016, 12:27:40 PM »
Why did so many people get pissed about Sansa getting raped on GoT, but no one cared when Reek got his dick chopped off?
They're preconceived notions of what constitutes racism/sexism/bigotry only occurs when it conveniences their narrative.
*their
kike sympathiser
2242
« on: April 15, 2016, 12:24:56 PM »
Why did so many people get pissed about Sansa getting raped on GoT, but no one cared when Reek got his dick chopped off?
Their preconceived notions of what constitutes racism/sexism/bigotry only occurs when it conveniences their narrative.
2243
« on: April 14, 2016, 07:02:24 AM »
2244
« on: April 12, 2016, 11:56:25 PM »
capeshit news is going full out today
2245
« on: April 12, 2016, 11:40:23 PM »
I honestly think WB should drop the DCCU and make like a Batman/Arkham cinematic universe or something. He's really the only character that's keeping DC relevant at this point.
2246
« on: April 12, 2016, 11:36:59 PM »
I swear to god if they tell Batmans stupid origin story again that literally everyone has seen 10 times over in some movie or another
They already kinda did that in BvS so I doubt it.
2247
« on: April 12, 2016, 11:31:53 PM »
2248
« on: April 12, 2016, 06:18:17 PM »
apparently people lying warrants jail time now
I know right false allegations that ruin a person's life and waste police and court time comes with heavy criminal penalties? who would've thought
2249
« on: April 12, 2016, 04:27:35 PM »
And like it or not, you're in no position to tell people how to live their lives in the first place.
When they collectively impact the cost of medical expenses and resources, it kind of is my business to tell them what they're doing effects more than just themselves.
I don't care if that statistic showed obese people were literally the antichrist, people have the right to put whatever shit they want to into their own bodies.
"I don't care if these people wreck the medical industry and soak up my taxes, as long as they have the right to do it."
2250
« on: April 12, 2016, 04:09:24 PM »
And like it or not, you're in no position to tell people how to live their lives in the first place.
When they collectively impact the cost of medical expenses and resources, it kind of is my business to tell them what they're doing effects more than just themselves.
Pages: 1 ... 737475 7677 ... 243
|
Show Posts
