2041
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 2042
The Flood / Re: Game of thrones S6E3: Oathbreaker (Tower of Joy) discussion thread« on: May 08, 2016, 08:18:37 PM »
The leak was right. Fuck this show.
2043
The Flood / Re: Game of thrones S6E3: Oathbreaker (Tower of Joy) discussion thread« on: May 08, 2016, 08:17:25 PM »
FOR FUCK SAKE
2044
The Flood / Re: Game of thrones S6E3: Oathbreaker (Tower of Joy) discussion thread« on: May 08, 2016, 07:54:39 PM »
5 MINUTES MY DUDES
2045
The Flood / Re: >doesn't listen to s club 7« on: May 08, 2016, 07:50:20 PM »
dONt STop MOviNg tO thE S cLuB bEAt
2046
The Flood / Re: How the fuck am I supposed to get a job« on: May 08, 2016, 07:05:04 PM »
Why can't you apply online? Pretty easy way of applying desu, especially if you're a pasty ass NEET. Beggars can't be choosers.
2047
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 08, 2016, 06:47:22 PM »http://vicsorsopinion.blogspot.be/2013/07/anitas-sources.html?m=1I've already posted this fgt. 2049
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 08, 2016, 05:40:56 PM »Not really offended, just perplexed by your behaviour. I mean, I don't give a fuck one way or the other what you think and how you respond to people, I guess I just expected a bit more intellectual rigour and a little less condescension from you.Where's this coming from exactly? There's having several heated disagreements with people and then there's being a passive aggressive prick about it. I expect this kind of snarky behaviour from Verb, not you.I'm not sure what exactly you're referring to, but I don't think it was snarky or passive aggressive. I bluntly told him that he was wrong and didn't know what he was talking about in regards to citation and fair use. Sorry? I had to respond to what seemed like a dozen identical posts riddled with the same misconceptions. 2050
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 08, 2016, 05:30:26 PM »
Where's this coming from exactly? There's having several heated disagreements with people and then there's being a passive aggressive prick about it. I expect this kind of snarky behaviour from Verb, not you.
2051
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 08, 2016, 03:55:29 PM »So basically many of you believe in unfettered free speech so long as you don't disagree with what the person is saying. When they say something you find disagreeable, then it's bring out the loopholes and point of view statements.Literally no one here has a problem with how she conducts her opinions. Our contention lies with the fact that she has been dishonestly plagiarizing content from other users without crediting them for several years now. The free speech strawman doesn't stick seeing as how no one here is really positing that notion. Quote There are hundreds if not thousands of YouTube channels that game play footage on them. Many copy footage from other channels. They aren't being banned. Fair use is fair use. So long as they don't try to profit from it or claim it as original, then it's usable. She did neither.And those should be penalised as well. Hundreds of small channels get nuked daily for less serious offences. No one seriously believes her channel should be suspended for her views or her character, just that she should be crediting the sources like any intellectually honest person should be doing. 2052
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 08, 2016, 02:50:23 PM »You're definition of "stolen" is pretty vague seeing as you seem to think the majority of YouTube consists of stolen content.I know you're arguing just for the sake of arguing but even you have to realise these contrarian excuses are pretty pathetic.if all "stolen" content on youtube was gotten rid of, youtube would die 2053
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 08, 2016, 02:45:42 PM »I know you're arguing just for the sake of arguing but even you have to realise these contrarian excuses are pretty pathetic.The defense of "well other people break the rules all the time" doesn't fly because those people should be getting suspended too, it's just impractical to catch everyone due to how absolutely massive youtube is.it's also the #1 reason anyone uses youtube in the first place 2054
The Flood / Re: Game of thrones S6E3: Oathbreaker (Tower of Joy) discussion thread« on: May 08, 2016, 12:00:47 PM »Spoiler ![]() 2055
The Flood / Re: Game of thrones S6E3: Oathbreaker (Tower of Joy) discussion thread« on: May 08, 2016, 11:48:58 AM »I saw it on 4chan from the guy that correctly predicted episode 2. Idk where it is now.Fuuuug I've just been given leaks to the new episode. It's gonna be another shit show if it's true smh. 2056
The Flood / Re: Game of thrones S6E3: Oathbreaker (Tower of Joy) discussion thread« on: May 08, 2016, 11:25:53 AM »
Fuuuug I've just been given leaks to the new episode. It's gonna be another shit show if it's true smh.
2057
The Flood / Re: "here come dat boi o shit waddup"« on: May 08, 2016, 11:24:53 AM »
This meme has been butchered by normies now.
2058
Serious / Re: Xhamster blocks North Carolina over its anti-trans bill« on: May 07, 2016, 09:39:35 PM »o shit waddup 2059
The Flood / Re: Game of thrones S6E3: Oathbreaker (Tower of Joy) discussion thread« on: May 07, 2016, 02:51:22 PM »![]() *Brienne teleports behind Night's King and stabs him* "pssht, nothing personnel kid" Screencap this. 2060
The Flood / Re: Movie Recommendation thread« on: May 07, 2016, 11:35:50 AM »
The Guest is pretty underrated.
2061
Serious / Re: Xhamster blocks North Carolina over its anti-trans bill« on: May 07, 2016, 06:46:21 AM »![]() 2062
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 06, 2016, 11:00:24 PM »http://vicsorsopinion.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/anitas-sources.htmlThe evidence is demonstrably is in her videos? You know, the fact that she shows multiple gameplay videos (without their context, mind you) and using them as her own.i don't know how i'm supposed to clairvoyantly detect the exact source of her game footage just by watching it, but okay 2063
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 06, 2016, 10:50:05 PM »The evidence is demonstrably is in her videos? You know, the fact that she shows multiple gameplay videos (without their context, mind you) and using them as her own.people like to make that accusation, but i've never seen any proof or evidenceGay. I don't have a problem with her views (I don't agree with them at all just as a caveat, but she has the right to voice them), just that she never really credits the gameplay she uses in her videos. I really hope some semblance of action was taken, because she's been getting away with this shit for far too long.OT: Good. Glad to see fair use applies to larger channels, not just small ones. This has nothing to do with free speech, it's a copyright issue. Bitch has been pawning off content without giving credit to the sources for a while now.She's already back up. Here's me thinking you were her biggest fan. 2064
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 06, 2016, 10:44:39 PM »I don't really care if her channel has been reinstated or not. Point still stands that she has been patently violating YouTube's fair use for well over a couple years now. The ban was completely warranted.It'll get reinstated. Aside from having an unpopular opinion, she didn't do anything wrong.She's been stealing content without permission for several years now. That violates YouTube's fair use policy. Quite frankly, she should've been taken down years ago, and I'm surprised she's lasted this long without any repercussions. Smaller channels have been penalised for less. 2065
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 06, 2016, 10:29:49 PM »Gay. I don't have a problem with her views (I don't agree with them at all just as a caveat, but she has the right to voice them), just that she never really credits the gameplay she uses in her videos. I really hope some semblance of action was taken, because she's been getting away with this shit for far too long.OT: Good. Glad to see fair use applies to larger channels, not just small ones. This has nothing to do with free speech, it's a copyright issue. Bitch has been pawning off content without giving credit to the sources for a while now.She's already back up. 2066
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 06, 2016, 10:22:48 PM »
OT: Good. Glad to see fair use applies to larger channels, not just small ones. This has nothing to do with free speech, it's a copyright issue. Bitch has been pawning off content without giving credit to the sources for a while now.
2067
The Flood / Re: Feminist Frequency Youtube channel banned« on: May 06, 2016, 10:21:26 PM »It'll get reinstated. Aside from having an unpopular opinion, she didn't do anything wrong.She's been stealing content without permission for several years now. That violates YouTube's fair use policy. Quite frankly, she should've been taken down years ago, and I'm surprised she's lasted this long without any repercussions. Smaller channels have been penalised for less. 2068
Serious / Re: Races of the World« on: May 06, 2016, 06:07:33 PM »Serious will get serious when you stop posting, that's for fucking sure."Serious is getting more serious" 2069
The Flood / Re: KHANDEEP wins mayor of London« on: May 06, 2016, 12:55:28 PM »![]() >electing a mussie 2070
Serious / Re: Races of the World« on: May 06, 2016, 10:54:35 AM »Yeah but the white man marches on.Oh no, I mean it's not like all humans have an estimated 99.9% similarity in genome or anything, or that people can actually have more genes in common with people of "different race" in other parts of the world than with people of their ethnic group. No, the differential appearance of organisms certainly means they're like different species altogether. |