http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36879196
((((cultural enrichment))))

>Munich shooter was a German naitonal
>Says he was inspired by Anders Breivik
>Says he hated turks and immigrants

Ahahahahaha

Fuckin' eat a dick alt reichers

wtf I hate /pol/ now

I corrected you on being wrong, because you are. It shouldn't be reinstated because there is no grounds for them to. They are a private company, they can host who they want - and ban who they don't. It's the same for this website, and any other internet forum/social media account.

I never said it should be reinstated because twitter are obligated to.

I said it should be reinstated because no rules were violated and the ban was completely unwarranted according to their ToS.

Whatever twitter decides is up to them, sure, doesn't mean I'm not going to call bullshit when I see it.

The argument that Twitter hasn't cracked down on ISIS/terrorist related accounts is false. Let's begin with the fact that, yes, Twitter and other social media sites have struggled to tread the line between allowing free speech and curbing users that routinely post threats, terroristic ties, etc. That hasn't stopped them from working to ban users in the latter category - Numerous users were removed to praising the attacks in Nice, France.

Good. Doesn't change the fact they were allowed to exist for a considerable amount of time unchallenged.

The second difference is in terms of scale - Milo had hundreds of thousand of followers (and likely as many people who simply viewed his Twitter) daily. When he would inevitably post shit that people found offensive, it was likely reported rapidly in a short amount of time. This is in comparison to accounts by random users who tweet similar things, and fly under the umbrella due to little to no reports.

So mob mentality dictates the rules of who gets banned and who doesn't? Doesn't seem like a very rationale way of moderating inappropriate content.

I think it would be beneficial for the conversation to refer you to twitter's terms of service on abuse:

Harassment: You may not incite or engage in the targeted abuse or harassment of others. Some of the factors that we may consider when evaluating abusive behavior include:

-if a primary purpose of the reported account is to harass or send abusive messages to other
-if the reported behavior is one-sided or includes threats;
-if the reported account is inciting others to harass another account; and
-if the reported account is sending harassing messages to an account from multiple accounts.

Hateful conduct: You may not promote violence against or directly attack or threaten other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or disease. We also do not allow accounts whose primary purpose is inciting harm towards others on the basis of these categories.

Multiple account abuse: Creating multiple accounts with overlapping uses or in order to evade the temporary or permanent suspension of a separate account is not allowed.

Private information: You may not publish or post other people's private and confidential information, such as credit card numbers, street address, or Social Security/National Identity numbers, without their express authorization and permission. In addition, you may not post intimate photos or videos that were taken or distributed without the subject's consent. Read more about our private information policy here.

Impersonation: You may not impersonate others through the Twitter service in a manner that is intended to or does mislead, confuse, or deceive others. Read more about our impersonation policy here.

Self-harm: You may encounter someone considering suicide or self harm on Twitter. When we receive reports that a person is threatening suicide or self harm, we may take a number of steps to assist them, such as reaching out to that person expressing our concern and the concern of other users on Twitter or providing resources such as contact information for our mental health partners.

So I implore you to elucidate how this:

falls under any of these categories.

Very true. The company still doesn't have to capitulate to the people who have a problem with their verdict.

I'm sick to the back teeth of hearing this. I'm well aware twitter has full autonomy over who gets to engage in their site and who doesn't. I'm well aware they are under no obligation to submit to people's grievances over the internet. If twitter wants to implode their site with partisan politics and inconsistent moderation that's their problem, not mine.

Quote from: Mordo on July 22, 2016, 09:46:02 AM

His twitter should be reinstated though. It's obvious they've had it in for him since day one.

No. No it shouldn't.

Please elaborate what twitter rules he violated then.

Because all I recall him doing is mildly insult a shitty actress and comedian.

He is not responsible for the stormfaggots' twitter crusade of racial abuse.

Didn't Thor get beat down by that big brollic nigger guard in the first movie lol?

He's like a cross between discount Tom Hardy and Sam Worthington's mongoloid little brother.

Yeah I know him by that name. Hell, I worked with him in Nam. Back then we called him 'Gook Gutting' Wahlberg because he never came out of a tunnel without a scalp, an ear, or covered with blood.

Most would call him insane, but that is why the green berets trained him. They saw potential. It wasn't until they learned his methods that they truly realized what a monster they created.

You see, most guys that go tunnel clearing take guns. Not Mark. No, he took knives, clubs, hatchets, sometimes nothing but his bare hands. After a few missions I got a chance to talk to him in the mess. He was wearing his blood stained hat, sunglasses, and combat fatigues, smoking a cigarette and drinking johnny walker black. It was contraband, but you NEVER told Mark what he could and couldn't do.

I asked him why he never took guns with him. He lowered is head and took a long slow draw from his hand rolled cig, pulled off his sun glasses and looked me right in the eyes, piercing my soul.

"I do it out of respect. Respect for the white race. These slant eye'd scum bags don't deserve the mercy of an American made bullet, but the slow torturous death of the hands of an American man!"

In a flash he pulled out his weathered, but razor sharp knife and stopped just short of sticking my gut. "The look in their eyes when I slip this baby into their swollen, rice filled bellies is reason enough. To see the last lights flick off in their heads as they see a real killer work."

Quote from: Mordo on July 20, 2016, 03:11:25 PM

How did Labour become so fucking JUST'd lol

Blair
Brown
Miliband
Corbyn

B
B
M
C

B
B
C

B B C

BBC

Labour got BLACKED

How did Labour become so fucking JUST'd lol

I'll join after I take my dump of the afternoon.

Quote from: Mordo on July 19, 2016, 10:30:43 PM

Just sounds like you found yourself a nice girl who has a nice family. Doesn't necessarily mean you need to convert to her faith, nor is the faith the underlying cause of their pleasantness.

But Islam is a major part of my woman's life. She says it has been a driving factor of who she is as a person. I'D like to emulate that from my own future family.

Dude, do what you want, it's your life. All I'm saying is converting to a major faith is a dumbfuck thing to do for a girl who's probably going to dump your ass in a couple months anyway.

#thotpatrol

Should've voted remain like a good goy

ISN'T IT FUNNY

>30 DEGREES IN BONGLAND REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

KEK IS PUNISHING US