This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mordo
Pages: 1 ... 484950 5152 ... 243
1471
« on: September 04, 2016, 08:24:04 PM »
LOL. And it goes personal.
"Star Trek was an attempt to say that humanity will reach maturity and wisdom on the day that it begins not just to tolerate, but take a special delight in differences in ideas and differences in life forms. […] If we cannot learn to actually enjoy those small differences, to take a positive delight in those small differences between our own kind, here on this planet, then we do not deserve to go out into space and meet the diversity that is almost certainly out there."
-Gene Roddenberry
That's my point. That maturity he's talking about is losing tribalism. Us vs Them. Globalism isn't bad because it's the start of maturity.
Why the fuck is Gene Roddenberry you're intellectual backing here?
You're literally citing Star Trek. What the fuck.
So? His story touched millions. Like it or not, his vision gave people hope.
And I'm not quoting Star Trek, I'm quoting the author.
It's not so much that his work is popular, it's the fact that you referenced a fucking screenwriter as a legitimate intellectual source in a serious discussion.
It's like you deliberately go out of your way to miss the point of what people are trying to say sometimes.
And?
Having a concrete view of the future and the ability to communicate that vision to millions puts him ahead of most. And does his life as a writer invalidate him? Especially when most mainstream scientists quote him whenever the future is brought up?
I don't really care how influential you think he is. He was a television writer, with virtually no intellectual or credible bearing to what the thread is about. As interesting as his perspectives may be, citing a sci fi writer and producer, aka an entertainer, doesn't exactly belong in the realms of a serious discussion. It's like asking Tom Clancy for advice on a genuine military operation.
You're entitled to your opinions on globalism but at least substantiate these opinions with a somewhat reputable backing to them.
Oh... So post what everyone rlse is with the same level of source?
TEH MUDSLINES R EBIL N EEE SHUD NUK M ALL
Posts like these is why nobody takes you seriously any more.
Why would you take anyone seriously on this board?
I take the people that post here far more seriously than someone who's a carbon copy of a reddit board.
1472
« on: September 04, 2016, 08:16:07 PM »
LOL. And it goes personal.
"Star Trek was an attempt to say that humanity will reach maturity and wisdom on the day that it begins not just to tolerate, but take a special delight in differences in ideas and differences in life forms. […] If we cannot learn to actually enjoy those small differences, to take a positive delight in those small differences between our own kind, here on this planet, then we do not deserve to go out into space and meet the diversity that is almost certainly out there."
-Gene Roddenberry
That's my point. That maturity he's talking about is losing tribalism. Us vs Them. Globalism isn't bad because it's the start of maturity.
Why the fuck is Gene Roddenberry you're intellectual backing here?
You're literally citing Star Trek. What the fuck.
So? His story touched millions. Like it or not, his vision gave people hope.
And I'm not quoting Star Trek, I'm quoting the author.
It's not so much that his work is popular, it's the fact that you referenced a fucking screenwriter as a legitimate intellectual source in a serious discussion.
It's like you deliberately go out of your way to miss the point of what people are trying to say sometimes.
And?
Having a concrete view of the future and the ability to communicate that vision to millions puts him ahead of most. And does his life as a writer invalidate him? Especially when most mainstream scientists quote him whenever the future is brought up?
I don't really care how influential you think he is. He was a television writer, with virtually no intellectual or credible bearing to what the thread is about. As interesting as his perspectives may be, citing a sci fi writer and producer, aka an entertainer, doesn't exactly belong in the realms of a serious discussion. It's like asking Tom Clancy for advice on a genuine military operation.
You're entitled to your opinions on globalism but at least substantiate these opinions with a somewhat reputable backing to them.
Oh... So post what everyone rlse is with the same level of source?
TEH MUDSLINES R EBIL N EEE SHUD NUK M ALL
Posts like these is why nobody takes you seriously any more.
1473
« on: September 04, 2016, 08:07:30 PM »
LOL. And it goes personal.
"Star Trek was an attempt to say that humanity will reach maturity and wisdom on the day that it begins not just to tolerate, but take a special delight in differences in ideas and differences in life forms. […] If we cannot learn to actually enjoy those small differences, to take a positive delight in those small differences between our own kind, here on this planet, then we do not deserve to go out into space and meet the diversity that is almost certainly out there."
-Gene Roddenberry
That's my point. That maturity he's talking about is losing tribalism. Us vs Them. Globalism isn't bad because it's the start of maturity.
Why the fuck is Gene Roddenberry you're intellectual backing here?
You're literally citing Star Trek. What the fuck.
So? His story touched millions. Like it or not, his vision gave people hope.
And I'm not quoting Star Trek, I'm quoting the author.
It's not so much that his work is popular, it's the fact that you referenced a fucking screenwriter as a legitimate intellectual source in a serious discussion.
It's like you deliberately go out of your way to miss the point of what people are trying to say sometimes.
And?
Having a concrete view of the future and the ability to communicate that vision to millions puts him ahead of most. And does his life as a writer invalidate him? Especially when most mainstream scientists quote him whenever the future is brought up?
I don't really care how influential you think he is. He was a television writer, with virtually no intellectual or credible bearing to what the thread is about. As interesting as his perspectives may be, citing a sci fi writer and producer, aka an entertainer, doesn't exactly belong in the realms of a serious discussion. It's like asking Tom Clancy for advice on a genuine military operation. You're entitled to your opinions on globalism but at least substantiate these opinions with a somewhat reputable backing to them.
1474
« on: September 04, 2016, 06:23:29 PM »
IT WAS ALL A MEME
1475
« on: September 04, 2016, 11:09:34 AM »
Our Father Lord kek, who art in Heaven,
hallowed be thy Name.
Thy memedom come.
Thy shitposting done
on /r/funny as it is in Heaven.
Give us this day's meme magic,
and forgive the cuckolds,
as we forgive those who trespass against Lord kek's living vessel Donald J. Trump,
and lead us not into temptation of the Crook Hillary,
but deliver us from cuckoldry of the Establishment and the Globalists.
For thine is the memes kingdom,
and the aesthetics and the dubs are yours
for ever and ever.
Praise Kek.
1476
« on: September 04, 2016, 09:39:06 AM »
LOL. And it goes personal.
"Star Trek was an attempt to say that humanity will reach maturity and wisdom on the day that it begins not just to tolerate, but take a special delight in differences in ideas and differences in life forms. […] If we cannot learn to actually enjoy those small differences, to take a positive delight in those small differences between our own kind, here on this planet, then we do not deserve to go out into space and meet the diversity that is almost certainly out there."
-Gene Roddenberry
That's my point. That maturity he's talking about is losing tribalism. Us vs Them. Globalism isn't bad because it's the start of maturity.
Why the fuck is Gene Roddenberry you're intellectual backing here?
You're literally citing Star Trek. What the fuck.
So? His story touched millions. Like it or not, his vision gave people hope.
And I'm not quoting Star Trek, I'm quoting the author.
It's not so much that his work is popular, it's the fact that you referenced a fucking screenwriter as a legitimate intellectual source in a serious discussion. It's like you deliberately go out of your way to miss the point of what people are trying to say sometimes.
1477
« on: September 03, 2016, 04:41:04 PM »
IT'S GONNA TAKE SOME TIME TO PAY THE FIIINE
1478
« on: September 03, 2016, 04:38:36 PM »
I'M LOCKED AWAY
I'M LOCKED AWAAAAY
1479
« on: September 03, 2016, 04:37:03 PM »
1480
« on: September 03, 2016, 04:20:52 PM »
It's a Saturday night you fucking cretinous plum. They're probably being shafted with rapid orders.
1481
« on: September 03, 2016, 03:31:25 PM »
Surprise, surprise, nature is immoral and we shouldn't live based on instincts. Even from the standpoint of basic utilitarianism, do you think the pleasure of a wolf eating a rabbit alive outweighs the pain of the rabbit?
Your pedestrian 'insight' into philosophy as an attempt to look as pseudo intellectual as possible never fails to crack me up pham.
1482
« on: September 03, 2016, 02:55:30 PM »
WHO DID THIS
read the title dipshit
learn to meme shitdip
1483
« on: September 03, 2016, 02:44:42 PM »
WHO DID THIS
1484
« on: September 03, 2016, 12:22:35 AM »
>being British
>using mom instead of mum
Deserve what's coming to you tbqfhidk
1485
« on: September 02, 2016, 02:51:18 PM »
GMOs
1486
« on: September 02, 2016, 02:49:52 PM »
Okay, so
-Telekinesis
-Domination
-Mind read
1487
« on: September 02, 2016, 02:13:07 PM »
Isn't suggestion basically just the weaker domination?
1488
« on: September 02, 2016, 10:15:32 AM »
Should remain illegal. Risk of child defects are too high not to mention sexual abuse can be more easily exploited.
1489
« on: September 02, 2016, 08:37:10 AM »
SNP purge when?
1490
« on: September 01, 2016, 08:50:02 PM »
The GMOs strike again.
1491
« on: September 01, 2016, 04:42:32 PM »
Just me and my 💕daddy💕, hanging out I got pretty hungry🍆 so I started to pout 😞 He asked if I was down ⬇for something yummy 😍🍆 and I asked what and he said he'd give me his 💦cummies!💦 Yeah! Yeah!💕💦 I drink them!💦 I slurp them!💦 I swallow them whole💦 😍 It makes 💘daddy💘 😊happy😊 so it's my only goal... 💕💦😫Harder daddy! Harder daddy! 😫💦💕 1 cummy💦, 2 cummy💦💦, 3 cummy💦💦💦, 4💦💦💦💦 I'm 💘daddy's💘 👑princess 👑but I'm also a whore! 💟 He makes me feel squishy💗!He makes me feel good💜! 💘💘💘He makes me feel everything a little should!~ 💘💘💘 👑💦💘Wa-What!💘💦👑
1492
« on: September 01, 2016, 09:39:51 AM »
1493
« on: September 01, 2016, 09:29:50 AM »
Seriously Turkey, you need to stop falling for this palpable bait.
1494
« on: September 01, 2016, 07:10:25 AM »
The main point of any Bernie supporter's argument:
"YOU'RE STUPID!"
"YOU'RE RACIST!"
"WHITE PEOPLE ARE BAD"
"YOU DARE ASK ME TO EXPLAIN MY REASONING?"
The main point of any right wing supporters argument:
>myconfinedspace.com Says it all really.
1495
« on: September 01, 2016, 06:41:29 AM »
Lemon.
What an annoying little illiterate fag.
1496
« on: August 31, 2016, 08:33:26 PM »
 >still believing Fenians are white FOR GOD AND ULSTER
1497
« on: August 31, 2016, 04:20:30 PM »
Globalism itself isn't intrinsically bad as long as the rules, customs and laws of the nation state are still respected.
1498
« on: August 30, 2016, 07:36:20 PM »
 FUNNY ISN'T IT?
1499
« on: August 30, 2016, 07:26:44 PM »
Yep. Also does anyone else think looking at women without their consent is rape?
Depends. Quick glance? Nope. Climbing up a tree to see her undress? Definitely.
Actually that's an invasion of privacy, which while creepy, isn't anywhere near the realms of rape. It genuinely scares me how you fucking neo lefties are so quick to conflate any kind of mild transgression against a woman with rape.
1500
« on: August 30, 2016, 07:21:29 PM »
I guess by that logic testosterone abdicates responsibility on behalf of the male too.
Pages: 1 ... 484950 5152 ... 243
|
Show Posts
