What are losers who live in their parents basements gonna do?

Potentially, they can find just about anything. Plans, hideouts, locations of leaders, a good number of stuff.

Now if only they didn't use those skills to make epilepsy websites flash and other such hijinks.

I could stop them. I just don't want to.

You disgrace your dead cousin.

This is the single scummiest thing I've ever seen anyone say on the internet.

I can only afford vanilla frappuccinos out of vending machines these days. They're really good though.

That must have taken you hours to come up with.

Quote from: Radorekd™ on November 14, 2015, 05:52:15 AM

Quote from: Thrasher on November 14, 2015, 04:06:47 AM

"I've always felt that 'game over' is a state of failure more for the game designer than from the player."

-David Cage

David Cage is a failure of the game designer.

He's kinda right though. In plenty of games, 'game over' is just 'let's just hit rewind and try that again'. At least some GOTY games like Dark Souls or waaaaay back to like, World of Warcraft, change things up by giving you a new objective. WoW popularized what's known as a 'corpse run', where you have to find your body again to retrieve the stuff you lost in your previous life. It at least gives some sort of meaning to dying.

Or, you know, a game like Heavy Rain where death is permanent and the story goes on without that character. It's a shit ton of work to do it right, but it's something worth pursuing IMO. (If we also consider GTA's 'Busted' screen a failure, Heavy Rain actually improves on that too, by having a special scenario play out if a certain character gets arrested--and another character has to defuse it.)

It'd be pretty crazy to have a branching Halo 5 storyline where failing or dying as Chief means someone else (such as Locke) has to take up the mantle (no pun intended) of responsibility, and it changes Halo 6's story accordingly. Or, like, Mass Effect perhaps, where ME3 is drastically different if Shepard dies. It'd raise the stakes and force the player to live with their failure, and just be pretty goddamn great if the writers could ever do it justice.

Except he didn't do anything like that. Instead, he decided to remedy the 'problem' by making it completely impossible for the player to lose. You can play through BTS without pressing a single button during the action scenes and still win.

His ban time should be doubled for trying to subvert it.

What did he post?

Unfortunate.

Made some comics that involved stick people mutilating each other (me and 2 friends would make these lol). I was stupid and was laughing while reading them in class one day. Only used 2 things: a pencil and a red crayon (its obvious what it was for >.>).

Let's just say, the councilor reading comics called "mass murder 5" or "saw 7" didn't make them think I was mentally sound.

Spoiler

it was still hilarious though

Same here. Though, I was rather puzzled as to how I always got in trouble when all of my friends who were doing the exact same thing managed to slip the radar.

The Flood will only truly be destroyed by firing the rings (let's not)

Unless there's life in other galaxies in which case wiping the Milky Way clean would be irrelevant for the most part.

In sixth grade I admitted to cheating on a test and had to retake it.

Theres always thirsty guys willing to fuck anyone with a vagina. If youre an ugly guy youre chances of getting anyone are pretty low

If you're a guy with loads of money, your appearance becomes irrelevant.

Quote from: EnderWOhlf on November 13, 2015, 04:36:54 PM

This is why we should just nuke the middle east

I'd rather not send radiation into the atmosphere and have it swept back to me

You're such a pussy.

And I'm Here Too.