...on limited release.

http://money.cnn.com/2014/12/23/media/the-interview-theaters/index.html

Link shows what theaters will be showing it.

I haven't noticed that at all but I've wondered what the agenda was behind people making conspiracy videos and telling blatant lies to turn people against the government.

I'm not sure which mindset is the more detrimental, the people strawmanning the protesters to make it look like they just want to put black people on a pedestal or the few people that actually do that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Dahmer#Trial
Near the bottom

Both of those claims are false. He was ruled to be legally sane, and he has pretty resoundingly been diagnosed - primarily - with borderline personality disorder.

You don't do what he did unless you're mentally ill.

In his final trial "Dahmer was ruled to be sane and not suffering from a mental disorder at the time of each of the 15 murders for which he was tried". But yeah I was wrong about the other part.

Quote from: Maverick on December 17, 2014, 06:16:34 PM

Quote from: Meta Cognition on December 17, 2014, 01:06:44 PM

I'm at a lose to find a truly sane, healthy individual who was actually evil. Namely because such people just don't exist.

Jeffrey Dahmer?

What?

He's like the best example of a mentally ill serial killer.

The Court ruled that he had no mental disorders and experts today disagree with each other about it.

People on social media are idiots and believe everything they see. On twitter, I always see people falling for shit like "Spongebob has been cancelled" and "Starbucks won't sell to the troops" when after a simple google, they could find out the truth. On Facebook, I see people posting articles like "200 ft shark captured" and "Ebola kills 20 kindergartners". It's ludicrous.

What's next,  The Amazing Spider-man 3 will be canceled because some kid in his basement doesn't want to see Spider-man win? Way to sour your already tainted reputation Sony.

For a company almost broke, this movie would have given them tons of profit. Maybe this is just a brilliant marketing ploy to spread the word a bit more.

http://variety.com/2014/film/news/sony-cancels-theatrical-release-for-the-interview-on-christmas-1201382032/

With theater chains defecting en masse, Sony Pictures Entertainment has pulled the planned Christmas Day release of “The Interview.”

In announcing the decision to cancel the holiday debut, Sony hit back at the hackers who threatened movie theaters and moviegoers and who have terrorized the studio and its employees for weeks.

“Those who attacked us stole our intellectual property, private emails and sensitive and proprietary material, and sought to destroy our spirit and our morale – all apparently to thwart the release of a movie they did not like,” the statement reads.

“We are deeply saddened at this brazen effort to suppress the distribution of a movie, and in the process do damage to our company, our employees, and the American public,” it continues. “We stand by our filmmakers and their right to free expression and are extremely disappointed by this outcome.”

The studio did not say it would never release the picture theatrically. Insiders tell Variety that Sony is exploring all options, including offering the picture on premium video-on-demand as a way to recoup at least some of its investment.

The comedy centers on a hapless television host who is recruited to assassinate North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un. The country has condemned the film and some cyber-security experts believe that it played a role in the hacking attack on the studio. North Korea has denied involvement in the attacks.

Seth Rogen and James Franco star in the picture, which cost $42 million to produce.

Sony has been reeling for weeks since hackers broke into the studio’s computer system in November and stole internal documents, email messages, film budgets, spreadsheets detailing top executive salaries and the social security numbers of thousands of employees. The documents and records were subsequently leaked online, setting off a firestorm of media coverage.

Tuesday’s message accompanied another data dump. It threatened violence on theaters that showed “The Interview” and people who attend screenings.

“The world will be full of fear,” the message reads. “Remember the 11th of September 2001. We recommend you to keep yourself distant from the places at that time. (If your house is nearby, you’d better leave.)”

In response, exhibition industry lobbying arm the National Association of Theatre Owners said its members must decide individually whether to release the picture and Sony said it would respect theater owners’ decision not to exhibit “The Interview.” That set off a cascade of cancellations.

The bulk of the country’s 10 largest theater chains — a group that includes AMC, Regal, Cinemark, Carmike and Southern Theatres — announced they would delay showing the picture or would drop it altogether. In statements, many of the theater chains suggested that Sony’s lack of confidence in the film prompted their decision.

Regal, for instance, said its decision was “due to the wavering support of the film ‘The Interview’ by Sony Pictures, as well as the ambiguous nature of any real or perceived security threats.”

Sony was more conciliatory even as it said exhibitor defections motivated its decision.

“We respect and understand our partners’ decision and, of course, completely share their paramount interest in the safety of employees and theatergoers,” the studio’s statement read.

Bruce Nash, founder of box office site TheNumbers, said that Christmas is one of the busiest times of year for moviegoing and is particularly strong for family films. Any perceived danger or threat might have depressed ticket sales.

“It was never going to be one of the big films of Christmas and clearly chains are going to be concerned about making sure people feel comfortable bringing their children to ‘Annie,’ ‘Into the Woods’ or ‘Night at the Museum,” said Nash.

Not sure if this has been posted yet. What do you think of this?

Give me a tldr about him. I pay no attention to celebrity news

Very anti-corporation, very serious about climate change. He makes youtube videos called the Trews, or "true news" and rants about corruption and greed alot.

What reasoning could anybody have for doing it? This isn't a rhetorical question, I really want to know how there are any positive consequence for getting rid of it.

Read the "if you don't think this is hot" thread.

Someone in the Bungie thread pointed out that the reason they had him on was to discuss his religious post, so it doesn't make sense that they would cut him off just because he was talking about religion.

It even mentions this in the article posted...

Quote from: Madman Mordo on December 04, 2014, 06:37:47 PM

Quote from: Azumarill on December 04, 2014, 06:33:51 PM

hyped*

no

*eye twitches*

GET HYPE FUCKING CONFIRMED

1. Don't take a shit in public restrooms
2. Grab more than one paper towel at a time
3. Air dryer is "too brutal"... r u srs?
4. The restrooms with a toilet not covered are meant for one person at a time
5. The thing about the sinks was dead on though