Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tackel

Pages: 1 ... 606162 6364 ... 86
1831
Gaming / Re: Will Microsoft ever go handheld?
« on: December 01, 2014, 02:43:58 PM »
Maybe if they did something like the Nvidia shield, play Xbox One games on the go. If they were to pull it off right it'd be pretty awesome.
Because the Vita is so successful, right?

Vita had shit for games for it's first year and a half. If Microsoft can actually launch it with decent games and keep support up for it, then it could be some good competition for Nintendo.

1832
Gaming / Re: Spike Game Awards 2014
« on: December 01, 2014, 02:41:47 PM »
A snippet of Battlefront footage would make me  :) Or maybe a new Star Wars game revealed.

Bioware is making an "open world Star Wars game"



Bioware, plz

1833
Gaming / Re: Will Microsoft ever go handheld?
« on: December 01, 2014, 02:38:25 PM »
I'd imagine games like Spartan Assault were a test to see if their franchises would be viable on the mobile market.
lol
Because Spartan Assault was so successful it needed a sequel.
You mean people didn't want anothe?

They're fun side games.

1834
Serious / Re: What if the Universe is just a part of a larger system?
« on: December 01, 2014, 02:23:13 PM »
The only problem with that is the fact that if you were to move faster than light, we'd leave our universe. If we were take your theory into account.

We don't want to leave our universe. We want to travel to the moon, and mars, and all the other solar bodies in our backyard quickly. But we don't want to overshoot the runway because then we get into some really fucking bad territory.

So, then we don't move. Instead we move the space around us. WARP 10, NUMBAH ONE!


1835
Gaming / Re: Is Halo MCC worth picking up an Xbone for?
« on: December 01, 2014, 07:40:59 AM »
It will be fixed by January. Campaign works fine and the Halo 5 beta is on the 29th. Up to you.

1836
Gaming / Re: Will Microsoft ever go handheld?
« on: December 01, 2014, 07:38:40 AM »
Yeah. It would be cool to see handheld getting traction again. Also give mobile games some competition to stop their microtransaction shit.

1837
Gaming / Will Microsoft ever go handheld?
« on: December 01, 2014, 07:22:48 AM »
A knock off, yet cheaper version of the vita. Maybe release some side 1st party games for it. Bundle Halo CE and 2 with it so you can Hdlo on the shitter. I'd buy it.

1838
The Flood / Re: So the Sith in the Episode VII trailer
« on: November 30, 2014, 09:57:37 PM »
From concept art the Sith's name is 'The Graverobber', so it's possible he's not actually a Sith but a dark-side user or collector of artifacts that sought out powerful weapons and tools, with Revan's saber potentially being on the list.

Hmm, cool. But it's Revan's mask, not the saber. Guess that also explain's Vader's mask.



didnt luke leave the mask on the death star.....

and didn't it like...ugh i don't know.... blow up?
Vader was cremated with the mask on in Return of the Jedi. It was a short scene if you can remember.

dang that's right. i forgot about that.


1839
The Flood / Re: So the Sith in the Episode VII trailer
« on: November 30, 2014, 09:11:24 PM »
Could someone explain where Revan came from? I seen Star Wars multiple times but never heard of Revan.

Play Knights of the Old Republic.

1840
The Flood / Re: So the Sith in the Episode VII trailer
« on: November 30, 2014, 07:58:54 PM »
From concept art the Sith's name is 'The Graverobber', so it's possible he's not actually a Sith but a dark-side user or collector of artifacts that sought out powerful weapons and tools, with Revan's saber potentially being on the list.

Hmm, cool. But it's Revan's mask, not the saber. Guess that also explain's Vader's mask.


You don't see his mask or face in the trailer, so I'm not sure where you get the idea that he has Revan's mask.

OP

1841
The Flood / Re: So the Sith in the Episode VII trailer
« on: November 30, 2014, 07:51:12 PM »
From concept art the Sith's name is 'The Graverobber', so it's possible he's not actually a Sith but a dark-side user or collector of artifacts that sought out powerful weapons and tools, with Revan's saber potentially being on the list.

Hmm, cool. But it's Revan's mask, not the saber. Guess that also explain's Vader's mask.


1842
The Flood / Re: I'm still trying to wrap my mind around this
« on: November 30, 2014, 07:47:06 PM »
> Verbatim

1843
The Flood / Re: So the Sith in the Episode VII trailer
« on: November 30, 2014, 07:39:52 PM »
Someone told me they basically fucked up Revan's plot line though.

If it is Revan I'm hyped (though it makes no sense)

Revan was put into a prison that's sort of like a stasis. In TOR he was released 300 years later and went bat shit. Since TOR is not canon anymore, they could take they same premise and have him awake during this time period instead. Though, would he be bad or good, or bat shit cray cray?

1844
The Flood / So the Sith in the Episode VII trailer
« on: November 30, 2014, 07:34:09 PM »
Could it be Revan? The lightsaber from this leaked pic was true, and the guy seems to be wearing Revan's mask. Could it be plausible?



Spoiler
inb4disney ruins everything


1845
The Flood / Re: Reasons why the Empire actually isn't that bad
« on: November 30, 2014, 05:41:11 PM »
I love the empire and the rebels sucked shit, but nuking Alderaan is about as easy to justify as nuking Nagasaki.

They were sympathisers and they were hiding the important rebels... ooookaaaaaayyyy buuut we didn't turn Pakistan into a glass crater because Bin Laden was hiding there .-.



Well prior to Disney's colossal fuck up with the EU it had been established that Alderaan was directly responsible for creating the rebel alliance, had been funding them, and were supplying them.
So Bail Organa isn't the Rebellion's bankroll anymore?

Since that was expanded universe stuff no. Alderaan is now completely innocent.
Not entirely, Bail still seems to be playing a key part in the Rebellion... as shown in Star Wars Rebels.

1846
The Flood / Re: FOR THE EMPIRE!
« on: November 30, 2014, 05:37:04 PM »
Okay, more question/critique time. Do the storm troopers look anorexic in Rebels like the Clone Troopers did in TCW? That always bothered the shit out of me, especially because I've got one action figure from TCW series, and all the rest are from Ep II-III.

Depends on the character:



Is the guy on the right dead? You only reach that color when you have been dead for a few hours.

Probably a member of the Sep7agon forums.

1847
The Flood / Re: Why is Noelle in so much denial?
« on: November 30, 2014, 01:28:23 PM »
Quote
Quote
They actually were planning on bringing Durge back for Season 7/8, and have him be involved on the attack on Courasant. The reason they couldn't bring him in earlier was due to the fact of limited animation, not that he would scare children. They beheaded people on screen, so that's not an issue.
Link? I have my obvious doubts about them being willing to bring him back, with all the childish stuff they pulled about them bringing in a regenerating, super quick, pyschopath that's the only Star Wars character to mercilessly and ruthlessly kill all Jedi he encounters while cursing them out with extreme prejudice and glee.

It was in an interview with Dave Filoni. If I find it, I'll PM you it.

As well, I think they'd be fine with a merciless Jedi killer in Season 7.
Spoiler
YouTube

YouTube

YouTube



1848
The Flood / Re: Why is Noelle in so much denial?
« on: November 30, 2014, 01:26:51 PM »
fuckin' double post

1849
The Flood / Re: Regarding World War cannons
« on: November 30, 2014, 01:02:01 PM »
They're are cool, man.

At least this thread isn't about Star Wars.

It is now, beotch


1850
The Flood / Re: So about that really really old Clone Wars show.
« on: November 30, 2014, 12:56:02 PM »
I feel like the 2003 show was only fucking awesome 'cause I was ten.

I rewatched it yesterday. It's really boring, IMO. A little bit of character dialogue here and there..but mostly just action with characters that don't even speak. A good thing TCW improved on that.
It's meant to depict the battles of the clone wars, first season is all about that, really rather exclusively, but even still a story is told and we are shown Anakin's rebellious and disobedient nature, and that he's always looking to do things his way and doesn't like it when he's challenged on it, and takes pride when it works for him.

Second season shows Anakin's relationship, how he feels about being a Jedi, and again him doing things his own way. It also does a fantastic job of foreshadowing Anakin's eventual transformation into Darth Vader, and shows how his rage and emotions can easily get the better of him when provoked. The battle of Coruscant is shown and explained, and everything is set up for Episode III. Keep in mind, the real reason was for it to bridge the gap between Episodes II and III, and not to be a standalone or anything else; and with how well taking time for characters sitting down having discussions went for Lucas in the movies, focusing primarily on action seemed like a really good idea for the time.

I will give you that there is very little dialogue, but much of the story is still shown without the use of it. While TCW did do well with giving the Clones personalities and stories for them, and the '03 series might've benefited from that, it wasn't really the best fit for the style and tone of the show.

If The Clone Wars did something right, then it was adding personalities to the clones... as well as making Anakin likable. They still kept Anakin's idiotic intelligence though.

YouTube

1851
The Flood / Re: Regarding Star Wars canon
« on: November 30, 2014, 12:50:10 PM »
Boba Fett is dead

As of right now, yeah.

I wouldn't be surprised if they brought him back in his spin off movie though.

1852
The Flood / Re: Reasons why the Empire actually isn't that bad
« on: November 30, 2014, 12:48:49 PM »
Dirty Rebel sympathizers

1853
The Flood / Re: Why is Noelle in so much denial?
« on: November 30, 2014, 12:44:25 PM »
Quote
Quote
Durge died in the '03 series. He was alive in the comics, which were said to be non canon by Lucas before The Clone Wars came out.
He didn't die though, it was more than evident that he could've lived, and was shown later on, like you said. Saying "he died in the '03 series" is really moot, when Darth Maul died in Episode I, but through far more absurd explanations he was able to come back. They didn't bring him back because they would've been afraid about scaring kids, clearly.

They actually were planning on bringing Durge back for Season 7/8, and have him be involved on the attack on Courasant. The reason they couldn't bring him in earlier was due to the fact of limited animation, not that he would scare children. They beheaded people on screen, so that's not an issue.

Sure, they could have had him in the suit for a few seasons, but that isn't what a majority of fans would want. We only got to see moving hair at the start of season 4. There was no what they could have him be a reoccurring character and be able to animate his tentacles on their budget. They could have done it by season 7 though, but it got canceled.

Quote
Quote
How is portraying a group of old fashion Mandalorians as terrorists who attack innocent citizens make them look "good". Just because you yourself might be rooting for them doesn't make them the story's protagonist.
Mandalorians are a warrior-culture, and when some people are claiming to be Mandalorians, but are pacifists, and the only Mandalorians that are acting the part are a group of terrorists that want to conquer the galaxy, there's a fucking problem. Especially since Mandalorians aren't a race or specific species, being Mandalorian is an idea, you can't accurately claim to be a follower of that idea and not act the part.

Cultures change, and that was the main plot of the Mandalorian Arcs. The Mandalorians took over again at the end of season 5, but then were mostly wiped out by Sidious when they continued to help Darth Maul.

Quote
Quote
The fans have been wanting that since TPM. It added a giant story element and character for Obi-wan as well. You've complained in other posts they don't service the fans, then when they do you complain? It sounds like you're butthurt over them not bending over backwards to service what you want. Guess what? You're not a special snowflake.
What fans, kids? I admit, when I was younger bringing back dead characters to have them fight new and create changes to the story and for other characters seemed like a fantastic and fun idea. However, I would expect more from the official writers than something from the mind of a young boy playing with his action figures. In story, death is supposed to mean something, you just don't bring dead characters back to life because they were cool. Yes, they might've been a great character, but bringing the dead back relentlessly shows disrespect for the character and original story that character played in. This is why in Halo people have been bitching that Cortana shouldn't come back, because the death meant something and voiding it makes that story pointless. Was a reaction elicited from Obi Wan? Yes, but it's nothing we haven't seen before.
 

I agree, if anything they should have just stuck with Savage Oppress. But it's not like the story they told with Maul was bad. It was really good. There was no harm to it and it only enriched the story.

1854
The Flood / Re: Why is Noelle in so much denial?
« on: November 30, 2014, 12:31:25 PM »
It's not up to the audience to decide what is canon and what isn't. If that were the case I'd consider the Metroid Prime series canon.
Of course it is not, but Disney cannot erase thirty years of established canon.

They didn't, it's still there and put into a "Legends" category. They can use anything from it any time they want.
TCW, Rebels, and future movies go into that "Legends" category, because it is an alternate timeline, because it would contradict the EU stuff. Just like how the new Star Trek movies are on a separate timeline.
http://www.starwars.com/news/the-legendary-star-wars-expanded-universe-turns-a-new-page

1855
The Flood / Re: So about that really really old Clone Wars show.
« on: November 30, 2014, 12:30:15 PM »
I feel like the 2003 show was only fucking awesome 'cause I was ten.

I rewatched it yesterday. It's really boring, IMO. A little bit of character dialogue here and there..but mostly just action with characters that don't even speak. A good thing TCW improved on that.

1856
The Flood / Re: Why is Noelle in so much denial?
« on: November 30, 2014, 12:27:18 PM »
It's not up to the audience to decide what is canon and what isn't. If that were the case I'd consider the Metroid Prime series canon.
Of course it is not, but Disney cannot erase thirty years of established canon.

They didn't, it's still there and put into a "Legends" category. They can use anything from it any time they want.

1857
The Flood / Re: FOR THE EMPIRE!
« on: November 30, 2014, 12:21:46 PM »
Okay, more question/critique time. Do the storm troopers look anorexic in Rebels like the Clone Troopers did in TCW? That always bothered the shit out of me, especially because I've got one action figure from TCW series, and all the rest are from Ep II-III.

Depends on the character:



1858
The Flood / Re: Regarding Halo canon
« on: November 30, 2014, 12:15:34 PM »
According to the logic of a few users here, only the games, Halo Legends, and Halo Nightfall are canon. None of the books or comics or anything else are canon.

343 didn't say they weren't canon. Disney did.

1859
The Flood / Re: Why is Noelle in so much denial?
« on: November 30, 2014, 12:03:04 PM »
Quote
What about shitting all over my childhood by making Grievous a pussy that coughs all the time, instead of a terrifying badass that fights multiple Jedi Masters and Knights with ease?

Grievous could still do all those things, we just never saw him face those Jedi Masters in the Clone Wars. In their first encounter, he got the jump and them and pulled out all of his stunts he could. The Jedi weren't prepared. He was a constant challenge for Obi-Wan, one of the most powerful Jedi aside from Mace and Yoda. Kit Fisto had to retreat from his battle with Grievous, and the only real times Grevious was defeated was through sheer arrogance and luck, which fits his character. Hell, he killed Mother Talzin.

Quote
What about shitting on the Republic Commando series and making it so that the novels were never finished?

They didn't? Karen Travis stopped writing because she got butthurt over what a small section of Mandalore looked like. They even acknowledge the existence of Delta Squad in TCW. The Republic Commando game is canon to an extent.

Quote
What about trying to recreate the cool moments of the '03 series and failing, like with the Kit Fisto episode?

Which Kit Fisto episode? There's a couple spread throughout the series. As well, they never tried to replicate the '03 series, so I don't know where you're getting that idea from.

 
Quote
What about giving the Chosen One who they were reluctant to make a Jedi Knight so hastily a padawan when that's clearly not a great idea?

The Clone Wars takes place after Anakin gets his scar on his right eye. The event above was way before that. If you want to see that, it's perfectly available to watch in the '03 series.

Quote
What about getting rid of Durge?

Durge died in the '03 series. He was alive in the comics, which were said to be non canon by Lucas before The Clone Wars came out.


Quote
What about making Dooku's head look similar to the '03 art style without realizing it doesn't work outside of that art style?

If you don't like the visuals, then okay. Not really a valid point for story telling issues, but whatever.

 
Quote
What about making the Death Watch look good in comparison, because there's a group calling themselves Mandalorian and being pacifists?

How is portraying a group of old fashion Mandalorians as terrorists who attack innocent citizens make them look "good". Just because you yourself might be rooting for them doesn't make them the story's protagonist.

Quote
What about bring Darth Maul back to life?

The fans have been wanting that since TPM. It added a giant story element and character for Obi-wan as well. You've complained in other posts they don't service the fans, then when they do you complain? It sounds like you're butthurt over them not bending over backwards to service what you want. Guess what? You're not a special snowflake.

1860
The Flood / Re: Why is Noelle in so much denial?
« on: November 30, 2014, 11:36:45 AM »
Star Wars EU is canon :)
So if the EU is canon does that mean things like Lego Star Wars, Kinect Star Wars and even fan fictions are canon as well? After all the EU would be on the same level as fan fictions now.
Nope, those things are not part of the EU. LEGO Star Wars is exactly that, LEGO, Kinect Star Wars is a shitty game, and other games like TFU are non-canon. Fan-fictions are obviously not canon.

Yeah, TFU was overruled by the Onderon Arc in TCW and Star Wars Rebels.
TCW and Rebels do not matter.

What don't you like about them by the way? They don't contradict the 2003 series. They have very good story telling and add a lot to the overall saga. Hell, IMO, The Clone Wars makes the prequels 100x better, and is what they should have been. The shows aren't "kiddy" and Rebels has basically no influence from Disney. I can understand the art style, but from a story telling standpoint, I don't see the issue.

Pages: 1 ... 606162 6364 ... 86