Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Verbatim

Pages: 1 ... 353637 3839 ... 1601
1081
Gaming / Re: Pokémon Sword & Shield - GOTTA CATCH... some of 'em
« on: January 21, 2020, 09:26:16 PM »
i still like charizard, in the same way that i like pikachu

that is to say, not openly, because they're so over-exposed, but i don't dislike them because of that

they still have amazing and iconic designs, and it's those amazing and iconic designs that made them so popular

beats the fuck out of dragonite, at least

1082
Gaming / Re: Why Is Dark Souls II So Bad?
« on: January 21, 2020, 03:22:06 PM »
>playing dark souls for pvp


1083
The Two Popes

Despite the fact that this movie's on Netflix, I've been putting this one off. It's rather difficult for me to give a rat's ass about anything to do with the Catholic Church, but I made an effort to put that prejudice aside for 2 hours and watch the movie for the sake of the movie. In the end, I came out of this one mildly entertained.

Anthony Hopkins is one of my favorite actors, and he played the part of Benedict XVI as well as you'd expect him to, netting himself a nomination for best supporting actor. I would've said that he carried the film for me, but Jonathan Pryce, the guy they got to play Pope Francis, did a pretty great job as well, and he's nominated for best leading actor.

Each of the conversations between these two are quite long, but still relatively engaging. While they can drag at points, there's an ample use of flashbacks to keep things from getting too dry. Particularly old flashbacks are filmed in black-and-white, and there's actually some really cool and interesting shots during these portions. The way these scenes were woven into the film's narrative in general was probably my favorite thing about it.

There was a surprising amount of humor and whimsy about the movie, as well—almost too much, I would say, in that there's an overly transparent effort being made to inflate the film's accessibility by bringing the characters a little too far down to earth. Like, did Pope Francis and Benedict really have pizza together and shit? I can't say I know for sure, I suppose, but if that happened, it wasn't really implemented in a way that felt real.

The movie was adapted from a play, and it kinda feels like it. It's very much a movie where very little happens onscreen—you're basically just sitting down, eavesdropping on a couple of old guys for the entire experience, which may not sound very riveting for some people, but apparently the Academy found it riveting enough to nominate it for best adapted screenplay. I don't know if this film really deserves to win any of the Oscars it was nominated for, but I don't regret watching it either. It was pretty okay.

6/10

1084
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers
« on: January 19, 2020, 06:41:22 PM »
Here's every DLC Mii costume that hasn't been carried over from Smash 4 yet:

Lloyd Irving
Regular hoodie

Just some useless information, although it makes me suspect we'll probably get a Monster Hunter character or something. There are some non-DLC outfits that haven't been brought back, as well, like the Swordfighter's Neon Suit, which sucks because that was my favorite one.

1085
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers
« on: January 16, 2020, 05:35:42 PM »
hey, but at least we're getting a second fighter pass with six MORE fire emblem characters

1086
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers
« on: January 16, 2020, 04:30:13 PM »
request title change to "Fire Emblem Megathread" because that's what this game is now

would have myself, but i forgot this wasn't my thread

1087
Sure but I don’t really sees how that takes away from the overall experience unless you’re some snob
obviously, it comes down to what you watch movies for

if you only care about the plot and the performances, these things probably won't bother you

for some, being able to see and hear the movie that you're watching kind of matters

1088
Knives Out

This was a pretty fun movie, although it was a fairly open-and-shut experience, in the sense that it didn't really leave a huge impression on me. It's nominated for best original screenplay, making it somewhat of a priority for me, and I can't say that it didn't deliver in that specific area. The plot and storytelling were about as good as you'd expect a modern day whodunit to be, with a couple of absurdities that help prevent it from becoming too dry or overbearingly serious. The main character, for example, has this amusing tendency to vomit whenever she lies, which is an obstacle that informs a good deal of her decisions throughout the movie, which is pretty fun. I almost feel like they could've done a bit more with that, but the movie does have other problems.

I have this pet peeve—unless it's very subtle, it always makes me cringe whenever writers can't resist putting topical dialogue in their stories. Whenever two young people of opposing political affiliation are present onscreen, you'll often hear them call each other things like "liberal snowflake" or "alt-right troll." Chris Evans even shows up, and one of the first things to come out of his mouth is the term "SJW" just to let you know that HE'S AN ASSHOLE in the most patronizingly unsubtle way possible. Does Rian Johnson think these terms are thrown around casually outside of the Internet? There's even a part where some of the characters start arguing about the immigrant detention camps, and it has nothing to do with the rest of the story. It's just a random distraction that not only dates the movie, but takes me right out of it.

Stuff like that bugs me, but it didn't affect my enjoyment too much overall. It's just that it's already a movie about a Hispanic girl getting one over a family of wealthy old white people, so the fact that the dialogue is so heavy-handed just feels like Rian Johnson's trying to physically beat me over the head with his point when I'm just trying to enjoy a fun mystery.

7/10

1089
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers
« on: January 16, 2020, 09:30:27 AM »
fire emblem is a literal psyop and you can't change my mind

1090
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers
« on: January 16, 2020, 09:29:39 AM »
i'm going to sell my copy of smash ultimate and nuke sakurai headquarters

1091
What's wrong with viewing movies on your phone
you're seeing and hearing less of what the director intended for you to see and hear due to the suboptimal resolution and audio quality

it's also just really tacky and zoomerish

1092
Gaming / Re: Super Smash Brothers
« on: January 15, 2020, 08:28:50 AM »
New character getting revealed tomorrow in a 35 minute presentation.

YouTube

oh wow i'm in a digibro video

1093
The Flood / Re: Traps Are Gay
« on: January 15, 2020, 08:25:29 AM »
Is their penis feminine?
irrelevant
sounds pretty gay tbh
so do you but that doesn't mean i should jump to conclusions

1094
The Flood / Re: Traps Are Gay
« on: January 14, 2020, 09:44:16 PM »

1095
The Flood / Re: Traps Are Gay
« on: January 14, 2020, 09:20:50 PM »
nope

1096
I say horror, but that isn't a 100% accurate description, just the genre it fits into most neatly. The horror elements are in the form of the tension and anxiety that pervade the film's atmosphere. There's no jump scares or gore intended to shock.
oh perfect, that's my kind of horror then

1097
(rather than on your phone or something)
never ever

YouTube

but yeah i'm interested in The Lighthouse, didn't actually know it was a horror movie though

1098
You have time for this outside school and work?
i have a pretty light schedule this semester, and even then, i think most people should be able to squeeze in at least one movie per night into their busy schedule

some of these will be hard to get a hold of legally, though

1099
Wow Verby, I didn’t expect you to care about the oscars, the oscars mean absolutely nothing, it's just a big meaningless circlejerk, I thought you only watch meaningful things
gives me something to do on a sunday evening

also gives me an excuse to watch a bunch of really good movies that aren't meaningless

1100
"i don't care about the oscars, the oscars mean absolutely nothing, it's just a big meaningless circlejerk, i only watch meaningful things"

yes yes you're very cool and intelligent

i'm shitting myself over how cool and intelligent you are

you can fuck off now

1101
The Flood / Parasite won best picture, woo yay
« on: January 13, 2020, 11:27:51 AM »
The Oscar nominations were just announced, I'm gonna try watching all of them this time. For every film I see, I'll update the thread with my thoughts on it, especially with respect to what it was nominated for.



Films nominated for a "big five" award (either best picture, director, actor, actress, and/or screenplay):

☐ Ford v Ferrari
☑ The Irishman
☐ Jojo Rabbit
☑ Joker
☑ Little Women
☑ Marriage Story
☑ 1917
☑ Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
☑ Parasite
☐ Pain and Glory
☑ The Two Popes
☐ Harriet
☐ Bombshell
☐ Judy
☑ Knives Out

Films nominated for other shit:

☐ A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood
☐ Richard Jewell
☐ How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World
☑ I Lost My Body
☑ Klaus
☐ Missing Link
☑ Toy Story 4
☐ Les Misérables
☐ Honeyland
☐ Corpus Christi
☑ American Factory
☐ The Cave
☑ The Edge of Democracy
☑ For Sama
☑ In the Absence
☐ Learning to Skateboard in a Warzone (If You're a Girl)
☑ Life Overtakes Me
☐ St. Louis Superman
☐ Walk Run Cha-Cha
☐ Brotherhood
☐ Nefta Football Club
☐ The Neighbor's Window
☐ Saria
☐ A Sister
☐ Dcera (Daughter)
☑ Hair Love
☐ Kitbull
☐ Memorable
☐ Sister
☑ Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker
☑ Rocketman
☐ Breakthrough
☐ Frozen II
☐ Ad Astra
☐ The Lighthouse
☐ Maleficent: Mistress of Evil
☑ Avengers: Endgame
☑ The Lion King

Looks like I have a lot of work to do.



Here, I'll just briefly go over the few films I've already seen:

The Irishman

Unsurprisingly, this was a great movie. Martin Scorsese is my 2nd favorite director, and I'm almost always pleased with his output. While it does tread around some familiar gangster movie territory, its deliberate pace and slow-burning approach to its storytelling helps it stand out—not to mention its epic 3h30m runtime. It's probably Scorsese's most grounded and mature film, too. Like, if you're under the age of 20, you'll probably find this movie boring as fuck. I think it requires a lot of perspective to fully appreciate, which is to say that I probably don't even fully appreciate it myself. I mean, we're essentially dealing with the affairs of a bunch of very old men from a bygone era, so there's layers to how disconnected I am from this kind of story, being a young person who doesn't know what it's like to feel overcome by my own waning mortality. I can only imagine what it's like, and for what it's worth, it's palpable and scary, and the film explores these emotions beautifully.

Even putting its themes aside, it's still such a treat to see legendary actors like De Niro, Pacino, and even Pesci come out of the woodwork to give it their all for (perhaps) the last time in their careers, if not their lives. As far as general entertainment value, I wouldn't necessarily put this film on the level of Goodfellas, Casino, or even The Wolf of Wall Street, but it's still a remarkable achievement, and I wouldn't complain if it won almost any of the awards it was nominated for... except for visual effects, I guess. They weren't the best. The de-aging effects are impressive, but you can still tell how old the actors really are by their movements, and Robert De Niro's contact lenses were so unnaturally bright-looking at times that it was honestly a little distracting.

Joe Pesci, though. Give that man an Oscar. We're never gonna see him again after this.

Overall, I'd give this an 8/10. For perspective, I'd probably give Casino a 9/10, and Goodfellas a 10/10.

Joker

This movie was cool, but I don't know if I'd consider it to be "best picture" material. Joaquin Phoenix could definitely walk away with an Oscar for his performance, and I'd be happy about that, but there's not much else about this movie that stood out to me as anything worth celebrating. It has a really cool tone and look to it, I suppose. The distinctly gritty aesthetic was more tasteful than Zack Snyder's idea of grit, and the quick outbursts of intense violence broken up between softer and quieter moments of introspection were pretty refreshing to see in a comic book movie.

Ultimately, my biggest problem with the film is that it's basically just Taxi Driver combined with The King of Comedy. That isn't a problem in and of itself—inspiration breeds creativity, and Scorsese is a wonderful director to take inspiration from—but instead of using these two films as a springboard for new ideas, I can't help but feel like they've been used a crutch to actively avoid needing any new ideas. Much of the film's entertainment value, as a result, is carried by Joaquin and his fantastic performance.

This movie is a 7/10 for me, which feels a bit generous, but 6/10 feels too harsh, so I'll just go for a 7/10. It's an impressive job and a likable effort coming from the guy who directed the Hangover movies, which I despise.

Marriage Story

If you have Netflix, and you're into some heavily emotional and dialogue-driven dramas, I highly recommend that you check this one out. The title is ironic; it's actually more of a divorce story, and it's a fairly captivating one at that. Adam Driver and Scarjo give two utterly fantastic performances—some would even say the best of the year, which I can't corroborate yet, because I haven't seen that many 2019 movies. What I will say is that they're the two best performances I've seen in years—at least, for this type of movie.

The screenplay is incredible. Both parties are equally sympathetic, with their respective sides of the story being given equal consideration and weight. You may find yourself siding with one of the two characters in the end, but you won't find yourself rooting against the other at any point. On top of this compelling narrative, we're provided with this remarkably poignant commentary on the state of marriage in the US, and how soul-crushing, bureaucratic, and Kafkaesque the divorce procedure can be—and, without spoiling anything, there does naturally come a point where it all explodes, and I have to say that it's probably my favorite singular scene from the few movies I've watched so far. You'll know it when you see it.

This is not the kind of film I normally watch, but here I am, giving it a strong review and recommendation. This is an 8/10, go watch it if you're interested.

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker

Despite the fact that I'm the only person in the universe who truly understands Star Wars, I really honestly couldn't give a fuck less about it at this point. The thought of giving a Star Wars movie any kind of praise from an artistic standpoint is kind of laughable to me, because it's always been nothing more than a silly cartoon, but this movie is only nominated for its score and visual effects anyway, so whatever I guess.

This movie was pretty stupid, but entertainingly so. JJ Abrams played it safe as we all expected him to, which was boring, but every time there was a stupid twist (and there were like, five of them), I had a big smile on my face, like, "Sure! Let's go with that!" and that was my takeaway. I guess I would've preferred a more serious attempt at a movie, like The Last Jedi, but I have real movies for that.

That said, the visual effects were typical Star Wars fare, and John Williams kinda phoned it in, like he has been doing for this entire trilogy. I fucking love John Williams, but he has enough Oscars at this point, and I really don't think he put in the effort to deserve another one.

I give this movie a 6/10 for what it is, although it probably deserves a bit lower. I'll never see it again to find out. My feelings on the franchise as a whole are ultimately negative, no thanks to the fans who wouldn't let me enjoy my prequels in peace until Disney showed up, but I think the new trilogy is still my favorite of the three trilogies (which isn't really saying a lot).

Avengers: Endgame

This movie was fun... at times, but it wasn't nearly as fun as Infinity War. It was kind of a dizzying mess, in fact, which lost it a lot of points for me, but it's only nominated for visual effects, which is a category I couldn't really care less about. I like it when visual effects are used to make a movie look stylish and distinctive, and not necessarily photorealistic. I'm not impressed by photorealism anymore, and I don't think I ever really was.

In general, superhero movies are about in the same realm as Star Wars for me, unless they're going for a more adult approach, and there haven't really been any Marvel movies made for adults yet (Deadpool doesn't count, because Deadpool is for manchildren, and Logan is at the tail-end of a long-running series of films I don't give a fuck about).

I don't really know what to rate this movie. Probably a 6/10? It did the bare minimum for me, as far as I'm concerned, and that's to just keep me from being completely bored, but it was also kind of annoying at times, especially with how they turned Thor into a fat drunk, except they won't put any fat on Chris Hemsworth's beautiful face, because we can't allow people to think he's unattractive now or something. It was cool that they embraced the stupidity of their time travel system, I guess, but it also made Thanos as boring as he was in all of his previous cameos. It's just such a weird, weird mixed bag of a movie, and it's impossible to watch unless you've seen 500 other movies. The fact that I was able to myself makes me feel kinda gross. I guess by rating it a 6/10, I get to keep my personal bias in check.

All right, that's it for now I guess. I gotta see more shit. The Two Popes, I Lost My Body, Klaus, American Factory, The Edge of Democracy, Life Overtakes Me, and Brotherhood are all on Netflix, so I guess I'll start with those.

1102
The Flood / Re: This weekend is looking interesting
« on: January 13, 2020, 08:27:29 AM »
some of my best posts are in that thread

1103
The Flood / Re: New Semester New Me
« on: January 06, 2020, 02:35:36 PM »
still on vacation for another week

1104
The Flood / Re: So I’m reading The Communist Manifesto/Das Kapital
« on: January 06, 2020, 01:48:50 AM »
Except not everybody shares the same idea of what direction humanity should go so it would be tyranny to try and enforce any one view on them

I mean you specifically state that having no children is good, some people don’t believe that
it's like that's why we debate or something

1105
Gaming / Re: Pokémon Sword & Shield - GOTTA CATCH... some of 'em
« on: January 06, 2020, 01:33:25 AM »
ON THE BRIGHT SIDE

Spoiler
Spoiler

Both found on the same day. What is HAPPENING
What in the Fffffffffuck is a dynamax level?
just how much HP/attack/defense the pokemon will have when dynamaxed
Just HP, actually

it's kinda silly and superfluous tbh, given how easy it is to max it out

1106
The Flood / Re: So I’m reading The Communist Manifesto/Das Kapital
« on: January 05, 2020, 10:28:31 PM »
i'm sure this was a completely unbiased close reading done in good faith with no preconceived notions whatsoever
I don’t know man
An ideology that’s killed millions tends to leave a bad taste
how could it have killed anybody when it was never implemented
So you’re saying it’s impossible to implement due to human nature

I agree
thank you for admitting that communism is great but humanity is garbage

however, given the rising number of people choosing not to have children, among other things that we're traditionally expected to do as a species, breaking this oh-so-incorrigible chain of human nature in a variety of ways, it seems overly defeatist (at best) to make an argument from futility like this

1107
The Flood / Re: So I’m reading The Communist Manifesto/Das Kapital
« on: January 05, 2020, 03:43:14 PM »
i'm sure this was a completely unbiased close reading done in good faith with no preconceived notions whatsoever
I don’t know man
An ideology that’s killed millions tends to leave a bad taste
how could it have killed anybody when it was never implemented

1108
The Flood / Re: So I’m reading The Communist Manifesto/Das Kapital
« on: January 05, 2020, 10:48:46 AM »
i'm sure this was a completely unbiased close reading done in good faith with no preconceived notions whatsoever

1109
Gaming / Re: Pokémon Sword & Shield - GOTTA CATCH... some of 'em
« on: January 04, 2020, 11:35:24 AM »
ON THE BRIGHT SIDE

Spoiler
Spoiler

Both found on the same day. What is HAPPENING

1110
Gaming / Re: Pokémon Sword & Shield - GOTTA CATCH... some of 'em
« on: January 04, 2020, 09:18:05 AM »
so on top of 3v3 being cancer, level 50 fucking stupid as well

i didn't think it would matter that much, because you're effectively just cutting a level 100 pokemon's stats in half, right?

but as it turns out, there are instances where it can completely throw your entire strategy off

I have everything fully invested into my Raichu's Speed stat, bringing its total to 350, which is the absolute highest it can go without items. On top of this, I'm having it hold a Choice Scarf, because he's designed to be a hit-and-run sort of Pokémon. This brings the stat up to 525, which is fuck you speed. Even with boosts, most Pokémon are going to struggle outspeeding that. The only notable example is Barraskewda in rain.

What's really cool about this setup is that it's enough to outspeed a Shell Smashed Cloyster by a single point, and Raichu's Volt Switch is strong enough to one-shot the thing. It's probably one of the most efficient yet least expected ways to punish that otherwise terrifying strategy.

However, as I've just discovered, this only applies if the Pokémon are set to level 100.

If they're set to level 50, like they are in Galar's ranked matches, it doesn't just cut the stats in half. It fucks with the numbers in such a way that the reverse becomes true: After a Shell Smash, Cloyster actually outspeeds my Scarfed Raichu by a single point. It's not even tied. So instead of one-shotting the Cloyster, it's now one-shotting me because of some weird fucking algorithmic deviation bullshit. That fucking sucks.

Pages: 1 ... 353637 3839 ... 1601