5431
The Flood / Re: how often do you make memes?
« on: October 19, 2014, 06:06:31 PM »
I don't do memes very often, but when I do...
Ok, seriously not very often, if at all.
Ok, seriously not very often, if at all.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 5431
The Flood / Re: how often do you make memes?« on: October 19, 2014, 06:06:31 PM »
I don't do memes very often, but when I do...
Ok, seriously not very often, if at all. 5432
The Flood / Re: Nice ads« on: October 19, 2014, 06:04:46 PM »
Bro, you should really answer your messages. Sounds like it's more than just one.
5433
Serious / Re: What do you think of the environmentalist movement?« on: October 19, 2014, 06:03:42 PM »False. I knew the second Icywind said this you were going to mention something along the lines of hemp clothing. 5434
The Flood / Re: You know who's my besf friend today Flood?« on: October 19, 2014, 02:07:43 PM »
French-Arabica coffee, made in a Moka pot.
YouTube 5435
Serious / Re: What do you think of the environmentalist movement?« on: October 19, 2014, 09:11:07 AM »
Good on some points, bad on others.
As one of my lecturers pointed out, they're protesting by waving plastic signs, a by-product of oil, while wearing nylon/polyester clothes (oil) and then going back to their coal-fire station-powered, centrally heated, well-lit homes to argue about the environment while eating food that may or may not have been grown intensively/ using fertilizers and pesticides. Hypocrisy and Irony at it's finest. Frankly there's too many people on this Earth to live environmentally-friendly, so protesting about power sources such as Nuclear and Fracking/Shale Gas at this stage is a bit late and pointless unless serious population control is implemented. 5436
The Flood / Re: So apparently I dress like "A Hick"« on: October 19, 2014, 09:00:42 AM »I've been told by a specific someone who is several decades younger than me that I dress like a hick. I'm not exactly sure what that means. I usually wear leather work boots or western boots, blue jeans, an undershirt with a collared button up shirt on top, both tucked in, and a leather belt. This is how I was raised to dress. It's always seemed the most practical to me. So since when has this been the way a hick dresses? ...so Hank Hill without glasses? Sounds generic rather than a hick, imo. 5437
The Flood / Re: Does anyone know the answer to this question?« on: October 19, 2014, 08:44:40 AM »
100.
Each slave gets 10 bottles to test a half-glass of (so they don't just die of alcohol poisoning and invalidate the tests), then whichever slave dies you throw out the 10 bottles they drank from, with only a 1% loss of wine which I think would be an acceptable loss. Of course this is purely from a numbers standpoint, it's better no-one dies at all. So a better technique is to ask which of the slaves has a chemistry degree, then send them to work testing all the bottles for whatever poison it is. So this could vary the number of slaves needed, depending on how many happened to be educated, but more would be better and save more time. Why he needs 1000 bottles ready to be drunk within 24 hours is odd though; you could just get one slave to test one bottle, and if he doesn't die the King can get pissed on that bottle for 3 hours, assuming no-one else is joining him. 5438
The Flood / Re: Trust system« on: October 18, 2014, 08:06:13 PM »
It should be based on likes per post, maybe a ratio threshold so after a certain amount you rank up.
e.g. 0.25 likes per post gives you respected, 0.40 Heroic, and so on, etc... (though the numbers would probably have to be tweaked). This means that rampant posters aren't just spamming for ranks, and are more likely to put what they post favourable to keep up ranks, though there may be a flaw with this, resulting in a circlejerk mentality. 5439
The Flood / Re: What song is your go to at the moment?« on: October 18, 2014, 11:13:27 AM »
Played this recently on Plug.DJ, found it after a bit of digging into the artist. Folky, but is nice to have on repeat or on infinite jukebox.
YouTube 5440
Serious / Re: The British Green Party is both great and retarded« on: October 18, 2014, 10:52:08 AM »
Most of it makes sense to me, except the GMO's and their complete denial of accepting Nuclear Power stations.
6 Nuclear Power stations could substitute ~50,000 wind turbines, and seeing as there's too many NIMBY's in Britain, the less eyesores, the better. And as for GMO's they already take precautions. GM crops are sterile to prevent breeding (which on the plus side stops native plant life being overwhelmed, but also monopolies the GM Business as you have to buy the GM seeds/plants from the company like Monsanto ). I'm kinda meh on the animal testing thing. I get that less essential research i.e. makeup and soap testing doesn't need animals to be tested, but medicinal research usually needs lab rats and a human substitute (like pigs IIRC) to test vaccines and cancer treatments, and inevitably that means that they will be hurt in the process and may have to be infected with a disease or cancer to test treatments. It's not pretty and I don't like to dwell on it, but I think that is a necessary evil in the wider scale of things. 5441
Serious / Re: Your Thoughts on GamerGate?« on: October 17, 2014, 08:56:06 PM »
I've no real idea what is going,and frankly don't care. Gaming journalism was always generally crap, and reviews always appeared rigged (and recently come to light that some were accentuating the positives of games such as BF4 to boost sales).
Though I do have a qualm with this: Quote The gaming universe has expanded beyond consoles in recent years to include players — many of them women — of casual and social games such as "FarmVille" and "Candy Crush." According to one survey, 48% of gamers are now female. Call me a console elitist, but I'd hardly call Candy Crush or FarmVille fracking games, definitely not "social games". Time wasters maybe, but not games and I'd vouch that it screws up the stats a bit. I want to see stats for PC and Consoles, phones can have their own stat which I'd guess would be largely a female base. 5442
Serious / Re: Lockheed Martin thinks it can give the world unlimited clean energy in 20 years« on: October 17, 2014, 05:17:08 PM »
Hmmm.
I like how it says how wrong the scientists of the 50's were wrong for expecting amazing technology in the near future, then going on to proclaim amazing technology will be available in the next 20 years. Contradictory bits aside, nuclear fusion being commercially and widely available would be nice, though I hope they're focusing on reliability and safety over how big the reactors are for the time being. You know, walk before you fly and all that. Only then can we have Concordes back, only fusion powered. 5443
The Flood / Re: Be glad you guys don't have to deal with this crap ._.« on: October 17, 2014, 04:53:50 PM »
Good to see helmets actually work as intended.
Still can't help but think of that scene in Saving Private Ryan though... 5444
Gaming / Re: Friendly reminder that Fallout 3 was a disservice to the franchise« on: October 17, 2014, 04:49:24 PM »I doubt it. Interplay/Obsidian are the only contenders, and they did already. But only after Fallout 3.It didn't.But it doesn't change the fact that F3 didn't help the actual game. 5445
Gaming / Re: Friendly reminder that Fallout 3 was a disservice to the franchise« on: October 17, 2014, 04:43:45 PM »But it doesn't change the fact that F3 didn't help the actual game. ...that don't make no sense. 5446
Gaming / Re: Friendly reminder that Fallout 3 was a disservice to the franchise« on: October 17, 2014, 04:20:03 PM »Then simply acknowledge it can't be a disservice if it revived the franchise. What you're saying conflicts this (though I assume now the discussion is a wider debate about Bethesda than actually Fallout 3 itself).I never said that.Not what we were talknig about.Fallout 3 was a great post-apocalyptic open world shooter.> Fallout 3 was a disservice to the franchise 5447
Serious / Re: Which is the stupidest thing to deny?« on: October 17, 2014, 04:18:01 PM »
The Holocaust. With irrefutable evidence, denying it is comparable to thinking the Earth is still flat. (InB4TheFlatEarthSociety). It may not change the fact that it happened by denying it, but is usually associated to anti-semitism which is detrimental to today's Jews.
Denying Global Warming is a bit of a more difficult thing to say. While humans' activity has certainly risen it over the last 250 years, on a Geological timescale it has been increasing for a long time, and falls again at regular cycles (currently we are at the top of the warming cycle, so soon there will be global cooling, though it's effects may be less compared to previous cycles). I'd say it's arguable to say it's totally human-created, but it is downright retarded to say it isn't happening at all. Denying evolution doesn't change anything. Whether someone believes it or not, the process will still happen regardless over the hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of years it takes. 5448
Gaming / Re: Friendly reminder that Fallout 3 was a disservice to the franchise« on: October 17, 2014, 04:07:25 PM »Not what we were talknig about.Fallout 3 was a great post-apocalyptic open world shooter.> Fallout 3 was a disservice to the franchise So you'd rather have no modern Fallouts at all? Ok. 5449
Serious / Re: [Psykana] Other people can tell whether your partner is cheating on you [BPS]« on: October 17, 2014, 03:41:53 PM »
I get feelings of "yeah, how long will that relationship last..." a lot with other people. So far in all cases but one (where my best friend dated a girl for 2 years when I thought it wouldn't last 2 months), it's been true. Never had an inclination that one would cheat in any couple though, but I'm putting that down to my general innocence and not seeing anybody in a bad light (unless it's really, really bad from the beginning).
But the lack of information on how the test was carried out exactly is a bit strange, normally they'd explain how it worked and how to train "coders" from say, a control group (which also there is no mention of). Still interesting to read about though. 5450
The Flood / Re: How long until I completely absorb the Serious board?« on: October 17, 2014, 03:29:04 PM »
What?
I thought you'd annexed it to the Meta-Board ages ago, with the odd incursion of a few others at the border. 5451
The Flood / Re: PLUG DJ DEMANDS *FURTHER* APPEASEMENT!« on: October 17, 2014, 03:24:34 PM »
It's a Friday so I can actually be nocturnal for you Americans. Now, where you at?
5452
Gaming / Re: Friendly reminder that Fallout 3 was a disservice to the franchise« on: October 17, 2014, 03:11:13 PM »Fallout 3 was a great post-apocalyptic open world shooter.> Fallout 3 was a disservice to the franchise It drove interest in the series, which in turn produced NV which apparently is more cannonically accurate (if that's a word). So that "disservice" revived the series which would otherwise have fallen into the fogs of unknown games. 5453
Serious / Re: Who should I vote for in 2015?« on: October 17, 2014, 03:08:18 PM »
UKIP is your most "liked"? Why? Serious question.
Anywho, the 3 main parties are generally untrustworthy and ineffective on their promises, so go for an quiet unknown like Green. 5454
Gaming / Re: I have found the edgiest game on the planet.« on: October 17, 2014, 06:23:07 AM »
Well, this certainly isn't going to cause controversy.
But whatever, it's a game and it'll certainly make a name for themselves for an otherwise unknown developer (though being known as "That lot wot influence kids to kill innocents" won't be too great) And to think, everyone flipped their shit at MW2's level. Now there's a whole game about massacres. As funny as the voice over sounds, I'm kinda glad this kicks political correctness in the teeth (and then stabs the shite out of it). 5455
The Flood / Re: Since Ebola is now in Connecticut« on: October 16, 2014, 04:36:13 PM »Nah, Wales. But judging by the accents around here, you'd think...where's the state that has an accent where everyone speaks like they're always asking a question? There.i always assumed you lived in Ireland. You're living in Connecticut?a pretty transparent plot IMO. Who'd be willing to risk their lives for money? 5456
The Flood / Re: Since Ebola is now in Connecticut« on: October 16, 2014, 02:25:21 PM »a pretty transparent plot IMO. Who'd be willing to risk their lives for money? A lot of people. Anywho, I should be ok. There are lot's of Americans at my Uni surprisingly, but seeing as freshers flu wasn't an Ebola epidemic I'm not worried, though there's always a Lidl's nearby if I need to panic buy for the coming apocalypse. 5457
Serious / Re: Lockheed Martin claims technological breakthrough with nuclear fusion« on: October 16, 2014, 02:19:57 PM »Wait a minute, I thought we hadn't quite figured out nuclear fusion yet. How is it powering warships?We use Fission Reactors for power, not fusion. And we can fusion, just not for an extended period of time, and it's not self sustaining at the moment. No, apparently over 100% (you get more than what you put in - how exactly that works I've no idea. I'm assuming it means self sustaining like the Sun). Remember seeing it on a BBC technology documentary...was a while ago though when fusion was limited to small scale scientific tests and the reactor chamber would disintegrate slightly with each use. Haven't heard much of it being used commercially or for military purposes since now. 5458
The Flood / Re: Qt 3.14 texted me me, wat do« on: October 16, 2014, 02:12:50 PM »
Toast, envelope. NAO!
But if you're being serious, reply back as normal, jesus. 5459
The Flood / Re: So we can't swear or post NSFW because Adsense, but they're allowed?« on: October 16, 2014, 02:01:22 PM »I can. You would be complaining too if you watched the 30 minute long borefest where the Google rep explains why they have to be "conservative" with their ad publishing.Adsense is testing us.with tits. I can't believe OP is complaining. Precisely. If we started an NSFW thread with a bikini-clad girl on a beach, we'd be outta there in a second. So what have you been browsing that they show you that? I've got ghostery on to stop trackers, so I've no idea. maybe it's just sending me everything and anything in the range of ads. 5460
The Flood / So we can't swear or post NSFW because Adsense, but they're allowed?« on: October 16, 2014, 11:06:13 AM »
Most recent Ad:
C'mon Adsense, you're taking the piss here, can't even see the frickin' "beach" with that woman's boob in the way. /distaste |