Absolutely no where near Frankie Boyle tier. He's practically Barry Chuckle compared to him. Sure, he makes the occasional vulgar "I'd bang her ahyuck hyuck kno what i mean ;^)" joke, but that's about as far is he goes. The furthest boundary I've ever seen him cross is like one rape joke he made.

Hmm, weird. All that fuss over small things while Jimmy Carr and Franky Boyle can go insane. Perhaps because he's a small fry so they can stop his career early (or he's just not a very good comedian).

I mean, c'mon:

Hmm, that guy was gonna have a gig at my Student's Union, but I think there's some sort of campaign to not have him here anymore.

Ah well, don't know him anyway. On a scale of Light hearted humour to Franky Boyle, how "shocking" is his material?

Guinness and Tequila Slammers.

Tequila for the hard stuff or when I'm not adequately buzzed, and Guinness for long drinking games and to wash down other spirits that I hate but inevitably down anyway.

On the most part, clean shaven.

I would like a bushy beard (kinda like my Green Khan avatar, but without the...beard pony-tail?), it seems it's a fad amongst Geologists. Gotta wait until my facial hair isn't just weirdly distributed before I even consider it, however...

Well, if they "got" that, they certainly aren't here now to reminisce about it..

Quote from: SuperIrish on November 10, 2014, 10:30:21 AM

cost on the NHS in the long term.

Obese people and smokers are actually cheaper to treat.

Where'd obese people come into this? I'm talking about liver cirrhosis, organ transplants, treatment for alcoholics, mental capacity and wellbeing for general life, all that stuff that comes with alcohol. A rise in price means less consumption, and at the very least the tax hike covers the cost of the damage alcohol does.

People get to live longer, meaning they work for longer, meaning they pay taxes longer, and now at a tad higher rate.

I ended up with £21.2 Billion.

For the record I would've cut just the Ministry of Sport and cut spending in just England by 10%, but that option wasn't available.

I don't think.

Did I win?

It's a sort of two-edgded sword if it's not managed correctly.

Think if Google got bigger and wasn't as nice - A monopoly in virtually all technology sectors, charging prices whatever it feels like with little options or competition, particularly if it held "business deals", aka a cartel in the industry with Apple and Samsung and Windows.

But restricting growth of companies can create a more localised problem, like the US' internet troubles. Limiting expansion or growth means an area might only have one option, meaning that company can impose whatever the fuck it likes unless you're lucky to have more than two companies in your area.

I'd say something along the lines of how telephone companies work here in the UK is fair - Allowing companies to share the wires of another (e.g. TalkTalk and others using British Telecom wiring), means you can still allow companies to expand as far as they like, but that area is overlain with other companies also, regardless of size. This in fact would aid start-up companies as it saves them money building up infrastructure when they can share the rest, and improve on areas they control. The only places with limited choice would be isolated areas such as mountainous Wales and Scotland, where there is choice but just not much improvement in quality over the other due to limited infrastructure and investment in the area.

On the downside, this could hamper overall development, as BT doesn't want to improve the wires at their expense when everybody else is going to freeload off it.

Trailer looks good.

9/10 won't pirate.

Answer them, goddammit!

Then react accordingly to whatever comes next. Should be standard procedure.

If you had seen what I saw at a Burger King at 1am last night, you'd have a different outlook on this.

Imagine a drunk granny wearing a frilly tight dress, only it somehow had wedgded itself firmly between her ass-crack. Now, immediately stop thinking about it before you start cerebral hemorrhaging.

160 acres? Shit, that's pretty good.

Not sure how planning development laws work in Alaska, but I know 2 boggy acres in Ireland just on the cusp of the recession with planning permission (to build houses on) would fetch easily £200,000.

Of course, seeing as you're Uncle wants the land to remain family I've no idea if that's any help at all given your situation. Plus, not entirely sure if there's a housing demand in the solitude that is Alaska.

tfw when you don't have to bear the harrowing experiences of pointless retarded shit that happens in jobs.

but also tfw when you have no reliable income.