Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Super Irish

Pages: 1 ... 151617 1819 ... 201
481
Just give 'em one'a deez;


482
Serious / Re: The 8th amendment in Ireland
« on: October 26, 2017, 04:59:35 PM »
It's a bit stupid since people who are going to have abortions regardless of the law in Ireland will have them in the UK. It has been done for some time now.

Since you can't just drop down and get it free on the NHS, you're stuck with private services, which restricts who actually gets one through an artificial barrier. The poor get fucked, other than literally, and then have to take care of a child they thought they weren't capable of. One life created, more often then not two lives ruined.

Rights of unborn children has been quite conservative in all regards in Ireland. There was a case a few years ago about a braindead woman being refused the right to die on the basis that she had a 6 month fetus. Don't know how it turned out.
Haven't heard of that case. Was she an Irish citizen? you're up North, right? I assume abortion is legal over there?

Heard it a while back, so after a quick google search I found some of my details were off;
https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/braindead-pregnant-woman-kept-on-life-support-31550989.html
Westmeath, so a Republic citizen. Her life support was eventually turned off, but only on the court's basis that the fetus wouldn't survive to full-term anyway. Wouldn't matter much where in Ireland she's from though, as NI bans abortions as well iirc.

I was in the South but now that I've moved, it doesn't personally affect me. Still, gotta have some pride in my country, and some shame when this old shite's still banging around.

483
Serious / Re: The 8th amendment in Ireland
« on: October 26, 2017, 08:20:14 AM »
It's a bit stupid since people who are going to have abortions regardless of the law in Ireland will have them in the UK. It has been done for some time now.

Since you can't just drop down and get it free on the NHS, you're stuck with private services, which restricts who actually gets one through an artificial barrier. The poor get fucked, other than literally, and then have to take care of a child they thought they weren't capable of. One life created, more often then not two lives ruined.

Rights of unborn children has been quite conservative in all regards in Ireland. There was a case a few years ago about a braindead woman being refused the right to die on the basis that she had a 6 month fetus. Don't know how it turned out.

484
Gaming / Re: Which category do you fall into?
« on: October 24, 2017, 06:39:31 PM »
Oldfag games, albeit I started playing all of them within the last 2 years.

485
The Flood / Re: damn I hate reddit
« on: October 24, 2017, 06:53:49 AM »
It's alright if you stick to lurking.

Get all the info you can, then get out before you see the comments.
The real pro tip is in the comments.

Ahh yes, but not when it's some gif or interesting that doesn't really warrant dad-joke-tier comments.

486
The Flood / Re: damn I hate reddit
« on: October 23, 2017, 02:40:03 AM »
It's alright if you stick to lurking.

Get all the info you can, then get out before you see the comments.

487
The Flood / Re: The Vader account was mine
« on: October 22, 2017, 06:18:51 PM »
I'm the lindburg baby! Wah, Wah!

488
The Flood / Re: How do you feel about stealing other people's work?
« on: October 22, 2017, 04:53:00 AM »
This poll won't satisfy your pre-determined answer in your head.

It won't give you a leg up or a "told you so" scenario.

It won't reverse everything that's already been stolen from you.

Let it go man.

489
The Flood / Re: Ask a Sith Lord Anything
« on: October 22, 2017, 04:33:21 AM »
Oh sweet jesus this is hard to watch.

Just go home Deci. You can't take a joke and we don't want you hurting yourself again.

490
The Flood / Re: MIGRATION: Move this community to EpicMafia
« on: October 19, 2017, 09:40:42 PM »
Go ask that weird creep deci-lookalike that arrived a while back and see if he still wants us.

Who knows, he may even up the price for a blowie.

491
The Flood / Re: So I watched the original Blade Runner
« on: October 17, 2017, 03:48:42 AM »
watch the movie again you didn’t pay attention to the weird details the movie leaves behind

also watch the directors cut I think? it has a different ending

ehhhh does the director's cut really add to it or just make you question deckard's humanity?

Theatrical beats you over the head with the plot and Deckard's detective work via VO, omits the unicorn dream and has a generic "driving off into the sunset" ending, as well as a few other details. Ironically while it serves the plot on a platter, the hints that Deckard may not be human aren't really developed. Iirc the escape scene deals with the fact he left Rachel alive rather than them both being replicants.

Director's and Final cut have little differences to each other apart from a few CGI improvements, colour filtering, and their format (originally the Director's Cut was VHS, and lower quality, while Final Cut got better quality through advances in film restoration on DVD/Bluray, and some bonus features).

If you get confused, go back and watch it again at some point. If you're still totally stuck, find a theatrical copy and watch it because all the detective work is explained with a jarring VO, or read the plot on Wkipedia.

492
The Flood / Re: Blade Runner 2049 Was Fuckin' GOOD
« on: October 13, 2017, 07:57:34 PM »
I ordered the DVD's of both Bladerunner and 2049 after watching.

I've seen 'em both, but there was some nifty plot in there. The cinematography was beautiful, and had little references and elements here and there of the old Bladerunner but without being too similar. Close enough, but not The Force Awakens to A New Hope close, if that makes sense.

Best film of this year. Star Wars better at least be as close as good in December.

EDIT: Just watched through the making-of documentar from 2007 (Dangerous Days; Making Bladerunner if anyone's interested) of the original Bladerunner, and one of the proposed intros during writing/stroyboard heavily influenced, if not is, the intro to 2049. The whole boiling pot of soup in the farmer's kitchen, and that short scene's plot. Even more little references than before.
Spoiler
Even the frickin' dog!

493
YouTube


Album came out today

494
That was actually pretty good.

Can we keep him?

495
What even is this thread.
Oh, thats what people are calling "dark corner of internet".

Sounds like two sides of an argument going through Google translate to insult each other,  with one being slightly illiterate.

496
Vikings by definition would have came as raiders or conquerors.

They raided abbeys and churches in the UK and Ireland for hundreds of years, slaughtered a shit ton of people and then took back the women, or just raped them then and there.

As a result we have Ireland's capital (Dublin, coming from the Gaelic Dubh Linn, or Blackpool because it was a swampy bog until vikings settled there), several coastal towns around Britain, and some leftover traces of Nordic genes in the population.

Benevolent they ain't, but influential on the future of both countries. The Saxons had to ward them off in the North before getting to Hastings and dealing with William (the future Conqueror of Britain).

Everyone generally sees the Romans in a positive light, but then in Britain alone they nearly eradicated the Celtic languages and culture. They made roads and Bath though, so it's all good.




497
The Flood / Re: wtf is wrong with the US
« on: October 10, 2017, 12:54:00 PM »
the most disgusting aspect is he's letting his bare skin touch a mcdonald's floor

More like the thin film of grease that layers the place. That's why his spazzed movements on the floor were so jerky, he was slippin'.


Spoiler

500
The Flood / Re: so i just saw blade runner (1982)
« on: October 09, 2017, 07:56:19 AM »
Saw 2049 and enjoyed it a lot. Definitely deserves a second viewing.

Agreed, but I have one misgiving;
Spoiler
What happened to the dog?

Doggo didn't need Deckard; Deckard needed Doggo


Really my only gripe with the film is
Spoiler
that the entire revolution plot came out of nowhere and didn't really add anything to the story except a way to tell K that he isn't Rachel's son. Apparently they all believed they could be the child, but none of them thought to look for whomever created and implanted that memory, which would have immediately led them to her like it did for K. Overall, that was just a really hamfisted way to tell the audience that everything isn't completely fucked for the replicants, which really hadn't been addressed at all.

Spoiler
Maybe it's left as a precursor to another Bladerunner film? Wallace still exists, he can keep making replicants (albeit not reproduce), and other replicants will keep learning of the miracle. 

501
The Flood / Re: so i just saw blade runner (1982)
« on: October 08, 2017, 07:55:25 PM »
Saw 2049 and enjoyed it a lot. Definitely deserves a second viewing.

Agreed, but I have one misgiving;
Spoiler
What happened to the dog?

502
The Flood / Re: so i just saw blade runner (1982)
« on: October 07, 2017, 09:42:24 PM »
Apparently the rapey scene was supposed to be a longer scene that was a romantic build up until Deckard became more of a brutish animal as shown, but it got cut because it took too long and messed with the pacing, so it stayed out and what was a more acceptable "passionate" scene in the 80's got a rapey vibe now.

Fun fact, the weird language the police guy and the locals use is supposedly a mishmash of the most common languages on Earth as the idea was the future would be more global than national, doing away with language barriers (although English seems to exist just fine), and that the whole global warming and climate change would've forced different cultures and language groups together forcing them to get along, if they couldn't leave Earth because they were too poor/disabled. Why they decided to conglomerate in LA is anybody's guess.

503
The Flood / Re: It's been a while - Post a picture of yourself.
« on: October 07, 2017, 08:34:47 AM »
Two weeks ago, 28 floors high in Kuala Lumpur;
Spoiler

504
The Flood / Re: Things you take for granted
« on: October 05, 2017, 12:43:52 PM »
Parents, and breathing through my nose.

Also at the moment, swallowing. Sore throats after drunken nights out are the worst.

505
The Flood / Re: S3 finale was lit honestly
« on: October 04, 2017, 05:39:20 PM »
Finale was probably the most boring.

Tales from the Citadel and the premiere were the best imo.

506
The Flood / Re: I need the opinions of actual Altrighters/Alex Jones fans
« on: October 04, 2017, 06:46:24 AM »
Not one myself, but it's probably something along these lines;


Kinda ignores that some police in the US do have access to military vehicles and other gear that's not capable of "glassing" an area and more along the lines of wiping out a house full of insurgents, as well as having reserves or the actual military troops that would likely be patrolling towns in such a scenario, but meh.

507
I feel like most if not all countries would do or have already done this to their respective citizens on their soil at some point.

508
Gaming / Re: Idiot videogame logic
« on: October 02, 2017, 05:27:02 PM »
I used to do a lot on CoD;

-Testing fences in various areas to see if I can jump over them or if it's an invisible wall (some edge of map areas are trolly and you can just jump off a cliff and die).

-Picking two variants of the same gun so I can carry double-ammo and only use the good one (e.g. M1 Garand + M1 Garand w/ bayonet or w/ launchers for 240-sumthing rounds, M4A1 + M4A1 Holographic/RedDot/SOPMOD/Grenade Launcher for 320 rounds).

-Killing the unnamed NPC teammates for extra ammo of my favourite gun (M1 Garand, PPSh). It turns out in Ring of Steel for CoD W@W, if you just hide a bit back while the NPC's attack each other across a street, they will respawn endlessly allowing you to just farm them for PPSH ammo (which you get barely any of at the start and usually have to drop it).

-Since MW2 I have to test how sniper rifles work because they started alternating between doing nothing to quickscoping, or adding some bullshit dispersion mechanic where if you fire too quickly after aiming the bullet goes off in a random direction. Black Ops is the worst as they kept changing the delay time which would mess up my aim even if I wasn't trying to do it.

-Cooking grenades to suicide to find out the cooking time and make DIY impact grenades.

-Learning what the lunge distances for the knife and the shotgun kill-shot ranges as the games changed. I have to do this in EVERY game with shotguns as they all have different ranges. I'm looking at you, GearsofWar/Halo/Battlefield/Borderlands/Metro/Fallout.




509
The Flood / Re: Anyone here know about high quality cameras?
« on: October 02, 2017, 05:03:39 PM »
DSLR's are medium-high end cameras, they're pricey (cheapest are somewhere around £5-600) and they're sorta bulky, but only to accommodate all the lenses and shit they need to take really good pictures, with MegaPixels (MP)'s well beyond everything else with picture-taking abilities, and most are also able to be used as a video camera. These are not really suited for amateurs or as starter cameras as they cost a bomb, and although they have an automatic setting, you won't get the most out of the camera's power to make real use out of it without knowing a bit about ISO's, light intensities, apertures, lenses, and shutter speeds, as well as what a RAW file is.

Compacts are what it says on the tin; small enough to fit in your pocket, at the cost of higher quality (similar MP-resolutions as a high-end phone), but are significantly cheaper, which can be under £100 if you get an old model. Great and cheap for starters, but may be limited in features such as only producing JPEG images that are harder to edit later on, might not have filming capabilities, and may or may not be limited to an auto-only setting (so you can't do specific focus on a subject, change the aperture, etc). Compacts can also have niche features, like being waterproof (good for diving or underwater photos), or being generally more rugged than a DSLR.

Compact DSLR's are a more recent thing - more compact than a DSLR, more features and quality than a compact, and somewhat in between the two for cost (between £3-400, but getting ever-cheaper). They may not have DSLR super MP quality, but are far less bulky, have filming capabilities, can have the niche features of compacts, and have slightly cheaper options available.

There's also the older SLR's (the D being Digital in the above) and 35mm film cameras. These can be dirt cheap because of their age unless it's some "classic/vintage model", but are a lot more finnicky because the tech is likely to have come from the 90's or earlier (i.e. no pre-/post-shot preview screens, limited indicators on shutter speed/aperture/light intensity, film is far more fragile to heat/light/cold/humidity/water/dust, x-rays and other radiation, etc), plus it's a constant cost to replenish the film, which depending on the camera and film type, can be very rare and/or expensive. The upside is you get a "classic" camera, with the mechanical bits and clicks, actual film, getting back negatives and actual photos, that sorta thing. It's kinda popular with hipster types, old folks and hobbyists.

I myself have a compact DSLR (Panasonic Lumix something or other) and an old Minolta 35mm from the 80's. I've been using the Lumix for ages now to learn how to do all the settings manually with the help of the preview screen to see the results before I click, so that I can transfer over and use the totally featureless 35mm and gauge what settings I need at the time to get a decent photo out of it.


510
Serious / Re: Shooting at Vegas, more than 50 dead.
« on: October 02, 2017, 12:11:07 PM »
Man, people are throwing stats and country factfiles around like crazy on Twitter. Should change #GunControl to #AmericanControl.
This tag is a nightmare. So much shite going around. So many bloody idiots. Reading through a guy's comments whose bio states that he's an independent and non-racist or non-bigoted yet tweets right wing, racist and sexist shit. Just one day ago, he made gloating comments about the Canada attack and how it's caused by immigrants (5 people injured, 0 deaths without access to guns). The irony in him vehemently attacking gun control after an attack (58 dead, 500 injured with access to guns) committed by a white national clearly escapes him. Sad shit.

Twitter on a busy day (some injustice, mass shooting, or something about genders) just becomes a youtube comments section. It's best to just leave at that point before the amount of alcohol needed to forget the stupidity becomes a lethal dose.

Pages: 1 ... 151617 1819 ... 201