This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Super Irish
Pages: 1 ... 117118119 120121 ... 201
3541
« on: June 25, 2015, 06:40:42 PM »
So what post are you trying to hide? Lulz
"Y'know, when he said he killed someone..." See, something like that would be sorta contrary to his wishes.
3542
« on: June 25, 2015, 06:24:52 PM »
Recuperating after a night of drinking. Not a hangover, just eating unhealthy junk while watching movies.
3543
« on: June 25, 2015, 06:20:17 PM »
3544
« on: June 25, 2015, 06:58:18 AM »
Drink water, eat lemons.
I'm serious, grin and bare and eat a lemon like you would an orange, you feel better afterwards.
3545
« on: June 24, 2015, 09:15:38 PM »
I don't get it
Just click on one of the most popular songs and watch the blue ticker go around.
3546
« on: June 24, 2015, 09:09:43 PM »
how do i make it play infinite happy hardcore and rave stabs
Search for the song and see if someone's already uploaded it, or upload an mp3 of it yourself (which takes about 5 minutes). And if you only have it on youtube...Yeah I've used it a few a times.
I like it with trippy, spacey shit.
This sounds really good, have replaced this as my looping stuff now.
3547
« on: June 24, 2015, 08:49:33 PM »
The Infinite JukeboxIt compares notes and beats and other various musical nonsense in a song to create loops, so a song can literally play forever. Best part is if you can't find a song to test it out/a song that you love and want to repeat, you can upload it, and there's a tuning system so if it's linking too much or too little you can reduce links to get more of the song in, or increase the links at the cost of the repeated song's looping quality. So, test it out with your musics and then post the good ones (as some can be noticeably jumpy if the music isn't very consistent). I'll start with Beck - Dreams. Currently have been playing it for 20 minutes. Note: It has to be an active window to keep playing, so you may have to put it into a separate browser if you wanted to run in the background.
3548
« on: June 24, 2015, 12:25:03 PM »
Adventure for Fiction, Military History for Non-Fiction.
Currently reading A Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (though haven't had a read of it in a while), and I've got a collection of Sherlock Holmes to read afterwards.
Nothing really on my wishlist, though I have to check if there are more books from Clive Cussler or Flashman.
3549
« on: June 24, 2015, 12:09:06 PM »
First it was house parties, than it was at the beach were occasionally the police would come because we'd have a small fire.
Later it become the local pub because their method of checking for age was:
"Are you 18?"
"Uh... yeah?"
3550
« on: June 24, 2015, 11:18:56 AM »
Unofficial Fallout Patch - Fixes a shit-ton of basic things, including the DLC radio additions spoiling the game early
GNR Enhanced Radio - Adds about 100 20's-40's themed songs to it)
Fellout - A basic filter remover, which makes it look less grimy and green. Believe me, even if you didn't notice it, it's surprisingly nicer without it.
I use these 3 because my laptop is pretty taxed as it is playing it, and they certainly freshen the game up a bit at minimal cost to performance.
3551
« on: June 24, 2015, 11:08:52 AM »
The guy's reaction is just priceless. Sorta double-takes. 
3552
« on: June 24, 2015, 11:03:57 AM »
I'm at the stage where I know I don't know, but don't know what I don't know.
...that sentence made sense, right?
3553
« on: June 24, 2015, 10:32:33 AM »
Must be because of the recent shitstorm about that Destiny DLC thingy.
Welcome, new and old, weird or popular. We don't give a shit anyways, so join the madhouse.
3554
« on: June 24, 2015, 10:24:17 AM »
Half Life I thought was more fun than the sequel. You got your human enemies, you got your alien ones, and a tad bit of dimension jumping and God-killing for the end.
Half Life 2 while fun, just wasn't as good. It had a weird mix of 1984 and War of the Worlds and all of the enemies although alien, were just converted/loyal humans or those machine-walkers.
3555
« on: June 24, 2015, 10:18:33 AM »
Wow. I can't tell if he's serious.
3556
« on: June 24, 2015, 10:16:11 AM »
 "Humans were a mistake. They're nothing but trash"But seriously Deci, lay off the global self-loathing and Agent Smith quotes.
3557
« on: June 24, 2015, 10:08:35 AM »
Futurama: Simpsons, but in 3000AD.
3558
« on: June 23, 2015, 07:45:43 AM »
Baking in the hot sun in Carmarthen after getting my braces tightened.
Hurts, but at least it's actually a warm sunny day worth burning in.
3559
« on: June 23, 2015, 07:18:47 AM »
I consider this an extension of myself, though I take what random people on here say here barely seriously.
Otherwise though, what you read of what I say is genuine, though usually I wish I could word my more serious posts better.
I try to remain on good terms with everyone or at the least nuetral like I do irl, but I'll hardly give a fuck if someone hates me online for one reason or another.
3560
« on: June 23, 2015, 03:30:23 AM »
I have a regular gander, but never commenting. The comment section is either a fight to be the most witty/funny, an argument over Israel/Palestine, or an occasional gem of further information coupled with rational, peaceful thought. It's decent on the places that I haven't auto-subscribed: Spoiler /r/
KerbalSpaceProgram
Metro2033
Fallout
Futurama
Space
Minecraft
GrandTheftAutoV
Arma
Beck
3561
« on: June 22, 2015, 08:48:16 PM »
On a related note...
Would this be a good time for a recruitment drive...?
Yes.
Go Go Go!
Why not?
Well, it is nearly 3am, and I am sorta tired... Tomorrow, if someone hasn't already done it.
3562
« on: June 22, 2015, 08:46:49 PM »
friendly Brotherhood Fallout endings:
"The death of the Master was the first major step towards ending his mad dream of conquest and enforced peace, but it is the destruction of the Vats that neutralizes the mutant threat. Without the ability to create more mutants and enforce their harsh brand of justice, the mutant armies flee to the east, beyond the no-man's land."
"The Brotherhood of Steel helps the other human outposts drive the mutant armies away with minimal loss of life, on both sides of the conflict. The advanced technology of the Brotherhood is slowly reintroduced into New California, with little disruption or chaos. The Brotherhood wisely remains out of the power structure, and becomes a major research and development house."
FO3's world assumes that the Vault Dweller killed the Master and Rhombus lived, meaning that the BoS essentially followed the mutants East and established another Citadel there to rally behind.
why is the Fallout community so split over whether NV is better or worse the Fallout 3?
Because Fallout 3 was essentially the half-serious revival of the series, with most of the issues referring back to breaking canon and general line of story (set in the East Coast, friendly Brotherhood, Enclave's robot president-in-a-bunker, retarded Supermutants, etc) while FNV tried to correct or incorporate these errors to cover it but had it's own issues due to time constraints (lack of depth for Caesar's Legion - game shows them as black 'n' white bad but with added cut/imagined content would have made them as grey as the NCR)
Also Fallout 3 had a more struggle to survive atmosphere which everyone but diehard fans loved, while FNV took a more realistic but slightly less interesting restoration and revival atmosphere.
There was nothing really canon breaking about it at all. It all fits in with the lore if you actually read the terminals. There is another Brotherhood that is more or less friendly as compared to the west, and they're called the Midwest brotherhood.
A faction of them being friendly isn't too far fetched after all of that. You basically have the conservative ones (West), moderate ones (Midwest), and very far out ones (DC). West wants all by themselves, Midwest is harsh like the west, but also friendly in recruiting as well, and DC is more friendly than all. The FEV thing for mutants also makes sense because it was one of the vaults. It just wasn't as well done as the west so they're far more aggressive and different in tone.
The Enclave bit makes sense too because they retreated to the west, and even though people paint them out to be evil and too black and white, I like to remind everyone that the SAME PEOPLE in Fallout 2 tried to use the FEV on the ENTIRE ATMOSPHERE, thus basically killing everyone other than them, and making the planet probably extinct entirely of life.
Die hard Fallout fans (or retarded ones) might claim FO3 isn't canon, but everything said in it DOES fit in terms of lore. And sorry, but the US is a little over 2500 miles long. Of course things are going to be different on the east and west coast. Hell in Europe in the old days, there was different culture a little over 200 miles away, so to think everything would be the same across the entire country (the west being in similar conditions/circumstances to the east) is just downright stupid.
Ok, well now I really don't understand why Fallout 3 is hated so much. It didn't really bother me, but thanks for both of you clearing it up.
3563
« on: June 22, 2015, 08:43:02 PM »
On a related note...
Would this be a good time for a recruitment drive...?
Yes.
Go Go Go!
3564
« on: June 22, 2015, 08:32:12 PM »
On a related note...
Would this be a good time for a recruitment drive...?
3565
« on: June 22, 2015, 08:03:41 PM »
why is the Fallout community so split over whether NV is better or worse the Fallout 3?
Because Fallout 3 was essentially the half-serious revival of the series, with most of the issues referring back to breaking canon and general line of story (set in the West Coast, friendly Brotherhood, Enclave's robot president-in-a-bunker, retarded Supermutants, etc) while FNV tried to correct or incorporate these errors to cover it but had it's own issues due to time constraints (lack of depth for Caesar's Legion - game shows them as black 'n' white bad but with added cut/imagined content would have made them as grey as the NCR)
Also Fallout 3 had a more struggle to survive atmosphere which everyone but diehard fans loved, while FNV took a more realistic but slightly less interesting restoration and revival atmosphere.
er... wasnt F3 set in DC?
Sorry, yeah. Meant to say East, which is contrary to F1 and 2's West coast setting.
oh. well, that means F4 is gonna be breaking all sorts of canoes?
Well... sort of no? Fallout 3 is considered canon (whether or not diehards like Door agree with that) , as shown by what Obsidian did in FNV to basically cover Bethesda-Zenimax's arse with the fuckups prior (e.g. Victoria mentioning the BoS in DC, Black Mountain Radio mentioning the retarded "Second Gen Supermutants" that exist in the East coast), and so while Fallout 4 may be canon it's still likely that diehards will find some flaws in it worthy to consider it non-canon again.
3566
« on: June 22, 2015, 07:57:09 PM »
So is it already bad that she gave birth despite not following an anti-natalist stance until after she'd read into it?
Regardless of the smothering part. Basically, yeah. It doesn't even really take an anti-natalist stance to know that having kids is a bad idea.
And I'm just gonna reiterate that, once again, if it were me, I probably couldn't bring myself to do it.
Ok. Not really sure I agree with it, but at least I'm following the line of thought here, sorta. I don't think many people could bring themselves to do it really. A Socio/Pyschopathic Anti-Natalist maybe.
3567
« on: June 22, 2015, 07:53:33 PM »
why is the Fallout community so split over whether NV is better or worse the Fallout 3?
Because Fallout 3 was essentially the half-serious revival of the series, with most of the issues referring back to breaking canon and general line of story (set in the West Coast, friendly Brotherhood, Enclave's robot president-in-a-bunker, retarded Supermutants, etc) while FNV tried to correct or incorporate these errors to cover it but had it's own issues due to time constraints (lack of depth for Caesar's Legion - game shows them as black 'n' white bad but with added cut/imagined content would have made them as grey as the NCR)
Also Fallout 3 had a more struggle to survive atmosphere which everyone but diehard fans loved, while FNV took a more realistic but slightly less interesting restoration and revival atmosphere.
er... wasnt F3 set in DC?
Sorry, yeah. Meant to say East, which is contrary to F1 and 2's West coast setting.
3568
« on: June 22, 2015, 07:50:14 PM »
Smothering the baby seems sorta contradictory.
I mean, giving a baby suffering to the point of death because of the potential suffering it would sustain later. I haven't read the books by those authors that could justify this in some form, but there's no guarantee that the baby will have a shitty life that warrants it's death pre-emptively. The idea is that it should never have been conceived in the first place; it's really not much different than an abortion in my eyes. Obviously, there comes a point where killing another human being is unacceptable, but I don't think that, in this particular scenario, it has reached that point.
So is it already bad that she gave birth despite not following an anti-natalist stance until after she'd read into it? Regardless of the smothering part.
3569
« on: June 22, 2015, 07:46:04 PM »
why is the Fallout community so split over whether NV is better or worse the Fallout 3?
Because Fallout 3 was essentially the half-serious revival of the series, with most of the issues referring back to breaking canon and general line of story (set in the East Coast, friendly Brotherhood, Enclave's robot president-in-a-bunker, retarded Supermutants, etc) while FNV tried to correct or incorporate these errors to cover it but had it's own issues due to time constraints (lack of depth for Caesar's Legion - game shows them as black 'n' white bad but with added cut/imagined content would have made them as grey as the NCR) Also Fallout 3 had a more struggle to survive atmosphere which everyone but diehard fans loved, while FNV took a more realistic but slightly less interesting restoration and revival atmosphere.
3570
« on: June 22, 2015, 07:34:15 PM »
Smothering the baby seems sorta contradictory.
I mean, giving a baby suffering to the point of death because of the potential suffering it would sustain later. I haven't read the books by those authors that could justify this in some form, but there's no guarantee that the baby will have a shitty life that warrants it's death pre-emptively.
Pages: 1 ... 117118119 120121 ... 201
|
Show Posts
