1861
The Flood / Re: ITT: List things that actually warrant a permanent forum ban
« on: March 20, 2016, 10:18:11 PM »
Repeated bans, even if unrelated.
5 strikes and you can fuck off.
5 strikes and you can fuck off.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1861
The Flood / Re: ITT: List things that actually warrant a permanent forum ban« on: March 20, 2016, 10:18:11 PM »
Repeated bans, even if unrelated.
5 strikes and you can fuck off. 1862
Serious / Re: Is it possible to use drugs responsibly?« on: March 20, 2016, 09:01:00 PM »
With proper education and respect of the drug, you can use it responsibly, even to the point that you decide not using it at all is the best choice.
Take alcohol as an example. While alcoholism is a concern, it is a minority among the millions of people who go out drinking every weekend who are affected by it, despite being a Class A if it were made illegal (Due to the damaging effects it has on you and others around you). The cause of that can be down to the fact that Secondary schools (at least in the UK and I assume elsewhere) teach about the effects and potential dangers of abusing alcohol at an early age, as well as illegal substances (although from what I've experienced alcohol is warned about far more often than illegal drugs, likely because you're at a higher chance to be exposed to it). Same goes for tobacco, which goes even further to have governments restricting the use of it. What I don't know (Full text behind a pay-wall) is if the study was conducted fairly, i.e. the effects of a drug on yourself or others as a pure sample. While it's obvious Heroin is a highly addictive and dangerous substance, I believe it would cause less harm to yourself if it was pure, rather than whatever the fuck street peddlers have cut in which is also not in your best interests to inject. I also have no idea how far the statements cover. Does harm to myself count if I fell over drunk, or others if I crashed my car drunk or stole money to feed my addiction? 1863
Gaming / Re: How many of you here regularly play the Xbone?« on: March 20, 2016, 08:44:49 PM »
Nah, got a PS4 because of the sweet Destiny console:
Shit on the game if you want, but damn it looks nice (and when it's cheaper than the standard at the time? Haha, sold!) 1864
The Flood / Re: Jesus. Fucking. Christ. This girl. (Seriously come look)« on: March 20, 2016, 08:26:16 AM »
Can't tell with that manufactured photo. Everyone looks great in those things... get one on a night out and you see closer to the truth.
1865
Gaming / Re: Steady 60FPS or 30FPS with more features?« on: March 19, 2016, 11:02:02 PM »
30 fps, more features.
I came to play a game, not to look at art. If I want to do that, I get a separate outlet for "artistic" games or just go to an abstract art gallery. 1866
The Flood / Re: The Six Nations 2016« on: March 19, 2016, 06:43:00 PM »Rugby is for rubes Say that to these fine gentlemen: Also, table updated for the final time. Bloody England, winning everything. 1867
The Flood / Re: Finally Recovered« on: March 19, 2016, 01:25:05 PM »
Not bad. Finished my final report for 2nd Year, relaxed until St Patrick's Day and yesterday where I drunk a lot and played pool with some friends.
1868
The Flood / Re: You can now memorize a list of 20 items, up to 30 numbers« on: March 19, 2016, 01:22:58 PM »
Count cards.
1869
The Flood / Re: St Patrick day and I am sober« on: March 19, 2016, 12:45:28 PM »
I enjoyed celebrating that day heavily.
1870
The Flood / Re: drunk agein« on: March 18, 2016, 10:23:15 PM »
Here's to that, as a fellow drunk
1871
The Flood / Re: All girls do is play mind games with me« on: March 17, 2016, 09:26:16 PM »I don't like starting conversations. I prefer to have them start it so I'm at ease knowing everything is okay. But I know they're very busy right now.Eh, that's kinda a time to ask what's up unless you're confident about the situation. It really is a case-by-case scenario. Last gf I had wasn't one to start conversation, so I had to which wasn't exactly the easiest when I'm the same. 1872
The Flood / Re: All girls do is play mind games with me« on: March 17, 2016, 09:16:14 PM »7+ days?Eh, that's kinda a time to ask what's up unless you're confident about the situation.You should be able to go several days or MORE with no texting between you and feel fine about it. 1873
Serious / Re: Racism« on: March 17, 2016, 09:14:01 PM »
>Says Racism is ego-stroking
>Is ego-stroking about the fact they aren't racist It's kinda obvious that racism is bad, but really? This is the Serious board. 1874
The Flood / Re: Sapphire went offsite« on: March 17, 2016, 10:28:29 AM »how often do we even bring up bnet Basically every time Destiny is brought up. 1875
The Flood / Re: Sapphire went offsite« on: March 16, 2016, 10:29:19 PM »Its pretty obvious their moderation is as subjective as it gets, varying from mod to mod more than likely. No reason to think that the same guy who warned you thinks the other stuff you did wasn't okay while another doesn't. Don't think about it too much and consider yourself likely to get banned at any point in time.I was even being Neutral about it, lol. I guess they're "Either with us or Against Us".I disagreed with her about Social Issues - http://www.sapphirehrg.com/viewtopic.php?p=18676#p18676Sapphire is a Joke, I got IP Banned "just for disagreeing" with WhitestGirlUKnow.... 1876
The Flood / Re: Sapphire went offsite« on: March 16, 2016, 10:23:40 PM »I was even being Neutral about it, lol. I guess they're "Either with us or Against Us".I disagreed with her about Social Issues - http://www.sapphirehrg.com/viewtopic.php?p=18676#p18676Sapphire is a Joke, I got IP Banned "just for disagreeing" with WhitestGirlUKnow.... That's really fucking weird. I've said relatively worse, had a disagreement, and defended my claim, yet I'm in the clear. Hell, even on here I've been free with my opinions and I haven't been Gestapo'd yet. This is just feeding me more evidence of massive inconsistencies in moderation. They must like you, thats enough of a reason to keep you there for them, well until you slip up. My first post got me warned. Yeah, they just love me. 1877
The Flood / Re: Sapphire went offsite« on: March 16, 2016, 10:09:22 PM »Sapphire is a Joke, I got IP Banned "just for disagreeing" with WhitestGirlUKnow.... What'd you do? I've already disagreed with people plenty and I'm wondering how I'm still there considering around half of us who posted on Sapphire have been IP banned already. 1878
The Flood / Re: It is St.Patrick's Day now« on: March 16, 2016, 09:48:29 PM »
Fun fact; Although St. Padraig removed all the snakes from Ireland, there are no moles either.
Sláinte/Cheers. 1879
The Flood / Re: Everything you've ever enjoyed is suddenly proven to be objectively shit« on: March 16, 2016, 12:20:20 PM »Disregard and continue enjoying my shit things. Who cares if it's objectively shit if I enjoy them. 1880
Serious / Re: My wish for British politics« on: March 14, 2016, 07:59:29 PM »Can anyone fill me in on British politics?It's basically a posher more controlled version of banter. (Supported by "OOOOHWAAAAY!") YouTube 1882
The Flood / Re: I'm bored« on: March 14, 2016, 05:44:38 PM »
I submitted a report that ends my assignments for 2nd Year. Onwards to drinking and then exams...
1883
The Flood / Re: Sapphire went offsite« on: March 14, 2016, 02:58:53 PM »Does posting pm's from another site violate our rules?I would think so. Either way, it's not something I'd risk. The ones I have talked to are, or have joined recently, so I wouldn't want to. Plus it'll stir up shit, and I'm fine having it as it is atm. 1884
The Flood / Re: Sapphire went offsite« on: March 14, 2016, 10:34:49 AM »Not to mention, Sapphire's perception of Sep7agon is very low as it is. To them, we're a group of toxic bigots, trolls, and shitposters who circlejerk about hating feminism and anything remotely "progressive" in any way. Can you honestly tell me that you don't see why they would've been so quick to punish you? Aaand that's the part I call bullshit. Being elitist about being a supposed better offsite when all they do is ban and censor opposing ideals, even by association is no better than we are for openly shitposting and going "lol muslims/women". I could show you how superior they feel with the PM's I received, but I know what the rules are here, and I intend to follow them. I don't hate the people there, not at all. Some are quite nice to talk to about some topics, privately or otherwise (after some convincing I'm not some Sep7 stereotype, whatever the fuck that is). For the record, while it may have been my first post, it was the first topic that appeared at the time. Soon afterwards there was a totally opposite version of the thread and I posted the exact opposite. Should they warn me because I may have been sarcastic on the happy thread too? The people are nice, the moderation is quick to judge and lackluster. 1885
The Flood / Re: Sapphire went offsite« on: March 14, 2016, 05:57:20 AM »Allowing the insult thread at all to continue is a greenlight to go insult there, or it's a lapse in moderation and seeing as mods were posting in there, green light a-go-go. At least here the rules are fairly set in stone, so everything is set out and very easy to follow. There the rules are greyed or simply followed or ignored depending on who it is. Can't be a bigot there, but by golly you can create your own thread and question the sanity of religious people, yet I can't do a single insult on an insult thread because it referenced the website in a sea of posts saying various manner of insults. That sorta bullshit. The matter was already settled there, but I'm surprised to see you attempting to defend them. Sure there is a "perceived line", but if they aren't setting it out in the rules or the rules are broad statements with them not being followed impartially and with impunity, it needs work. 1886
The Flood / Re: Sapphire went offsite« on: March 14, 2016, 05:09:39 AM »The reason why so-and-so got warned for posting an insult in the insult thread is because so-and-so crossed a perceived line. On an insult thread I wouldn't have been so hard on the words if it was anything else. Hell, someone said "site needs work lol" and got warned. Don't take away the context from this, it's a bullshit excuse. It was so bullshitty that I called out on it and had it rescinded. 1887
Serious / Re: Are you guys watching the Kanas City riot?« on: March 13, 2016, 09:37:11 PM »Waiting for Trump to walk out with his own version of SS guards Maybe publish a book about his troubles of only getting a small loan of a million dollars and having to pay it back. Mein Dumpf 1888
The Flood / Re: Poster Habits You Wish They'd Bring Back« on: March 13, 2016, 09:21:43 PM »I don't get it It's ol' Kupo, before he became a grumpy bastard. 1889
Serious / Re: Are you guys watching the Kanas City riot?« on: March 13, 2016, 08:30:36 AM »YouTube 1890
The Flood / Re: Sapphire went offsite« on: March 13, 2016, 07:05:03 AM »Nah, that's a step up.Spamming is the lowest form of shitposting.Even if it's baneposting? Intermediate-grade. Only makes a profit when the markets are favourable. |