Quote from: Verbatim on August 27, 2016, 03:45:31 PM

Well, you know that's not true, so I don't even know why you'd say that. You really can't think of a situation where you'd look something up--like the brand name for some product you've never heard of--learn that it's not for you, and then move on and forget about it? I do that shit all the time.

But it would focus more on the heavily searched options rather than the one off thing. Just because you search "Pikachu" once it doesn't mean it'll cater to that over the 10+ times you might have searched "Solid Snake" or something related to it. I think that's what Cheat is getting at.

Aye. Obviously it wouldn't carry the same weight as like several sessions on searching for some really specific hardcore porn on a weekly basis, but you did search for it and it is obvious you are interested in it enough to search for it, and that's all they care about.

Quote from: Cheat on August 27, 2016, 03:06:17 PM

Ads are super specific. They just aren't complicated. The provider looks at your history, compares it with other people's online purchases who share the same or similar search history, and then provides you with ads for products people with similar history have a trend of buying.

that's fantastic

just one problem: not once have i seen an advertisement on this website for a product that i would personally buy

so you can say that they're "super" specific, but that's a bit of a joke, because in my case, they couldn't be less specific

this is what i mean by specific, cheat: specifically catered to a person's interests, which cannot happen, because we're not always searching for things with the intent to buy some product, ie. just because you looked up what a "pikachu" was, doesn't mean you have any interest in Pokémon, but you might see Pokémon ads anyway

...so because it's not fetching you relevant results, it's the same for everyone? You do realize that this kind of data mining is pretty big business and is, more often than not, a very useful tool for online businesses?

And yes, if you look up "Pikachu", that does mean you do have some sort of interest with Pokemon. It takes all of your search history into account (that it can).

Quote from: Cheat on August 26, 2016, 11:10:07 PM

Charlie, you know the ad provider uses your browsing habits when deciding on which ad to fetch, right?

Cheat, if I had known what a shit show this would have turned into, I wouldn't have done this troll thread. I know the ads are decided on our cookies. I honestly didn't expect a tranny hatefest

"troll thread"

Suuuuuuuuure...

Bought a car. It's neat.

RIP Chet.

Quote from: Cheat on August 17, 2016, 09:30:54 PM

That looks more like TBlocks than me. Like a fat TBlocks.

TBlobs

Or maybe Fat Cheat + TBlocks.

Quote from: Cheat on August 17, 2016, 10:16:28 PM

I've submitted a report. Thx bby.

there's another ad i posted above, too

just fyi

I got both.

https://r15—sn-tt17rn76.c.2mdn.net/videoplayback/id/165742b13419ca87/itag/18/source/doubleclick_dmm/ratebypass/yes/acao/yes/ip/24.226.65.97/ipbits/0/expire/3608656320/sparams/acao,expire,id,ip,ipbits,itag,mm,mn,ms,mv,nh,pl,ratebypass,source/signature/740509BFB6E9DD52D97A3BF5A9D611187A44D34B.63503FDC2368954FFEE4AD7393299035B4AD8CC2/key/cms1/cms_redirect/yes/mm/30/mn/sn-tt17rn76/ms/nxu/mt/1471488971/mv/m/nh/IgpwcjAxLnl5ejA2Kg0yMDkuODUuMTczLjQx/pl/18/file/file.mp4


this audio ad keeps showing up

Quote from: Cheat on March 22, 2016, 09:35:24 PM

Was this on the front page or a different page?

INTP

Quote from: Tyger on August 14, 2016, 09:37:43 PM

Quote from: Joyce Byers on August 14, 2016, 09:36:20 PM

that was MY poll

I deserve recognition

i am hearing you and i am recognizing you

omg thank you

I literally need validation for my e persona

I am too lazy to use Google. What is your avatar / name off of?

Screenshot it. I need screenshots to show the ad provider.

Cats are better than dogs IMO.

Fuck.

Sure. If they looked cool I would consider adding new ones.

A score like that is expecting from someone who rides Marvel's dick on this forum

I would rate it somewhere between a 4.5 and a 5 out of 10, so IMO he's not wrong. The plot seemed...lost(?) at times and there were too many characters (half of which were stupid and could have been left out). The antagonists were meh and their motivations weren't really believable. Joker seemed to be there because reasons. They could have left him in the flashbacks/backstory of Harley Quinn and the plot would have probably been a lot more focused on the shitty bad guy.

The movie plays like it went through editing hell (which it did). They did play a lot of good music throughout the movie, though (almost too many, actually; the 'cool' parts were made a little less cool since they decided to play iconic songs basically during every scene change).

But yeah, it's better than BvS. I would suggest seeing it if you care at all about the DC Universe these guys are trying to pull off, but it's kind of a crappy movie as a standalone film.