1681
The Flood / Re: So Flood, Let's Chat
« on: August 28, 2015, 01:41:20 AM »>is gold
Join the true mustard rice. UrbanAsphaltGT is a quality game.
Oh, bby.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1681
The Flood / Re: So Flood, Let's Chat« on: August 28, 2015, 01:41:20 AM »>is gold Oh, bby. 1682
why is it so stupidWhat kind of phone do you have? 1683
The Flood / Re: Why is getting laid such a big fucking deal?« on: August 28, 2015, 12:43:53 AM »Why would you care if it's not a big deal?I bet you this forum would never believe me when I lose my virginity eventually.And even if I wasn't one, it would still bother me because it's mildly annoying.Well you are talking to a virgin...Why does it bother you if someone brags about it?I really do thoughWhy not?Because I have the highest fucking sex drive in the world that's why :] 1684
The Flood / Re: Anyone know a good way to prank text someone?« on: August 27, 2015, 10:46:03 PM »If you have a Google account, or even if you don't, sign up for Google Voice and you'll get a free anonymous cell phone number to text from.Your cat facts for today. 1685
The Flood / Re: The LGBTQIA+ is now a thing« on: August 27, 2015, 06:23:33 PM »Until they start forcing people to have sex, not really. The only negative is people acting like it's not actually a thing, but it's not really a big deal in the grand scheme.good to see someone is fighting for Cheat's sexual equalityWutAesexual 1686
The Flood / Re: About the front page....« on: August 27, 2015, 01:16:53 PM »
Aye. It will be done.
1687
The Flood / Re: Came across a "Restore Marriage!!!!111!!!1!" ad on the internet« on: August 27, 2015, 01:10:03 PM »im ashamed to be from san diegoBut it's Ron Burgundy's stomping ground, mate. He's an American treasure. 1688
The Flood / Re: Other than Sep7 what's your online presence?« on: August 26, 2015, 04:36:05 PM »
Reddit (lurking mostly)
B.lind That's really it. Used to be a heavy Nintendo forum freak when it was up, but that's gone now. 1689
Gaming / Re: Destiny The Taken King - Legendary Edition« on: August 26, 2015, 03:32:11 PM »Truth. I would have been out $40 when I decided I couldn't stand Destiny anymore if it was a digital copy. I sold it months later and only lost a few bucks total.You can't trade-in digital games doe>sticking to physical media this gendigital a shit.kinda old, bud.I only just found out today because you can preorder it digitally now. Plus, you can't lose your collection of games if for some reason you lose access to your account (and this does happen). 1690
The Flood / Re: Avatar fans rejoice!« on: August 26, 2015, 02:08:00 PM »Does he not learn or does he not care about the consequences of his action. His movie sucked.The third Twilight movie I watched right after the Avatar movie was better than it, and that's hard to do. 1692
I don't think you'd like me in real life, then. My online persona is a lot nicer than I am normally. But I am sorry I pissed you off in that Skype chat; I get carried away sometimes.Actually trust? Hmmmm. 1693
Septagon / Re: Why does sep7 keep opening the appstore for me?« on: August 26, 2015, 09:57:09 AM »I know. I mean take a screenshot of the app it sends you to. Wherever you get redirected is where I need to see, so I can report it to the ad service.It's malicious ads. Take a screenshot of the page you're redirected to and post it here or PM it to me the next time it happens.It doesn't take me to a page, it just sends me straight to the appstore. 1694
Septagon / Re: Why does sep7 keep opening the appstore for me?« on: August 26, 2015, 09:50:15 AM »
It's malicious ads. Take a screenshot of the page you're redirected to and post it here or PM it to me the next time it happens.
1696
Serious / Re: I may need some assistance gentlemen« on: August 25, 2015, 09:10:58 PM »Try setting written goals.Yup. I procrastinate a lot and sticking notes to the bottom of my computer screen help remind and motivate me. 1698
News / Re: New Monitors« on: August 25, 2015, 08:31:43 PM »Focnr's no longer on staff. I know the staff thread probably needs updating, but he's been gone for a while.Focnr never diesWhilst that was considered, what outweighed that was Kupo being a part of the community for a long time prior to that (Bnet as well as septagon from the early days) Taking a break from the forums in the grand scheme of things isn't something that invalidates someone as a candidate (especially seeing as how a good chunk of the staff have died/vanished for longer than that at a time) <.<So.... we pick the guy who left for weeks then came back to only memepost and go "rood"?This is a ruse, right? 1699
Septagon / Re: is this website ever going to get https« on: August 25, 2015, 07:52:48 PM »$3.99 x 12 months = $47.88 per year.60+4=64...yes.That's like $4.From what I read it's like 60 bucks a year. Where did you get your figure from?They require a dedicated IP for SSL. Those combined add to the number I posted. Basic SSL for 1 domain is $4.99 per month. x12 is $59.88 per year. $59.88 + $47.88 = $107.76 per year. pls stop 1700
Septagon / Re: is this website ever going to get https« on: August 25, 2015, 07:48:39 PM »...yes.That's like $4.From what I read it's like 60 bucks a year. Where did you get your figure from?They require a dedicated IP for SSL. Those combined add to the number I posted. And when you math, those add up to that $107/year figure. 1701
Septagon / Re: is this website ever going to get https« on: August 25, 2015, 07:27:36 PM »From what I read it's like 60 bucks a year. Where did you get your figure from?They require a dedicated IP for SSL. Those combined add to the number I posted. 1702
Gaming / Re: Question Of The Day – How Poor Am I For Still Owning An X-Box 360?« on: August 25, 2015, 06:35:00 PM »
I prefer playing Halo 3 and Halo 4 on the 360 and don't have any plans to sell my old console.
1703
Septagon / Re: is this website ever going to get https« on: August 25, 2015, 06:26:34 PM »Feel free to ask Bluehost how much it is per year.Ran the numbers just now. It's an additional $107.76 per year for an SSL certificate (which we'd need if we go with https). Something to think about; I might end up opening up donations to cover that cost if it's something a lot of people want.Where's the proof it's $107.76 per year? 1704
Septagon / Re: Profile picture« on: August 25, 2015, 06:02:51 PM »Fixing UI mishaps like the avatar button being hidden on mobile or the alert icon being too close to the avatar box up in the top nav is more important than allowing you to show/hide NSFW avatars currently, yes.the approval and overall happiness of a sizable portion of your user base isn't important?It's definitely not a top priority, mate. There are a handful of UI improvements and fixes that need to be addressed (for mobile mostly) first. I'm already running behind on groups.i would call this a top prioritythen just do that ffsI'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabledthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhi'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that 1705
Septagon / Re: is this website ever going to get https« on: August 25, 2015, 06:01:25 PM »
Ran the numbers just now. It's an additional $107.76 per year for an SSL certificate (which we'd need if we go with https). Something to think about; I might end up opening up donations to cover that cost if it's something a lot of people want.
1706
Septagon / Re: is this website ever going to get https« on: August 25, 2015, 05:44:22 PM »I'd probably just ask for a donation and see what happens instead of killing myself.if its $20 or less and you're being that much of a jew, seriously kill yourself.I'll ask the host. I don't recall the exact amount off hand.cheat you never addressed how much it costs 1707
Septagon / Re: Profile picture« on: August 25, 2015, 05:43:13 PM »It's definitely not a top priority, mate. There are a handful of UI improvements and fixes that need to be addressed (for mobile mostly) first. I'm already running behind on groups.i would call this a top prioritythen just do that ffsI'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabledthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhi'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that 1708
Septagon / Re: is this website ever going to get https« on: August 25, 2015, 05:38:21 PM »I'll ask the host. I don't recall the exact amount off hand.cheat you never addressed how much it costs 1709
Septagon / Re: Profile picture« on: August 25, 2015, 05:37:41 PM »Never got it working, unfortunately. This might be an option in the future, though, for avatars registered as NSFW. I'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabled, but blocking individual avatars probably isn't going to happen outside of custom CSS scripts.this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhi'd be in goddamn full acceptance of that 1710
Septagon / Re: is this website ever going to get https« on: August 25, 2015, 05:21:17 PM »You can look up the specifics yourself, but that is where the vulnerability lies. If you're on your phone and connecting via LTE or 4G and don't have your phone infected to hell with malware, you've got nothing to worry about.The http request when you enter in your password. It's plain-text at that point, so a dickbag could be listening in and intercept the password field you submitted before it's hashed and then compared to the saved password hash.Uh, ok? The passwords are hashed and cannot be read or decrypted unless you used a really short word without numbers or special characters that has that particular hash indexed.If you're not on a secure LAN, yeah, they could get your password.That costs extra, so... |