Quote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 07:56:34 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 07:31:38 AMjudgment is okayit's not that it's "okay"—it is practically required, if you care about having a society of intellectuals, which you shouldyou've always had a knack for taking good ideas and concepts and injecting them with toxinsbetween your views on men, your views on drug use, and your silly "individual > collective" attitude, i can't decide which one is worseId rather have a society of free thinkers than a society of intellectuals
Quote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 07:31:38 AMjudgment is okayit's not that it's "okay"—it is practically required, if you care about having a society of intellectuals, which you shouldyou've always had a knack for taking good ideas and concepts and injecting them with toxinsbetween your views on men, your views on drug use, and your silly "individual > collective" attitude, i can't decide which one is worse
judgment is okay
Quote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:00:49 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 07:56:34 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 07:31:38 AMjudgment is okayit's not that it's "okay"—it is practically required, if you care about having a society of intellectuals, which you shouldyou've always had a knack for taking good ideas and concepts and injecting them with toxinsbetween your views on men, your views on drug use, and your silly "individual > collective" attitude, i can't decide which one is worseId rather have a society of free thinkers than a society of intellectualsthey're one in the samecollectivism does not preclude free thinkingif anything, it encourages it
Quote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:14:51 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:00:49 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 07:56:34 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 07:31:38 AMjudgment is okayit's not that it's "okay"—it is practically required, if you care about having a society of intellectuals, which you shouldyou've always had a knack for taking good ideas and concepts and injecting them with toxinsbetween your views on men, your views on drug use, and your silly "individual > collective" attitude, i can't decide which one is worseId rather have a society of free thinkers than a society of intellectualsthey're one in the samecollectivism does not preclude free thinkingif anything, it encourages itlolnocollectivism encourages beneficial thinking, not free thinking
Quote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:36:34 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:14:51 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:00:49 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 07:56:34 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 07:31:38 AMjudgment is okayit's not that it's "okay"—it is practically required, if you care about having a society of intellectuals, which you shouldyou've always had a knack for taking good ideas and concepts and injecting them with toxinsbetween your views on men, your views on drug use, and your silly "individual > collective" attitude, i can't decide which one is worseId rather have a society of free thinkers than a society of intellectualsthey're one in the samecollectivism does not preclude free thinkingif anything, it encourages itlolnocollectivism encourages beneficial thinking, not free thinkingthey're one in the samethere's no such thing as non-beneficial thinking
Quote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:40:39 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:36:34 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:14:51 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:00:49 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 07:56:34 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 07:31:38 AMjudgment is okayit's not that it's "okay"—it is practically required, if you care about having a society of intellectuals, which you shouldyou've always had a knack for taking good ideas and concepts and injecting them with toxinsbetween your views on men, your views on drug use, and your silly "individual > collective" attitude, i can't decide which one is worseId rather have a society of free thinkers than a society of intellectualsthey're one in the samecollectivism does not preclude free thinkingif anything, it encourages itlolnocollectivism encourages beneficial thinking, not free thinkingthey're one in the samethere's no such thing as non-beneficial thinking"I want to go do heroin because it makes me feel good" is free thinking, but not beneficial thinking
Quote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:44:26 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:40:39 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:36:34 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:14:51 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:00:49 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 07:56:34 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 07:31:38 AMjudgment is okayit's not that it's "okay"—it is practically required, if you care about having a society of intellectuals, which you shouldyou've always had a knack for taking good ideas and concepts and injecting them with toxinsbetween your views on men, your views on drug use, and your silly "individual > collective" attitude, i can't decide which one is worseId rather have a society of free thinkers than a society of intellectualsthey're one in the samecollectivism does not preclude free thinkingif anything, it encourages itlolnocollectivism encourages beneficial thinking, not free thinkingthey're one in the samethere's no such thing as non-beneficial thinking"I want to go do heroin because it makes me feel good" is free thinking, but not beneficial thinkingif you want to do heroin, you're probably addicted to itaddiction is the antithesis of free-thinking
Quote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:53:58 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:44:26 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:40:39 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:36:34 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:14:51 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:00:49 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 07:56:34 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 07:31:38 AMjudgment is okayit's not that it's "okay"—it is practically required, if you care about having a society of intellectuals, which you shouldyou've always had a knack for taking good ideas and concepts and injecting them with toxinsbetween your views on men, your views on drug use, and your silly "individual > collective" attitude, i can't decide which one is worseId rather have a society of free thinkers than a society of intellectualsthey're one in the samecollectivism does not preclude free thinkingif anything, it encourages itlolnocollectivism encourages beneficial thinking, not free thinkingthey're one in the samethere's no such thing as non-beneficial thinking"I want to go do heroin because it makes me feel good" is free thinking, but not beneficial thinkingif you want to do heroin, you're probably addicted to itaddiction is the antithesis of free-thinkingnot truefree thinking is thinking whatever you want
Quote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:55:02 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:53:58 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:44:26 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:40:39 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:36:34 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:14:51 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:00:49 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 07:56:34 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 07:31:38 AMjudgment is okayit's not that it's "okay"—it is practically required, if you care about having a society of intellectuals, which you shouldyou've always had a knack for taking good ideas and concepts and injecting them with toxinsbetween your views on men, your views on drug use, and your silly "individual > collective" attitude, i can't decide which one is worseId rather have a society of free thinkers than a society of intellectualsthey're one in the samecollectivism does not preclude free thinkingif anything, it encourages itlolnocollectivism encourages beneficial thinking, not free thinkingthey're one in the samethere's no such thing as non-beneficial thinking"I want to go do heroin because it makes me feel good" is free thinking, but not beneficial thinkingif you want to do heroin, you're probably addicted to itaddiction is the antithesis of free-thinkingnot truefree thinking is thinking whatever you wantand an addict doesn't think about what he wants
Quote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:55:29 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:55:02 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:53:58 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:44:26 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:40:39 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:36:34 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 10:14:51 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 10:00:49 AMQuote from: Verbatim on September 08, 2017, 07:56:34 AMQuote from: SecondClass on September 08, 2017, 07:31:38 AMjudgment is okayit's not that it's "okay"—it is practically required, if you care about having a society of intellectuals, which you shouldyou've always had a knack for taking good ideas and concepts and injecting them with toxinsbetween your views on men, your views on drug use, and your silly "individual > collective" attitude, i can't decide which one is worseId rather have a society of free thinkers than a society of intellectualsthey're one in the samecollectivism does not preclude free thinkingif anything, it encourages itlolnocollectivism encourages beneficial thinking, not free thinkingthey're one in the samethere's no such thing as non-beneficial thinking"I want to go do heroin because it makes me feel good" is free thinking, but not beneficial thinkingif you want to do heroin, you're probably addicted to itaddiction is the antithesis of free-thinkingnot truefree thinking is thinking whatever you wantand an addict doesn't think about what he wantsyou are you on drugsyou are society on collectivism
I disagree with the speed at which you believe it's acceptable to complete Dark Souls.
I don't agree with your stance on mods, with the whole "you should consume games in the way that the creator intended". What if that way is shitty? Mods in single player games doesn't affect anyone negatively. I get if you personally want to experience games in the most pure way or whatever, but that doesn't make mods an inherently bad thing.
please stop replying to me
Hmm... Idk really. I disagree with your positions, but at the same time I understand where you're coming from when you are calm and explain yourself. I'd say modding, but then I think of Bethesda and how they take advantage of mods to make up for their own shortcomings, and then try to make people pay for it (lol). So idk.
Quote from: Luciana on September 08, 2017, 10:37:52 AMHmm... Idk really. I disagree with your positions, but at the same time I understand where you're coming from when you are calm and explain yourself. I'd say modding, but then I think of Bethesda and how they take advantage of mods to make up for their own shortcomings, and then try to make people pay for it (lol). So idk.likewisei guess if i had to bring up something, it would either have to do with veganism or drug use, but i think you're already well-aware that you're in the wrong on both of those subjects already, so it's harder to say
i didn't look long enough
no it doesn'tit's an illusion/projection
Quote from: Velox on September 08, 2017, 10:37:25 AMI don't agree with your stance on mods, with the whole "you should consume games in the way that the creator intended". What if that way is shitty? Mods in single player games doesn't affect anyone negatively. I get if you personally want to experience games in the most pure way or whatever, but that doesn't make mods an inherently bad thing."drunkposting is acceptable behavior"
What do you think of age of consent laws?
what do you think is my most incorrect belief
