Total Members Voted: 33
Quote from: 卐RIGHT WING DAS SQUAD卐 on May 25, 2016, 03:32:32 PMTrump may be a shithead, but at least he's not a puppet for the NWO. Remember, a vote for Hillary is a vote for the One World Government hello alex jones.
Trump may be a shithead, but at least he's not a puppet for the NWO. Remember, a vote for Hillary is a vote for the One World Government
The fact there are people who seriously support and defend Trump's childish borderline retarded antics is truly a depressing thing. To think that these absolutely braindead scumbag people exist, and actually think they are in the right is just, holy shit. Like you wonder what exactly goes through these people's heads day to day.
Quote from: Verbatim on May 25, 2016, 08:51:54 PMQuote from: JUSTFLUXMYSHITUP on May 25, 2016, 08:47:12 PMQuote from: PsygnI on May 25, 2016, 02:52:52 PMI don't think people will vote crazy in. Unfortunately it looks like it's a Shiniest Turd competition.Hillary is leagues worse than Trump, but she could hold it together by at least acting professional.Trump has acted professional. He mentioned that he can act presidential and did so through one of the later debates while cruz kept thrashing on him like a child. He says he only acts the way he does when he is being attacked.Which is unprofessional.And yet the whole point of what he said was that Hillary can at least act professional compared to Trump, but the truth is that Trump can and has acted professionally.
Quote from: JUSTFLUXMYSHITUP on May 25, 2016, 08:47:12 PMQuote from: PsygnI on May 25, 2016, 02:52:52 PMI don't think people will vote crazy in. Unfortunately it looks like it's a Shiniest Turd competition.Hillary is leagues worse than Trump, but she could hold it together by at least acting professional.Trump has acted professional. He mentioned that he can act presidential and did so through one of the later debates while cruz kept thrashing on him like a child. He says he only acts the way he does when he is being attacked.Which is unprofessional.
Quote from: PsygnI on May 25, 2016, 02:52:52 PMI don't think people will vote crazy in. Unfortunately it looks like it's a Shiniest Turd competition.Hillary is leagues worse than Trump, but she could hold it together by at least acting professional.Trump has acted professional. He mentioned that he can act presidential and did so through one of the later debates while cruz kept thrashing on him like a child. He says he only acts the way he does when he is being attacked.
I don't think people will vote crazy in. Unfortunately it looks like it's a Shiniest Turd competition.Hillary is leagues worse than Trump, but she could hold it together by at least acting professional.
Quote from: challengerX on May 25, 2016, 09:01:52 PMThe fact there are people who seriously support and defend Trump's childish borderline retarded antics is truly a depressing thing. To think that these absolutely braindead scumbag people exist, and actually think they are in the right is just, holy shit. Like you wonder what exactly goes through these people's heads day to day.I just don't want the SJWs' candidate to win.
Well he's not. Bernie isn't gonna become the candidate ;^)
Trump is now beating Hillary in a few national polls. Tied in other polls.
Quote from: JUSTFLUXMYSHITUP on May 25, 2016, 08:57:53 PMQuote from: Verbatim on May 25, 2016, 08:51:54 PMQuote from: JUSTFLUXMYSHITUP on May 25, 2016, 08:47:12 PMQuote from: PsygnI on May 25, 2016, 02:52:52 PMI don't think people will vote crazy in. Unfortunately it looks like it's a Shiniest Turd competition.Hillary is leagues worse than Trump, but she could hold it together by at least acting professional.Trump has acted professional. He mentioned that he can act presidential and did so through one of the later debates while cruz kept thrashing on him like a child. He says he only acts the way he does when he is being attacked.Which is unprofessional.And yet the whole point of what he said was that Hillary can at least act professional compared to Trump, but the truth is that Trump can and has acted professionally.He has before. In fact after Indiana primaries he was acting like he wanted to be president. It was a good shift and the so called "pivot" he's been going on about.However the past few weeks he's done nothing but regress, and made the STUPID decision to blast the Latino Republican governor of New Mexico. You know, the one that could help him gain ground on two demographics he's absolutely doing awful in. Women and Latino's. Instead, he insults her and does none of it, and that's why I honestly think he doesn't want to win this.I think he's in it more to make a point than anything else. I really don't think he wants to be president.
And that's a damn shame because he would really rile the system. It's unfortunate his own party would rather stab him in the back then try and support two possible candidates competing equally.
Although he has caucused with the Democrats in the Senate, Sanders has't really been a member of the party (in the traditional sense) until this election cycle. It's why many party insiders feel insulted, that instead of running as an independent like he has in the past, Sanders simply latched onto the party for additional name recognition.
Quote from: Ian on May 26, 2016, 05:12:50 AMIt'll be funny to see just how many actually leave the country out of being butthurt and who was just saying that to cry when God Emperor Trump wins.what
It'll be funny to see just how many actually leave the country out of being butthurt and who was just saying that to cry when God Emperor Trump wins.
Can you blame him when third parties and independents get the shaft when it's not a local election? Quote from: Icy on May 26, 2016, 08:10:06 AMAlthough he has caucused with the Democrats in the Senate, Sanders has't really been a member of the party (in the traditional sense) until this election cycle. It's why many party insiders feel insulted, that instead of running as an independent like he has in the past, Sanders simply latched onto the party for additional name recognition.
And that's a damn shame because he would really rile the system. It's unfortunate his own party would rather stab him in the back then try and support two possible candidates competing equally. But then again if they did that they can no longer call the GOP primaries infighting (even though it isn't, God forbid primaries are a thing), so they either have to admit it isn't infighting and it's a democratic process inside their own party or they back stab and sabotage one of their own during the primaries. Quote from: Luciana on May 26, 2016, 03:42:42 AMWell he's not. Bernie isn't gonna become the candidate ;^)
Quote from: Luciana on May 26, 2016, 03:42:08 AMQuote from: JUSTFLUXMYSHITUP on May 25, 2016, 08:57:53 PMQuote from: Verbatim on May 25, 2016, 08:51:54 PMQuote from: JUSTFLUXMYSHITUP on May 25, 2016, 08:47:12 PMQuote from: PsygnI on May 25, 2016, 02:52:52 PMI don't think people will vote crazy in. Unfortunately it looks like it's a Shiniest Turd competition.Hillary is leagues worse than Trump, but she could hold it together by at least acting professional.Trump has acted professional. He mentioned that he can act presidential and did so through one of the later debates while cruz kept thrashing on him like a child. He says he only acts the way he does when he is being attacked.Which is unprofessional.And yet the whole point of what he said was that Hillary can at least act professional compared to Trump, but the truth is that Trump can and has acted professionally.He has before. In fact after Indiana primaries he was acting like he wanted to be president. It was a good shift and the so called "pivot" he's been going on about.However the past few weeks he's done nothing but regress, and made the STUPID decision to blast the Latino Republican governor of New Mexico. You know, the one that could help him gain ground on two demographics he's absolutely doing awful in. Women and Latino's. Instead, he insults her and does none of it, and that's why I honestly think he doesn't want to win this.I think he's in it more to make a point than anything else. I really don't think he wants to be president.I haven't really been paying too much attention to Trump lately, so I haven't even noticed him attacking the governor of New Mexico and why it came about. However, in regards to your last sentence, I think at first he was running for fun, but started taking it seriously when he saw becoming the nominee as a feasible goal.
Quote from: Ian on May 26, 2016, 09:46:45 AMCan you blame him when third parties and independents get the shaft when it's not a local election? Quote from: Icy on May 26, 2016, 08:10:06 AMAlthough he has caucused with the Democrats in the Senate, Sanders has't really been a member of the party (in the traditional sense) until this election cycle. It's why many party insiders feel insulted, that instead of running as an independent like he has in the past, Sanders simply latched onto the party for additional name recognition. Blame him? Not at all, though I'd say his ability to be elected to Senate for multiple terms as a fully fledged independent shows some level of support. But at the same time, his latching onto the party for name recognition, and then attempting to rewrite policies that have been around for many, many election cycles, is quite shallow.
It's kind of sad when the only difference separating the two parties is social issues, and how to spend money (which they all spend massively anyway). Republicans say small government but it doesn't really happen.Other than that, I can't begin to see a difference. Gun rights and uhh... what?
Quote from: Luciana on May 26, 2016, 01:13:50 PMIt's kind of sad when the only difference separating the two parties is social issues, and how to spend money (which they all spend massively anyway). Republicans say small government but it doesn't really happen.Other than that, I can't begin to see a difference. Gun rights and uhh... what?And that's why I'm a libertarian. Government spending pls go and stay go... and get out of my bedroom.
Quote from: Icy on May 26, 2016, 10:42:53 AMQuote from: Ian on May 26, 2016, 09:46:45 AMCan you blame him when third parties and independents get the shaft when it's not a local election? Quote from: Icy on May 26, 2016, 08:10:06 AMAlthough he has caucused with the Democrats in the Senate, Sanders has't really been a member of the party (in the traditional sense) until this election cycle. It's why many party insiders feel insulted, that instead of running as an independent like he has in the past, Sanders simply latched onto the party for additional name recognition. Blame him? Not at all, though I'd say his ability to be elected to Senate for multiple terms as a fully fledged independent shows some level of support. But at the same time, his latching onto the party for name recognition, and then attempting to rewrite policies that have been around for many, many election cycles, is quite shallow.I'd say Hillary and Bill rewriting the policies of the Dems to make them virtually identical to the Republican party of the day is pretty shallow.
Quote from: LC on May 26, 2016, 12:41:23 PMQuote from: Icy on May 26, 2016, 10:42:53 AMQuote from: Ian on May 26, 2016, 09:46:45 AMCan you blame him when third parties and independents get the shaft when it's not a local election? Quote from: Icy on May 26, 2016, 08:10:06 AMAlthough he has caucused with the Democrats in the Senate, Sanders has't really been a member of the party (in the traditional sense) until this election cycle. It's why many party insiders feel insulted, that instead of running as an independent like he has in the past, Sanders simply latched onto the party for additional name recognition. Blame him? Not at all, though I'd say his ability to be elected to Senate for multiple terms as a fully fledged independent shows some level of support. But at the same time, his latching onto the party for name recognition, and then attempting to rewrite policies that have been around for many, many election cycles, is quite shallow.I'd say Hillary and Bill rewriting the policies of the Dems to make them virtually identical to the Republican party of the day is pretty shallow.Such as?
Name calling and conspiracy theories can only get you so far.
I think Hillary will crush Trump.Trump is a one-trick pony. It worked out well for him in the primaries, but for a general election? I don't think so. I think enough people will realize how utterly full of shit Trump is so that he won't actually win the election. Name calling and conspiracy theories can only get you so far.
Quote from: coolmike699 on May 27, 2016, 11:19:32 AMI think Hillary will crush Trump.Trump is a one-trick pony. It worked out well for him in the primaries, but for a general election? I don't think so. I think enough people will realize how utterly full of shit Trump is so that he won't actually win the election. Name calling and conspiracy theories can only get you so far.The Sanders v Trump debate will be the testing ground for that.
Poll
Who is going to win the General Election?