Quote from: FatherlyNick on May 23, 2017, 05:09:02 PMOut of all 6 events that are considered terrorist attacks having taken place in the UK since 2010, 2 were committed by right-wing extremists and 4 by British citizens (one of which suffered from major psychosis and paranoia). Not a single one was committed by a refugee, and these stats are similar for continental Europe. I'm not too pro-immigration myself, but this meme that it's refugees being responsible for these attacks is just wrong.
Hate to say it but if these countries don't start deporting these refugees en masse then they're pretty much asking for it at this point.
Quote from: 🅱🅾🅾🅿 on May 23, 2017, 07:19:20 PMHate to say it but if these countries don't start deporting these refugees en masse then they're pretty much asking for it at this point.The guy was a home grown terrorist though. The last several attacks were home grown in fact, as Flee pointed out.There are obviously various logistic and integration issues in regards to taking in such monumental numbers of migrants and refugees at the level Europe has for the past half a decade now, but terrorism isn't one of them, at least in the UK.
Quote from: The Hidden Gabber on May 23, 2017, 07:24:16 PMQuote from: 🅱🅾🅾🅿 on May 23, 2017, 07:19:20 PMHate to say it but if these countries don't start deporting these refugees en masse then they're pretty much asking for it at this point.The guy was a home grown terrorist though. The last several attacks were home grown in fact, as Flee pointed out.There are obviously various logistic and integration issues in regards to taking in such monumental numbers of migrants and refugees at the level Europe has for the past half a decade now, but terrorism isn't one of them, at least in the UK.So then how do you propose stopping these home grown terrorists, and why is it that countries who haven't accepted any refugees haven't had these same problems? It goes beyond just the terrorist attacks, crime in general has gone up too.
Quote from: The Hidden Gabber on May 23, 2017, 07:24:16 PMQuote from: 🅱🅾🅾🅿 on May 23, 2017, 07:19:20 PMHate to say it but if these countries don't start deporting these refugees en masse then they're pretty much asking for it at this point.The guy was a home grown terrorist though. The last several attacks were home grown in fact, as Flee pointed out.There are obviously various logistic and integration issues in regards to taking in such monumental numbers of migrants and refugees at the level Europe has for the past half a decade now, but terrorism isn't one of them, at least in the UK.The home grown terrorists are usually the sons of displaced people from wars in the 90's. They usually weren't wholly integrated in to their birth nation's society since their parents statistically most likely settled down around others of their kind, and recent tensions causes them to seek out freshly imported Islamic refugees to associate with, where they are further exposed to more raw or non-westernized Islamic ideas. They finally find a community that they feel most at home with, and radicalize themselves out of frustration for having been born in a nation that distrusts or dislikes them. The attackers aren't refugees, but Muslim migration to the west is without a doubt related to their actions.
it's gotten the point when I hear or some sort of attack in ___ I automatically assume it's related to islam. every time. again, and again.
I agree that immigration needs restricting, but the solution to terrorist activities isn't to hound out people who have lived here for generations just because they subscribe to a set of belief systems, however immoral they may be.
Fucking nanny states
Quote from: Batch on May 24, 2017, 05:43:38 AMFucking nanny states lolSame shit, right?
Quote from: FatherlyNick on May 24, 2017, 05:58:44 AMQuote from: Batch on May 24, 2017, 05:43:38 AMFucking nanny states lolSame shit, right?Nah brah.Sikhism was created as a militant response to Muslim agression around eastern India.
Quote from: The Hidden Gabber on May 23, 2017, 07:45:07 PMI agree that immigration needs restricting, but the solution to terrorist activities isn't to hound out people who have lived here for generations just because they subscribe to a set of belief systems, however immoral they may be.So you're okay with allowing people who believe in a religion that refers to non-believers as infidels, and that infidels should be killed to live in your country when you know for a fact that these sort of attacks, conducted by people of this religion, aren't going to stop? You're okay with these same people who treat your women like disposable garbage because to them they are whores and impure, simply for not following their religious standards? You're okay with these people who hate your country and westernism as a whole?Morals have already been thrown out of the window.
Quote from: DAS B00T x2 on May 24, 2017, 06:57:16 AMQuote from: FatherlyNick on May 24, 2017, 05:58:44 AMQuote from: Batch on May 24, 2017, 05:43:38 AMFucking nanny states lolSame shit, right?Nah brah.Sikhism was created as a militant response to Muslim agression around eastern India.I wasn't being serious there. Sort of quoting what the (((journalists))) thought.
So then how do you propose stopping these home grown terrorists, and why is it that countries who haven't accepted any refugees haven't had these same problems? It goes beyond just the terrorist attacks, crime in general has gone up too.
Don't have to deport muslims. You can just say you are not allowed to practice Islam here. If they ask why you can just say because we are not allowed to practice our religion in their country.