Even I would go to a Trump rally. It's just fun to hear him pontificate about dumb bullshit.I'd imagine most people are there for the same reason.
Then why are they not going to Hillary's rallies?
Wait does OP unironically support Trump?
Quote from: Verbatim on September 29, 2016, 02:35:21 PMQuote from: challengerX on September 29, 2016, 02:34:40 PMWait does OP unironically support Trump?She does.Wait, seriously?
Quote from: challengerX on September 29, 2016, 02:34:40 PMWait does OP unironically support Trump?She does.
Quote from: Flee on September 29, 2016, 03:56:29 PMQuote from: Verbatim on September 29, 2016, 02:35:21 PMQuote from: challengerX on September 29, 2016, 02:34:40 PMWait does OP unironically support Trump?She does.Wait, seriously?I mean, I'm pretty sure. She's been banging on about him all year without a hint of irony.
Quote from: gats on September 29, 2016, 02:39:04 PMTrump is an idiot, it says a lot about his voters.I'm inclined to agree. Even with the mess that is Brexit, I could still see why some people would support it. But Trump? How anyone sane of mind can support him is just beyond me.
Trump is an idiot, it says a lot about his voters.
Even with the mess that is Brexit
I don't think it necessarily speaks for how many supporters each candidate has, but I do think the representation has some merit. Especially when you consider the stigma for being a Trump supporter, and even being physically threatened an attacked, that that many people still show up, yet Hillary's crowds look more like a nursing home gathering. It might show more that Trump's supporters are more passionate about him and this election, or that more people genuinely like him. Because from what I've seen personally and what others have commented, it doesn't seem like people really like Hillary, they're just misinformed and/or unthinking anti-Trumpers because of.. what? False assumptions more often than not. As to how they're tied, I honestly have no idea. Polls vary wildly, and trust in the media is at an all-time low, so it's becoming difficult to trust most polls. And when you throw in how low the trust in Hillary is, it makes, well at least me, skeptical whenever data shows Hillary with a wide lead. My guess as to how she's doing so well is again tied to misinformation on both parts, or worse, people willingly, or not, turning a blind eye to just how much Hillary has done wrong, like saying all women with rape allegations deserve to be heard, unless its against her husband; having a hand in the American deaths in Benghazi; creating a power vacuum in the middle east be having Gaddafi taken out; voting for the war in Iraq (which people like to over look and call Trump a warmonger); being extremely careless with national security; conniving with the DNC against Bernie; the list goes on, and somehow people turn a blind eye to all of the that because... Trump's racist? No, the DNC referred to the hispanics as "Taco Bowls". Because he's mean? The truth doesn't care about your feelings. He was obsessed over Obama's birther? Well that's kind of important to be president, he did the same with Cruz, and Hillary started the "birtherism". Honestly, I couldn't tell how they're nearly tied. Other than accounting for illegal votes from voter fraud and illegal immigrants, which lets be honest, the left only cares about the third-world illegals because the overwhelmingly vote left.
Are you referring to that info wars conspiracy theory about hillary being a hologram with your comment about the green screen? Because that's been completely debunked as nothing more than an illusion created by a combination of the cameras position, the lens being used (both on the camera and on the phones of the people in the crowd), and the high compression of the data being sent via satellite back to the studio.
Quote from: LC on September 29, 2016, 01:41:25 PMAre you referring to that info wars conspiracy theory about hillary being a hologram with your comment about the green screen? Because that's been completely debunked as nothing more than an illusion created by a combination of the cameras position, the lens being used (both on the camera and on the phones of the people in the crowd), and the high compression of the data being sent via satellite back to the studio.Not that she's being green screened rather the crowd is.
Quote from: Kits on September 30, 2016, 01:43:12 PMQuote from: LC on September 29, 2016, 01:41:25 PMAre you referring to that info wars conspiracy theory about hillary being a hologram with your comment about the green screen? Because that's been completely debunked as nothing more than an illusion created by a combination of the cameras position, the lens being used (both on the camera and on the phones of the people in the crowd), and the high compression of the data being sent via satellite back to the studio.Not that she's being green screened rather the crowd is.an equally ridiculous notion
Quote from: LC on September 30, 2016, 01:47:33 PMQuote from: Kits on September 30, 2016, 01:43:12 PMQuote from: LC on September 29, 2016, 01:41:25 PMAre you referring to that info wars conspiracy theory about hillary being a hologram with your comment about the green screen? Because that's been completely debunked as nothing more than an illusion created by a combination of the cameras position, the lens being used (both on the camera and on the phones of the people in the crowd), and the high compression of the data being sent via satellite back to the studio.Not that she's being green screened rather the crowd is.an equally ridiculous notionReally? Why? If you look at all the cell phones in the front of the crowd there are big things missing from the screens like the American flag and Hillary. Some screens show different rooms entirely.
Does Size Matter?
