Developments- I am a theist.

Winy | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Phasenectar
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Winy
IP: Logged

3,164 posts
 
Please don't, I'll wear it with a badge of honor. Every time I make a mistake that just brings me one step closer to the truth. I'll happily make a fool myself now for all the world to see if it means I'll never make those mistakes again.
If I can offer a criticism that really doesn't have much to do with your beliefs; you write like we're stuck in a Shakespearean play. Like, dude, it's okay to just write down your thoughts as you'd say them normally. Your posts are so dramatic...


Cadenza has moved on | Ascended Posting Riot
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Cadenza
IP: Logged

596 posts
 
Religion is simply a means of controlling people's minds so that they act in a specific way.

So 'God' doesn't exist? Because if he does, then 'religion' is more than just 'a means to control people'.
If that religion is one devoted to God then yes, in addition to the purpose of making people behave better, it also has the purpose of making them worship God. But if that religion is false then worshiping a false god is just another means to cement control.
Quote

Quote
Ideally, they are controlled to become moral people that support their community and love their family.

Sure, but based on your statements above, you don't believe 'God' exists, and that would mean 'religion' is arbitrarily deciding what is 'good' the same way an atheist is.

Again, if 'God' does exist, then religion is more than a tool to control people.
I admit my belief in god has been fluctuating recently, but it is consistently moving towards belief. A religion should be founded on humanity's innate sense of morality, and that innate sense is derived from god. A religion should make people act in accordance with that morality, but there can exist religions that do not, they are perversions.
Quote

Quote
You cannot disprove that anymore than you can disprove conversations, that doesn't even make sense.

What am I supposed to be 'disproving' here?
That's my point, you said science has disproved religion but that doesn't make sense since you can't disprove the existence of something that exists.
Quote

Quote
Furthermore you can have a religion without believing in supernatural god, for most political views they act similarly to religion but substitute a man for god.

I just don't see the point of 'religion' without a deity. It's just... if you concede that religion can exist without a god, then these 'religions' are just as arbitrary as an atheist's sense of morality. If you can act morally without a god, why wouldn't you just do that...? Seems like a ton of work for nothing.
Conceding that something exists does not mean I approve of it's existence. I believe that those religions are flawed precisely because they lack an absolute morality to base everything on. The only way you could act morally without God is if your morality was logically equivalent to someone who was acting morally with God, which is a contradiction resulting from assuming you can have a morality without God.
Quote

Quote
I am not at all sure what you mean by:
Quote
recognise that eating animals or reproducing is wrong.
Could you go into more detail?

Sure. Eating animals is wrong and having kids are objectively wrong things to do. I haven't seen a single religion acknowledge or preach this.
Long story short, he's a vegan and anti-natalist.

Humans are parasitic on other lifeforms and birth is both non-consensual and creates suffering and therefore bad.

Or something like that...

Pretty much. But I'm not going to turn this into a "vegan/anti-natalist" thread. He can either acknowledge that I find both things wrong and argue from that mindset, or he can stop. I'm not going to push my ideas where they aren't welcomed.
Since the discussion wasn't about this I'm fine with not going further into it.


Winy | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Phasenectar
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Winy
IP: Logged

3,164 posts
 
All I'm seeing is a really, really bad misinterpretation of normal atheist beliefs (Or lack thereof).


Cadenza has moved on | Ascended Posting Riot
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Cadenza
IP: Logged

596 posts
 
Please don't, I'll wear it with a badge of honor. Every time I make a mistake that just brings me one step closer to the truth. I'll happily make a fool myself now for all the world to see if it means I'll never make those mistakes again.
If I can offer a criticism that really doesn't have much to do with your beliefs; you write like we're stuck in a Shakespearean play. Like, dude, it's okay to just write down your thoughts as you'd say them normally. Your posts are so dramatic...
I guess when I get carried away my writing gets emotional. I need to get better at talking online to people.


Korra | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Avatar Korra
IP: Logged

19,118 posts
uhhh...

- korrie
Good for you in following your heart, Door.


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,949 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
If that religion is one devoted to God then yes, in addition to the purpose of making people behave better, it also has the purpose of making them worship God. But if that religion is false then worshiping a false god is just another means to cement control.

You need to clarify what you mean by this. If that religion (say, Islam) is worshiping a false god, it's another means to control people. But if they're worshiping the 'true' God (like say, Christianity), it's more than a means to control people? How do you decide which religion is true and which is false?

Quote
A religion should be founded on humanity's innate sense of morality, and that innate sense is derived from god.

1. A religion should be founded on what your deity says is acceptable.
2. There isn't a single deity that hasn't sanctioned reprehensible things, so to say that morality is based on God's is kind of silly. How do we know God is morally perfect when he allows his name to be tied to texts that condone stoning of homosexuals or slavery?

Quote
A religion should make people act in accordance with that morality, but there can exist religions that do not, they are perversions.

Sounds like a No True Scotsman fallacy to me.

Quote
That's my point, you said science has disproved religion but that doesn't make sense since you can't disprove the existence of something that exists.

You misunderstood me. When I said "science has disproven religion", I meant, "science has disproven claims that religions make about the world", like the 7-day creation story, or the flood. Those things simply did not happen.

Quote
Conceding that something exists does not mean I approve of it's existence. I believe that those religions are flawed precisely because they lack an absolute morality to base everything on. The only way you could act morally without God is if your morality was logically equivalent to someone who was acting morally with God, which is a contradiction resulting from assuming you can have a morality without God.

You need to clarify this, also. How do we know which religion is 'true'? Additionally, we CAN act morally without God. 'God' doesn't influence my morality, and I'm the most moral person I know IRL.


Jocephalopod | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: joecephalopod
PSN:
Steam: j0cephalopod
ID: Jocephalopod
IP: Logged

8,352 posts
 
do you have a soft spot for Christianity or something? or do you prefer to constitute your own rules when it comes to the belief in god?


ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TrussingDoor
IP: Logged

7,667 posts
"A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, 'You are mad, you are not like us'."
-Saint Anthony the Great
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!

Back a page or two, I made a post that I'd like to read your response to. If it isn't too much to ask.


Cadenza has moved on | Ascended Posting Riot
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Cadenza
IP: Logged

596 posts
 
If that religion is one devoted to God then yes, in addition to the purpose of making people behave better, it also has the purpose of making them worship God. But if that religion is false then worshiping a false god is just another means to cement control.

You need to clarify what you mean by this. If that religion (say, Islam) is worshiping a false god, it's another means to control people. But if they're worshiping the 'true' God (like say, Christianity), it's more than a means to control people? How do you decide which religion is true and which is false?
It has to do with the moral justification for controlling people, if there is not a good justification behind the control then it should not take place. For a religion to be successful it must have some level of control over it's followers, or else it will loose those followers and cease to exist.
Suppose there exists a religion that is false, then for the people leading that religion there are two possibilities. The first is that they are unaware that it is a false religion, their actions may be well intentioned but they are ultimately leading their followers down the wrong path, so their actions are immoral even if they do not realize it. The second option is that they realize their religion is false but continue leading it anyway, in which case the leaders have no moral justification at all, and are being deceptive on purpose. Now if their purpose is to be deceptive then they would wish to succeed at deception, and so every immoral act of control is now available to them, as they do not care about the consequences.

In the first case people leading the religion can be forgiven provided they change their ways, but in the second case they are simply con artists acting to trick people. In both cases the religion has no justification for it's actions.

Now for determining the true religion, I do not believe my sense of morality is false, but I know that if I am not careful it can be corrupted however, so the true religion must be one that is consistent with this sense of morality and acknowledges it's potential to be corrupted. I find Islam and Judaism to be inconsistent with my morality, and Buddhism and Taoism to be more consistent, and Christianity to be both consistent and capable of explaining and dealing with the corruption of morality. I am not sure if any of that answered the question, and I feel that using process of elimination isn't enough to determine the truth, but it is the best I can do right now.

Quote
1. A religion should be founded on what your deity says is acceptable.
2. There isn't a single deity that hasn't sanctioned reprehensible things, so to say that morality is based on God's is kind of silly. How do we know God is morally perfect when he allows his name to be tied to texts that condone stoning of homosexuals or slavery?
In this case God says that morality is acceptable, which is why we all have a sense of it. Specifically I see morality as a natural part of being human, and religion to be, ideally, a means of facilitating that part of us.

I don't really know a damn thing about God, I haven't studied enough yet. All I know is that my sense of right and wrong doesn't stem from physical evolution, as immorality would be far more useful, so either immorality is the natural order of things and I am defective, or I have been granted morality and have the option of corrupting it.

Quote
Sounds like a No True Scotsman fallacy to me.
I would not approve of an immoral religion, and if that were the true religion then I'm fucked, but I would go against it.

Quote
You misunderstood me. When I said "science has disproven religion", I meant, "science has disproven claims that religions make about the world", like the 7-day creation story, or the flood. Those things simply did not happen.
Agreed. As far as I'm concerned God only needed to have started the big bang, everything afterwards is science.
Quote
You need to clarify this, also. How do we know which religion is 'true'? Additionally, we CAN act morally without God. 'God' doesn't influence my morality, and I'm the most moral person I know IRL.
I simply don't believe I'm mentally strong enough to be a good person without something to guide me. If you're capable of doing that then I have to ask how you're capable of doing so, what standard you hold yourself to and where it comes from.


ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TrussingDoor
IP: Logged

7,667 posts
"A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, 'You are mad, you are not like us'."
-Saint Anthony the Great
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.
Last Edit: November 30, 2015, 08:19:04 PM by Cyrus


ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TrussingDoor
IP: Logged

7,667 posts
"A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, 'You are mad, you are not like us'."
-Saint Anthony the Great
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


The Hån | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: The Han
IP: Logged

2,853 posts
does this stuff even work?
Well good for you man. I hope you grow in your faith.


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
It has to do with the moral justification for controlling people, if there is not a good justification behind the control then it should not take place. For a religion to be successful it must have some level of control over it's followers, or else it will loose those followers and cease to exist.
Suppose there exists a religion that is false, then for the people leading that religion there are two possibilities. The first is that they are unaware that it is a false religion, their actions may be well intentioned but they are ultimately leading their followers down the wrong path, so their actions are immoral even if they do not realize it. The second option is that they realize their religion is false but continue leading it anyway, in which case the leaders have no moral justification at all, and are being deceptive on purpose. Now if their purpose is to be deceptive then they would wish to succeed at deception, and so every immoral act of control is now available to them, as they do not care about the consequences.

In the first case people leading the religion can be forgiven provided they change their ways, but in the second case they are simply con artists acting to trick people. In both cases the religion has no justification for it's actions.

Mate, this is some really shady rationality.

Quote
Now for determining the true religion, I do not believe my sense of morality is false, but I know that if I am not careful it can be corrupted however, so the true religion must be one that is consistent with this sense of morality and acknowledges it's potential to be corrupted. I find Islam and Judaism to be inconsistent with my morality, and Buddhism and Taoism to be more consistent, and Christianity to be both consistent and capable of explaining and dealing with the corruption of morality. I am not sure if any of that answered the question, and I feel that using process of elimination isn't enough to determine the truth, but it is the best I can do right now.

So you're saying it's sort of a "find the best fit for you"? Meaning, that your "true religion" couldbe someone else's "false religion"? I believe there can only be one correct answer; either you're wrong or the other person is, y'know? This "up to interpretation" shit is just... no.

Quote
In this case God says that morality is acceptable, which is why we all have a sense of it. Specifically I see morality as a natural part of being human, and religion to be, ideally, a means of facilitating that part of us.

Okay, let me get this straight. Religion is what we use to worship god. It guides our life based on God's principles and values. We can gather these values from the book he inspired. In that book, there are morally reprehensible things that the religion should condone if it follows God's word literally (as it should). This means, that God is either immoral (as he *officially* condones morally reprehensible things), being misrepresented (in which case, we can never truly know his nature and we have even less proof of his existence), or he simply doesn't exist. Which one is it?

Quote
All I know is that my sense of right and wrong doesn't stem from physical evolution, as immorality would be far more useful.

Simply not true. Empathy -- the basis of morality -- would be useful in tribal scenarios where we have to take care of our fellow man. Humans have always been pack animals.

Quote
I would not approve of an immoral religion, and if that were the true religion then I'm fucked, but I would go against it.

But all religions are immoral if you take them literally (as you should).

Quote
I simply don't believe I'm mentally strong enough to be a good person without something to guide me. If you're capable of doing that then I have to ask how you're capable of doing so, what standard you hold yourself to and where it comes from.

Like I said, I'm capable of being moral because I have empathy. Do my actions cause a net-positive amount of suffering? If so, they're immoral. It's that simple.

I don't buy the "I need God to be moral" meme because God isn't moral.


ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TrussingDoor
IP: Logged

7,667 posts
"A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, 'You are mad, you are not like us'."
-Saint Anthony the Great
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
I don't claim to understand the nature of god at all, but I don't feel that evolution or the big bang conflict with the idea of a creator god.

So how do you reconcile the creation story with evolution? They're incompatible.

Quote
I believe it does. Calvinism is fucking gay.

Did you believe that as an atheist?

Quote
Just because you share ideas with Christians doesn't mean you should or shouldn't get closer to Christianity.

Well, yeah. I wasn't getting closer to Christianity because I believe some of the same things. I have a different motive.

Quote
Just because they have the same result does not necessarily mean they are compatible.

Of course, yeah I know what you mean. I was just saying -- at a glance, I'm not so different from many Christians.

I think the biggest things for me is going to be the heaven/hell/afterlife bit... I just can't make sense of it. But thanks for taking the time to address my thoughts.


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
While I have explained why I started to believe, I feel like I should expand upon it by explaining where I've been emotionally and philosophically in recent months, which has played a role in my enthusiasm for these things and may have spurred my shift in attitude in the first place. If anyone is interested I can post that.

I'd read it.


ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TrussingDoor
IP: Logged

7,667 posts
"A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, 'You are mad, you are not like us'."
-Saint Anthony the Great
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
I don't see how, unless you're fixed on a strict literalist interpretation of the KJV.

I was thinking more Adam and Eve. It's literally impossible that we came from two people -- and if you don't take that story literally, then that would mean sin has always existed, making Christ's appearance later completely irrelevant.


ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TrussingDoor
IP: Logged

7,667 posts
"A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, 'You are mad, you are not like us'."
-Saint Anthony the Great
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Winy | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Phasenectar
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Winy
IP: Logged

3,164 posts
 
I think it's important to note that the laws of biology would not necessarily apply if god did not want them to.
This way of thinking is honestly dangerous in my eyes.


ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TrussingDoor
IP: Logged

7,667 posts
"A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, 'You are mad, you are not like us'."
-Saint Anthony the Great
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Winy | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Phasenectar
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Winy
IP: Logged

3,164 posts
 
I think it's important to note that the laws of biology would not necessarily apply if god did not want them to.
This way of thinking is honestly dangerous in my eyes.
As long as you're not attributing every anomaly to an act of god, I don't see it as being too problematic. It's not my line of thinking, I should note. I believe in natural selection and the geological formation of the earth following the big bang. You're talking to someone who always wanted to be a paleontologist growing up. I just don't necessarily see these notions as incompatible with divine intervention. We can clearly observe that competition between organisms is a natural force. Attributing this force to god's will isn't really problematic.
I mean, I disagree, and view any sort of thinking along those lines to be counterproductive and "Problematic," at least to an extent, but I'm not the type to really argue about it if it isn't significant.


R o c k e t | Mythic Smash Master
 
more |
XBL: Rocketman287
PSN:
Steam: Rocketman287
ID: Rocketman287
IP: Logged

22,974 posts
I neither fear, nor despise.
Just a heads up though. Be prepared to become the next Rocketman.

ayyy


 
Elai
| Gay Tupac
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Prehistoric
IP: Logged

18,968 posts
male, he/him

dracula can eat my whole ass!
Adam's original sin could be seen as a metaphor for man's inherent sinfulness.

If sin is inherent, Christ isn't really necessary, though.


ΚΑΤΑΝΑΛΩΤΗΣ | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: TrussingDoor
IP: Logged

7,667 posts
"A time is coming when men will go mad, and when they see someone who is not mad, they will attack him saying, 'You are mad, you are not like us'."
-Saint Anthony the Great
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
I think it's important to note that the laws of biology would not necessarily apply if god did not want them to.
I see a lot of Christians use this to explain away anything they can't defend in the scriptures, and I really have to disagree. If we (Christians) are going to say the laws of God are absolute, we can't disregard the physical in justification of the moral.


Assassin 11D7 | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Assassin 11D7
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Assassin 11D7
IP: Logged

10,059 posts
"flaming nipple chops"-Your host, the man they call Ghost.

To say, 'nothing is true', is to realize that the foundations of society are fragile, and that we must be the shepherds of our own civilization. To say, 'everything is permitted', is to understand that we are the architects of our actions, and that we must live with their consequences, whether glorious or tragic.
I don't claim to understand the nature of god at all, but I don't feel that evolution or the big bang conflict with the idea of a creator god.

So how do you reconcile the creation story with evolution? They're incompatible.
I don't see how, unless you're fixed on a strict literalist interpretation of the KJV. The Hebrew word used in Genesis can mean either "day" or "age". Even then, biblical creationism being wrong does not necessarily mean that the notion of a creator god is wrong. Evolution is driven by Natural Selection, which is driven by the natural force of competition. Competition is a kind of invisible hand that one could attribute to a supreme being.
Another explanation I've heard from Christians is that the first part of Genesis is actually a poem. It has an order in how it goes, and it ends with God creating mankind, his greatest creation. Personally my favorite take on it.


Winy | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Phasenectar
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Winy
IP: Logged

3,164 posts
 
I don't claim to understand the nature of god at all, but I don't feel that evolution or the big bang conflict with the idea of a creator god.

So how do you reconcile the creation story with evolution? They're incompatible.
I don't see how, unless you're fixed on a strict literalist interpretation of the KJV. The Hebrew word used in Genesis can mean either "day" or "age". Even then, biblical creationism being wrong does not necessarily mean that the notion of a creator god is wrong. Evolution is driven by Natural Selection, which is driven by the natural force of competition. Competition is a kind of invisible hand that one could attribute to a supreme being.
Another explanation I've heard from Christians is that the first part of Genesis is actually a poem. It has an order in how it goes, and it ends with God creating mankind, his greatest creation. Personally my favorite take on it.
It's also totally out of order