The government doesn't want him in office so they're radicalizing him by making it appear as if his followers are in favor of a revolution. I'm not against government action impeding in the democratic process if to prevent bad ideas, I'm just pointing it out because it's pretty easy to figure it out. Some of you may have heard my conspiracy theory on government conspiracy theories (the government creates radical conspiracy theories in order to de-legitimatize conspiracy theories that are actually true like the NSA government spying stuff).

weird.

anything else change while i was banned for a month for calling deci a troll?

HOLY FUCK THIS MOVIE

Just saying, if you stupid fucks actually used your brains for two seconds you'd see it too. It's so fucking obvious all the little ploys he does to make it seem like he's actually mentally ill. But Deci is actually perfectly fine, mentally speaking.

I hope rick dies. I quit watching after he killed shane in season two. He was the only enjoyable character to watch.

I would bend over and spread my ass cheeks for Shane.

Well at least you don't have to work at the DMV

I'm just curious if this is possible. Could the Muslims, theoretically, all move into the desert and declare Sharia law?

So you're purposely expecting something to be unrealistically good so that when you listen to it you'll be disappointed? And of course you're aware that doing this is just going to guarantee that you'll be disappointed. So do you consciously try to get yourself to hate things to help justify anti-natalism or are you not even aware of what you're doing?

You should have spent that time walking or running or something.

I mean if you got one of those peddling desks you'd be a top athlete by now.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Christian_sentiment

Quote from: Dustin' on March 19, 2015, 12:57:28 AM

Favorite meme?

Memes are for kufar.

Bored of memes now. My new gimmick for the next 6 months is the Islamic State.

Favorite Islamic state?

inb4 but i thought you left even though you never said you'd leave im just a retard who doesn't know how to read

I'd rather live in a society where people work hard due to cultural conditioning/interest/good-samaritanism rather than an ambition to make money. We don't have to have equal wages but it'd be nice if there was a standard of living. And there'd still be competition, just not in competition for money. Rather, people would compete for a more comfortable, interesting job. The only poor you'd have are those who get fired from their jobs (for being lazy or whatever). And yeah, the government would manage this entire system. I understand the usual counter argument--that governments don't manage supply and demand well empirically speaking, but that's not actually true. There's never been a single, non-impoverished state who's ever tried a command economy. Though there have been plenty of impoverished states who've tried decentralization and they're not better off. Clearly, the main variable in the growth of an economy is scientific innovation (also production but that's not the point), not the collective individual motivation to accumulate more money. People can still work hard if they're just conditioned to (or because they love their job).

tl;dr: Point is, we don't have to force ourselves into a more miserable existence so that a small percentage of us can live lavishly. We can have functioning economies without the accumulation of money being the driver behind it.

And it's not like that utopia you guys dream about is going to be a reality in the next twenty years. I mean that's just ridiculously, unrealistically optimistic. Let's say you actually have a realistic time frame for that 'eventuality,' say 150 years in the future, it's still not going to happen. Why in the hell would the people in power give up all their money to a bunch of unemployed people? They have that money because they're not good-samaritians; because their ruthless; because their primary concern is the accumulation of money and not charity. People are going to fight each other for jobs that pay pennies a day, that's what's going to happen. No one's going give anyone free money, even if they have enough of it to go around. Selfishness and ruthless are the mentalities that the capitalist system favored that put those people in that position, so for them to just magically change their minds and decide that they're just going to give up all their money one day is batshit insane and irritatingly retarded.

tl;dr: If you think we'll inevitably reach a socialist state via the capitalist system then you're ignorantly optimistic about the kind of human behavior that the capitalist system creates.

He's a donor.

Aren't you the one that's always posting Pascal's wager?

Solipsism deduces all reality into a position where I am the reality. Either the soul is immortal and god exists or the soul isn't immortal and god doesn't exist. Pascal's wager isn't a fallacy if you apply radical doubt.

Quote from: Dustin' on March 13, 2015, 05:49:36 PM

Quote from: ((go)^ji)^ra on March 13, 2015, 04:20:08 PM

Quote from: ((go)^ji)^ra on March 11, 2015, 07:57:05 PM

Quote from: Dustin' on March 11, 2015, 07:56:01 PM

You can't fight fire with a nuclear bomb, only more nukes.

Wha

No really, what

You have to stoop to the same low if you want to accomplish anything.

But you're saying that you can't fight X with Y, instead you can only do so with... more of Y?

Yeah I know it didn't make any sense on a logical basis, but I thought it sounded better that way. And people understood what I meant by it anyway... well maybe except for you because you read things logically.