This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Luciana
Pages: 1 ... 377378379 380381 ... 442
11341
« on: July 26, 2015, 06:56:49 PM »
"generic military shooter"
That's literally what Battlefield is.
But Bad Company had humor to it in a lot of areas. It wasn't just the super serious "STOP THE NUKES! STOP THE BAD GUYS!!!" crap. And obviously the older ones are WW2 shooters, which honestly needs to come back. We've had a long enough break, right? And I'm sick of this "near future" crap we're getting.
11342
« on: July 26, 2015, 06:54:42 PM »
Yeah to compete to with cod is to become similar to it which is a no no for battlefield pls. I feel like that's what we got with hardline because it was so much more "arcade-like" than the previous installments.
It wasn't as dubby dubstep/UBER SERIOUS as BF4 was though, so I feel they both kinda went towards and away with CoD. I dunno, it's weird. I hope the next main installment isn't just another generic military FPS.
11343
« on: July 26, 2015, 06:51:43 PM »
FPS is an entire genre. One game maybe, but a whole genre? Now that's just silly.
11344
« on: July 26, 2015, 06:45:53 PM »
When this series actually had personality to it and not just dubby dubstep to "beat CoD" (which is literally what they said they wanted with Battlefield "broken for a while" 4. I wish they'd go back to their roots, or at least a Bad Company 3, both of which are unlikely. Hell, give us a WW2 game with the Frostbite engine, because it's a GOOD engine and looks lovely. Can't say the same for CoD which has been using the same one since 2002. It shouldn't be a game that competes with Call of Duty, because I don't think any game really can. It should be its own thing with its own fanbase, like it was before.
11345
« on: July 26, 2015, 06:13:55 PM »
Also for the record, I was kidding about Fallout 3 being better than NV, and NV failing to capture the things the old ones did.
Though I DO still think FO1/2 had the best atmosphere and consistent since of "getting by" (if that makes sense. I don't wanna say dread or hopelessness) that the game wanted you to really feel.
11346
« on: July 26, 2015, 05:00:32 PM »
I would hope the group knows which I prefer.
Defenceless little naive girl.
Ha
how wrong you are
Mmhm..
Your false sense of security is cute!
Give your closet family member a big hug and say something ominous!
Can I get in on the flirting here?
You can flirt with Luci, since shes that easy. Sure.
Oh please
your legs fidget at the single thought of choking someone or pinning them to the wall.
You say that like it's a bad thing
I never said such a thing. just saying what she does
11347
« on: July 26, 2015, 04:51:10 PM »
I would hope the group knows which I prefer.
Defenceless little naive girl.
Ha
how wrong you are
Mmhm..
Your false sense of security is cute!
Give your closet family member a big hug and say something ominous!
Can I get in on the flirting here?
You can flirt with Luci, since shes that easy. Sure.
Oh please your legs fidget at the single thought of choking someone or pinning them to the wall.
11348
« on: July 26, 2015, 03:10:07 PM »
I would hope the group knows which I prefer.
Defenceless little naive girl.
Ha
how wrong you are
Mmhm..
Your false sense of security is cute! Give your closet family member a big hug and say something ominous!
11349
« on: July 26, 2015, 03:07:04 PM »
Assassins Creed Revelations was good
AC3 still sets the benchmark for modern gaming...
11350
« on: July 26, 2015, 03:04:52 PM »
I would hope the group knows which I prefer.
Defenceless little naive girl.
Ha how wrong you are
11351
« on: July 26, 2015, 03:04:03 PM »
No, see. I wouldn't ever do that stuff to Little Tru.
I'd just choke him slowly until the life nearly fades from his eyes.
I think I'm in love. I find it cute you think you're so SURE of yourself.
11352
« on: July 26, 2015, 02:49:14 PM »
Assassin's Creed: Black Flag is the worst in the series.
AC3 is the most fun in the series.
I laughed because of how you followed that up I think we identified the problem
11353
« on: July 26, 2015, 02:48:48 PM »
Enclave are trying to take over in Fallout 3 as well
what are you on about? That whole battle at the end was a battle.
Yes, but the focus was still shifted.
In Fallout 3 you have one guy and a radio channel until they come out of nowhere halfway into the game.
Even then the overwhelming theme in 3 is that mankind is trying to survive, not that a war is coming.
Well yeah, it had no government or force there to clean up, it was all anarchy. D.C. chapter was the only stabilizing thing that came in like 5 years ago.
Exactly. Thanks for agreeing with me.
...  ?
11354
« on: July 26, 2015, 02:43:38 PM »
Like what, having the same control scheme and character customizer?
More so the very gameplay in general. It was an overhead camera thing until Fallout 3, and it probably did save the series. After Fallout 2 it met nothing but shitty troubles.
And I believe I've mentioned before that the gameplay of Fallout 3 isn't what makes me dislike it. In fact, I felt like it was a good modernization for the series. The combat felt really simple, but NV did bring more depth into that.
Oh agreed. The combat was at least manageable in NV because of ADS. That's not to say it was... GOOD, but on PC at least you can fight without VATS.
11355
« on: July 26, 2015, 02:28:17 PM »
Like what, having the same control scheme and character customizer?
More so the very gameplay in general. It was an overhead camera thing until Fallout 3, and it probably did save the series. After Fallout 2 it met nothing but shitty troubles.
11356
« on: July 26, 2015, 02:00:30 PM »
It's like watching the downfall of Silent Hill again.
Not really
>Silent Hill
>Good game series
>eventually became shit because it was constantly given to the wrong devs
Yes, it's exactly like it, actually.
Yeah, no. If it wasn't for Bethesda, Fallout would have stayed a dead series. And mind you, NV follows the same foundations 3 does, so yeah. You can dislike Fallout 3, but to say the devs and the game is shit is laughably wrong.
11357
« on: July 26, 2015, 12:48:50 PM »
Enclave are trying to take over in Fallout 3 as well
what are you on about? That whole battle at the end was a battle.
Yes, but the focus was still shifted.
In Fallout 3 you have one guy and a radio channel until they come out of nowhere halfway into the game.
Even then the overwhelming theme in 3 is that mankind is trying to survive, not that a war is coming.
Well yeah, it had no government or force there to clean up, it was all anarchy. D.C. chapter was the only stabilizing thing that came in like 5 years ago.
11358
« on: July 26, 2015, 12:40:08 PM »
Enclave are trying to take over in Fallout 3 as well
what are you on about? That whole battle at the end was a battle.
11359
« on: July 26, 2015, 12:39:04 PM »
It's weird when guys play as girls and vice versa.
If someone chooses to play as someone simply because they find them sexually attractive, they can go fuck themselves.
I play as a guy in games like Diablo and stuff because I feel a tank is much better as a big beefy dude than some chick.
11360
« on: July 26, 2015, 12:35:21 PM »
Fallout New Vegas fails to capture what the old Fallout games had, and 3 offers a better story
Sincerely asking, what is it that the old Fallout games had that the new ones fail to provide? I've played through about half of Fallout 2 (really didn't enjoy the gameplay so I never finished it) and I really don't see it.
NV actually lived up to the first two games in atmosphere, story and characters.
3 was a pretty pathetic Fallout game. It lacked the morally grey intrigue of the first games, it's atmosphere was way off, instead of being about the inevitably of war it was about the survival of mankind.
Uhh... no. The Fallout games never had that "inevitability of war" thing because the war already happened.
11361
« on: July 26, 2015, 12:31:51 PM »
Escapism is a waste of time in general
how it is spent is irrelevant
Agreed. I've always stated that I don't play games for escapism--I play them because there is a legitimate experience to be had.
True, but I think it's still escapism.
11362
« on: July 26, 2015, 12:31:10 PM »
Fallout New Vegas fails to capture what the old Fallout games had, and 3 offers a better story
Sincerely asking, what is it that the old Fallout games had that the new ones fail to provide? I've played through about half of Fallout 2 (really didn't enjoy the gameplay so I never finished it) and I really don't see it.
Atmosphere, humor, and guns.
11363
« on: July 26, 2015, 12:28:23 PM »
Sometimes, less is more.
If a game has crucial flaws, it's a waste of time to enjoy it.
Escapism is a waste of time in general how it is spent is irrelevant
11364
« on: July 26, 2015, 12:27:19 PM »
Fallout New Vegas fails to capture what the old Fallout games had, and 3 offers a better story
11365
« on: July 26, 2015, 11:56:15 AM »
it's actually me
11366
« on: July 26, 2015, 09:13:20 AM »
Yeah I noticed that too. They're really pushing the franchise lately. This, the Total Warhammer one, and Space Hulk as well.
3 big projects. They're ALSO still working on that MMO one that's been under wraps for the most part.
Edit: Warhammer: End Times is another
11367
« on: July 26, 2015, 09:06:04 AM »
I noticed in Fallout NV for the first time last night, how there was one of those dinosaur figure toy things, with a cigarette in his mouth along with a smoke pack by it. They had something similar in Fallout 3 where in the back of a metro, there is a teddy bear strapped to the railroad track by a rope.
I never noticed that in all my years of playing, and it is EASILY avoidable. I think the tiny details like that are what show a devs passion. The tiny little things you don't need to do, add up to a more rich product.
Another example is in Total War Attila. You have this cast army v army game, and can zoom all the way out and see the carnage. But if you zoom in as they march/stand idle, you can hear them banter between each other, and sneeze and cough and stuff. I just find it great how a game that promotes itself as big scale battles, adds little things like that in it.
11368
« on: July 26, 2015, 09:03:41 AM »
7 is the best one.
Like LOL
It's a great game but vastly overrated I honestly think I prefer 4 over 7, which is saying a lot considering 7 was all of my PS1 childhood days
11369
« on: July 26, 2015, 07:41:01 AM »
I honestly know a mod or two that'd give you updated graphics and music if that's what you want.
Not the Advent Children character models, thank god, but updated ones that still fit the style.
Problem with FF7 was the MOMENT FF8 came out, the graphics of 7 already looked outdated.
11370
« on: July 25, 2015, 03:08:28 PM »
I'm only in it for glorious Leysritt and Sella.
Pages: 1 ... 377378379 380381 ... 442
|
Show Posts