This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - big sponge
Pages: 1 ... 328329330 331332 ... 394
9871
« on: November 11, 2014, 04:07:13 PM »
Shots are being fired.
She's a horrible fucking shot. This is why you don't give little girls guns.
9872
« on: November 11, 2014, 04:05:13 PM »
Yutaka wants to have sex with his mother.
*Channels inner Tru*
GO CHOKE ON A GOD DAMN TACO HONKEY.
What? Did I expose your secret or something?
9873
« on: November 11, 2014, 04:03:05 PM »
Yutaka wants to have sex with his mother.
What? That's Psychology right?
Oedipus bruh
Freud says he wants to have sex with his mother and Freud is a psychologist.
Sakura Fish pls
9874
« on: November 11, 2014, 04:01:01 PM »
Yutaka wants to have sex with his mother.
That face tells me that you have a thing for it.
9875
« on: November 11, 2014, 04:00:15 PM »
Yutaka wants to have sex with his mother.
What? That's Psychology right?
Oedipus bruh
Freud says he wants to have sex with his mother and Freud is a psychologist.
9876
« on: November 11, 2014, 03:57:08 PM »
Yutaka wants to have sex with his mother.
What? That's psychology right?
9877
« on: November 11, 2014, 03:54:24 PM »
Yutaka wants to have sex with his mother.
9878
« on: November 11, 2014, 03:09:28 PM »
It might be passable if they remove that stupid one hit kill ground pound thing.
9879
« on: November 11, 2014, 03:01:52 PM »
Holy fuck those lyrics are god fucking awful sweet jesus titty crackers who the fuck actually likes this god awful shit sucking tripe?
9880
« on: November 11, 2014, 02:42:00 PM »
Let me know when they un-postpone StarCraft: Ghost.
This
You know how bad I wanted that game to come out when I was younger? And then BAM! Blizzard cancels it.
It's not canceled. Blizzard keeps listing it as being postponed which indicates that they eventually want to do something with it.
Its been like 11 years since they were working on it. I think that we can come to the conclusion that it won't ever come out.
You shut the fuck up right now.
9881
« on: November 11, 2014, 02:40:41 PM »
I like how for the first time in Halo history, the spartans are holding their weapons properly. The teacup grip on the pistols oin previous games made me cringe every time I saw it.
>implying you don't hold your pinky out when firing your pistols like a proper chap
9882
« on: November 11, 2014, 02:35:58 PM »
Most dual weilding combos could only be used in short range also and in many cases grenades or weapon switching would give you a kill time just as fast as the dual wield combos while not being limited on their range and allowing the wielder to be able to respond to a much larger variety of situations.
That shits fine for noncompetitive or custom games, but when you're playing against some really good people that versatility is going to be what nets you kills and saves your ass.
That requires you to have enough skill to pull off switching weapons mid-shots and have a weapon that will work well in a switch-combo. I can't think of many times where someone with Dual SMGs, or a SMG/PR combo, got killed by a dude with a BR or something. And I've never seen somebody beat a guy with Dual Maulers at CQs, trade kills, yes, but never win. While most DW weapons are limited to close range, that's because like the BR/CC take mid range, the SMG/PR take that role(although the PR was accurate at range in H2 but the projectiles were just really slow).
And I'm not suggesting it for MLG play, I'm suggesting it to be kept, and for players to be able to tweak the weapons' traits on their own, so maybe they can find the perfect balance.
You're missing the part where I said that people who were pretty good at 2/3 could pull that stuff off regularly. I'm personally struggling to think of a time where I was beaten by someone dual wielding any weapon when I had a BR in my hand. The only times I actually preferred to dual wield was in those insta-kill infection gametypes where the humans had unlimited ammo. Even then though if there was a sentinel beam on the map I'd pick that up instead. EDIT: To clarify, I'm not saying dual wielding should be removed, but rather if it doesn't return nothing of value was lost.
9883
« on: November 11, 2014, 01:48:25 PM »
Those "spartan commentaries" are cringe worthy. 343i needs to remove them. I don't want a dudebro commenting on my play while I play. At least give me the option to turn them off or something.
9884
« on: November 11, 2014, 01:37:56 PM »
Isn't it the Japanese imperial flag?
Looks like it.
9885
« on: November 11, 2014, 01:36:02 PM »
Let me know when they un-postpone StarCraft: Ghost.
This
You know how bad I wanted that game to come out when I was younger? And then BAM! Blizzard cancels it.
It's not canceled. Blizzard keeps listing it as being postponed which indicates that they eventually want to do something with it.
9886
« on: November 11, 2014, 01:23:36 PM »
Gasai is still a dirty naggerman.
9887
« on: November 11, 2014, 11:57:39 AM »
Since when was any of this shit exclusive to libertarians?
Gun rights are a big thing for the Republicans and decriminalizing/legalizing marijuana and legalizing gay marriage is a big thing for the Democrats.
9888
« on: November 11, 2014, 11:53:18 AM »
So it looks like things are geting a bit heated in here between some folks. I'm going to step in and remind people to keep shit respectful if you're going to be disagreeing over something.
9889
« on: November 11, 2014, 11:39:28 AM »
People are crying about new stuff they've had no hands on with and is also a beta and subject to change.
Because saying, "Wait until you play the game before hating on it!" worked so well with Halo 4?
Ah yes. I forgot that we had input on Halo 4 by playing the Beta... Oh.
Just going to throw this out there.
Reach actually got worse after the beta.
Which ironically enough, 343 improved after Bungie left.
Not really, the title update actually made Reach even worse than it already was.
Yes, because bloom was so great, right?
For Reach? It was better than no bloom. Reach was balanced around bloom and its maps were made with it in mind so taking it out ended up fucking up the games balance and threw the whole thing out of wack.
A game designed around something that promotes spam isn't that good.
When were we under the impression that Reach was good?
We weren't.
Why is it that I only ever see Halo fans bashing Halo games and everyone else seems to enjoy them?
lolwut
9890
« on: November 11, 2014, 04:42:01 AM »
The first movie came first, however the anime isn't based on the same universe as the movie. Think alternate timeline shit.
That's helpful. I guess I won't watch the movie then. I saw it once a few years ago at a friend's place while a little fucked up. It was confusing as shit and I don't remember anything.
If you're going to watch the anime, the only movie that actually takes place in that universe is Ghost in the Shell: Solid State Society and it takes place two years after GitS: 2nd GiG.
9891
« on: November 11, 2014, 04:21:04 AM »
The first movie came first, however the anime isn't based on the same universe as the movie. Think alternate timeline shit.
9892
« on: November 11, 2014, 02:25:29 AM »
So yeah, this thread isn't going anywhere good.
9893
« on: November 11, 2014, 01:01:42 AM »
People are crying about new stuff they've had no hands on with and is also a beta and subject to change.
Because saying, "Wait until you play the game before hating on it!" worked so well with Halo 4?
Ah yes. I forgot that we had input on Halo 4 by playing the Beta... Oh.
Just going to throw this out there.
Reach actually got worse after the beta.
Which ironically enough, 343 improved after Bungie left.
Not really, the title update actually made Reach even worse than it already was.
Yes, because bloom was so great, right?
For Reach? It was better than no bloom. Reach was balanced around bloom and its maps were made with it in mind so taking it out ended up fucking up the games balance and threw the whole thing out of wack.
A game designed around something that promotes spam isn't that good.
When were we under the impression that Reach was good?
9894
« on: November 11, 2014, 12:53:24 AM »
I thought we were arguing about Halo 5 sucking balls, can we get back on track, please?
We've all ran out of ways to say that it looks like CoD and is a departure from the franchise. If we're going to keep this conversation going, we'll have to start copy/pasting.
Why the hell does nobody respond to my comments on Dual Wielding, ever? There's literally no flaw in the system, is that why?
I don't really see it as a gamebreaking flaw personally. Dual wield was a good mechanic that worked well in previous installments but it's possible 343 couldn't find a way to make it work in with this one.
What? It was unbalanced.
>SMG has faster killtime than AR at close range
>Plasma Rifle tears shields down quickly even on its own
>PP has EMP and can deplete shields when OC'd
>Bungie could never figure out wtf to do with the Magnum after Halo 1, so you got me there m80.
And again, there can be many weapons in the game that traits can be altered in Customs/Forge. There can be a DW set and a non-DW set.
Respond, mother fucker.
daaaaaaaaaaang son.
Not one person that opposes Dual Wielding has ever responded to that proposal in the history of my life. I take that as a sign that it's a really good idea.
I will, dual wielding was honestly pretty worthless and was nothing other than a last resort. The versatility you gained from not dual wielding was greater than any benefits you had while doing so.
I don't see how it can be considered only a last resort. Certain Dual Wielding combinations are far from "last resorts", they can even best other strong weapons like the BR/Shotgun/Sword/etc.
What versatility is this that comes from not DW'ing? Being able to throw grenades immediately?
Most dual weilding combos could only be used in short range also and in many cases grenades or weapon switching would give you a kill time just as fast as the dual wield combos while not being limited on their range and allowing the wielder to be able to respond to a much larger variety of situations. That shits fine for noncompetitive or custom games, but when you're playing against some really good people that versatility is going to be what nets you kills and saves your ass.
9895
« on: November 11, 2014, 12:52:36 AM »
People are crying about new stuff they've had no hands on with and is also a beta and subject to change.
Because saying, "Wait until you play the game before hating on it!" worked so well with Halo 4?
Ah yes. I forgot that we had input on Halo 4 by playing the Beta... Oh.
Just going to throw this out there.
Reach actually got worse after the beta.
Which ironically enough, 343 improved after Bungie left.
Not really, the title update actually made Reach even worse than it already was.
Yes, because bloom was so great, right?
For Reach? It was better than no bloom. Reach was balanced around bloom and its maps were made with it in mind so taking it out ended up fucking up the games balance and threw the whole thing out of wack.
9896
« on: November 11, 2014, 12:41:44 AM »
I thought we were arguing about Halo 5 sucking balls, can we get back on track, please?
We've all ran out of ways to say that it looks like CoD and is a departure from the franchise. If we're going to keep this conversation going, we'll have to start copy/pasting.
Why the hell does nobody respond to my comments on Dual Wielding, ever? There's literally no flaw in the system, is that why?
I don't really see it as a gamebreaking flaw personally. Dual wield was a good mechanic that worked well in previous installments but it's possible 343 couldn't find a way to make it work in with this one.
What? It was unbalanced.
>SMG has faster killtime than AR at close range
>Plasma Rifle tears shields down quickly even on its own
>PP has EMP and can deplete shields when OC'd
>Bungie could never figure out wtf to do with the Magnum after Halo 1, so you got me there m80.
And again, there can be many weapons in the game that traits can be altered in Customs/Forge. There can be a DW set and a non-DW set.
Respond, mother fucker.
daaaaaaaaaaang son.
Not one person that opposes Dual Wielding has ever responded to that proposal in the history of my life. I take that as a sign that it's a really good idea.
I will, dual wielding was honestly pretty worthless and was nothing other than a last resort. The versatility you gained from not dual wielding was greater than any benefits you had while doing so.
9897
« on: November 11, 2014, 12:39:20 AM »
People are crying about new stuff they've had no hands on with and is also a beta and subject to change.
Because saying, "Wait until you play the game before hating on it!" worked so well with Halo 4?
Ah yes. I forgot that we had input on Halo 4 by playing the Beta... Oh.
Just going to throw this out there.
Reach actually got worse after the beta.
Not the same company...
But Generator Defense. I'll never forget...
Bungie never fucking did anything with Firefight versus. That made me so mad.
9898
« on: November 11, 2014, 12:37:31 AM »
People are crying about new stuff they've had no hands on with and is also a beta and subject to change.
Because saying, "Wait until you play the game before hating on it!" worked so well with Halo 4?
Ah yes. I forgot that we had input on Halo 4 by playing the Beta... Oh.
Just going to throw this out there.
Reach actually got worse after the beta.
Which ironically enough, 343 improved after Bungie left.
Not really, the title update actually made Reach even worse than it already was.
9899
« on: November 11, 2014, 12:33:27 AM »
People are crying about new stuff they've had no hands on with and is also a beta and subject to change.
Because saying, "Wait until you play the game before hating on it!" worked so well with Halo 4?
Ah yes. I forgot that we had input on Halo 4 by playing the Beta... Oh.
Just going to throw this out there. Reach actually got worse after the beta.
9900
« on: November 11, 2014, 12:20:58 AM »
Why not try out new things in side games instead of fucking up the main ones?
Pages: 1 ... 328329330 331332 ... 394
|
Show Posts