This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - big sponge
Pages: 1 ... 818283 8485 ... 394
2461
« on: May 11, 2016, 05:23:15 PM »
My first ever Shiny was a magikarp.
by breeding the red gyarados or what
fishing
2462
« on: May 11, 2016, 05:15:18 PM »
My first ever Shiny was a magikarp.
2463
« on: May 11, 2016, 01:55:07 PM »
Cause you don't have to pay licensing fees on a PC.
2464
« on: May 10, 2016, 07:21:37 PM »
Kind of wish Nintendo would take its head out of its ass and bring back trainer customization.
They did.
Last I heard Nintendo said it was Kalos exclusive.
2465
« on: May 10, 2016, 12:32:07 PM »
Kind of wish Nintendo would take its head out of its ass and bring back trainer customization. That's an addition that doesn't make sense to keep game exclusive.
2466
« on: May 09, 2016, 04:33:42 PM »
2467
« on: May 08, 2016, 07:52:04 PM »
That's not me being mean or condescending or anything negative when I say that.
I say that because I've seen things like "I'm really good at making sandwiches and I do it all the time at home" on applications before.
2468
« on: May 08, 2016, 07:50:07 PM »
A way to " hedge your bets" so to speak would be to list any volunteer work you've done.
if i had any
i'm helping my dad build a house this summer, though, so there's that
That'll actually be good to put on there provided you spruce it up to look better than "I helped my dad".
2469
« on: May 08, 2016, 07:18:39 PM »
Also to add onto inglorious there is a lot of competition for the piss easy zero education required jobs out there. Applying for those is going to be like playing the lottery if you don't have any prior work experience.
A way to " hedge your bets" so to speak would be to list any volunteer work you've done. That shows that you aren't a complete zero when it comes to working a job.
2470
« on: May 08, 2016, 07:16:08 PM »
Basically this. Seven is pretty paltry. You should be filing multiple ones a week if you don't already have a job and want one.
that's the thing, though
i don't want a job
i'm societally obligated to get a job, so i'm not going to be filing them as if i enjoy doing it
Very few people enjoy working outside of whatever it is they really want to do for a living. You could think of it a different way though. If you want to continue to live the way you currently are or improve your current standing you're going to have to pay your dues. Same goes for anything else you may want to obtain. Very rarely are people ever handed a comfortable life and all the things they may want on a silver platter.
2471
« on: May 08, 2016, 07:05:33 PM »
>2016
>having a hard time finding a job
seven applications filed this year
nothing
seven is nothing dude
especially over the course of a whole year
Basically this. Seven is pretty paltry. You should be filing multiple ones a week if you don't already have a job and want one.
2472
« on: May 08, 2016, 07:02:51 PM »
At least we don't weigh shit in stones.
2473
« on: May 08, 2016, 06:58:43 PM »
A game that becomes less interesting the more I see of it.
2474
« on: May 08, 2016, 06:56:15 PM »
You basically have to keep applying until there's a place desperate to take someone without prior work experience.
2475
« on: May 08, 2016, 06:51:57 PM »
http://vicsorsopinion.blogspot.be/2013/07/anitas-sources.html?m=1
Here's an earlier piece on her stealing other peoples let's plays, also some bonus stuff about her using other peoples artwork to promote herself without the artists permission.
I'll have to see if u can dig up the social media compilation for the other stuff. Not really interested on doing that on a phone.
I've already posted this fgt.
Oh I'm only checking in every once in a while due to being kind of busy at work at the minute.
2476
« on: May 08, 2016, 06:49:38 PM »
Let's plays are also generally considered to be fair use due to the interactive nature of the medium and the commentary from the personalities that make them.
2477
« on: May 08, 2016, 06:46:20 PM »
http://vicsorsopinion.blogspot.be/2013/07/anitas-sources.html?m=1Here's an earlier piece on her stealing other peoples let's plays, also some bonus stuff about her using other peoples artwork to promote herself without the artists permission. I'll have to see if u can dig up the social media compilation for the other stuff. Not really interested on doing that on a phone.
2478
« on: May 08, 2016, 06:09:01 PM »
Cod gets brought up with every shooter. It's not just battlefield or Halo and trying to frame it as such is rather silly.
The same thing happened when Halo was Captain King. Everyone was always comparing it to everything.
2479
« on: May 08, 2016, 05:29:04 PM »
I'll have to go back and find the articles and videos that demonstrated that she's been taking other people's videos and claiming them as her own when I'm not at work and not using a phone.
2480
« on: May 08, 2016, 04:22:09 PM »
I'm not sure why people are bringing up copyright when it isn't even relevant.
The terms of service specifically mention that you are not allowed to use another users video without their permission and that's all that really matters. Copyright doesn't even play into it.
2481
« on: May 08, 2016, 04:13:30 PM »
Only not at all. If someone has uploaded footage of themselves playing a game that isn't stolen content. If someone is giving a talk on the industry or offering their opinions on the industry they are not stealing content. Reviews are also not stolen content. Using other people gameplay or videos with their authorization isn't stolen content. Using a third party tool to rip videos from youtube (something that is against the ToS) and then reuploading them inter the pretense that they were made by you is. by this logic, anita hasn't stolen anything
you're really stretching here, LC
I hate to use a camnatorism but you've seriously gone incoherent at this point. It feels like you're disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing right now. Taking someone else's video and claiming it as your own is content theft, there's not really any way around it.
2482
« on: May 08, 2016, 03:40:50 PM »
Back in the early days of YouTube this was true. However these day the number one sector of the site is gaming. Let's Plays, competitive matches, industry talks, reviews, previews, editorials et cetera are what make up the lions share of profit now.
...all of which contain stolen content, by your definition
Only not at all. If someone has uploaded footage of themselves playing a game that isn't stolen content. If someone is giving a talk on the industry or offering their opinions on the industry they are not stealing content. Reviews are also not stolen content. Using other people gameplay or videos with their authorization isn't stolen content. Using a third party tool to rip videos from youtube (something that is against the ToS) and then reuploading them inter the pretense that they were made by you is. You're really stretching here Verb.
2483
« on: May 08, 2016, 02:50:55 PM »
The defense of "well other people break the rules all the time" doesn't fly because those people should be getting suspended too, it's just impractical to catch everyone due to how absolutely massive youtube is. it's also the #1 reason anyone uses youtube in the first place
they use it to watch stolen content--period
if they were to delete all copyrighted content off of youtube, guess how many people would use youtube
so not only would it be "impractical," it would be fucking retarded
Back in the early days of YouTube this was true. However these day the number one sector of the site is gaming. Let's Plays, competitive matches, industry talks, reviews, previews, editorials et cetera are what make up the lions share of profit now.
2484
« on: May 08, 2016, 02:25:00 PM »
It's a violation of their community guidelines which is stated to be against the terms of service.
Only upload videos that you made or that you're authorized to use. This means don't upload videos you didn't make, or use content in your videos that someone else owns the copyright to, such as music tracks, snippets of copyrighted programs, or videos made by other users, without necessary authorizations.
Clips from other videos are neither music tracks, snippets of copyrighted programs, nor videos made by others. They aren't even really clips of videos made by others, since that person doesn't retain any rights to those clips. There are tons of videos out there that use clips of other peoples' original content as well, such as reaction videos or videos about YouTube drama; the terms of use clearly prohibit uploading someone else's video, but not the use of someone's clips in a different, original video.
It doesn't really matter whether or not if lets players "retain rights" to their clips or not because youtube's ToS clearly states that you are not allowed to use another users videos without authorization from that user. A video and clip can also be the same thing as a clip is just a short slice of a film or broadcast and a video is just a recording or broadcast of moving images and when taking YouTubes past actions into account it's clear that YouTube considers them to be synonymous as well. The defense of "well other people break the rules all the time" doesn't fly because those people should be getting suspended too, it's just impractical to catch everyone due to how absolutely massive youtube is. Really though, Anita should either just ask these lets players for permission to use their videos or you know, actually use the money she was paid to actually play those video games and record her own footage.
2485
« on: May 08, 2016, 01:07:15 PM »
Shame she's back up because of her notoriety. If a smaller channel had been banned for stealing other peoples work and claiming it as their own they'd never have won their appeal.
Can someone actually talk about whether using others' clips is stealing? Content creators do not retain any rights to their clips as far as I'm aware, because all of that falls under whoever owns that intellectual property; in this case, it's the game's publisher. Content creators own the rights to their commentary and subsequent video, but I don't see how they could argue she stole their work unless she's copying other peoples' videos or arguments (which doesn't appear to be the case). And beyond that, if she's just using standalone clips, that would also fall under fair use because it's transformative and journalistic.
http://newmediarights.org/fairuse/
Spoiler Do you own the rights to each piece of media that you use in the documentary or online video?
No
If you don't own the content, do you have a license to use it?
No
Is the media released under a Creative Commons license?
No
Is the media you are reusing part of the public domain?
No
Is the purpose of the use criticism, commentary, reporting, teaching, research or parody?
Yes
Does your reuse transform the material in some way?
Yes
Is the use of the copyrighted media necessary to understand the meaning of your video?
Yes
Is the project for profit?
Yes
Is the content you reuse fact based or is it highly creative?
Factual
Was the content published?
Yes
Did you use only as much copyrighted content as was needed to make your point?
Yes
What percentage of the reused content was taken, and what percentage of the new work does it constitute?
Low
Is the content taken at the heart of the work?
No
Will your work negatively affect the sales of the content you reuse?
Yes
Is your video or product competing in the same market as the copyrighted content?
No
It's a violation of their community guidelines which is stated to be against the terms of service. Only upload videos that you made or that you're authorized to use. This means don't upload videos you didn't make, or use content in your videos that someone else owns the copyright to, such as music tracks, snippets of copyrighted programs, or videos made by other users, without necessary authorizations. You further agree that you will not submit to the Service any Content or other material that is contrary to the YouTube Community Guidelines, currently found at https://www.youtube.com/t/community_guidelines, which may be updated from time to time, or contrary to applicable local, national, and international laws and regulations.
2486
« on: May 08, 2016, 01:58:28 AM »
well shit
2487
« on: May 08, 2016, 12:10:31 AM »
Interesting thought from Forbes. These next couple of years could be really tough on COD due to Activisions inability to realize that the market is saturated with modern/near future/future shooters and people are tired of them because of the way they set up their yearly releases. All of their COD studios are knee deep in their future shooters and it's too late for them to overhaul and play catch up to DICE now.
It'll be interesting to see what the future holds for that franchise.
2488
« on: May 07, 2016, 09:31:25 PM »
You're right. She's absolutely filthy though because she never takes a shower. I'd have to get use to that.
2489
« on: May 07, 2016, 09:27:49 PM »
Ender so I can wear all the pretty dresses.
2490
« on: May 07, 2016, 09:17:39 PM »
Shame she's back up because of her notoriety. If a smaller channel had been banned for stealing other peoples work and claiming it as their own they'd never have won their appeal.
Pages: 1 ... 818283 8485 ... 394
|
Show Posts