This forced confrontational personality he's trying out is getting pretty cringy.

Probably just you crashing after so long from the caffeine.

Sounds like some Sapphire bullshit to me.

The first time I heard about this was from Jaythenerdkid, ironically when the most powerful person in America was black.

Now I see it on twitter all the time and it seems like a lazy way to undercut any racist comments made by minorities.

a single individual having power when he happens to be black does not give blacks power

Saying that an entire race "doesn't have power" would imply that there are institutions in place which try to keep minorities impoverished when literally the opposite is the case. Everybody has the same potential to gain power, regardless of race. Acting like whites hold all the power because there are more white politicians and judges in majority white countries is just mindless. "Disadvantaged" would be a much more apt description.

Drifting through the wind

Windows Button > Power > Shut down

Maverick agreeing with you shows that you're wrong.

No shame in that.

Your desperate attempts to try to create some kind of internet feud with me just gets sadder every time.

Pretty much impossible to say without some kind of research but I'd speculate entertainment has more of a subconscious influence.

Nope he should stay in power until he dies and then Donald Trump Jr. can take over.

Gus Fring: a man who entered the drug business solely to get revenge on those who massacred his lover, but quickly became the monster he had to become to stay afloat in that world. As a contrast to Walter who did it all for himself, Gus literally did it for his (only) family.

Anton Chigurh: A force of nature whose role in the story goes beyond basic antagonism and more resembles an inevitable reckoning. Barely a character at all, actually, beyond his physical traits - he's literally an agent of fate. When he violates his purpose near the end of the film and kills Carla Jean out of his own volition, the cosmos punish him for it and take him out of commission.

Meanwhile, the Joker is every bit as 2-D as I said. You just admitted it too, by trying to break down other characters instead of doing what I just did and defended your own.

Not really. I'm just not understanding these criticisms you're attributing to the Joker, that other characters are omitted from. The Joker is usually given a somewhat tragic upbringing as well, such as the loss of his wife or something driving him to insanity, compared to Batman, who lost his parents. In the same way Chigurh is barely a character, the Joker is the same in the sense that he has very few relateable/human characteristics and basically exists as a way to challenge Batman. I'm not going to argue that he's as well conceived as Fring or Chigurh but he's basically as perfect as antagonists can get along with the likes of someone like Moriarty.

woah man, crazy criminal who would rather cause chaos than profit

I'd say his obsession with Batman and challenging him is a more defining attribute of most Jokers than the anarchist stuff, which is mainly from the Nolan Joker.

Hammil's Joker is great but it would never translate into a live action film.

i can't tell if you're joking or not

really

Quote from: Maverick on June 07, 2017, 09:43:50 PM

http://uk.isidewith.com/results/3221993921
Not that well versed in UK politics but I got Tories as usual.

That's bad. Tories are cutting funding for police departments, restricting the interwebz, and May is saying she'll take away human rights if it gets in the way of terrorism, which is easily a slippery slope.

Don't side with Margaret Thatcher 2.0.

1. I don't live in the U.K.
2. It's just an online test. I'm far from picking sides. Like I said, I'm not that well versed in UK politics.