4981
The Flood / Re: MFW when SecondClass's wiki got deleted for reals #WikiWars2015
« on: January 14, 2015, 09:18:54 PM »
What the fuck are you people fussing about now. . .
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 4981
The Flood / Re: MFW when SecondClass's wiki got deleted for reals #WikiWars2015« on: January 14, 2015, 09:18:54 PM »
What the fuck are you people fussing about now. . .
4982
The Flood / Re: Fuck yall niggas« on: January 14, 2015, 07:01:38 PM »
Would you honestly expect any different?
4983
The Flood / Re: Years on the Flood?« on: January 14, 2015, 05:46:24 PM »
Over seven for me. Seven years of I don't even. . .
4984
The Flood / Re: DANK THREAD« on: January 14, 2015, 04:59:39 PM »
This guy is straight OG.
YouTube 4985
The Flood / Re: Announcement about the Wiki« on: January 14, 2015, 04:08:09 PM »I don't smoke very much anymore. I'm more of a psychonaut anyways.tf even is this. . .Lol, I need to add you to the Stoners page. 4986
The Flood / Re: Announcement about the Wiki« on: January 14, 2015, 03:25:26 PM »
tf even is this. . .
Ah w/e. 4987
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 08:06:56 PM »I guess not. I just find it offensive when someone is blatantly cruel.Yes, that's pretty obvious. You can learn not to let it affect you, however. 4988
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 08:04:55 PM »It doesn't have to. There's no reason you have to actually take offense to it.Do you understand how saying something like this might hurt someone's feelings?I wish you wouldn't judge so much. I'm really not looking for people telling me I'm pathetic and my threads suck.Then don't be pathetic and make sucky threads. 4989
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 07:53:48 PM »you might not remember this, but sometime in 2011/2012 harlow compiled a massive blacklist of "undesirable users" on bnet, people who would be rejected on sight in the member queue. he's not really the most level-headed admin when it comes to the interests of parityI stopped keeping tabs on HRG/Sapphire peeps a long time ago. 4990
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 07:50:35 PM »idk, you quoted me twice. If you felt the need to add on to the first one you could have just made an edit but it's w/e.Nope. Unless that's a rhetorical statement.I think you quoted the wrong guy, bub.Well, I'm sorry, they really proved that they are beyond decency. I don't think it really makes a difference. Maybe I'm wrong. If that's the case then I'm sorry, secondclass. I hope we can put aside our differences or something.>mfw second class is just as bad as jay and harlowDon't instigate further if you don't like being instigated yourself, G. 4991
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 07:47:16 PM »I think you quoted the wrong guy, bub.Well, I'm sorry, they really proved that they are beyond decency. I don't think it really makes a difference. Maybe I'm wrong. If that's the case then I'm sorry, secondclass. I hope we can put aside our differences or something.>mfw second class is just as bad as jay and harlowDon't instigate further if you don't like being instigated yourself, G. 4992
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 07:45:37 PM »I've disagreed with Harlow before and He didn't ban me. . .>mfw second class is just as bad as jay and harlowI get the feeling that if he had his own forum he wouldn't ban people just for disagreeing with him. Huh. . . 4993
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 07:40:36 PM »>mfw second class is just as bad as jay and harlowDon't instigate further if you don't like being instigated yourself, G. 4994
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 07:39:17 PM »If you think it's gone on too long, then don't continue it. Not that hard of a concept.I don't think it's gone on too long. Longer than it could have, maybe, but I'm not bothered by that. I could keep going tbh. Not so sure you'd enjoy it or not. I assume you got my point anyways so I guess I'm done then. 4995
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 07:26:27 PM »The point I was trying to make is that you actually did give a shit to some degree or you wouldn't have gone out of your way to pester Loaf. (Yes, whether or not you pester any or everyone you find annoying does not take away from the fact that you pestered Loaf as well.)Every single thing you see affects you in some way. When you read a sentence, your mind and your ego forms opinions about it instantly. It could be as simple as agreeing or disagreeing with it, and annoyance is a subset of that.Again, you don't need to care about something to merely express your dislike for it.I don't mean 'care' in the generic context that you find interest in something. I mean care in it's most basic form, in that something affects you in anyway, in that you've given attention to something. The only reason this conversation has gone on for so long is because you tried to refute that for some reason, as if being accused of concerning yourself with him was something you didn't like. If that's true then just don't concern yourself with him and I won't accuse you of such. Otherwise, take what I said for what it is, me calling it like I see it, and go about your business. 4996
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 07:04:23 PM »Again, you don't need to care about something to merely express your dislike for it.I don't mean 'care' in the generic context that you find interest in something. I mean care in it's most basic form, in that something affects you in anyway, in that you've given attention to something. When you feel annoyed by loaf then you've concerned yourself with him. You've paid attention to his actions and you've taken in enough of what he's done for it to affect you. Then when you take the time to point out how annoyed you are by his actions, you've concerned yourself with that annoyance. You'd given it attention and decided that Loaf needed to know how his actions have affected you. However, all of that is meaningless in the end. If you truly did not care then you would remain unphased and no annoyance would ever arise. You would never have felt the need to point out your annoyance and then you would truly be abiding by the comment, "I don't give a shit." 4997
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 06:35:10 PM »There's no defensiveness or concern here.Well then you would never care enough to make any sort of fuss to begin with. The fact that you find Loaf's threads annoying alludes to the fact that he's affecting you in some way. If you truly didn't care and never concerned yourself with him then he wouldn't affect you at all and you'd never find his threads annoying. 4998
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 06:30:25 PM »No it's pretty much common sense that getting annoyed by someone and making a fuss means you've concerned yourselves with them to some degree.I know...you're trying to say that commenting on a user's thread somehow requires caring about that user. Even when that's ridiculous.I never said you cared about his story specifically.That's really not how it works. Pointing out that no one cares about his sob story doesn't require any attachment.It's pretty obvious you care somewhat about Loaf or you wouldn't continue to pester him.You know what's great is I feel just fine knowing that secondclass dislikes me. I really don't like you either. I dunno who this / person is though. I'm not angry right now, so maybe that's why it doesn't bother me.Good for you? I don't give a shit. Quote And "pester" him? Please. I didn't have any idea what Loaf was talking about when he sent me that PM, and I still don't. When I see an annoying thread, I make it clear that it's an annoying thread. Just because Loaf has a high quantity of them doesn't mean I'm singling him out.I never said you were singling him out either. There's no need to get defensive. I'm just calling it like I see it. If you don't want to be accused of concerning yourself with Loaf then maybe you shouldn't concern yourself with him. Just sayin' nigs. It's not like it does anything for you, anyways. 4999
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 06:22:45 PM »I never said you cared about his story specifically.That's really not how it works. Pointing out that no one cares about his sob story doesn't require any attachment.It's pretty obvious you care somewhat about Loaf or you wouldn't continue to pester him.You know what's great is I feel just fine knowing that secondclass dislikes me. I really don't like you either. I dunno who this / person is though. I'm not angry right now, so maybe that's why it doesn't bother me.Good for you? I don't give a shit. You definitely go out of your way to concern yourself with him, however. 5000
The Flood / Re: Are You Happy With Where You Are In Life?« on: January 13, 2015, 06:13:02 PM »Because I'm a deadbeat.Absolutely. 5001
The Flood / Re: Are You Happy With Where You Are In Life?« on: January 13, 2015, 06:04:08 PM »
Absolutely.
Absolutely not. 5002
The Flood / Re: Does anyone else have a problem with following rules?« on: January 13, 2015, 06:03:02 PM »It's pretty obvious you care somewhat about Loaf or you wouldn't continue to pester him.You know what's great is I feel just fine knowing that secondclass dislikes me. I really don't like you either. I dunno who this / person is though. I'm not angry right now, so maybe that's why it doesn't bother me.Good for you? I don't give a shit. 5003
The Flood / Re: You All Have to Say Goodbye...« on: January 13, 2015, 05:59:15 PM »You should never poison you mind with cannabis cancers. You should heal yourself with acid and McDonalds.What is that even supposed to mean? smh 5004
The Flood / Re: You All Have to Say Goodbye...« on: January 13, 2015, 05:57:21 PM »Maybe I'm just an ignoramus but I seem to recall Flee stating just above you that PSU had been banned for ignoring warnings.Before the inevitable accusations of modbias and modabuse start coming in, I'll go over the recent events involving PSU real quick.I'm surprised that he's "choosing" to leave instead of being banned for blatant rule violation and ignoring warnings. Let me read his post again. . . Ah yes, I assumed as much. 5005
The Flood / Re: I may have a new heel.« on: January 13, 2015, 12:44:11 PM »Remember, negativity doesn't negate importance. Not caring is the only thing that does.True, but its mostly negative attention.Trying so hard to stay important are we?Y'all niggas love to play this card all the time yet you still give him loads of attention. 5006
The Flood / Re: I may have a new heel.« on: January 13, 2015, 12:40:05 PM »Trying so hard to stay important are we?Y'all niggas love to play this card all the time yet you still give him loads of attention. Sometimes you peeps make little sense. 5007
The Flood / Re: Anybody else remember 2012 and 2013 on B.net?« on: January 13, 2015, 12:08:05 PM »IN your level?I was more of an 08-09 guy, personally.05-06. Get in muh level! 5008
The Flood / Re: It was just a forum post, but it made my stomach sick« on: January 13, 2015, 11:59:43 AM »
Weak.
5009
The Flood / Re: We must confront the reality that nothing in Bungie.net can help us.« on: January 13, 2015, 11:52:16 AM »Yes, I know.All I'm saying is no one would really be having this conversation right now otherwise.Well actually it's because you decided to have the conversation. Which you didn't have to, of course.I still don't quite understand why you all concern yourselves with B.net. I mean Sep7agon is large and stable enough as an offsite to forget about B.net, stop being an 'offsite' altogether, and start being it's own site.The only reason we're even having this conversation is because Ktan is here. 5010
The Flood / Re: Anybody else remember 2012 and 2013 on B.net?« on: January 13, 2015, 11:44:02 AM »
I was more of an 08-09 guy, personally.
|