This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Aether
Pages: 1 ... 135136137 138139 ... 229
4081
« on: April 12, 2015, 05:46:08 PM »
>iron man
>people saying it's tin foil
>ALUMINIUM
It warms my heart to see a yank spell it correctly ;-;
I watch a lot of science youtube channels like a nerd.
4082
« on: April 12, 2015, 05:43:16 PM »
>iron man
>people saying it's tin foil
>ALUMINIUM
4083
« on: April 12, 2015, 03:57:13 PM »
killed Palpatine.
Well actually, he might not have.
4084
« on: April 12, 2015, 02:17:27 PM »
Again, I attribute the latter to the "trickle down" effect. As to where this effect began, I can't be certain. Probably with the growth in popularity of the birth control pill.
Ah ye see that's the part I was trying to get at. It's w/e.
4085
« on: April 12, 2015, 02:12:30 PM »
No. I'm saying, the increased rate of sexual promiscuity outside the bounds of marriage is not a positive phenomenon.
Ah, I see. Well that's merely a matter of perspective. Sorry, I thought you were trying to explain something more objective in nature with your point. Specifically, the cause of increased sexuality in youth.
4086
« on: April 12, 2015, 02:06:13 PM »
I think that a lack of social restrictions and pressures regarding sexual promiscuity will, and does, have a negative effect upon our society and is not a positive thing. It leads to a trickle down effect that eventually results in rather young children (around 12-13) becoming interested in sexual activity too early.
I don't see how the unorthodox sexualities are specifically connected with increased sexuality in youth. Privacy in sexuality isn't compromised simply because that sexuality isn't normal. In fact, a lot of times, privacy increases in those instances to avoid judgement.
However increased media coverage of any sexuality can and definitely will expose youth to it, regardless of the nature of that sexuality. It is often the case that unorthodox sexualities are displayed in media with a higher impact than their orthodox counterparts, and thus they can have the potential to influence younger people more so.
I wasn't talking about unorthodox sexualities, I was talking about sexual activity in general. I simply spoke of the silly LGBTQIA+ thing before it went on to promiscuity.
You mean to say that the acceptance of having more diverse sexualities would influence younger people to display more sexuality of their own? Do I have that right? I would say yes and no. Yes if that acceptance is made out to be a big deal and thus displayed in media with a higher impact, as I said before. But not necessarily if that acceptance merely becomes the norm and isn't made out to be a big deal. It is true that the former is generally the case, this day and age.
4087
« on: April 12, 2015, 01:58:32 PM »
I think that a lack of social restrictions and pressures regarding sexual promiscuity will, and does, have a negative effect upon our society and is not a positive thing. It leads to a trickle down effect that eventually results in rather young children (around 12-13) becoming interested in sexual activity too early.
I don't see how the unorthodox sexualities are specifically connected with increased sexuality in youth. Privacy in sexuality isn't compromised simply because that sexuality isn't normal. In fact, a lot of times, privacy increases in those instances to avoid judgement. However increased media coverage of any form of any sexuality can and definitely will expose youth to it, regardless of the nature of that sexuality. It is often the case that unorthodox sexualities are displayed in media with a higher impact than their orthodox counterparts, and thus they can have the potential to influence younger people more so.
4088
« on: April 12, 2015, 12:47:25 PM »
It's not my birthday tho
Ye I realize that. I could only go by quotes when typing that and y'all niggas' Sangheili names get mixed up in my brain at times.
Well we've all got different colored stuff at least.
ye I mostly go by your user styles. Your name is the easiest to recognize, though, since it still has Nuka.
4089
« on: April 12, 2015, 12:41:17 PM »
It's not my birthday tho
Ye I realize that. I could only go by quotes when typing that and y'all niggas' Sangheili names get mixed up in my brain at times.
4090
« on: April 12, 2015, 12:37:12 PM »
You can't will autism away.
I'm so sorry. There being no hope for you must be a harrowing experience. You have my sympathy.
#modabuse
From a philosophical standpoint though, I find the concept of no hope more comforting than the gamble on a slight hope. At least you know you're fucked and can prepare for it.
It's not always a gamble though. Sometimes it's a matter of willpower and determination. That's the kind of hope I value the most.
4091
« on: April 12, 2015, 12:33:38 PM »
it was shear spite.
Which is provocative. You seem like an impulsive person. Be careful now.
4092
« on: April 12, 2015, 12:32:00 PM »
Aww Elegiac already got to ya. Shit son. Jokes done. Game over man.
4093
« on: April 12, 2015, 12:30:57 PM »
You can't will autism away.
I'm so sorry. There being no hope for you must be a harrowing experience. You have my sympathy.
4094
« on: April 12, 2015, 12:28:04 PM »
Literally nobody gives a shit.
And yet you cared enough to post.
Literally nobody gives a shit.
>he continues posting despite apparently not giving a shit
It's pretty obvious that what he cares about is provoking you. That doesn't necessarily mean he gives any amount of shits that it's your birthday. (Have a nice one btw) With that being said. You can cool it now, assassin.
4095
« on: April 12, 2015, 10:50:46 AM »
4096
« on: April 12, 2015, 10:15:51 AM »
Hmmm. . . idk I'm alright with grey. Maybe I'd have them be a slightly lighter shade.
4097
« on: April 12, 2015, 08:01:30 AM »
It shouldn't be free, it should just be working with everything that was promised.
4098
« on: April 12, 2015, 07:56:40 AM »
The only reason that you're against progressivism is because you will lose your privilage as a white male. Progressiveness is NOT a bad thing incase you were too stupid to realise unless of course you're a disgusting social conservative.
You realize that by saying this, it makes it increasingly harder for people to take you seriously, right?
4099
« on: April 11, 2015, 09:11:17 PM »
That's it, sorry I forgot to go check the container.
What's an NSAID?
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Like naproxen sodium, aspirin, ibuprofen etc. Have to be careful with them since they can damage the lining of your stomach and give you an ulcer if you take too many too often.
4100
« on: April 11, 2015, 08:41:05 PM »
Well obviously I have to ask what the med is. .
I know nothing short of a narcotic would quell the headaches I'd get.
Maloxicant?
If I remember correctly
Meloxicam. You're lucky. NSAID's do nothing for me.
4101
« on: April 11, 2015, 08:35:20 PM »
Well obviously I have to ask what the med is. .
I know nothing short of a narcotic would quell the headaches I'd get.
4103
« on: April 11, 2015, 01:04:21 PM »
He had a nice butt though.
his firm ass will always be remembered
tbh I don't think any b.net member has a firmer ass than CoffeeBlackMetal.
i think you have some confessions to make
Ye I've seen his ass before, it's true. I've also seen LiftsHerTails' cock.
4104
« on: April 11, 2015, 12:16:24 PM »
He had a nice butt though.
his firm ass will always be remembered
tbh I don't think any b.net member has a firmer ass than CoffeeBlackMetal.
4105
« on: April 11, 2015, 10:29:51 AM »
Technically speaking, modbias does exist since it's virtually impossible to eliminate all forms of bias in the mind of a normal human being. That's why we have to make our rules as objective as possible and abide by them consistently when moderating.
Which is why I'm not fond of rules like, "No shitposting threads. All threads must have certain levels of discussion value,' as it leaves too much room for subjective interpretation and ergo more complaints and claims of 'modbias.'
For the most part, though. I've not seen the staff here stray too far from objectivity when moderating. Some just aren't exactly so friendly and/or communicative in many instances, so I can see why some might feel like they just don't give a shit about them.
I'm so hot for you right now.
Ye but I look like shit right now.
4106
« on: April 11, 2015, 10:27:49 AM »
Technically speaking, modbias does exist since it's virtually impossible to eliminate all forms of bias in the mind of a normal human being. That's why we have to make our rules as objective as possible and abide by them consistently when moderating.
Which is why I'm not fond of rules like, "No shitposting threads. All threads must have certain levels of discussion value,' as it leaves too much room for subjective interpretation and ergo more complaints and claims of 'modbias.'
For the most part, though. I've not seen the staff here stray too far from objectivity when moderating. Some just aren't exactly so friendly and/or communicative in many instances, so I can see why some might feel like they just don't give a shit about them.
4107
« on: April 11, 2015, 09:44:19 AM »
innocent children
Oh they're hardly innocent.
4108
« on: April 11, 2015, 09:30:23 AM »
womenz.
Don't you mean, 'little girls?'
4109
« on: April 11, 2015, 09:28:39 AM »
Sometimes I wonder how I've been able to talk about my experience with drugs on there and, at the same time, haven't been banned in 6 years.
4110
« on: April 11, 2015, 07:48:32 AM »
Pages: 1 ... 135136137 138139 ... 229
|
Show Posts
